Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"parish" parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote in message ... Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. I wonder if B&Q will give the certificates away for free with new kitchens and bathrooms or if they'll stick true to form and sell you one on request ? :-)) --- www.basecuritysystems.no-ip.com Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/03 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
Andrew McKay wrote:
I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:21:07 +0000, parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com
wrote: Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. So all that would happen with this additional piece of pointless regulation is that people who want to wire themselves will continue to do so, and then one of two things will happen when it comes to sale time. a) seller will get an electrical inspection done and be able to produce certificate at his cost whereas now the buyer pays. b) people will apply for regularisation at the local authority. This costs typically 20% more than if a Building Notice had been requested in the first place. However, since there is no VAT on the regularisation fee, the difference in cost is minimal. Both of these will be technically breaking the law, but my estimation is that it will be as widespread as speeding. With any luck, the government will continue digging in the hole in which it finds itself and this won't make the statute books due to lack of priority. ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"parish" parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote in message ... BigWallop wrote: "parish" parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote in message ... Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. I wonder if B&Q will give the certificates away for free with new kitchens and bathrooms or if they'll stick true to form and sell you one on request ? :-)) LOL. Tell you what BW, the more of this **** that the Civil Service morons in Whitehall come up with the more appealing emigrating to rural France and restoring a derelict farmhouse becomes. ROFLMAO !!!! With my luck, B&Q would open a warehouse next door. --- www.basecuritysystems.no-ip.com Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/03 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 03:48:49 GMT, "BigWallop"
wrote: ROFLMAO !!!! With my luck, B&Q would open a warehouse next door. You do seem to have a fascination with B&Q - are you considering a new career as one of their ever-so-helpful-helpers? g,d&rvvf Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:10:47 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote: With any luck, the government will continue digging in the hole in which it finds itself and this won't make the statute books due to lack of priority. I think you will find this is scheduled to enter statute next April. It has been rumoured for a while, the sparkies I did my C&G2381 course with earlier this year knew all about it. What you have to realise is what is going on behind the scenes. These new regulations favour the big companies, who eventually will be the only ones able to furnish their sparkies with the necessary experience and certification requirements. The small one-man-band operators will be sacrificed because in true Labour style everyone really should be an employee of BigCo. Being an employee of BigCo means that you are on PAYE. And being on PAYE means it is very easy for the Inland Revenue to get at your tax. Plus of course Labour as a political party are deeply in debt. So there is probably some palm oiling going on behind the scenes here with BigCo's making donations. This is EXACTLY what is going on in the IT industry with some of the big players starving out the little guys. Example: An IT company such as EDS (they write the Inland Revenue IT systems which never work - e.g. child tax credit) charge out a warm body at a cost of about £1,000 per day. They pay the warm body £200 per day, pocketing £800 per day in profit - which is taken offshore. If the warm body were an IT contractor (as I was) then exactly the same person who subcontracted to EDS (e.g.) would charge the same client directly (without the EDS middle man) in the region of £300 per day - without offshoring. Much more profitable using the little guy who doesn't have all the overheads of BigCo. At the end of the day these sorts of stupid policies hurt the chancellor in ways he can't imagine. My income level used to be a guaranteed 60K per year (that's £300 per day, 200 days worked per year), which the chancellor gained lucrative amounts of tax on (up until last year I paid in tax what I will now receive as total renumeration). With the handyman business I'm likely to be earning more like 20K per year - because that's what I need to survive on, and if necessary I'll stay at home 2 days a week to make sure I don't pay the chancellor any more than he has to receive. Once I've got the loaves on the table to feed my family I couldn't give a toss about working any harder - it isn't worth it under Labour. Meanwhile Labour have (a) opened the floodgates with respect to giving visas to IT migrants and (b) promoted the offshoring of work to India and elsewhere. As a direct result of their own policies Labour are losing tax revenue hand over fist in the IT field, which is why Gordon is now finding inventive new ways of taxing the blue collar worker. Remember the good old days when Labour were going to get into power to tax the rich? One other thing that may have slipped past the jobbing handymen. Gordon Brown extended the reach of IR35 in this years budget to include nannies, butlers and others who are employed by other members of the public. That means that 95% of all income coming into your company from a client is supposed to be treated as personal salary, regardless of whether you decide to pay that to yourself or not: http://www.accountancyage.com/News/1133170 There weren't any blowing of trumpets with regard to this change, but from next April you can expect any Inland Revenue inspector to get a gleeful look in his eye should he inspect your books (the tax isn't due until next April). Someone mentioned on this thread about moving to France to do up an old farmhouse. Sounds like a jolly good idea to me! Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
