On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:46:37 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
wrote:


The jury is still out. They are more complex and not many local techs
have much experience with them in the US. Not many users have experience
with them. On the other hand they are a mature product having been the norm
in many parts of the world, take up less space and have less idle losses
than a standard tank type does. For now I think I will stick with the tank
type, but I could be talked into one if the price was right. I would not
count on the big energy savings some suggest. You are likely to get some
energy savings, but that would depend on your usage profile.


Ahhh mr. Meehan. why do you insist on giving answers to things you
know nothing about? I have worked on quite a few of these and they are
not that much more complex. they are noisy though as they need a power
vent.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++
spam protection measure, Please remove the 33 to send e-mail