Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 00:43, Rod Speed wrote:
Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote Chris Green wrote Turning a handle or pushing a lever is simply 'work' as in force x distance. But pressing it with your finger isnt either. So when you press this 'switch' with a finger, you're not applying a force which moves a finite distance? Corse you are, but its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. You have show earlier you're incapable of looking up kinetic energy and so remain ignorant of what kinetic energy is. Or isn't "work = force x distance" any more? Pity its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. When did that change? It didnt, stupid. Are you now claiming kinetic energy is the same as work? Do make up your mind. |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:39, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 15/03/2019 23:03, Rod Speed wrote: "Roger Hayter" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message ... Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote It uses kinetic energy to send a wifi signal to the base. You were doing well until this point. That's what it does. No battery no wires. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philips-Per...ting-Synthetic s/dp/ B0748MQWP3/ref=dp_ob_title_light I'd prefer to call it mechanical rather then kinetic energy, without further information. But perhaps he was suggesting that Wifi was not really an appropriate radio protocol for the purpose? All the makers and sellers of them call them kinetic for some strange reason. That's because that's what they are. They don't use the static force of the finger on the button, they use the movement of the button. But the energy supplied is nothing to do with the speed of the press. Yes, that’s just used to generate a small amount of electrical power. The energy provided by the finger is force times distance moved. Wrong with an electrical generator that uses the kinetic energy. This is not kinetic energy at any stage, Wrong. Explain what kinetic energy is? Look it up for yourself. And it’s the kinetic energy of the finger stopping that the button that is what generates the small amount of power needed to power the zigbee transmitter. I have, and you continue to show you're clueless. We'll see... It shouldn't be difficult unless google is beyond your ability. Don’t need to goggle it, I have know what it is for 3/4 of a century, thanks. Sound like googling is beyond you. Then you need a new battery in your hearing aid, you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. or if it is, only internal to the machine. Irrelevant. The energy supplied by the operator is not kinetic energy. Wrong. Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi. Zigbee is a complete protocol stack and a form of low power, low data rate radio communication. You can call it wireless if you like. Wifi is a name given to a specific standard IEEE 802.11, And zigbee is the name of the protocol that is done over that. you can call it wireless if you like. I can call it wifi too. Only someone with a lack of knowledge would call it wifi. Philips too eh ? BTW, Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance. Whoopy ****ing do. Which is a standard associated with IEEE 802.11 Duh. Being wrong is so painful for you. I'm not wrong, and neither is Philips. Only an idiot would confuse the two as being the same. Never said they are the same, idiot. You're the idiot that said, "Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi", That’s not saying they are the same, ****wit. I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. whatever did you mean by that? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:43, Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote Chris Green wrote Turning a handle or pushing a lever is simply 'work' as in force x distance. But pressing it with your finger isnt either. So when you press this 'switch' with a finger, you're not applying a force which moves a finite distance? Corse you are, but its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. You have show earlier you're incapable of looking up kinetic energy Dont need to look it up, I knew what it was before you were even born, ****wit. and so remain ignorant of what kinetic energy is. Philips too eh ? Yeah, right. Or isn't "work = force x distance" any more? Pity its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. When did that change? It didnt, stupid. Are you now claiming kinetic energy is the same as work? Nope. Do make up your mind. Havent changed it, ****wit. |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 02:06, Rod Speed wrote:
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:39, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 15/03/2019 23:03, Rod Speed wrote: "Roger Hayter" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message ... Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote It uses kinetic energy to send a wifi signal to the base. You were doing well until this point. That's what it does. No battery no wires. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philips-Per...ting-Synthetic s/dp/ B0748MQWP3/ref=dp_ob_title_light I'd prefer to call it mechanical rather then kinetic energy, without further information.* But perhaps he was suggesting that Wifi was not really an appropriate radio protocol for the purpose? All the makers and sellers of them call them kinetic for some strange reason. That's because that's what they are. They don't use the static force of the finger on the button, they use the movement of the button. But the energy supplied is nothing to do with the speed of the press. Yes, that’s just used to generate a small amount of electrical power. The energy provided by the finger is force times distance moved. Wrong with an electrical generator that uses the kinetic energy. This is not kinetic energy at any stage, Wrong. Explain what kinetic energy is? Look it up for yourself. And it’s the kinetic energy of the finger stopping that the button that is what generates the small amount of power needed to power the zigbee transmitter. I have, and you continue to show you're clueless. We'll see... It shouldn't be difficult unless google is beyond your ability. Don’t need to goggle it, I have know what it is for 3/4 of a century, thanks. Sound like googling is beyond you. Then you need a new battery in your hearing aid, you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. or if it is, only internal to the machine. Irrelevant. The energy supplied by the operator is not kinetic energy. Wrong. Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi. Zigbee is a complete protocol stack and a form of low power, low data rate radio communication. You can call it wireless if you like. Wifi is a name given to a specific standard IEEE 802.11, And zigbee is the name of the protocol that is done over that. you can call it wireless if you like. I can call it wifi too. Only someone with a lack of knowledge would call it wifi. Philips too eh ? Even they call it wireless. BTW, Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance. Whoopy ****ing do. Which is a standard associated with IEEE 802.11 Duh. Being wrong is so painful for you. I'm not wrong, and neither is Philips. Even they call it wireless. Only an idiot would confuse the two as being the same. Never said they are the same, idiot. You're the idiot that said, "Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi", That’s not saying they are the same, ****wit. I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. You've just said "that's not saying they are the same", are you now agreeing they are different? whatever did you mean by that? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. The final sign you have lost your argument, you've been losing a lot of arguments recently. |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 00:10, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/03/2019 23:24, Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message snip Turning a handle or pushing a lever is simply 'work' as in force x distance. But pressing it with your finger isnt either. So when you press this 'switch' with a finger, you're not applying a force which moves a finite distance? Or isn't "work = force x distance" any more? When did that change? Oh that changed when climate chage came along and science rewrote the laws of physics to allow perpetual motion, and called it 'renewable energy' -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood. |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 02:06, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:39, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 15/03/2019 23:03, Rod Speed wrote: "Roger Hayter" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message ... Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote It uses kinetic energy to send a wifi signal to the base. You were doing well until this point. That's what it does. No battery no wires. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philips-Per...ting-Synthetic s/dp/ B0748MQWP3/ref=dp_ob_title_light I'd prefer to call it mechanical rather then kinetic energy, without further information. But perhaps he was suggesting that Wifi was not really an appropriate radio protocol for the purpose? All the makers and sellers of them call them kinetic for some strange reason. That's because that's what they are. They don't use the static force of the finger on the button, they use the movement of the button. But the energy supplied is nothing to do with the speed of the press. Yes, that’s just used to generate a small amount of electrical power. The energy provided by the finger is force times distance moved. Wrong with an electrical generator that uses the kinetic energy. This is not kinetic energy at any stage, Wrong. Explain what kinetic energy is? Look it up for yourself. And it’s the kinetic energy of the finger stopping that the button that is what generates the small amount of power needed to power the zigbee transmitter. I have, and you continue to show you're clueless. We'll see... It shouldn't be difficult unless google is beyond your ability. Don’t need to goggle it, I have know what it is for 3/4 of a century, thanks. Sound like googling is beyond you. Then you need a new battery in your hearing aid, you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. or if it is, only internal to the machine. Irrelevant. The energy supplied by the operator is not kinetic energy. Wrong. Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi. Zigbee is a complete protocol stack and a form of low power, low data rate radio communication. You can call it wireless if you like. Wifi is a name given to a specific standard IEEE 802.11, And zigbee is the name of the protocol that is done over that. you can call it wireless if you like. I can call it wifi too. Only someone with a lack of knowledge would call it wifi. Philips too eh ? Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. BTW, Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance. Whoopy ****ing do. Which is a standard associated with IEEE 802.11 Duh. Being wrong is so painful for you. I'm not wrong, and neither is Philips. Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. Only an idiot would confuse the two as being the same. Never said they are the same, idiot. You're the idiot that said, "Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi", That’s not saying they are the same, ****wit. I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. You've just said "that's not saying they are the same", are you now agreeing they are different? Nope, that zigbee runs over wifi with that switch, ****wit. whatever did you mean by that? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. The final sign you have lost your argument, You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. you've been losing a lot of arguments recently. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. |
#47
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:51:01 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: FLUSH the senile psychopath's psychopathic troll**** Seems more and more people are getting wise to what's the matter with you, psychopath. BG -- Bill Wright to Rot Speed: "That confirms my opinion that you are a despicable little ****." MID: |
#48
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 13:08:36 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: Are you now claiming kinetic energy is the same as work? Nope. Do make up your mind. Havent changed it, ****wit. ....and your idiocy and psychopathy keeps getting exposed. I no longer would be surprised if you were really trolling from a mental institution, senile Rot. I just suppose they wouldn't allow you to get up and start using the computer every day from between 1 and 4 am. But that's the only argument against you being institutionalized. -- pamela about Rot Speed: "His off the cuff expertise demonstrates how little he knows..." MID: |
#49
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
Rod Speed wrote:
I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. Just to help the discussion along, that sentence is complete gibberish. Zigbee is a low-level protocol used for wireless links. The high level information needed to implement the button action is sent as a zigbee message and the zigbee is decoded and the high level message passed on to a NIC in the receiver which sends the same message to the LAN (perhaps, from what you say) but no way at all is *zigbee* operating over Wifi. In fact if the zigbee receiver is plugged in then the higher-level message never sees wifi, it goes straight into an ethernet packet. -- Roger Hayter |
#50
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 04:51, Rod Speed wrote:
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 02:06, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:39, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 15/03/2019 23:03, Rod Speed wrote: "Roger Hayter" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message ... Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote It uses kinetic energy to send a wifi signal to the base. You were doing well until this point. That's what it does. No battery no wires. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philips-Per...ting-Synthetic s/dp/ B0748MQWP3/ref=dp_ob_title_light I'd prefer to call it mechanical rather then kinetic energy, without further information.* But perhaps he was suggesting that Wifi was not really an appropriate radio protocol for the purpose? All the makers and sellers of them call them kinetic for some strange reason. That's because that's what they are. They don't use the static force of the finger on the button, they use the movement of the button. But the energy supplied is nothing to do with the speed of the press. Yes, that’s just used to generate a small amount of electrical power. The energy provided by the finger is force times distance moved. Wrong with an electrical generator that uses the kinetic energy. This is not kinetic energy at any stage, Wrong. Explain what kinetic energy is? Look it up for yourself. And it’s the kinetic energy of the finger stopping that the button that is what generates the small amount of power needed to power the zigbee transmitter. I have, and you continue to show you're clueless. We'll see... It shouldn't be difficult unless google is beyond your ability. Don’t need to goggle it, I have know what it is for 3/4 of a century, thanks. Sound like googling is beyond you. Then you need a new battery in your hearing aid, you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. or if it is, only internal to the machine. Irrelevant. The energy supplied by the operator is not kinetic energy. Wrong. Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi. Zigbee is a complete protocol stack and a form of low power, low data rate radio communication. You can call it wireless if you like. Wifi is a name given to a specific standard IEEE 802.11, And zigbee is the name of the protocol that is done over that. you can call it wireless if you like. I can call it wifi too. Only someone with a lack of knowledge would call it wifi. Philips too eh ? Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. Only in your world. BTW, Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance. Whoopy ****ing do. Which is a standard associated with IEEE 802.11 Duh. Being wrong is so painful for you. I'm not wrong, and neither is Philips. Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. Only in your world. Only an idiot would confuse the two as being the same. Never said they are the same, idiot. You're the idiot that said, "Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi", That’s not saying they are the same, ****wit. I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. You've just said "that's not saying they are the same", are you now agreeing they are different? Nope, that zigbee runs over wifi with that switch, ****wit. Only in your world. whatever did you mean by that? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. The final sign you have lost your argument, You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. you've been losing a lot of arguments recently. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. A triple admission of failure. |
#51
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 11:47, Roger Hayter wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. Just to help the discussion along, that sentence is complete gibberish. Zigbee is a low-level protocol used for wireless links. The high level information needed to implement the button action is sent as a zigbee message and the zigbee is decoded and the high level message passed on to a NIC in the receiver which sends the same message to the LAN (perhaps, from what you say) but no way at all is *zigbee* operating over Wifi. In fact if the zigbee receiver is plugged in then the higher-level message never sees wifi, it goes straight into an ethernet packet. I concur with everything you say. Zigbee is designed primarily for battery powered low data rate applications. It is one of the few standards that includes the radio hardware. The only time I have come across Zigbee in my work has been in utility meters where a gas meter could talk to an electric meter which of course has the power to retransmit over GSM etc. |
#52
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
On 16/03/2019 02:08, Rod Speed wrote:
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:43, Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote Chris Green wrote Turning a handle or pushing a lever is simply 'work' as in force x distance. But pressing it with your finger isnt either. So when you press this 'switch' with a finger, you're not applying a force which moves a finite distance? Corse you are, but its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. You have show earlier you're incapable of looking up kinetic energy Dont need to look it up, I knew what it was before you were even born, ****wit. and so remain ignorant of what kinetic energy is. Philips too eh ?Â* Yeah, right. Or isn't "work = force x distance" any more? Pity its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. When did that change? It didnt, stupid. Are you now claiming kinetic energy is the same as work? Nope. Do make up your mind. Havent changed it, ****wit. It seems to have done, and now you're in denial. |
#53
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote: Oh that changed when climate chage came along and science rewrote the laws of physics to allow perpetual motion, and called it 'renewable energy' Go on then, clever clogs. How would you rename what most understand by renewable energy? -- *Frustration is trying to find your glasses without your glasses. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#54
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
Roger Hayter wrote
Rod Speed wrote I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. Just to help the discussion along, that sentence is complete gibberish. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. Zigbee is a low-level protocol used for wireless links. Yes, it doesn’t have to be over wifi, but is with the Hue switches. The high level information needed to implement the button action is sent as a zigbee message and the zigbee is decoded and the high level message passed on to a NIC in the receiver which sends the same message to the LAN (perhaps, from what you say) but no way at all is *zigbee* operating over Wifi. There is nothing else for it to operate over with a Hue system. In fact if the zigbee receiver is plugged in It isnt with that switch. then the higher-level message never sees wifi Then how does it get from that switch which isnt wired into anything ? it goes straight into an ethernet packet. Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never had a ****ing clue. |
#55
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 04:51, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 02:06, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:39, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 15/03/2019 23:03, Rod Speed wrote: "Roger Hayter" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Chris Green" wrote in message ... Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote It uses kinetic energy to send a wifi signal to the base. You were doing well until this point. That's what it does. No battery no wires. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Philips-Per...ting-Synthetic s/dp/ B0748MQWP3/ref=dp_ob_title_light I'd prefer to call it mechanical rather then kinetic energy, without further information. But perhaps he was suggesting that Wifi was not really an appropriate radio protocol for the purpose? All the makers and sellers of them call them kinetic for some strange reason. That's because that's what they are. They don't use the static force of the finger on the button, they use the movement of the button. But the energy supplied is nothing to do with the speed of the press. Yes, that’s just used to generate a small amount of electrical power. The energy provided by the finger is force times distance moved. Wrong with an electrical generator that uses the kinetic energy. This is not kinetic energy at any stage, Wrong. Explain what kinetic energy is? Look it up for yourself. And it’s the kinetic energy of the finger stopping that the button that is what generates the small amount of power needed to power the zigbee transmitter. I have, and you continue to show you're clueless. We'll see... It shouldn't be difficult unless google is beyond your ability. Don’t need to goggle it, I have know what it is for 3/4 of a century, thanks. Sound like googling is beyond you. Then you need a new battery in your hearing aid, you pathetic excuse for a bull**** artist. or if it is, only internal to the machine. Irrelevant. The energy supplied by the operator is not kinetic energy. Wrong. Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi. Zigbee is a complete protocol stack and a form of low power, low data rate radio communication. You can call it wireless if you like. Wifi is a name given to a specific standard IEEE 802.11, And zigbee is the name of the protocol that is done over that. you can call it wireless if you like. I can call it wifi too. Only someone with a lack of knowledge would call it wifi. Philips too eh ? Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. Only in your world. In any Hue system, actually. And trivial to prove that by turning off the router and having the Hue switch stop working. BTW, Wi-Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance. Whoopy ****ing do. Which is a standard associated with IEEE 802.11 Duh. Being wrong is so painful for you. I'm not wrong, and neither is Philips. Even they call it wireless. Pity it runs over wifi. Only in your world. In any Hue system, actually. And trivial to prove that by turning off the router and having the Hue switch stop working. Only an idiot would confuse the two as being the same. Never said they are the same, idiot. You're the idiot that said, "Just as wrong as your claim that zigbee isnt wifi", That’s not saying they are the same, ****wit. I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. You've just said "that's not saying they are the same", are you now agreeing they are different? Nope, that zigbee runs over wifi with that switch, ****wit. Only in your world. In any Hue system, actually. And trivial to prove that by turning off the router and having the Hue switch stop working. whatever did you mean by that? You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. The final sign you have lost your argument, You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. you've been losing a lot of arguments recently. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. A triple admission of failure. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. |
#56
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 11:47, Roger Hayter wrote: Rod Speed wrote: I have just rubbed your ****wit nose in the FACT that zigbee is in fact the protocol that is operating over wifi. Just to help the discussion along, that sentence is complete gibberish. Zigbee is a low-level protocol used for wireless links. The high level information needed to implement the button action is sent as a zigbee message and the zigbee is decoded and the high level message passed on to a NIC in the receiver which sends the same message to the LAN (perhaps, from what you say) but no way at all is *zigbee* operating over Wifi. In fact if the zigbee receiver is plugged in then the higher -level message never sees wifi, it goes straight into an ethernet packet. I concur with everything you say. Changes nothing. Zigbee is designed primarily for battery powered low data rate applications. Irrelevant to the fact that it runs over wifi with a Hue system. And trivial to prove that by turning the router off and discovering that the Hue switch being discussed no longer switches anything when the buttons are pressed because the Hue base doesnt do wifi, the router does. It is one of the few standards that includes the radio hardware. Doesnt have to. The only time I have come across Zigbee in my work has been in utility meters where a gas meter could talk to an electric meter which of course has the power to retransmit over GSM etc. Irrelevant to the fact that with a Hue system, its done over wifi. |
#57
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless switches for lights - recommendations?
"Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 02:08, Rod Speed wrote: "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 16/03/2019 00:43, Rod Speed wrote: Fredxx wrote Rod Speed wrote Chris Green wrote Turning a handle or pushing a lever is simply 'work' as in force x distance. But pressing it with your finger isnt either. So when you press this 'switch' with a finger, you're not applying a force which moves a finite distance? Corse you are, but its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. You have show earlier you're incapable of looking up kinetic energy Dont need to look it up, I knew what it was before you were even born, ****wit. and so remain ignorant of what kinetic energy is. Philips too eh ? Yeah, right. Or isn't "work = force x distance" any more? Pity its the kinetic energy of the finger that is what generates the small amount of power that powers the chip that transmits the zigbee signal to the base. When did that change? It didnt, stupid. Are you now claiming kinetic energy is the same as work? Nope. Do make up your mind. Havent changed it, ****wit. It seems to have done, Then you need to get your seems machinery seen to, BAD. and now you're in denial. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. |
#58
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:12:32 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. Shove your Philips Hue up your arse, but don't forget to pull your head out of it first, senile cretin! -- Bill Wright addressing senile Ozzie cretin Rot Speed: "Well you make up a lot of stuff and it's total ******** most of it." MID: |
#59
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:17:03 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: Irrelevant to the fact that with a Hue system, its done over wifi. Didn't someone just tell you to shove your Philips Hue up yours, or can't you do it because your senile head is up there all the time? BG -- Sqwertz to Rot Speed: "This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative asshole. MID: |
#60
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 04:59:26 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: Just to help the discussion along, that sentence is complete gibberish. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag. You KEEP bull****ting your way into your grave, you abnormal 85-year-old senile Ozzie pest! -- Richard addressing Rot Speed: "**** you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: |
#61
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! LOL
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 05:21:09 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: FLUSH senile stinking troll**** -- Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp addressing Rot Speed: "You really are a clueless pillock." MID: |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|