Fletis Humplebacker wrote:

Steve Peterson wrote:

"Fletis Humplebacker" ! wrote in message


No, I feel freed from the burdens of the fundamentalism that has
enslaved your thinking. I can look at both sides of the issues.



You seem to be a living, breathing, evolved example of fundamentalism run
amok. You certainly don't look at both sides of the evolution issue. John
has given you a great deal of reading to do,

As I suspected, most of this went over your head, Steve. I've provided
quotes with links to support my view, which probably also went over your
head.

!

I can throw out any number of books too but the point is that
anything welll documented and accepted will have some reference
on the web.

An interesting thesis. It might be true, though I don't think so yet. At
any rate, I'm not as good at finding things on the web as I am at
knowing the scientific literature.

Dipping into each other's bank accounts isn't necessary.

That's what libraries are for, dude. Learn to use them.

and summarized the information.
I have given you additional information of another type. You just ignore
it if you don't like it, and keep playing one note on the piano.

This coming from you has quite some irony. Rather than spewing your
vitriol why didn't you show me where I was wrong? If you're that right and
I'm that wrong it should be easy enough.

Showing where you were wrong is easy enough. It's showing *you* that's
the trick.

You are
stuck in the Cambrian,

Wrong.

but have to make your observations 600 million years
later.

Time traveling isn't within my powers.

I think you are about to lose points for tardiness.

Steve

Let us know if you can come up with something substantive.

I will admit that I don't know what Steve was talking about either.