Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall. This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT! PROPOSITION 1: It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical, http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 Collapse start time: 17 seconds Collapse end time: 23 seconds Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds PROPOSITION 2: A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6 seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean) kinematical considerations alone: Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration * total time^2 or s = ut + 1/2at^2 where s = 174 m (height of building) u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse) a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at a constant) Thus, 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2 Solving for t t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8) = 5.9590 ~ 6 seconds |
#2
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 8, 8:08 am, wrote:
Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall. This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT! PROPOSITION 1: It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical, http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 Collapse start time: 17 seconds Collapse end time: 23 seconds Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds PROPOSITION 2: A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6 seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean) kinematical considerations alone: Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration * total time^2 or s = ut + 1/2at^2 where s = 174 m (height of building) u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse) a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at a constant) Thus, 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2 Solving for t t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8) = 5.9590 ~ 6 seconds The equation pears right and the top floor only need be hot enough to collapse thus causing an overload & downward motion, they all fell without controlled demolition! No public mention was not worthy since no plane flu into it! If what your assuming is true, then they knew the planes destiny in advance and loaded the top of the building with fuel!! The bracing held the building from falling sideways& the floor beams pulled the coliums inward.the higher up the lighter the building matereal was in design Thus had they have used the elevator instead of the truck bomb in the lower parking garage it would have fell on thier first attempt!!!! |
#3
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Isn't everything scandalous or a conspiracy though now a days?
|
#4
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
I like that movie Conspiracy Theory with Julia Roberts and Mel Gibson.
Isn't the Soviet Union responsible for our weather patterns?.....Global Warming....humbug! "ViperMods" wrote in message ps.com... Isn't everything scandalous or a conspiracy though now a days? |
#5
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Building 7 contained records of Enron that would have implicated Bush.
Besides, it wasn't entirely the US gov't behind it..it was the Trilateral Commission...and they tell all Gov't what to do "ViperMods" wrote in message ps.com... Isn't everything scandalous or a conspiracy though now a days? |
#6
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Luvrsmel wrote:
Building 7 contained records of Enron that would have implicated Bush. Besides, it wasn't entirely the US gov't behind it..it was the Trilateral Commission...and they tell all Gov't what to do All of whom are ultimately controlled by the Illuminati, who are controlled by the Rothschilds. |
#7
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Just Wondering wrote:
Luvrsmel wrote: Building 7 contained records of Enron that would have implicated Bush. Besides, it wasn't entirely the US gov't behind it..it was the Trilateral Commission...and they tell all Gov't what to do All of whom are ultimately controlled by the Illuminati, who are controlled by the Rothschilds. Doesn't DeBeers figure in there somewhere? -- If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough |
#8
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
. .. Luvrsmel wrote: Building 7 contained records of Enron that would have implicated Bush. Besides, it wasn't entirely the US gov't behind it..it was the Trilateral Commission...and they tell all Gov't what to do All of whom are ultimately controlled by the Illuminati, who are controlled by the Rothschilds. How do people like luvrsmel function in society? Building 7 had Enron records? Well, of course the answer is to blow it up. |
#9
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 8, 8:07 am, joeturn wrote:
On Oct 8, 8:08 am, wrote: Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? Just Google for "Loose Change 2" to see what happened there. Also check out "Terror Storm" and "Alex Jones"; it's scary stuff and if all this **** is true then Alex Jones would not be allowed to have his radio show. So the "Fear" market lives on, buy your dosage today! Only $19.95 plus your Civil Liberty and shipping. "You're either with us or you're with the terrorists." -George Bush Take your pick, either way they win so don't believe the hype. Although I do think we all should drop windows, use linux/open source (free software) and use encryption for all our e-mail in order to "keep it real" and protect privacy. Fedora has a flavor of linux which allows you to try it on your windows PC without installing to your hard drive or changing anything. It boots up from the CD/DVD drive and only resides in your RAM memory so where you take out the disk you have your windows back until you decide to make the change and re-format install. Goto http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ to get their "Live" CD free download. It's great, the first thing you will love is No Virus Protection Needed; so you're not forced into buying a cure for their disease. Peace SF |
#10
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
Regardless of whether you believe 'conspiracy theory' or not, there are a
lot of facts involved (with the Towers as well) that can't be ignored. wrote in message oups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall. This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT! PROPOSITION 1: It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical, http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 Collapse start time: 17 seconds Collapse end time: 23 seconds Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds PROPOSITION 2: A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6 seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean) kinematical considerations alone: Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration * total time^2 or s = ut + 1/2at^2 where s = 174 m (height of building) u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse) a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at a constant) Thus, 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2 Solving for t t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8) = 5.9590 ~ 6 seconds |
#11
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 8, 4:42 pm, "Kilroy" wrote:
Regardless of whether you believe 'conspiracy theory' or not, there are a lot of facts involved (with the Towers as well) that can't be ignored. wrote in message oups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall. This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT! PROPOSITION 1: It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical, http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 Collapse start time: 17 seconds Collapse end time: 23 seconds Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds PROPOSITION 2: A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6 seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean) kinematical considerations alone: Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration * total time^2 or s = ut + 1/2at^2 where s = 174 m (height of building) u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse) a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at a constant) Thus, 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2 Solving for t t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8) = 5.9590 ~ 6 seconds I heard of ppl using linux and booting it from usb memory stick http://www.pendrivelinux.com/ |
#12
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Oct 8, 9:23 pm, ViperMods wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:42 pm, "Kilroy" wrote: Regardless of whether you believe 'conspiracy theory' or not, there are a lot of facts involved (with the Towers as well) that can't be ignored. wrote in message roups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall. This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT! PROPOSITION 1: It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical, http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 Collapse start time: 17 seconds Collapse end time: 23 seconds Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds PROPOSITION 2: A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6 seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean) kinematical considerations alone: Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration * total time^2 or s = ut + 1/2at^2 where s = 174 m (height of building) u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse) a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at a constant) Thus, 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2 Solving for t t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8) = 5.9590 ~ 6 seconds I heard of ppl using linux and booting it from usb memory stickhttp://www.pendrivelinux.com/ Yes but it is not as extensive as Fedora; which is meant to replace Windows in a realistic way. |
#13
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
wrote in message oups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? -conspiracy crap snipped No, it was not demolished. It was heavily damaged by the other two buildings falling on it, and fires combined with the structural damage finished it off. Visible signs of it failing were obvious well before it came down, which is why the fire crews were pulled from the area. |
#14
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:49:27 GMT, "Robert Weldon"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? -conspiracy crap snipped No, it was not demolished. It was heavily damaged by the other two buildings falling on it, and fires combined with the structural damage finished it off. Visible signs of it failing were obvious well before it came down, which is why the fire crews were pulled from the area. Your mere presence is depriving some village of its idiot. |
#15
Posted to alt.dss.hack,rec.woodworking,de.alt.dateien.weibsbilder,edm.forsale,alt.fashion
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...
wrote in message ... On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:49:27 GMT, "Robert Weldon" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came crashing down on the day of 9/11. The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329 There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report. Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall rate? If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the demolitions industry! How do we know WTC 7 was demolished? -conspiracy crap snipped No, it was not demolished. It was heavily damaged by the other two buildings falling on it, and fires combined with the structural damage finished it off. Visible signs of it failing were obvious well before it came down, which is why the fire crews were pulled from the area. Your mere presence is depriving some village of its idiot. Sorry, you appear to be looking in a mirror. I base my opinion on fact, not conspiracy loon websites. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help A " Differently Abled Man's" Dream Come True | Woodworking | |||
Help A " Differently Abled Man's" Dream Come True | Home Ownership | |||
Help A " Differently Abled Man's" Dream Come True | Home Repair | |||
vise grip conspiracy theories? | Home Repair |