![]() |
Talking Wood? (longish)
(this one’s a little long but hopefully the pay off will
be of use to you ) Talking wood? This guy’s inhaled too much sawdust!!! OK, how about - wood communicates? The difficulty is understanding what it’s communicating. Let me explain with an example. I’m turning a green walnut branch. I’ve gotten through the bark and the cambium layer into the sapwood. I can recognize when the roughing gouge encounters a hidden knot or heartwood bump just below the surface because the tool will bump there - just a little - before I can actually see the source of the bump. If there’s some punky wood just under the surface, that will also be communicated - a different kind of bump - a soft bumping. But sometimes interpretting what the wood is “saying” is more difficult to interpret. I was just working into the heartwood when I heard, rather than felt, an unfamiliar sound - a soft clicking. I stopped the lathe to investigate. Nothng was obvious. Turned some more and heard the same sound again, but over a longer area of the piece. Stopped the lathe and checked things out again. Still no obvious source for the sound. Now I’m taking light shearing cuts and listening carefully. The sound changes from a clicking to what seems the familiar flapping of a torn piece hitting the closely placed tool rest. I stop the lathe, planning on removing the errant piece. Nothing there to remove. Guess I’m getting paranoid. But a little more turning and the flapping sound returns. This time when I look for the source of the problem I look a little more closely. In the suspect area, the surface is different than on either side of the last pass. It’s rough, not smooth, like the surface had rubbed the tool rest. Though it’s close to the tool rest, it isn’t making contact with the tool rest - while the lathe is off. I check that the piece is secured between the spur drive and the tail head. But that wasn’t the source. Hmmm. A few more passes and more of the under lying heartwood is exposed. And the flapping sound gets louder. A deeper pass and the source becomes apparent. There’s a subtle tear/split in the heartwood, running parallel to the long axis - but only for three or four inches. The centripital force (you’re thinking “shouldn’t that be centrifical force?” No, because that’s a misnomer. What we call “centrifical force” is actually “centripital force” but we’ll let that go) opens up the tear, just a little, and the pressure of the tool closes it. The result is a flapping sound. The wood had been trying to tell me there was a tear below the surface but I wasn’t able to interpret what it was telling me. Had I made a deep cut pass I might have had a nasty tearout or catch. So now I have another “word” to add to my “wood language” dictionary, and so do you. Wood does talk to you. But you have to use all your senses, smell, touch, hearing and taste sometimes or you’ll miss what it’s trying to tell you. Just something to tuck away in your bag of tricks - or not. charlie b so much to learn, so much fun learning it |
Talking Wood? (longish)
"charlie b" wrote in message ... So now I have another "word" to add to my "wood language" dictionary, and so do you. Wood does talk to you. But you have to use all your senses, smell, touch, hearing and taste sometimes or you'll miss what it's trying to tell you. Just something to tuck away in your bag of tricks - or not. One of the reasons why slapping on the tunes (then there's the dangling wires, but that's another danger) isn't the best thing to do while turning. At the first "click" you should be checking to find out what's about to shred the piece. Burls, with all the internal surprises, are my favorite. |
Talking Wood? (longish)
"charlie b" wrote in message ... The centripital force (you're thinking "shouldn't that be centrifical force?" No, because that's a misnomer. What we call "centrifical force" is actually "centripital force" Wouldn't that be "tangential acceleration"?-) Bjarte |
Talking Wood? (longish)
Bjarte Runderheim wrote:
"charlie b" wrote in message ... The centripital force (you're thinking "shouldn't that be centrifical force?" No, because that's a misnomer. What we call "centrifical force" is actually "centripital force" Wouldn't that be "tangential acceleration"?-) Centrifugal force is the reaction force produced by an object undergoing centripetal acceleration if one wants to be pedantic. Bjarte -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter