In article ,
Chris Bacon wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Since you seem to be incapable of understanding a simple statement
I'll go through it again as you do when teaching children.

My original comment was to Drivel - since he seems to think the large
power input of a cheap tool makes it somehow more desirable over other
models.

It doesn't. It's the output power which matters - however it is
measured.

And if a cheapy needs a 1000 watt (input) motor to do what a decent
one can with a 600 watt, it means it's a poor design of motor and
probably drive mechanism. And likely, the end result rather heavier
than it could be. And all that wasted energy goes in heat, which isn't
a good thing for the longevity of the tool.

Well, thank you for explaining that so plainly - combined with your
earlier efforts, it shows even more evidently what you know. I'm sure
you're aware of this already.

You've not really understood any of this, have you?

--
*Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.