![]() |
Nuisance calls
On 16/05/2019 10:01, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2019 17:27:56 +0100, John Rumm wrote: On 15/05/2019 12:29, Jethro_uk wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2019 07:13:24 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote: My elderly neighbour was complaining about nuisance calls. I said I'd register them with the Telephone Preference Service, but I find they're already registered. I presume this means that the bulk of their nuisance calls are coming from overseas, although I'm also with the TPI and get very few, just the occasional broadband cut-off scam, as do my neighbours. Is there an alternative or addition to the TPS that also blocks overseas nuisance calls? Dump the landline. Even then, scammers are starting to call mobiles. Also a bit problematic is that is how your broadband arrives... There's no law that you have to use the POTS you get with broadband. Indeed there is not, and there are also a few BB technologies that don't actually require a phone line anyway. However for many the deal is structured to encourage you to take the package of BB + Phone + whatever, and since you have now in effect "paid" for the phone, it makes less sense to pay for it again elsewhere. I'm with virgin who bizarrely make it cheaper to have POTS+TV+BB than standalone BB. But the phone hasn't been plugged in for 4 years. Personally I would not want to be without my landlines... better voice quality, lower latency, integration with my PABX, and they circumvent the somewhat ropey mobile signal here (i.e. it works, but only in some places in some rooms of the house). -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
Nuisance calls
John Rumm wrote:
I'm with virgin who bizarrely make it cheaper to have POTS+TV+BB than standalone BB. But the phone hasn't been plugged in for 4 years. Personally I would not want to be without my landlines... better voice quality, lower latency, integration with my PABX, and they circumvent the somewhat ropey mobile signal here (i.e. it works, but only in some places in some rooms of the house). I'm with you there John. The poor quality and plain unreliability of many mobile calls gets on my nerves, especially when the caller actually has a landline and is at home. -- Chris Green · |
Nuisance calls
On 5/16/2019 5:48 PM, Chris Green wrote:
John Rumm wrote: I'm with virgin who bizarrely make it cheaper to have POTS+TV+BB than standalone BB. But the phone hasn't been plugged in for 4 years. Personally I would not want to be without my landlines... better voice quality, lower latency, integration with my PABX, and they circumvent the somewhat ropey mobile signal here (i.e. it works, but only in some places in some rooms of the house). I'm with you there John. The poor quality and plain unreliability of many mobile calls gets on my nerves, especially when the caller actually has a landline and is at home. I was very glad to have a landline this week - we lost power for hours, twice, due to an enormous wildfire (north coast of Scotland). After about an hour, the local mobile tower died. With the landline, we still had access to the outside world. Today, EE was working on that tower, and standard mobile service disappeared. My current phone does wifi calling, though, through the broadband I get with the landline. |
Nuisance calls
"Chris Green" wrote in message ... John Rumm wrote: I'm with virgin who bizarrely make it cheaper to have POTS+TV+BB than standalone BB. But the phone hasn't been plugged in for 4 years. Personally I would not want to be without my landlines... better voice quality, lower latency, integration with my PABX, and they circumvent the somewhat ropey mobile signal here (i.e. it works, but only in some places in some rooms of the house). I'm with you there John. The poor quality and plain unreliability of many mobile calls gets on my nerves, especially when the caller actually has a landline and is at home. with a setup fee of 20p and 10ppp mobile calling is now much much cheaper (and don't tell me I can get "free" calls from my LL if I subscribe into a bundle. I don't have a baseline use the phone that's enough to make use of a bundle, for the optional extra calls to be free) tim |
Nuisance calls
tim... wrote:
with a setup fee of 20p and 10ppp mobile calling is now much much cheaper (and don't tell me I can get "free" calls from my LL if I subscribe into a bundle. I don't have a baseline use the phone that's enough to make use of a bundle, for the optional extra calls to be free) There is also the 18185 option https://www.18185.co.uk/rates Their setup charge is 4p and UK landlines are 1.7p per minute. Mobile calls are 6p per minute, but my Three PAYG rate is 3p per minute. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK @ChrisJDixon1 Plant amazing Acers. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter