Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
What is the theory behind levels?
I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Emanuel Berg wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Think how annoying it would be to use a bubble level that was 100% accurate. Different fluids having different viscosities yield different sensitivity. More accuracy may be justified for a transit (surveying tool), I don't know. |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:57:52 PM UTC-6, Emanuel Berg wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? In the spirit of chess, it's to give a comparative ranking to the individual players. BTW, are you the Swedish grand master? Otherwise: ???? I suppose it's to help make things level or as level as possible, no matter what the profession. I've never heard that one profession's efforts are more precise, than another's. "Something" is either level or it's not and the particular or different leveling tools make for achieving the goal as best as possible, in/for the particular scenarios. When I bought my old pillared house, I suspected it wasn't level. I made a 100' water level, with 1/2" clear tubing. I was able to gauge the floor's levelness from one or more point(s) to any/all other point(s). That would have been much more difficult with a 4' level. Sonny |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Sonny wrote:
In the spirit of chess, it's to give a comparative ranking to the individual players. BTW, are you the Swedish grand master? No Berg is common last name (means "mountain"), Emanuel or Manne/Manny less so but still not that uncommon. "Something" is either level or it's not In the math world perhaps... When I bought my old pillared house, I suspected it wasn't level. I made a 100' water level, with 1/2" clear tubing. I was able to gauge the floor's levelness from one or more point(s) to any/all other point(s). That would have been much more difficult with a 4' level. Here, the floor is so uneven even people who are slightly drunk can hardly stand. I used a marble to find out just which way it went and it instantly rolled into a corner -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 12:57:52 AM UTC-5, Emanuel Berg wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Precision can often be based on the size of the bubble. My pet peeve when it comes to spirit levels are bubbles that are too small. If the bubble is so small that there is a relatively significant gap on both sides when trying to level something, then the user is left to "eyeballing level" by trying to get the gaps even via sight. There is certainly a lack of precision when that needs to be done. If the bubble is large enough that it almost touches (or perhaps just touches) the lines, then finding level is not as much of a guessing game. Compare the full-size bubble in this level... https://i.imgur.com/TQHLNXE.jpg ....to this short one: https://i.imgur.com/uZ2WkRh.jpg All else being equal, which one do you think is more precise? |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 06:11:07 -0800 (PST), Sonny
wrote: On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:57:52 PM UTC-6, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? In the spirit of chess, it's to give a comparative ranking to the individual players. BTW, are you the Swedish grand master? Otherwise: ???? I suppose it's to help make things level or as level as possible, no matter what the profession. I've never heard that one profession's efforts are more precise, than another's. I would assume so. The masonry and frame structure had better line up somewhere. ;-) FOr masonry, the overall level is set up by the corners and strings are used to mark "level" every several courses. The mason's level is used to speed things up and keep things from going too far out of whack between these "absolutes". "Something" is either level or it's not and the particular or different leveling tools make for achieving the goal as best as possible, in/for the particular scenarios. Something is "close enough", or it's not (nothing is perfect). To that end, I can imagine a trade-off of sensitivity for speed. When I bought my old pillared house, I suspected it wasn't level. I made a 100' water level, with 1/2" clear tubing. I was able to gauge the floor's levelness from one or more point(s) to any/all other point(s). That would have been much more difficult with a 4' level. I use water levels for many things. It's easier to set up siding, for example, with a water level. Set the level on the house, and measure from there. Drains, landscaping, and concrete work, are other useful applications for water levels. Gotta make sure to get all the air out of the tube, though. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/29/17 11:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Interesting discussion. I've never really thought about it, as far as accuracy goes. I really doubt that a carpenter's level is more accurate than a mason's, but who knows. My gut is that *if* there was a difference, it would be the other way around since carpenters pretty much only need level or plumb for about 8ft. And even then with framing, 1/8" off plumb at 8ft is still considered ok. In any case, the big difference is with durability. A mason will often use his level to tap brick/block into place. Also, it's easier to clean mortar off of wood. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 11:22:29 AM UTC-6, wrote:
Gotta make sure to get all the air out of the tube, though. And your tube needs to be 3/8" dia. or larger, I was told. A smaller dia. tube would allow for the water's adhesive forces to affect the internal flow, possibly giving an inaccurate reading..... and probably more so with a longer tube. Sonny |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/2017 10:21 AM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Here, the floor is so uneven even people who are slightly drunk can hardly stand. I used a marble to find out just which way it went and it instantly rolled into a corner The marble or the drunk? |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 09:48:17 -0800 (PST), Sonny
wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 11:22:29 AM UTC-6, wrote: Gotta make sure to get all the air out of the tube, though. And your tube needs to be 3/8" dia. or larger, I was told. A smaller dia. tube would allow for the water's adhesive forces to affect the internal flow, possibly giving an inaccurate reading..... and probably more so with a longer tube. Sonny strictly theoreretically, the small tube should eventially be just as accurate as the larger one but it might take half an hour to rersolve instead of half a second - - - |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 08:01:20 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 12:57:52 AM UTC-5, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Precision can often be based on the size of the bubble. My pet peeve when it comes to spirit levels are bubbles that are too small. If the bubble is so small that there is a relatively significant gap on both sides when trying to level something, then the user is left to "eyeballing level" by trying to get the gaps even via sight. There is certainly a lack of precision when that needs to be done. If the bubble is large enough that it almost touches (or perhaps just touches) the lines, then finding level is not as much of a guessing game. Compare the full-size bubble in this level... https://i.imgur.com/TQHLNXE.jpg ...to this short one: https://i.imgur.com/uZ2WkRh.jpg All else being equal, which one do you think is more precise? Not so much the size of the bubble as the size relative to the reference lines. A smaller bubble, with the finer line spacing to match, would by default create a more "precice" level. ASlso. the diametric ratio of the tube (Vial) (or curve, in the case of a single position level) also affects the accurace. The tube of an "all position" level is larger in diameter at the center, and smaller at each end. Some crappy cheap chinese levels are inaccurate because the widest portion of the tube is not at the center, or one end is wider than the other.. The bubble MUST be able to rize to the highest point when the level is "level". The larger the radius of the vial, the better the sensitivity - measured by the number of degrees of tilt required to deflect the bubble a given distance. A virtually straight vial (infinite radius) will be so sensitive that it will be virtually impossible to center the bubble - the bubble will always be either at one end or the other.. Engineers levels , transits, and machinists levels tend to be large radius vials,and very sensitive and precice, while "framing" and "bricklayers" levels tend to have a smaller radius and less precision. A bricklayers level may be less accurate as well due to being banged around more - so the bubble may be off center slightly (out of calibration) Calibration error can be quickly checked by turning the level end for end on the same surface and noting the relative displacement of the bubble. |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
Here, the floor is so uneven even people who are slightly drunk can hardly stand. I used a marble to find out just which way it went and it instantly rolled into a corner The marble or the drunk? Ha ha -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:32:00 -0600, -MIKE-
wrote: On 12/29/17 11:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Interesting discussion. I've never really thought about it, as far as accuracy goes. I really doubt that a carpenter's level is more accurate than a mason's, but who knows. My gut is that *if* there was a difference, it would be the other way around since carpenters pretty much only need level or plumb for about 8ft. And even then with framing, 1/8" off plumb at 8ft is still considered ok. In any case, the big difference is with durability. A mason will often use his level to tap brick/block into place. Also, it's easier to clean mortar off of wood. My dad's favorite carpenter's level was wood with a brass edge, but the one he used most was aluminum because it stood up to bouncing around the back of the truck with all the other tools and supplies. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
DerbyDad03 wrote:
Precision can often be based on the size of the bubble. My pet peeve when it comes to spirit levels are bubbles that are too small. If the bubble is so small that there is a relatively significant gap on both sides when trying to level something, then the user is left to "eyeballing level" by trying to get the gaps even via sight. There is certainly a lack of precision when that needs to be done. If the bubble is large enough that it almost touches (or perhaps just touches) the lines, then finding level is not as much of a guessing game. That's right! I noticed this today when I almost hurt my eyes trying to get the bubble in the middle! -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Just Wondering wrote:
What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Isn't that to take it back a level, having to use utensils to verify your tools? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 5:15:17 PM UTC-5, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Just Wondering wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Isn't that to take it back a level, having to use utensils to verify your tools? But just once... |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 11:48 AM, Sonny wrote:
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 11:22:29 AM UTC-6, wrote: Gotta make sure to get all the air out of the tube, though. And your tube needs to be 3/8" dia. or larger, I was told. A smaller dia. tube would allow for the water's adhesive forces to affect the internal flow, possibly giving an inaccurate reading..... and probably more so with a longer tube. Sonny You can add dishwasher rinse aid to the water to help prevent that. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 11:32 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 12/29/17 11:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Interesting discussion.Â* I've never really thought about it, as far as accuracy goes. I really doubt that a carpenter's level is more accurate than a mason's, but who knows. My gut is that *if* there was a difference, it would be the other way around since carpenters pretty much only need level or plumb for about 8ft.Â* And even then with framing, 1/8" off plumb at 8ft is still considered ok. In any case, the big difference is with durability.Â* A mason will often use his level to tap brick/block into place.Â* Also, it's easier to clean mortar off of wood. BTW, we're forgetting about the plumber's level. It has three lines. 1st is level, 2nd is 1/8" slope in a foot. 3rd is 1/4" slope in a foot. I think I have those number correct. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering
wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
DerbyDad03 wrote:
But just once... When and how does decalibration occur? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
krw wrote:
Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Good rule, easy to remember -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:37:46 +0100, Emanuel Berg
wrote: DerbyDad03 wrote: But just once... When and how does decalibration occur? Banging around, more expensive levels have an adjustment for the bubble, though I have not seen one for sometime for sale. |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:38:40 +0100, Emanuel Berg
wrote: krw wrote: Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Good rule, easy to remember It's quite a useful technique when buying a new level. Home Depot has a lot of them to try (but discourage the throwing part). ;-) |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE-
wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 17:04:31 -0600, Markem
wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:37:46 +0100, Emanuel Berg wrote: DerbyDad03 wrote: But just once... When and how does decalibration occur? Banging around, more expensive levels have an adjustment for the bubble, though I have not seen one for sometime for sale. The problem with calibrations is that the calibration mechanism, itself, is often the biggest reason calibration is necessary. |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 6:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. Yeah, I'm pretty sure everyone, you included, knows what I mean. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:28:16 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. If you use a level to compare against, it doesn't matter that the (test) level is level (see above) or even that it's a good level, it just needs to be somewhat close to being level and, of course, repeatable. |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 7:16 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:28:16 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03 wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. If you use a level to compare against, it doesn't matter that the (test) level is level (see above) or even that it's a good level, it just needs to be somewhat close to being level and, of course, repeatable. It's not going to help at the store, but I make a habit of having the front of my workbench be perfectly level and perfectly flat on the front edge. It's nice to be able to quickly check a level you dropped and to be able to quickly check an edged board without using a held straightedge against it. The long, perfectly straight front edge also makes it a quick task to check squares for square using the mark and flip method. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 23:37:46 +0100, Emanuel Berg
wrote: DerbyDad03 wrote: But just once... When and how does decalibration occur? abuse |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
DerbyDad03 wrote in
: A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. You can rest assured that a level sitting on a level is truly on the level. Puckdropper -- http://www.puckdroppersplace.us/rec.woodworking A mini archive of some of rec.woodworking's best and worst! |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 8:13:14 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
On 12/30/17 6:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. Yeah, I'm pretty sure everyone, you included, knows what I mean. I guess I should have included the: ;-) |
#37
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/2017 3:15 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Just Wondering wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Isn't that to take it back a level, having to use utensils to verify your tools? Perhaps. I was responding to the stated example about "the only way to tell" with another way to tell. As someone else pointed out, you could also check with your level oriented in one direction, then turn your level end-for-end and compare the result. There are probably lots of other ways to tell. |
#38
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
On 12/30/17 10:41 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 8:13:14 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 6:28 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: On Saturday, December 30, 2017 at 6:29:00 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 5:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 16:48:00 -0600, -MIKE- wrote: On 12/30/17 4:37 PM, wrote: On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:11:07 -0700, Just Wondering wrote: On 12/29/2017 10:57 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Just put it on something level (e.g. another level), then flip the level end for end and top for bottom. If it doesn't read level after any of the steps, throw it as far as possible and start over (with another level). Doesn't really have to be level. If it hits the line or is the same distance from the line when flipped, it's level. True, it's just easier if it's level. Comparing it to another level makes it so you don't even need a fixed place to test (sometimes difficult in a store). Tell me about it. I like HF but I need to test their levels. I have a 6 footer from there and it's too cheap not to buy, but I had to go through about 7 of them before I found one that was acceptable. Not level, acceptable. A level itself isn't level...unless it's laying on something level. Yeah, I'm pretty sure everyone, you included, knows what I mean. I guess I should have included the: ;-) Well, there it is, right there. ^^^^ :-p -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- www.mikedrums.com |
#39
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Just Wondering wrote:
On 12/30/2017 3:15 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: Just Wondering wrote: What is the theory behind levels? I've heard that carpenter's are more precise than those used by bricklayers. I have examined the ones we have here and there is no indication as to precision on either so the only way to tell would be the mortar stains on one of them... Use it to "level" a board, then put a cup filled with water on the board. The cup will confirm whether the board is level. Isn't that to take it back a level, having to use utensils to verify your tools? Perhaps. I was responding to the stated example about "the only way to tell" with another way to tell. As someone else pointed out, you could also check with your level oriented in one direction, then turn your level end-for-end and compare the result. There are probably lots of other ways to tell. After about 25 posts, no one has come back to the OP's point that a level can indicate that a surface is level ("both ways") even for a surface which is slightly off-level. Different levels have different tolerances by design. As I indicated in my post, a 100% accurate level would be a PITA. But, I believe that there are different categories of bubble levels. I think this is left to be addressed. |
#40
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
spirit levels
Bill wrote:
As I indicated in my post, a 100% accurate level would be a PITA. 100% literally would be impossible but 100% practically speaking - why would that be a PITA? Because nothing would ever satisfy it? Well, if so, a ruler for example - I always considered that 100% accurate practically speaking but that hasn't stopped anyone from using it as far as I know? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
spirit levels | UK diy | |||
Spirit Levels - was how level is level | UK diy | |||
lidl electronic spirit levels | UK diy | |||
Small bullseye spirit levels? | UK diy | |||
High quality spirit levels | Woodworking |