Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this
statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
Lee Michaels wrote:
I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 Just click the order button and see what comes up. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On Apr 1, 3:42 pm, "Lee Michaels"
wrote: I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 LOL.. certainly a funny Douglas Adams reference. "Expertly Made In Magrathea" would have been another nice addition. I always look forward to what Robin and his mirthmakers dreamt up on April 1. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
Good catch on the Douglas Adams reference. I missed it the first time around
myself. "Robatoy" wrote in message ups.com... On Apr 1, 3:42 pm, "Lee Michaels" wrote: I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 LOL.. certainly a funny Douglas Adams reference. "Expertly Made In Magrathea" would have been another nice addition. I always look forward to what Robin and his mirthmakers dreamt up on April 1. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On 1 Apr 2007 13:26:45 -0700, "Robatoy" wrote:
LOL.. certainly a funny Douglas Adams reference. "Expertly Made In Magrathea" would have been another nice addition. Yup... 42! |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On 1 Apr 2007 13:26:45 -0700, "Robatoy" wrote:
LOL.. certainly a funny Douglas Adams reference. "Expertly Made In Magrathea" would have been another nice addition. But that would be highly improbable. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
B A R R Y wrote:
On 1 Apr 2007 13:26:45 -0700, "Robatoy" wrote: LOL.. certainly a funny Douglas Adams reference. "Expertly Made In Magrathea" would have been another nice addition. But that would be highly improbable. At the edge of the universe all things are equally improbable. -- http://nmwoodworks.com/cube --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 000730-1, 04/02/2007 Tested on: 4/3/2007 3:09:02 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:09:01 -0400, Bill in Detroit
wrote: At the edge of the universe all things are equally improbable. Kolmogorov's zero-one law (yes, look it up) says that they're not. As most "things" (including breakfast at Milliways) would thus qualify as "tail events" for Kolmogorov, they're instead either almost certain, or almost impossible (i.e. their probability is either zero or one, but not intermediate). Sadly it's often possible to apply this law, but rarely to tell just which probability they have. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On Apr 1, 3:42 pm, "Lee Michaels"
wrote: I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 This made me chortle: "Once you've lapped your chisels and blades to a common thickness (a trivial one-time exercise)," Sure, it's a straightforward task that you only have to do once...for about a month straight! R |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly
-- should me the MK.XLII It has a probability ranking of 0.75, and is about as attractive as the fjords of Norway. On Apr 4, 8:41 am, "RicodJour" wrote: On Apr 1, 3:42 pm, "Lee Michaels" wrote: I am sorry, I can't tell. But the product description concludes with this statement, "So why call it the Mk.XXXXII? Well - we put a lot of deep thought into the design, and what else could we call a jig that's clearly the shop equivalent of the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything." That may be a clue. http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?p=56737&c=1 This made me chortle: "Once you've lapped your chisels and blades to a common thickness (a trivial one-time exercise)," Sure, it's a straightforward task that you only have to do once...for about a month straight! R |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
"LarryLev" wrote:
Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly -- should me the MK.XLII They beat you to it. From the "more information" page: :P.S. We know that 42 would correctly be written "XLII" in Roman numerals, :but thought that "XXXXII" just worked better in this case...! -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
alexy wrote:
: "LarryLev" wrote: :Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly :-- should me the MK.XLII : : They beat you to it. From the "more information" page: : :P.S. We know that 42 would correctly be written "XLII" in Roman numerals, : :but thought that "XXXXII" just worked better in this case...! Actually ... both notations are as correct as the other. The substractive notation (IX instead of VIIII, for example) got accepted very late in the game. And the non-subtractive got used occasionally even into the 20th century. -- Andy Barss |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
"Andrew Barss" wrote in message ... alexy wrote: : "LarryLev" wrote: :Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly :-- should me the MK.XLII : : They beat you to it. From the "more information" page: : :P.S. We know that 42 would correctly be written "XLII" in Roman numerals, : :but thought that "XXXXII" just worked better in this case...! Actually ... both notations are as correct as the other. The substractive notation (IX instead of VIIII, for example) got accepted very late in the game. And the non-subtractive got used occasionally even into the 20th century. -- Andy Barss When you consider that there were many times being chiseled in granite an "XI" is a helluva lot easier to chisel than a "VIIII" Just some food for thought - |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
"Vic Baron" wrote:
"Andrew Barss" wrote in message ... alexy wrote: : "LarryLev" wrote: :Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly :-- should me the MK.XLII : : They beat you to it. From the "more information" page: : :P.S. We know that 42 would correctly be written "XLII" in Roman numerals, : :but thought that "XXXXII" just worked better in this case...! Actually ... both notations are as correct as the other. The substractive notation (IX instead of VIIII, for example) got accepted very late in the game. And the non-subtractive got used occasionally even into the 20th century. -- Andy Barss When you consider that there were many times being chiseled in granite an "XI" is a helluva lot easier to chisel than a "VIIII" Just some food for thought - Or even IX if you didn't want to wait a couple of years! g But the notion that Roman numeral use is not carved in stone (if you'll pardon the pun) but still evolving into the XXth century is strange. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:17:17 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Barss
wrote: And the non-subtractive got used occasionally even into the 20th century. Non-subtractive is still standard for clockfaces (for IIII) even in the 21st century. I believe this is owing to Henry VIII, and the clock at Hampton Court |
Is this the Lee Valley April Fools Tool/Product?
Recalling my 4th grade math class, when using Roman numerals, the rule is no
more that 3 of a given character, thus 4 is IV and not IIII. As far as I personally know, the rule never changed. Just because someone in the 20th century used it, doesn't mean it's correct. So 42 can accurately only be written as XLII since XXXXII exceeds the 3 character rule. "Andrew Barss" wrote in message ... alexy wrote: : "LarryLev" wrote: :Just to be annoying, let me point out that the model -- more correctly :-- should me the MK.XLII : : They beat you to it. From the "more information" page: : :P.S. We know that 42 would correctly be written "XLII" in Roman numerals, : :but thought that "XXXXII" just worked better in this case...! Actually ... both notations are as correct as the other. The substractive notation (IX instead of VIIII, for example) got accepted very late in the game. And the non-subtractive got used occasionally even into the 20th century. -- Andy Barss |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter