|
Design comments requested
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
Greg Guarino wrote:
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. I strongly prefer the version with arches. Of course, whichever details you choose should fit with it's destination (as to "form and function"). All that work and no drawer??? : ) Bill --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
"Greg Guarino" wrote in message ... I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. I prefer the arched one. What I don't care for are all the protrusions...tenons, splines, legs. I know you are itching to make them but I find them distracting...they interrupt the visual flow. -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Taxes out of hand? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 6:08 AM, Greg Guarino wrote:
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com The arches! Breaks up all the straight lines. I almost always add curves or arches to my pieces now. |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 7:37 AM, dadiOH wrote:
"Greg Guarino" wrote in message ... I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. I prefer the arched one. What I don't care for are all the protrusions...tenons, splines, legs. I know you are itching to make them but I find them distracting...they interrupt the visual flow. "Itching" may not be quite accurate. It's more a combination of "intrigued" and "afraid". :) But I will whip up some variations and see what I think. Thanks. |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 7:37 AM, dadiOH wrote:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ I prefer the arched one. What I don't care for are all the protrusions...tenons, splines, legs. I know you are itching to make them but I find them distracting...they interrupt the visual flow. Arched one here too, but I like the protrusions. Looking forward so seeing the finished product. |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 7:08 AM, Greg Guarino wrote:
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com Arches |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 7:08 AM, Greg Guarino wrote:
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com I prefer the arched aprons. They are visually more pleasing, and go well with that look. But that's just my opinion. -- Jeff |
Design comments requested
Greg Guarino wrote in
: I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...3215/in/album- 72157639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...0957/in/album- 72157639547178715/ Hmmm, not as easy to answer as I first thought. The arches definately lighten the piece. OTOH, they tend to make the legs look a little heavy and blocky. I don't think you'd want to taper the legs because of the mortise-tenon for the lower rails. Maybe a stopped chamfer would complement the arch? The non-arched version has something to say for itself in it's simplicity - square legs, square rails, square top, kind of a repeating theme (*). You'd almost have to build both of them and see them "in the flesh" to really know which is better. John (* "square" as in rectilinear, not literally all four sides the same) |
Design comments requested
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:08:48 -0400
Greg Guarino wrote: left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. change the arch so the curve's up the luck won't run out? |
Design comments requested
I do like the subtle arch.
And I like showing the joinery. Very nice. yes, I would like to see a finished project. John "Greg Guarino" wrote in message ... I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
John McCoy wrote:
You'd almost have to build both of them and see them "in the flesh" to really know which is better. I don't think I'd want to build a kitchen for you! ;) |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 7:22 AM, Bill wrote:
All that work and no drawer??? This must be my 15th design for an end table; not that I've *built* any, mind you. :) Some had drawers. But we don't particularly need drawers, and this design does have a storage nook under the middle panel. It's not that practical, but it's cute and we'll probably store pens and coasters in there. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 4:23 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
Looking forward so seeing the finished product. Me too. But I work slowly (not on purpose, it just turns out that way) and I don't have a lot of spare time. So expect a few months lead time. :) --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 8:12 PM, John McCoy wrote:
You'd almost have to build both of them and see them "in the flesh" to really know which is better. I see you are not acquainted with my pace of work and my available time. :) --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Design comments requested
"Greg Guarino" wrote in message
... I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...7639547178715/ You can actually switch between the designs more easily with your left and right arrows. You'll get perspective and parallel views of each. The only difference is the arched rails. I think its going to be a matter of matching your other furniture rather than an over riding question of preference. |
Design comments requested
On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 8:12:26 PM UTC-5, Electric Comet wrote:
change the arch so the curve's up the luck won't run out? He hasn't told us, yet, but the arch curving up design is for his next set of side tables, shoulder-arch-shoulder contour, with a shell or scalloped carving (or applique) centered on each arch. : ) This thread is his sneaky, subtle way of poking us with a pointy stick, before he springs this other design idea, on us. I vote for the arched design. Sonny |
Design comments requested
Greg Guarino wrote in
: On 4/10/2015 8:12 PM, John McCoy wrote: You'd almost have to build both of them and see them "in the flesh" to really know which is better. I see you are not acquainted with my pace of work and my available time. :) When I was younger and had more energy, I'd sometimes build something out of construction lumber & plywood to see what it looked like, and then do it over in quality wood. Now, like you, I find I only have enthusiasm to do things once. That said, you could mock up just the rails both ways and dry-fit them to see which you liked better. John |
Design comments requested
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Sonny wrote: He hasn't told us, yet, but the arch curving up design is for his next set of side tables, shoulder-arch-shoulder contour, with a shell or scalloped carving (or applique) centered on each arch. : ) This thread is his sneaky, subtle way of poking us with a pointy stick, before he springs this other design idea, on us. interesting will have to wait and see |
Design comments requested
On 4/10/2015 6:08 AM, Greg Guarino wrote:
I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: Another approach for consideration: not uncommon in this style of furniture to arch just the bottom rail and leave the top rail straight. That can work nicely if you also taper the inside faces of the legs: https://picasaweb.google.com/1113554...0561129766 42 https://picasaweb.google.com/1113554...4962 59490898 -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
Design comments requested
On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 8:13:49 PM UTC-4, John McCoy wrote:
Greg Guarino wrote in : I'm still tweaking my design. I'm curious to know who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...3215/in/album- 72157639547178715/ and who prefers this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdguar...0957/in/album- 72157639547178715/ Hmmm, not as easy to answer as I first thought. The arches definately lighten the piece. OTOH, they tend to make the legs look a little heavy and blocky. I don't think you'd want to taper the legs because of the mortise-tenon for the lower rails. Maybe a stopped chamfer would complement the arch? The non-arched version has something to say for itself in it's simplicity - square legs, square rails, square top, kind of a repeating theme (*). You'd almost have to build both of them and see them "in the flesh" to really know which is better. Anyone have a 3D printer lying around? |
Design comments requested
Bill wrote:
I strongly prefer the version with arches. Of course, whichever details you choose should fit with it's destination (as to "form and function"). All that work and no drawer??? : ) Bill By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill |
Design comments requested
Bill wrote:
Bill wrote: I strongly prefer the version with arches. Of course, whichever details you choose should fit with it's destination (as to "form and function"). All that work and no drawer??? : ) Bill By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill I hate to carry on these conversations with myself--it seems to bother some folks. But I guess modern cabinet hinges are often so adjustable that there are just "easier options" than planing. What do you think, Bill? Bill |
Design comments requested
Bill wrote in
: The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Apologies for jumping into your conversation, but I plane cabinet doors. I don't get "perfect" reveals (or anything close) since that's a skill I'm still working on, but that's the intention. As an aside, I've found a Yankee spiral screwdriver the perfect tool for cabinet hinges. You end up installing and removing the doors a dozen times to get them to fit, the Yankee screwdriver lets me hold the door with one hand while screwing/unscrewing with the other, and it's more controlable on the tiny hinge screws than a power driver. John |
Design comments requested
On 4/12/2015 2:18 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote: I strongly prefer the version with arches. Of course, whichever details you choose should fit with it's destination (as to "form and function"). All that work and no drawer??? : ) Bill By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill I did not read the article but what part do they plane, the edges or the front? If your drawer slides inside the opening squarely, into a squarely built cabinet at it should not need to be planed at all. I do however plane the edges of inset doors to produce the perfect reveal. FWIW These drawers are side hung and while I did not plane at all I did run the drawers through the drum sander to create equal spacing between the tops and bottoms of the drawers. I built two of these chests. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4335052930/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4080828302/ |
Design comments requested
On 4/12/2015 3:25 AM, Bill wrote:
Bill wrote: Bill wrote: I strongly prefer the version with arches. Of course, whichever details you choose should fit with it's destination (as to "form and function"). All that work and no drawer??? : ) Bill By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill I hate to carry on these conversations with myself--it seems to bother some folks. But I guess modern cabinet hinges are often so adjustable that there are just "easier options" than planing. What do you think, Bill? Bill Euro hinges tend to fit tight, meaning there is no slop in their action. Typical hinges that have two wings to attach to the door and cabinet often have a lot of slop and no adjustment at all for alignment. I try to use Euro style hinges if at all possible. |
Design comments requested
Leon wrote:
Bill wrote: By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill I did not read the article but what part do they plane, the edges or the front? Thank you for your reply! I realized after I posted, that instead of the front, I should have written "the edges of the front". It appears that's the same way you do it (nice work!). I see that hanging an inset cabinet door is even more "troublesome" than I thought it might be! Bill If your drawer slides inside the opening squarely, into a squarely built cabinet at it should not need to be planed at all. I do however plane the edges of inset doors to produce the perfect reveal. FWIW These drawers are side hung and while I did not plane at all I did run the drawers through the drum sander to create equal spacing between the tops and bottoms of the drawers. I built two of these chests. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4335052930/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4080828302/ |
Design comments requested
On 4/12/2015 10:30 PM, Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: Bill wrote: By the way, the Jun/2015 issue of FWW has an interesting article on "side hung drawers". The last step performed, to achieve "perfect" reveals, was to plane the front of the drawer. It made me wonder whether Swingman, and others, do that when they fit inset cabinet doors. Bill I did not read the article but what part do they plane, the edges or the front? Thank you for your reply! I realized after I posted, that instead of the front, I should have written "the edges of the front". It appears that's the same way you do it (nice work!). I see that hanging an inset cabinet door is even more "troublesome" than I thought it might be! I sneaked up on the perfect "width" fit when cutting the length of the fronts. I built the height of the drawers to be a tight fit and drum sanded the tops and bottoms to fit the the reveal you see. Then I glued the tiger maple veneer onto the drawer fronts. Hanging inset doors are troublesome too. Typically they are much larger than a drawer and large openings lend themselves to sometimes not be perfectly square or there might be a slight bow to the cabinet face frame stiles. In a small opening situation this is usually easier to deal with. And If you use the typical hinge there is no adjustment. I had to deal with that here, on the two upper doors on each cabinet. The drawers are inset too but not nearly as problematic. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4242237973/ These doors and drawers are inset too except on this job I used concealed Euro hinges and that made adjustments for the doors much much easier. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ I try to design with overlay doors and drawers to simplify the build. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/15554060238/ |
Design comments requested
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 10:31:48 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
On 4/12/2015 10:30 PM, Bill wrote: As a last resort, if you ever have a visual results screw up, per alignment (gaps), with the fitting of an inset door, and if the design (face edges) permits, then a bead trim (edging) can be used to help take your eye away from a slight misalignment issue. Sonny |
Design comments requested
Leon wrote:
I sneaked up on the perfect "width" fit when cutting the length of the fronts. I built the height of the drawers to be a tight fit and drum sanded the tops and bottoms to fit the the reveal you see. Then I glued the tiger maple veneer onto the drawer fronts. That is a clever thought (no doubt one would learn this from experience)! Hanging inset doors are troublesome too. Typically they are much larger than a drawer and large openings lend themselves to sometimes not be perfectly square or there might be a slight bow to the cabinet face frame stiles. In a small opening situation this is usually easier to deal with. And If you use the typical hinge there is no adjustment. I had to deal with that here, on the two upper doors on each cabinet. The drawers are inset too but not nearly as problematic. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/4242237973/ These doors and drawers are inset too except on this job I used concealed Euro hinges and that made adjustments for the doors much much easier. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ I try to design with overlay doors and drawers to simplify the build. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/15554060238/ Nice projects; thank you for a good lesson! I think I would probably be wise to start with overlay doors and drawers. Bill |
Design comments requested
Leon wrote:
Hanging inset doors are troublesome too. Typically they are much larger than a drawer and large openings lend themselves to sometimes not be perfectly square or there might be a slight bow to the cabinet face Oh, I am SOOOO glad to know that I am not the only one to get less than square openings. Onrare occasion, of course :) -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Taxes out of hand? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
Design comments requested
"dadiOH" wrote in :
Leon wrote: Hanging inset doors are troublesome too. Typically they are much larger than a drawer and large openings lend themselves to sometimes not be perfectly square or there might be a slight bow to the cabinet face Oh, I am SOOOO glad to know that I am not the only one to get less than square openings. Onrare occasion, of course :) Man, I had the exact same thought :-) John |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter