Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?


Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the
forest....
--
--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

After serious thinking Jim K wrote :
Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the
forest....

It does look as if the tail is broken or bent to an odd angle, but they
were supposed to have found a large item washed up on a beach
somewhere. There is an odd pink colour of the foliage ahead of the
aircraft nose.

Jim K Wrote in message:
Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?


Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the
forest....

The satellite catching a plane in flight over the jungle seems the
most likely thing


--
Chris French

"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
news
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

That's not a 777-200ER

And bits of the MH370 have been found in the southern indian ocean.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malays...#Marine_debris

Harry Bloomfield wrote:

9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly
land intact, inside a forest.

After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote :
Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land
intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks
bent/ distorted?

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
wrote:

Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance

Google Earth

Search for Russell Square London

or this lat and long

51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W

Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010

Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap)

https://ibb.co/e3QnR9

If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around 15km and
still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the aircraft
taking the image.

P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square

--

Harry Bloomfield wrote:

Andy Burns wrote :

Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would
hardly land intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks
bent/ distorted?

https://thenextweb.com/google/2017/0...ne-mid-flight/

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

!

On 08/10/2018 21:24, Andy Burns wrote:
Harry Bloomfield wrote:

Andy Burns wrote :

Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would
hardly land intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks
bent/ distorted?

https://thenextweb.com/google/2017/0...ne-mid-flight/

Chromatic aberration, indeed! I'm pleased they printed that correction.






They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take
a look.

!

"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
news
After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote :
Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly
land intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely,

Very likely in fact. There is no way that it could be MH370
given that even if it had landed there, it wouldn't have
ended up so intact in that sort of jungle, and there would
still be the track of the swath that the plane produced
landing there even now.

but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks bent/
distorted?

Likely just an camera artefact given how far away it must be.

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

Fools abound given the known bits of MH370 found on the southern indian
ocean.

"The Other Mike" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
wrote:

Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance

Google Earth

Search for Russell Square London

or this lat and long

51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W

Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010

Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap)

https://ibb.co/e3QnR9

If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around
15km and
still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the
aircraft
taking the image.

P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square

And when you go back to the previous image with his original
coords, no plane, and its still well after MH370 went missing.

On 08/10/18 19:05, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?
Prolly anaircraft flying under whatever shot te picture.

Bits of MH370 have washed up.

That isnt in te sea is it?


--
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over
the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that
authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

Frédéric Bastiat

On 08/10/2018 19:05, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

A plane about to land at Phuket airport. Photos taken from a satellite.

In article , The Other Mike
scribeth thus
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:05:20 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
wrote:

Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?

It's definitely real and there are lots of them around. For instance

Google Earth

Search for Russell Square London

or this lat and long

51°31'18.04" N 0°07'32.34" W

Use the 'clock' icon to go back to the historic view from June 2010

Or just view the same google earth view here (jpg screen cap)

https://ibb.co/e3QnR9

If you declutter labels etc you can zoom out on Google Earth to around 15km and
still 'see' the aircraft giving some indication of the height of the aircraft
taking the image.

P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square


Theres a housing estate up at Huntingdon that has a Lancaster flying
over it looks rather impressive, it was the battle of Britain one
returning from a display somewhere...

--
Tony Sayer

On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:19:58 +0100, The Other Mike wrote:

P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square

Schrodinger's aircraft?

--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

in 1736056 20181008 211535 Harry Bloomfield wrote:
After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote :
Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly land
intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks
bent/ distorted?

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

Who is "they"?

You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you
can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated
earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day.
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Jim K" wrote in message
o.uk...
Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?


Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the
forest....
--
--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 9 Oct 2018 00:07:49 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:

On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:19:58 +0100, The Other Mike wrote:

P.S. The aircraft is and never was parked in the square

Schrodinger's aircraft?

I blame the cat for distracting me and random words just appearing on the page.
I can't blame it for the typing as it was sat on the keyboard connected to the
NAS at the time.
--

Brian Gaff wrote

You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age
you can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the
sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from
space every day.

They don’t do it often enough to catch something like that.

"Jim K" wrote in message
o.uk...
Harry Bloomfield Wrote in message:
Googleearth 9°09'20.0"N 98°33'10.0"E

A Briton suggests this might be the missing MH 370.

Is it a real aircraft or a Googleearth aberration?


Shurely some bits would have broken off when it crashed into the
forest....
--
--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

"Bob Martin" wrote in message
...
in 1736056 20181008 211535 Harry Bloomfield
wrote:
After serious thinking Andy Burns wrote :
Presume it's a real aircraft flying below the satellite, it would hardly
land
intact, inside a forest.

Ulikely, but.... I wonder what the pink is and why the fuselage looks
bent/ distorted?

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

Who is "they"?

The fools that are too stupid to even use the clock icon with google
earth and notice that it only shows a plane with one scan.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 19:26:43 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again:


You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age
you can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the
sophisticated earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from
space every day.

They don¢t do it often enough to catch something like that.

LOL Is this guy for real? He ALWAYS has to go one better! And I mean,
ALWAYS!

--
FredXX to Rot Speed:
"You are still an idiot and an embarrassment to your country. No wonder
we shippe the likes of you out of the British Isles. Perhaps stupidity
and criminality is inherited after all?"
Message-ID:

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 19:30:16 +1100, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again:

They are convinced enough to try to organise an helicopter to go take a
look.

Who is "they"?

The fools that are too stupid to even use the clock icon with google
earth and notice that it only shows a plane with one scan.

Here, senile one:
https://thetravellingtiles.files.wor...b6f9820001.jpg

--
Sqwertz to Rot Speed:
"This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative
asshole.
MID:

On 09/10/2018 07:55, Brian Gaff wrote:
You would have thought so. It is a worry though that in this day an age you
can lose a large aircraft for so long considering all the sophisticated
earth monitoring systems we have today looking down from space every day.
Brian

Bill Bryson has an interesting example of something fairly large that
went down some time ago in the Appalachian forests and has never been
found. But I agree, there is more scanning these days.