Two parties
 

Upscale wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:46:23 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
As is the case with all of the emotional non-thinking anti-gun folks
out there. If they stopped the bleed from their heart for just a
moment, and thought just a little bit about the nice fuzzy stuff
they were spouting, they'd realize the folly of it all. The bad
guys scare them, so because they don't know how to deal with that,
they seek to legislate the good guys. Just plain dumb.

Ask yourself where the guns come from that the criminals have? The
obvious answer is that they come from people like you who insist on
their right to ownership.

It's been admitted time and time again that the criminals don't
usually buy legal guns. So where do they get them then?
The only answer is that guns are either stolen from legal gun owners
or they're brought into the country. What if legal ownership was
terminated and border control was increased? Where would the criminal
element get their guns from when their source dries up?

unfortunately, this isn't even close to being correct. mexico has no private
ownership of guns. the border guards are very strict looking for them when i
go over the border. ownership of even a few shells by a US citizan is a 10
year sentance in a mexico jail.

doesn't seem to slow down the mexican death rate any.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americ...iref=allsearch