Andy Hall wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:21:07 +0000, parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote: Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. So all that would happen with this additional piece of pointless regulation is that people who want to wire themselves will continue to do so, and then one of two things will happen when it comes to sale time. a) seller will get an electrical inspection done and be able to produce certificate at his cost whereas now the buyer pays. b) people will apply for regularisation at the local authority. This costs typically 20% more than if a Building Notice had been requested in the first place. However, since there is no VAT on the regularisation fee, the difference in cost is minimal. Both of these will be technically breaking the law, but my estimation is that it will be as widespread as speeding. With any luck, the government will continue digging in the hole in which it finds itself and this won't make the statute books due to lack of priority. All this sounds bad but in practice won't alter anything. The crunch for me would come if small works certificates for domestic stuff are needed and/or professional work could only be done by registered people. In which case I'll be a couple of grand down (test equipment, exams , subscriptions) untilI've recouped the cost on the bills wry smile. Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
If I wanted to be really paranoid, I would wonder whether the proposed colour changes for fixed wiring cores (from red/black to brown/blue etc), were perhaps intended to coincide with the proposed regulations which will make DIY wiring difficult/illegal. This way it will be difficult to claim that that new ring main spur has been in place for at least five years "long before the new regulations came in guv!". Perhaps we should all be laying in stocks of T&E in the current colours? Charles F |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
Ed Sirett wrote:
The crunch for me would come if small works certificates for domestic stuff are needed and/or professional work could only be done by registered people. In which case I'll be a couple of grand down (test equipment, exams , subscriptions) untilI've recouped the cost on the bills wry smile. I always wonder what qualifications will be required for certificating installations. I don't have any specific 'trade' type qualifications but I am a C.Eng. and Eur.Ing. (with my original degree in Electrical Engineering). It probably turns out that I'm allowed to set and examine the 'trade' qualifications but I'm not allowed to do it. -- Chris Green ) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Ed Sirett" wrote in message
... Andy Hall wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:21:07 +0000, parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote: Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. So all that would happen with this additional piece of pointless regulation is that people who want to wire themselves will continue to do so, and then one of two things will happen when it comes to sale time. a) seller will get an electrical inspection done and be able to produce certificate at his cost whereas now the buyer pays. b) people will apply for regularisation at the local authority. This costs typically 20% more than if a Building Notice had been requested in the first place. However, since there is no VAT on the regularisation fee, the difference in cost is minimal. Both of these will be technically breaking the law, but my estimation is that it will be as widespread as speeding. With any luck, the government will continue digging in the hole in which it finds itself and this won't make the statute books due to lack of priority. All this sounds bad but in practice won't alter anything. The crunch for me would come if small works certificates for domestic stuff are needed and/or professional work could only be done by registered people. In which case I'll be a couple of grand down (test equipment, exams , subscriptions) untilI've recouped the cost on the bills wry smile. Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html And that's about it - the cost of (legal) electrical work will surely go up as a result of a restricted supply (as if it's easy to get decent sparks at the moment!) due to barriers to entry and higher operating costs. This will make it less likely that electrical maintenance work will actually be done, and that DIY work that is allowed will probably stray into the bounds of less safe practise as a result of the regulations (e.g. simply extending a ring from an old fused CU rather than a nice new ring on a new split CU). I suspect that the situation will actually worsen as a result of this. Of course, if you're sat in your Islington house, a government residence, or a rented London flat whilst you're creating these rules and regs, none of this cost stuff has any relevance to you at all, and you'd never dream of lifting a screwdriver and doing it yourself. Talk about detatched from reality - this lot make the Tories seem down to earth... As for the poster that suspected that 90% of the accidents that did happen were due to DIY work on FIXED electrical installations - I'd defy you to produce any evidence to back that up. Even the cost/benefit in the proposal was very vague in this area - neatly ignoring that glaring question completely. Ban non-licensed use of ladders - that'll save some lives. Time for more action methinks. Emailing MP and opposition members today...... cheers Richard -- Richard Sampson email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
So does this make it illegal to do your own electrics or not, forgetting the
problem of selling your house. John "northern_relayer" wrote in message om... extracted from: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN...n_id=2003_0133 page/announcement dated 15 July 2003 --------------------- Tough, new controls on electrical work in the home will reduce deaths, injuries and fires caused by defective installations and save the economy an estimated £93m over ten years, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister announced today. CRACKDOWN ON DANGEROUS ELECTRICAL WORK SUPPORTS GOVERNMENT'S FIRE PREVENTION AGENDA Tough, new controls on electrical work in the home will ....... NB the word 'tough' The Government wants to curb the rising number of electrical accidents and fires in the home by bringing electrical safety within the scope of the building regulations for the first time. But the success of the new controls, which could come into force by next spring 2004, depends on the electrical industry coming forward with trade certification schemes to test the competence of installers. ........ .....Government, ......... now wants national safety standards reinforced by redefining work on fixed electrical installations in the home as building work to bring them within the control of building regulations........... Notes to Editors 1. These regulatory proposals have been developed in response to the Construction Industry Deregulation O Orwell! Thine spirit lives! Task Force’s 1995 report which recommended amongst other things that the Building Regulations should address electrical safety ............ 2. The current Building Regulations for England & Wales (2000) do not address the safety of fixed electrical systems in buildings. For the purposes of Building Regulations a fixed electrical system means those parts of the wiring and appliances that are fixed to the building fabric e.g. sockets, switches, fuse-boxes, immersion heaters and ceiling fittings............. 8. Regulations are considered necessary to bolster the existing voluntary schemes because: Existing voluntary schemes have attracted less than one quarter of electrical Large numbers of jobbing electricians and the DIY market are beyond the reach of voluntary controls NB last line - it is aimed at us! 10. The Building Regulations 2000: Proposals for amending Schedule 1 to introduce electrical safety requirements is available on the DTLR website northern relayer |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Andrew McKay" wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 03:48:49 GMT, "BigWallop" wrote: ROFLMAO !!!! With my luck, B&Q would open a warehouse next door. You do seem to have a fascination with B&Q - are you considering a new career as one of their ever-so-helpful-helpers? g,d&rvvf Andrew I just can't stand the places and I think they should invest in some people that know what the job is like from the inside. They're actually getting just as bad as my local wholesalers. :-)) --- www.basecuritysystems.no-ip.com Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/03 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:58:02 GMT, "Charles Fearnley"
wrote: Perhaps we should all be laying in stocks of T&E in the current colours? I was pondering that very topic earlier today, as I've got a few reels of the old colour knocking around (seems to me I used to buy a new reel each time I went in a shed.....). Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"RichardS" noaccess@invalid wrote in message . .. "Ed Sirett" wrote in message ... Andy Hall wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:21:07 +0000, parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote: Andrew McKay wrote: I don't somehow see Joe Public taking the slightest bit of notice. If I understand the proposals correctly the problem for DIYers is that it means you will have to produce a certificate or something (like the FENSA cert. for replacement windows) when you sell your house and, if you don't, lay yourself open to compensation claims after the event. So all that would happen with this additional piece of pointless regulation is that people who want to wire themselves will continue to do so, and then one of two things will happen when it comes to sale time. a) seller will get an electrical inspection done and be able to produce certificate at his cost whereas now the buyer pays. b) people will apply for regularisation at the local authority. This costs typically 20% more than if a Building Notice had been requested in the first place. However, since there is no VAT on the regularisation fee, the difference in cost is minimal. Both of these will be technically breaking the law, but my estimation is that it will be as widespread as speeding. With any luck, the government will continue digging in the hole in which it finds itself and this won't make the statute books due to lack of priority. All this sounds bad but in practice won't alter anything. The crunch for me would come if small works certificates for domestic stuff are needed and/or professional work could only be done by registered people. In which case I'll be a couple of grand down (test equipment, exams , subscriptions) untilI've recouped the cost on the bills wry smile. Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html And that's about it - the cost of (legal) electrical work will surely go up as a result of a restricted supply (as if it's easy to get decent sparks at the moment!) due to barriers to entry and higher operating costs. This will make it less likely that electrical maintenance work will actually be done, and that DIY work that is allowed will probably stray into the bounds of less safe practise as a result of the regulations (e.g. simply extending a ring from an old fused CU rather than a nice new ring on a new split CU). I suspect that the situation will actually worsen as a result of this. No "decent spark" would leave an installation without testing it to the required standard anyway. The legislation for this already exists. Guidance note 3 to BS 7671. The work you describe would require a full electrical inspestion certificate which would only be valid if a "schedule of test results" along with a "schedule of inspections" were to be appended to it. The written part of this exam is "closed book" with a nationwide practical exam to complete if you are succesful in the written part. The written part really is written this time as distinct from BS 7671 which is "open book" and multiple choice. Of course, if you're sat in your Islington house, a government residence, or a rented London flat whilst you're creating these rules and regs, none of this cost stuff has any relevance to you at all, and you'd never dream of lifting a screwdriver and doing it yourself. Talk about detatched from reality - this lot make the Tories seem down to earth... As for the poster that suspected that 90% of the accidents that did happen were due to DIY work on FIXED electrical installations - I'd defy you to produce any evidence to back that up. Even the cost/benefit in the proposal was very vague in this area - neatly ignoring that glaring question completely. Ban non-licensed use of ladders - that'll save some lives. Time for more action methinks. Emailing MP and opposition members today...... cheers Richard -- Richard Sampson email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"impvan" wrote in message m... The olny time I can see the new rules helping is for the 'whole job' kind of kitchen fitters, where the joiner/plumber does the electrics, so they can claim to offer 'a complete service'.......and I've seen some right horrors here - worse than DIY. Of course if the electrical work is a part of other work coming within the scope of building control (eg extension or loft conversion) this may be included (at a marginal cost) with the building control application and anyone can then do the work. It will then be the responsibility of building control to certify the work. It will be interesting to see what they do. They are unlikely to have the necessary "in house" skills, so will presumably employ an electrician for the task. Will they have problems finding someone within the required timescales, at the rates they will be prepared to pay? Will the person employed be motivated to properly check the work - or will they just regard it as a burocratic form filling exercise to be completed as quickly as possible? It would be interesting to know what currently happens when someone deposits a building control notice for a controlled fuel burning appliance. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 11/07/2003 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
Andrew McKay wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:58:02 GMT, "Charles Fearnley" wrote: Perhaps we should all be laying in stocks of T&E in the current colours? I was pondering that very topic earlier today, as I've got a few reels of the old colour knocking around (seems to me I used to buy a new reel each time I went in a shed.....). Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk If fixed electrical works can only be carried out by certificated people, what will the impact be on the sheds/lighting shops etc.? Would they continue to sell light fittings, swiches, cable, trunking etc in the knowledge that they were being sold to people who couldn't use them? Or are we heading to a position where these things will only be available for purchase via an electrician? Of course cable etc will be available from e.g., France - perhaps P&O will offer day trips to sheds in France from where you can smuggle in some cable. I can just hear the customs now "is that a flourescent light fitting I can see or are you just pleased to see me?" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:11:17 +0100, "James"
wrote: Of course if the electrical work is a part of other work coming within the scope of building control (eg extension or loft conversion) this may be included (at a marginal cost) with the building control application and anyone can then do the work. It will then be the responsibility of building control to certify the work. It will be interesting to see what they do. They are unlikely to have the necessary "in house" skills, so will presumably employ an electrician for the task. Will they have problems finding someone within the required timescales, at the rates they will be prepared to pay? Will the person employed be motivated to properly check the work - or will they just regard it as a burocratic form filling exercise to be completed as quickly as possible? It would be interesting to know what currently happens when someone deposits a building control notice for a controlled fuel burning appliance. Precisely. I can see the smart move becoming accumulating a number of DIY activities over a period of time, and submitting a building notice for them. This of course, is not what the government intends. The series of legislation and the stated policy in a number of building areas is to steer people to using professionals from trade associations. The real motivation for that, one can theorise about. If people were to start submitting building notices for these areas which have been "subcontracted" out of BC expertise on a wide scale, then it would cause considerable problems of expertise and funding and hopefully there would start to be complaints to central government (not that that would do anything). Regarding availability of materials, do I think that electrical fittings would disappear from the shelves of B&Q? Not really, although they may scale it down a bit. At least it would mean that the intrusive "helpers" that they have who come and poke their noses into what you are buying would be redeployed. If you think about it, B&Q still sells gas fittings, fires and windows. In the studies relating to gas safety run by the HSE, limiting availability of materials to trade outlets and selling only to card carrying professionals was discussed. Very few "stakeholders" thought it was a good idea or even practical. On this one, because it has been common practice forever for people to do their own electrical work, if legislation were to be introduced I think that it would, quite rightly, be largely ignored. ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Andy Hall" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:11:17 +0100, "James" wrote: Regarding availability of materials, do I think that electrical fittings would disappear from the shelves of B&Q? Not really, although they may scale it down a bit. At least it would mean that the intrusive "helpers" that they have who come and poke their noses into what you are buying would be redeployed. If you think about it, B&Q still sells gas fittings, fires and windows. .andy A couple of years ago when I was refitting the kitchen the local B&Q didn't have any gas fittings (plenty of fires / boilers etc.). The assistant I spoke to said it was because of the "regulations". Went last week for some bits for the bathroom and lo and behold all the gas fittings had re-appeared! Perhaps they found out that people still wanted to buy these bits to make interesting wall hangings or something? Richard |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Frisket" wrote in message
... "Andy Hall" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:11:17 +0100, "James" wrote: Regarding availability of materials, do I think that electrical fittings would disappear from the shelves of B&Q? Not really, although they may scale it down a bit. At least it would mean that the intrusive "helpers" that they have who come and poke their noses into what you are buying would be redeployed. If you think about it, B&Q still sells gas fittings, fires and windows. .andy A couple of years ago when I was refitting the kitchen the local B&Q didn't have any gas fittings (plenty of fires / boilers etc.). The assistant I spoke to said it was because of the "regulations". Went last week for some bits for the bathroom and lo and behold all the gas fittings had re-appeared! Perhaps they found out that people still wanted to buy these bits to make interesting wall hangings or something? Richard IME there are two reasons that assistants, assistant managers and managers always give for not providing customer service: 1) Regulations 2) Insurance Officious application of (1) once prevented me from taking safety razors on board a SleazyJet flight, even though said items had been bought air-side at Heathrow T4 the week before (and well after US attacks). (2) prevented me from being able to get a long board cut down at one of the sheds so that it would fit in the car. They wouldn't lend me one of their saws, and wouldn't even let me cut it in the car park if I bought a cheap saw. I got a refund immediately, and the next day was allowed to do exactly what I wanted to do at a local timber yard. My local electrical warehouse say they're not unduly worried about the effects of the new regs, and will continue to sell anything to anyone unless they are specifically prohibited from doing so by law. cheers Richard -- Richard Sampson email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"RichardS" noaccess@invalid wrote in message .. . (2) prevented me from being able to get a long board cut down at one of the sheds so that it would fit in the car. They wouldn't lend me one of their saws, and wouldn't even let me cut it in the car park if I bought a cheap saw. How were they going to manage that? Bigger saw? More saws? I don't believe there would be enough hands in the shed. Couldn't you relocate to the next store's parking area? And if the worst came to the worst it would still need to be cut down to fit in the police car. Otherwise no evidence. Alan |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Alan James" wrote in message
... "RichardS" noaccess@invalid wrote in message .. . (2) prevented me from being able to get a long board cut down at one of the sheds so that it would fit in the car. They wouldn't lend me one of their saws, and wouldn't even let me cut it in the car park if I bought a cheap saw. How were they going to manage that? Bigger saw? More saws? I don't believe there would be enough hands in the shed. Couldn't you relocate to the next store's parking area? And if the worst came to the worst it would still need to be cut down to fit in the police car. Otherwise no evidence. Alan perhaps I wasn't too clear in that sentence. Couple of years ago bought a long board. got out to car park, discovered couldn't fit it in car. went back in store... Me: "Is there anyone that can cut this down for me?" Them: "no - insurance and health & safety". Me: "can I borrow a saw and cut it myself?" Them: "no - insurance and health & safety". Me: "ok, I'll buy a cheap saw and cut it myself in the car park." Them: "no - insurance and health & safety". Me: "here's the board back. I'll have a refund please." quite frankly the officious person that I was arguing with would have probably followed me out if I'd bought a saw. However, I wasn't about to waste time, expense and effort in finding out at the time. cheers Richard -- Richard Sampson email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On 23 Jul 2003 13:36:22 -0700,
(northern_relayer) wrote: extracted from: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN...n_id=2003_0133 For what it's worth I printed that web document and have just written to my MP, making a few salient points about the probabilities relating to electrical casualties which take place: * Consumers who insist on using adaptors, allowing multiple appliances to be plugged into a single socket, thus overloading the circuit. * Damaged or badly maintained appliance cabling. * Consumers who jury-rig their electrical installations without having a clue nor caring about 'the wiring regulations'. * Consumers who use improperly protected or unsuitable equipment in the garden. I made several other points as well, for good measure offering the following: * The chancellor is going to be pleased to find that I can no longer pay as much tax to him, due to being prevented from working on simple electrical enhancements (add a new light fitting, add a spur, etc). * Consumers are going to have to wait a lot longer to get hold of an electrician. * Consumers are going to have to pay a lot more in order to take advantage of this charter for registered electricians to charge more. I would encourage others to write to their MP. It will almost certainly achieve very little, but like a trained dog the more times an MP hears something the more obedient he becomes towards sorting something out. Don't forget that MP's aren't persuaded so much by the quality of the mail they receive, but by the weight of the postal sack containing the same message over and over again. Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
"Andrew McKay" wrote :
For what it's worth I printed that web document and have just written to my MP, making a few salient points about the probabilities relating to electrical casualties which take place: * Consumers who insist on using adaptors, allowing multiple appliances to be plugged into a single socket, thus overloading the circuit. Only if they make "trees" with unfused 2-way adaptors. All three-ways (since I can remember) and trailing gangs are protected by a 13A max fuse. * Damaged or badly maintained appliance cabling. * Consumers who jury-rig their electrical installations without having a clue nor caring about 'the wiring regulations'. * Consumers who use improperly protected or unsuitable equipment in the garden. This regs change won't make a blind bit of difference to that. In fact, it could exacerbate the problem as (as I read the proposal) DIYers are specifically prohibited from circuit modifications that involve RCDs or similar protective devices. This prohibits a DIYer from adding an RCD-protected spur to a non-RCD downstairs ring feeding an external socket with the purpose of discouraging outside use of non-protected inside sockets. I made several other points as well, for good measure offering the following: * The chancellor is going to be pleased to find that I can no longer pay as much tax to him, due to being prevented from working on simple electrical enhancements (add a new light fitting, add a spur, etc). Eh? Don't quite follow the logic or relevance here. You'll still be able to add new sockets and spurs to the ring, and you'll still be able to change/add light fittings. If you have to pay a spark to do this then your payment to him/her will come out of already taxed income. The spark will have to pay tax on the profits of this work, so the Chancellor will probably be quids in. Oh, and if you have to go to a larger firm (as a result of the certification requirements & expense) then you'll be paying VAT on the transaction as well. * Consumers are going to have to wait a lot longer to get hold of an electrician. * Consumers are going to have to pay a lot more in order to take advantage of this charter for registered electricians to charge more. I would encourage others to write to their MP. It will almost certainly achieve very little, but like a trained dog the more times an MP hears something the more obedient he becomes towards sorting something out. Don't forget that MP's aren't persuaded so much by the quality of the mail they receive, but by the weight of the postal sack containing the same message over and over again. Andrew However, glad you've written to your MP though. cheers Richard -- Richard Sampson email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
In article ,
Andrew McKay writes: I would encourage others to write to their MP. It will almost certainly achieve very little, but like a trained dog the more times an MP hears something the more obedient he becomes towards sorting something out. Don't forget that MP's aren't persuaded so much by the quality of the mail they receive, but by the weight of the postal sack containing the same message over and over again. I wrote to mine again a couple of days ago. (I wrote originally during the consultation last year.) -- Andrew Gabriel |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
In article , Parish
wrote: Good question. I believe that DIY electrical work is already banned in Scotland (can anyone confirm this?). So what has been the impact on the sheds up there? I don't know the details but AIUI you have to be a card carrying electrician to work on fixed wiring in Australia. IIRC there are two grades: one can do all the roughing in of cables, but only the higher grade is allowed to do the terminating at fittings. The reality is that there are people out there (both DIY and 'professional') who should not be let anywhere near electrics but this does all look like sledgehammers to crack nuts. If it is really thought that there are lurking hazards it would make more sense to insist on a safety test when a property is sold. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk Free SEDBUK boiler database browser http://www.sda.co.uk/qsedbuk.htm |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
In article ,
parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com writes: Good question. I believe that DIY electrical work is already banned in Scotland (can anyone confirm this?). So what has been the impact on the sheds up there? Not unless they've changed it recently. They did what we should have done -- brought it under building control so BS7671 becomes mandatory, but not imposed all the stupid paperwork and cost overheads. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
RichardS wrote:
(2) prevented me from being able to get a long board cut down at one of the sheds so that it would fit in the car. They wouldn't lend me one of their saws, and wouldn't even let me cut it in the car park if I bought a cheap saw. I got a refund immediately, and the next day was allowed to do exactly what I wanted to do at a local timber yard. Like those hand-pumped hydraulic shears they have for cutting chain. The blades are surrounded by a perspex shield (so you can only just get the chain in) and a big sign saying that it is a dangerous machine and it is only to be operated by staff. When I wanted some chain I couldn't see any staff around (no surprise there) so set about doing it myself. A memeber of staff appeared then (how do they do that?) and told me I couldn't do it myself (so why are they called DIY stores?). I pointed out that I have setup 100-ton power presses and 3-metre long shears capable of cutting 6mm plate so I reckon I can handle these glorified tin-snips. But no, he had to do it. OK then. Could he work out how to use the machine? Could he fck. Whilst he went off to find someone who knew, I did it myself and by the time he returned I was at the checkout. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
Donald MacLennan wrote:
No "decent spark" would leave an installation without testing it to the required standard anyway. The legislation for this already exists. Guidance note 3 to BS 7671. The work you describe would require a full electrical inspestion certificate which would only be valid if a "schedule of test results" along with a "schedule of inspections" were to be appended to it. I already have and use test equipment. I would have to purchase certified/calibrated equipment were I requird to fill in certificates. -- Ed Sirett - Property maintainer and registered gas fitter. The FAQ for uk.diy is at www.diyfaq.org.uk Gas fitting FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/GasFitting.html Sealed CH FAQ http://www.makewrite.demon.co.uk/SealedCH.html |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:44:17 +0100, Tony Bryer
wrote: I don't know the details but AIUI you have to be a card carrying electrician to work on fixed wiring in Australia. That is correct. When I attended the C&G2381 certification course a short time ago there was an electrician (cum gas fitter and any other skilled trade you can think of....) who had just returned from living and working in Australia (personally I feel the guy must either be barmy, or Aus is a lot worse than it is made out to be....) where he practiced as an electrician. He said it is mandatory that anyone who works on electrical installation is an approved contractor. Andrew Do you need a handyman service? Check out our web site at http://www.handymac.co.uk |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P)
From the chaotic regions of the Cryptosphere, Andrew McKay
wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:29:38 +0100: On 23 Jul 2003 13:36:22 -0700, (northern_relayer) wrote: extracted from: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN...n_id=2003_0133 Thanks for drawing attention to this, it has been expected for a while. I notice the link at the bottom of the page to the DTLR web site doesn't work. The consultation paper is at http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/grou...hcst?n=173&l=2 or http://makeashorterlink.com/?L1F832565 -- Hugo Nebula "You know, I'd rather see this on TV, Tones it down" - Laurie Anderson |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P))
From the chaotic regions of the Cryptosphere, parish
parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote on Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:43:04 +0000: Good question. I believe that DIY electrical work is already banned in Scotland (can anyone confirm this?). So what has been the impact on the sheds up there? Are there any Scottish BCOs in this group (even if you're lurking)? There are a number of Eng&W BCOs here, but it would be useful to get an insight into how the Scottish system of control differs. This IS a UK group after all. -- Hugo Nebula "You know, I'd rather see this on TV, Tones it down" - Laurie Anderson |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P))
"Hugo Nebula" Send-My-Spam-To: abuse@localhost wrote in message ... From the chaotic regions of the Cryptosphere, parish parish_AT_ntlworld.com wrote on Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:43:04 +0000: Good question. I believe that DIY electrical work is already banned in Scotland (can anyone confirm this?). So what has been the impact on the sheds up there? Are there any Scottish BCOs in this group (even if you're lurking)? There are a number of Eng&W BCOs here, but it would be useful to get an insight into how the Scottish system of control differs. This IS a UK group after all. Hugo Nebula The BCO's I've met up here are just ordinary guys who know the jobs and let you do yours. I find them pretty consistent with the methods of regulation and what they'll let you get away with. They also seem to be on the same page as to what needs and has to be done before they'll let the job through to the next stage. Yes, all in all, I find them easy to work with on all our projects. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations onelectrical work (Part P))
BigWallop wrote re Scottish BCOs:
The BCO's I've met up here are just ordinary guys who know the jobs and let you do yours. I find them pretty consistent with the methods of regulation and what they'll let you get away with. They also seem to be on the same page as to what needs and has to be done before they'll let the job through to the next stage. Yes, all in all, I find them easy to work with on all our projects. Would you know anything about BCOs in Sutherland? We're considering some major work. Sheila |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P))
From the chaotic regions of the Cryptosphere, "BigWallop"
wrote on Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:20:55 GMT: The BCO's I've met up here are just ordinary guys who know the jobs and let you do yours. I find them pretty consistent with the methods of regulation and what they'll let you get away with. They also seem to be on the same page as to what needs and has to be done before they'll let the job through to the next stage. Yes, all in all, I find them easy to work with on all our projects. I'm sure that Scottish BCOs are as professional as their Southern colleagues, that they have a similar proportion of good-guys vs. cowboys, etc., and know the ins-and-outs of the Scottish Building Act & Regulations. It's just that they differ from the Building Act and Building Regulations in England & Wales. AFAIK, they don't have Approved Inspectors or Building Notices; building work can't start until a Warrant has been issued; and (the thing that sparked it off in my mind (no pun intended)), they have some regulations relating to electrical installations. From the perspective of an English BCO, these things are foreign, so I was wondering if any Scottish BCOs would like to chip in with how such matters work North of the border. -- Hugo Nebula "You know, I'd rather see this on TV, Tones it down" - Laurie Anderson |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P))
In article ,
Hugo Nebula Send-My-Spam-To: abuse@localhost writes: I'm sure that Scottish BCOs are as professional as their Southern colleagues, that they have a similar proportion of good-guys vs. cowboys, etc., and know the ins-and-outs of the Scottish Building Act & Regulations. It's just that they differ from the Building Act and Building Regulations in England & Wales. AFAIK, they don't have Approved Inspectors or Building Notices; building work can't start until a Warrant has been issued; and (the thing that sparked it off in my mind (no pun intended)), they have some regulations relating to electrical installations. From the perspective of an English BCO, these things are foreign, so I was wondering if any Scottish BCOs would like to chip in with how such matters work North of the border. I can tell you how it worked for someone I know who does work there. BS7671 is called up by the building regs and therefore all electrical work must conform to it. However, there is no requirement to notify BCO's of any electrical work, and no requirement for them or anyone else to inspect it, although they may inspect it if they want to. Typically, it gets inspected by the BCO if it's part of a job where other things are being inspected, i.e. part of some construction work, and not otherwise. If the work was done by an electrical company, the BCO will usually just ask for the completion certificate, and if it was DIY, the BCO will check it themselves, but they can't demand that you get it check/tested by someone else. I don't know how well that agrees with what's supposed to happen, but I'm told this is what happens in practice. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Any Scottish BCOs here? (was Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P))
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Building Warrants - Buying Flat Without | UK diy | |||
Central Heating Install: Building Control system/procedures etc | UK diy |