|
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E
A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the forest.... -- -- Jim K ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
After serious thinking Jim K wrote :
Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the forest.... It does look as if the tail is broken or bent to an odd angle, but they were supposed to have found a large item washed up on a beach somewhere. There is an odd pink colour of the foliage ahead of the aircraft nose. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Jim K Wrote in message:
Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the forest.... The satellite catching a plane in flight over the jungle seems the most likely thing -- Chris French |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message ... Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? That's not a 777-200ER And bits of the MH370 have been found in the southern indian ocean. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malays...#Marine_debris |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Harry Bloomfield wrote:
9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote :
Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
wrote: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance Google Earth Search for Russell Square London or this lat and long 51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010 Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap) https://ibb.co/e3QnR9 If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around 15km and still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the aircraft taking the image. P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square :) -- |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Andy Burns wrote : Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? https://thenextweb.com/google/2017/0...ne-mid-flight/ They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. ! |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On 08/10/2018 21:24, Andy Burns wrote:
Harry Bloomfield wrote: Andy Burns wrote : Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? https://thenextweb.com/google/2017/0...ne-mid-flight/ Chromatic aberration, indeed! I'm pleased they printed that correction. They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. ! |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message ... After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote : Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, Very likely in fact. There is no way that it could be MH370 given that even if it had landed there, it wouldn't have ended up so intact in that sort of jungle, and there would still be the track of the swath that the plane produced landing there even now. but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? Likely just an camera artefact given how far away it must be. They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. Fools abound given the known bits of MH370 found on the southern indian ocean. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
"The Other Mike" wrote in message ... On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield wrote: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance Google Earth Search for Russell Square London or this lat and long 51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010 Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap) https://ibb.co/e3QnR9 If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around 15km and still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the aircraft taking the image. P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square :) And when you go back to the previous image with his original coords, no plane, and its still well after MH370 went missing. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On 08/10/18 19:05, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? Prolly anaircraft flying under whatever shot te picture. Bits of MH370 have washed up. That isnt in te sea is it? -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On 08/10/2018 19:05, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? A plane about to land at Phuket airport. Photos taken from a satellite. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
In article , The Other Mike
scribeth thus On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield wrote: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance Google Earth Search for Russell Square London or this lat and long 51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010 Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap) https://ibb.co/e3QnR9 If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around 15km and still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the aircraft taking the image. P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square :) Theres a housing estate up at Huntingdon that has a Lancaster flying over it looks rather impressive, it was the battle of Britain one returning from a display somewhere... -- Tony Sayer |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:19:58 +0100, The Other Mike wrote:
P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square Schrodinger's aircraft? -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
in 1736056 20181008 211535 Harry Bloomfield wrote:
After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote : Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. Who is "they"? |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you
can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day. Brian -- ----- -- This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please Note this Signature is meaningless.! "Jim K" wrote in message o.uk... Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the forest.... -- -- Jim K ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On 9 Oct 2018 00:07:49 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:19:58 +0100, The Other Mike wrote: P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square Schrodinger's aircraft? I blame the cat for distracting me and random words just appearing on the page. I can't blame it for the typing as it was sat on the keyboard connected to the NAS at the time. -- |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
Brian Gaff wrote
You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day. They don’t do it often enough to catch something like that. "Jim K" wrote in message o.uk... Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message: Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370. Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration? Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the forest.... -- -- Jim K ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
"Bob Martin" wrote in message ... in 1736056 20181008 211535 Harry Bloomfield wrote: After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote : Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land intact, inside a forest. Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/ distorted? They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. Who is "they"? The fools that are too stupid to even use the clock icon with google earth and notice that it only shows a plane with one scan. |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 19:26:43 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day. They don¢t do it often enough to catch something like that. LOL Is this guy for real? He ALWAYS has to go one better! And I mean, ALWAYS! -- FredXX to Rot Speed: "You are still an idiot and an embarrassment to your country. No wonder we shippe the likes of you out of the British Isles. Perhaps stupidity and criminality is inherited after all?" Message-ID: |
Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 19:30:16 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again: They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a look. Who is "they"? The fools that are too stupid to even use the clock icon with google earth and notice that it only shows a plane with one scan. Here, senile one: https://thetravellingtiles.files.wor...b6f9820001.jpg -- Sqwertz to Rot Speed: "This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative asshole. MID: |
OT MH 370 is it, is it not?
On 09/10/2018 07:55, Brian Gaff wrote:
You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day. Brian Bill Bryson has an interesting example of something fairly large that went down some time ago in the Appalachian forests and has never been found. But I agree, there is more scanning these days. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter