Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
was looking at an orbital air sander and the claim was that it did a
better job then similar electric sander the only thing i could think of that would be different was that it was higher rpms but my electric goes plenty fast marketing claim or is there really something to it |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Electric Comet wrote:
was looking at an orbital air sander and the claim was that it did a better job then similar electric sander the only thing i could think of that would be different was that it was higher rpms but my electric goes plenty fast marketing claim or is there really something to it It's the size of the swirls it cuts. -- -Mike- |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Electric Comet wrote in news:nmejmk$qpb$1
@dont-email.me: was looking at an orbital air sander and the claim was that it did a better job then similar electric sander the only thing i could think of that would be different was that it was higher rpms but my electric goes plenty fast marketing claim or is there really something to it American Woodworker did a review of palm sanders years ago, and included 2 or 3 air models in their selection. As I recall, they found the air sanders, to be lighter, easier on the hands because of less vibration, and more powerful. They also noted the possibility of getting lube oil on the work from the air exhaust (I guess they had an in-line oiler in the air system they were using). John |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/17/2016 9:44 AM, John McCoy wrote:
Electric Comet wrote in news:nmejmk$qpb$1 @dont-email.me: was looking at an orbital air sander and the claim was that it did a better job then similar electric sander the only thing i could think of that would be different was that it was higher rpms but my electric goes plenty fast marketing claim or is there really something to it American Woodworker did a review of palm sanders years ago, and included 2 or 3 air models in their selection. As I recall, they found the air sanders, to be lighter, easier on the hands because of less vibration, and more powerful. They also noted the possibility of getting lube oil on the work from the air exhaust (I guess they had an in-line oiler in the air system they were using). John I would imagine that for the average woodworker with out a 60 gallon plus compressor tank that the volume necessary for an air sander would be out of reach except for a few seconds of use at a time. Air consumption of one of the Mirka air sanders is 475 l/min. IMHO a 25 gallon compressor is not going to be able to keep up. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/17/2016 2:48 PM, Leon wrote:
I would imagine that for the average woodworker with out a 60 gallon plus compressor tank that the volume necessary for an air sander would be out of reach except for a few seconds of use at a time. Air consumption of one of the Mirka air sanders is 475 l/min. IMHO a 25 gallon compressor is not going to be able to keep up. I have a 30 gallon and it can't keep up with my (old) Milwaukee air sander. I guess it depends more on the compressor than the tank though. Has no dust collection either, so it never, ever gets any use. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/21/2016 11:14 AM, Jack wrote:
On 7/17/2016 2:48 PM, Leon wrote: I would imagine that for the average woodworker with out a 60 gallon plus compressor tank that the volume necessary for an air sander would be out of reach except for a few seconds of use at a time. Air consumption of one of the Mirka air sanders is 475 l/min. IMHO a 25 gallon compressor is not going to be able to keep up. I have a 30 gallon and it can't keep up with my (old) Milwaukee air sander. I guess it depends more on the compressor than the tank though. Has no dust collection either, so it never, ever gets any use. Precicely, I kinda lumped them all in the same type category. It is all about the CFM of the pump and not so much the tank size. But for the most part the bigger the tank the less the pump has to recharge. I once bought an 80 gallon compressor from a garage sale, it had a tiny single piston pump. It literally took approximately 45 minutes to fill from no pressure. Obviously it was a "piece it together" affair. I was glad to sell it and downsize to a "New" compressor 20 years ago. LOL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Got electric shock while touching pot rack and electric range at thesame time | Home Repair | |||
HI AMP ELECTRIC PowerwoRx e3 Installer in Wa. State Save money onyour electric bill Buy powerwoRx e3 NOW | Home Repair | |||
[SPAM] Electric forum for electric problems | Home Repair | |||
Separate electric oven and electric hob | UK diy | |||
adding electric circuit for air con + general electric questions | UK diy |