"Fletis Humplebacker" wrote in message
.. .
John Brock wrote:
snip
To answer part of your childish rant I asked for his credentials
because he was placing his expertise over another in the field
that he disagreed with, a Dr. Chein, and making many assertions
as scientific fact. I made it clear, how did you miss it? Selective
reading or selective comprehension?

Your above comment illustrates your narrow minded world view
so I'm not going to waste anymore time with you, given your level
of maturity, but I'll leave you with this...

From a well know fundamentalist right wing source...

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feat.../11/slack.html
Scientists talk about why they believe in God.

In his day, Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame,
religion without science is blind." More recently, a Nature survey of
American scientists found about 40 percent of them to be religious.

For the religious scientists, their faith is strong enough to believe that
if the natural world is the work of the creator, then the workings of the
natural world are the workings of the creator; that is how it works.
Creationists, including IDers, have a weak faith that can't handle some
information that conflicts with their dogma. Is that true of you? Do you
oppose evolution because your faith is too weak?

Steve
For some reason, still reading this drivel.