Is it just me or has the spam volume increased dramatically? As one of
those northeastern libtards, I'm adamantly opposed to the death
penalty but I'm willing to make an exception for these fscks...

Jeff

"Jeff" wrote in message
...
Is it just me or has the spam volume increased dramatically? As one of
those northeastern libtards, I'm adamantly opposed to the death
penalty but I'm willing to make an exception for these fscks...

Jeff

Dam those Monty Python Characters.

On Mar 18, 12:35 pm, Jeff wrote:
Is it just me or has the spam volume increased dramatically? As one of
those northeastern libtards, I'm adamantly opposed to the death
penalty but I'm willing to make an exception for these fscks...

Jeff

I have to get an expert on my machine so I can get the rec on
something other than Google, at least until Google starts offering
some kind of filtering. I'm tired of all these people having to worry
about my watches, Gucci clothing, penis size and such.

What I am curious about is why they pay someone to spam newsgroups so
heavily. I doubt it's possible they get enough responses to make the
outlay worthwhile, even as cheap as it is.

I'm also curious as to why Google hasn't set up some kind of filter
system, even if optional and something you had to pay a buck or six
for each month. Rather than futz around with newsreaders elsewhere, I
think a bunch of people would jump on that, and I'd probably spring
first or damned close to it.

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:16:38 -0700 (PDT), Charlie Self
wrote:

What I am curious about is why they pay someone to spam newsgroups so
heavily. I doubt it's possible they get enough responses to make the
outlay worthwhile, even as cheap as it is.

Works on a referral per click, but a fraction of a penny per click.
Someone in India, or a third world country could be the difference of
having food or not.

If the UPD would be used maybe it could be cleaned up, though it would
have to be run through the committee of all committees.

Mark