DIYbanter

DIYbanter (https://www.diybanter.com/)
-   UK diy (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/)
-   -   RCB PROBLEMS (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/87350-rcb-problems.html)

PhilÅ January 20th 05 04:38 PM

RCB PROBLEMS
 
Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??



[email protected] January 20th 05 04:41 PM

"PhilÅ" wrote:
Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??

You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green

PhilÅ January 20th 05 04:50 PM


wrote in message ...
"PhilÅ" wrote:
Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??

You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green


Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light live, so
I am to take it all from the lighting ring...



Fred January 20th 05 05:16 PM


"PhilÅ" wrote in message
...

wrote in message

...
"PhilÅ" wrote:
Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??

You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green


Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light live,

so
I am to take it all from the lighting ring...



I don't want to sound offensive I would suggest you get professional help
in.

You should never take a live feed of one circuit and a effectively a neutral
of another. If your case there is no longer a neutral current so there'll
immediately be an imbalance of current in the live and neutral flowing
through the RCD. It will trip as soon as you put any load on any circuit.



PhilÅ January 20th 05 05:29 PM


"Fred" wrote in message
...

"PhilÅ" wrote in message
...

wrote in message

...
"PhilÅ" wrote:
Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??

You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green


Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light live,

so
I am to take it all from the lighting ring...



I don't want to sound offensive I would suggest you get professional help
in.

You should never take a live feed of one circuit and a effectively a
neutral
of another. If your case there is no longer a neutral current so there'll
immediately be an imbalance of current in the live and neutral flowing
through the RCD. It will trip as soon as you put any load on any circuit.



fairy muff, I will forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up to
the lighting thingy..

Cheers



Christian McArdle January 20th 05 05:41 PM

fairy muff, I will forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up to
the lighting thingy..


Er, you can run the timer off the lighting circuit. The whole thing should
be entirely off the lighting circuit.

You need to take the live, switched live and neutral from the ceiling
rose/junction box. Then pass each of these through a 3 pole isolator switch
and into the fan.

Christian.



Andrew Chesters January 20th 05 05:54 PM

PhilÅ wrote:
"Fred" wrote in message
...

"PhilÅ" wrote in message
...

wrote in message


...

"PhilÅ" wrote:

Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??


You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green

Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light live,


so

I am to take it all from the lighting ring...



I don't want to sound offensive I would suggest you get professional help
in.

You should never take a live feed of one circuit and a effectively a
neutral
of another. If your case there is no longer a neutral current so there'll
immediately be an imbalance of current in the live and neutral flowing
through the RCD. It will trip as soon as you put any load on any circuit.




fairy muff, I will forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up to
the lighting thingy..

Cheers


Can you run a 3 core and earth to the fan? One core switched with the
bulb, an other to provide power for the timed run with the third as
neutral. This is how they are intended to work, but with the changes to
bathroom regs, I'm not sure what would be required any more.

Andrew

PhilÅ January 20th 05 06:13 PM


"Andrew Chesters" wrote in message
...
PhilÅ wrote:
"Fred" wrote in message
...

"PhilÅ" wrote in message
...

wrote in message

...

"PhilÅ" wrote:

Hello

I have just installed a bathroom fan which is on a timer...

Problem is...

fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.

the light feed is not on the RCB.

So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??


You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green

Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light
live,

so

I am to take it all from the lighting ring...



I don't want to sound offensive I would suggest you get professional help
in.

You should never take a live feed of one circuit and a effectively a
neutral
of another. If your case there is no longer a neutral current so
there'll
immediately be an imbalance of current in the live and neutral flowing
through the RCD. It will trip as soon as you put any load on any
circuit.




fairy muff, I will forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up
to the lighting thingy..

Cheers


Can you run a 3 core and earth to the fan? One core switched with the
bulb, an other to provide power for the timed run with the third as
neutral. This is how they are intended to work, but with the changes to
bathroom regs, I'm not sure what would be required any more.

Andrew


I think I might do that??.

Have to find suitable cable.

The fan does not have any place for a earth??.



Stefek Zaba January 20th 05 06:13 PM

PhilÅ wrote:


You should never take a live feed of one circuit and a effectively a
neutral of another.


Dead right. From Phil's description he's in fact got live feeds from two
different circuits - a perm-live wrongly taken from the ring, and a
switched-live ("trigger" for the fan's run-on timer) from the lighting
circuit (specifically, I'd guess, from the bathroom lamholder's
(switched) live terminal).

Fixing this to be Right is not so hard. You don't need to


.... forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up to
the lighting thingy..


Rather, you need to forget the ring circuit altogether as your source of
perm-live. Run a triple-and-earth cable from the Appropriate Place on
your lighting circuit. That T&E wants to carry the (lighting circuit)
Permanent Live, the bathroom light's Switched Live, the (lighting
circuit) Neutral, and the (lighting circuit) Earth. It wants to go via a
3-pole fan isolator (made for the job, switching all three non-earth
conductors, you see) and on to the relevant terminals of the fan.

OK, but what's this Appropriate Place? That depends on how your bathroom
light is wired. If it's the loop-in system, all four connections are
already present at the ceiling rose - N (black wires at one edge),
perm-L (in the middle), switched-L (at the other edge) and an E
terminal. Though the loop-in arrangement is the most common system on
newer properties, ceiling roses are not usual in new-build bathrooms
(usually an fitting is used which is flush to the ceiling). In this case
it's most likely that there's a junction box in the loft above the
bathroom, which becomes the Appropriate Place, as it'll bring together
the N, perm-L, switched-L, and E in one neat place. There's a third
'standard' possibility where all wiring is done at the switches and
lighting points, with the extra way or two sometimes needed being made
using bits of 'chocolate block'; in this case you may not end up with
one Appropriate Place, but would have to use two T&E runs to your 3-way
isolator to get all 4 connections.

In summary: DON'T mix 'final' circuits: make all your connections ONLY
into the lighting circuit. DO use a bathroom fan isolator (and position
it out of reach of anyone using, incl. standing in, the bath/shower). IF
you're sure you can safely bring both switched-L and perm-L to the
isolator, do that; if not, go for your 'forget the timer, just use the
lighting point' simplification. IF you're in any doubt, get a sparks in:
no point frying yourself or your Lurved Ones (or even a visitor!) for
the sake of 80 notes...

Stefek

:::Jerry:::: January 20th 05 06:14 PM


"Christian McArdle" wrote in message
. net...
fairy muff, I will forget the timer option, and just connect the fan up

to
the lighting thingy..


Er, you can run the timer off the lighting circuit. The whole thing should
be entirely off the lighting circuit.

You need to take the live, switched live and neutral from the ceiling
rose/junction box. Then pass each of these through a 3 pole isolator

switch
and into the fan.


I think the best advice was to let someone with a clue have a look, IME
people without one normally make other (possibly lethal) errors as well....



[email protected] January 20th 05 06:33 PM

"PhilÅ" wrote:

I take it I now have to connect the lighting ring to the RCB??

You should have taken all the feeds to the bathroom fan from a single
circuit, I'm pretty sure your wiring contravenes the IEE regs and, as
you've discovered, it doesn't work either!

--
Chris Green


Chris

If I take them from the mains ring (common) then this contravenes IEE is
dangerous, as the lighting ring could be switched off and the light live, so
I am to take it all from the lighting ring...

Yes, I think that's the normal way of doing things, all from the
lighting circuit.

--
Chris Green

Lurch January 20th 05 07:27 PM

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:07 -0000, "PhilÅ"
strung together this:

I think I might do that??.

Have to find suitable cable.

The fan does not have any place for a earth??.

Leave it alone, get someone in who knows what they are doing. You are
obviously a danger to yourself and others.
--

SJW
Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject

Fred January 20th 05 07:53 PM


"Lurch" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:13:07 -0000, "PhilÅ"
strung together this:

I think I might do that??.

Have to find suitable cable.

The fan does not have any place for a earth??.

Leave it alone, get someone in who knows what they are doing. You are
obviously a danger to yourself and others.
--

SJW
Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject


If this was designed with flat T+E, wouldn't it have a parking connector for
the earth?



John Rumm January 20th 05 09:52 PM

Fred wrote:

If this was designed with flat T+E, wouldn't it have a parking connector for
the earth?


many don't since they are double insulated and expect to be fed from a
flex connected to an adjacent flex outlet or FCU...

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/


Dave Plowman (News) January 21st 05 12:29 AM

In article ,
PhilÅ wrote:
fixed 240 V is from a 3A spur of the a socket ring on the RCB.


the light feed is not on the RCB.


So when connected up the neutrals are now common and the RCB is
tripping..


Yup. They're good at showing up stupid things. ;-)

--
*One nice thing about egotists: they don't talk about other people.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

John Rumm January 21st 05 11:34 AM

Stefek Zaba wrote:



....................... DO use a bathroom fan isolator (and position
it out of reach of anyone using, incl. standing in, the bath/shower).



Can the isolator be in the loft above the ceiling ( ie next to the fan)?

Strictly speaking, no: as a motor isolator, it's supposed to be
accessible and if not within ready control of whoever's working on the
dreadfully dangereous arm-chopping motor, able to be locked off.


I would argue that if the fan itself is actually in the loft (i.e. it is
a ducted fan) then having the isolater there next to it is logical since
it is within ready control of the person working on the fan.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

Martin Crook January 21st 05 12:32 PM


"Stefek Zaba" wrote in message
...


into the lighting circuit. DO use a bathroom fan isolator (and position
it out of reach of anyone using, incl. standing in, the bath/shower).


Can the isolator be in the loft above the ceiling ( ie next to the fan)?

Martin



Stefek Zaba January 21st 05 12:57 PM

Martin Crook wrote:


....................... DO use a bathroom fan isolator (and position
it out of reach of anyone using, incl. standing in, the bath/shower).


Can the isolator be in the loft above the ceiling ( ie next to the fan)?

Strictly speaking, no: as a motor isolator, it's supposed to be
accessible and if not within ready control of whoever's working on the
dreadfully dangereous arm-chopping motor, able to be locked off.

Still, 'strict' conformance should (in my way of thinking) be weighed
against rationality. If something really is a serious limb- or
life-endangering fixed motor, and needs frequent mechanical maintenance
(blade-changing, filter-changing, whatever) I'd do my nut if it wasn't
reliably isolatable. But for a domestic bathroom fan, especially if the
loft's accessible (fixed loft ladder, light, and boards), I can't see it
being seriously, dangerously wrong to fit the isolator above the
ceiling, especially if you can put a little label in/near the visible
part of the fan in the bathroom to describe the isolator's location.

Now waiting for the wrath of NICEIC to descend...

Stefek

:::Jerry:::: January 21st 05 04:24 PM


"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Stefek Zaba wrote:



....................... DO use a bathroom fan isolator (and position
it out of reach of anyone using, incl. standing in, the bath/shower).


Can the isolator be in the loft above the ceiling ( ie next to the

fan)?

Strictly speaking, no: as a motor isolator, it's supposed to be
accessible and if not within ready control of whoever's working on the
dreadfully dangereous arm-chopping motor, able to be locked off.


I would argue that if the fan itself is actually in the loft (i.e. it is
a ducted fan) then having the isolater there next to it is logical since
it is within ready control of the person working on the fan.


In fact it could be argued that that it's not just logical but would be the
correct location for the 'motor isolator' - if the isolator isn't next [1]
to the motor unit then the isolator need either a lock or removable link.

[1] ie. in the same room.



Stefek Zaba January 21st 05 07:41 PM

John Rumm wrote:


I would argue that if the fan itself is actually in the loft (i.e. it is
a ducted fan) then having the isolater there next to it is logical since
it is within ready control of the person working on the fan.

No question that you're right. My thoughts were supposed to refer to the
fan-through-the-wall or similar case, where the motor's in the bathroom.
That's the more arguable case, where the isolator isn't so readily
operable and observable (or, without local knowledge, even locatable!)
by whoever's doing the maintenance; I call it 'arguable' rather'n
'forbidden' since, in the domestic case, there won't be other people
trooping up into the loft to switch the isolator back on, and if it's
accessible in practice, I can't see it being a gross violation.

But smarter still, and quite common practice, is to put the isolator
just outside the bathroom, right up by the ceiling - out of reach of
casual switching, more accessible than up in th'loft.

Martin Crook January 25th 05 07:59 AM


"Stefek Zaba" wrote in message
...
John Rumm wrote:


I would argue that if the fan itself is actually in the loft (i.e. it is
a ducted fan) then having the isolater there next to it is logical since
it is within ready control of the person working on the fan.

No question that you're right. My thoughts were supposed to refer to the
fan-through-the-wall or similar case, where the motor's in the bathroom.
That's the more arguable case, where the isolator isn't so readily
operable and observable (or, without local knowledge, even locatable!)
by whoever's doing the maintenance; I call it 'arguable' rather'n
'forbidden' since, in the domestic case, there won't be other people
trooping up into the loft to switch the isolator back on, and if it's
accessible in practice, I can't see it being a gross violation.

But smarter still, and quite common practice, is to put the isolator
just outside the bathroom, right up by the ceiling - out of reach of
casual switching, more accessible than up in th'loft.


Thanks, my fan is in fact a ducted type fan and the isolator is just next to
it., I should have made that clear. There is no way you could work on it
from inside the bathroom, you would have to be in the loft.

Martin




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter