Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
In the loft/come shack I spotted a radio controlled clock I had bought
maybe a decade before - so I thought slap some batteries in and try it. I think it was an Aldi/Lidl purchase, most likely Aldi.... It made several attempts to receive the time data, but consistently failed downstairs. On moving it to a better reception position upstairs, it again made several attempts, but must have got some reception, because several times it at least showed seconds in the display, then eventually got a full data set and displayed an 'S'. I'm wondering if it might be trying to receive the German time signal, hence the troubles syncing itself? MSF is usually easy to receive here. There is no name on it, a reset hole in the rear, a very large LCD digit display, display the temperature C or F, the moons phase, day/month day. It has four buttons on the front - Set time, up, down and a C/F button. It can be wall hung or a fold out metal bracket allows it to stand on a desk. It has a switch on the rear CET / UK. CET makes it one hour fast and 24 hour clock, UK makes it show UK time, but am/pm 12 hour. I think that lack of UK with 24 hour format was why it got forgotten. I wonder if anyone might recognise it. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:42:03 +0100, Harry Bloomfield
wrote: In the loft/come shack I spotted a radio controlled clock I had bought maybe a decade before - so I thought slap some batteries in and try it. I think it was an Aldi/Lidl purchase, most likely Aldi.... It made several attempts to receive the time data, but consistently failed downstairs. On moving it to a better reception position upstairs, it again made several attempts, but must have got some reception, because several times it at least showed seconds in the display, then eventually got a full data set and displayed an 'S'. I'm wondering if it might be trying to receive the German time signal, hence the troubles syncing itself? MSF is usually easy to receive here. There is no name on it, a reset hole in the rear, a very large LCD digit display, display the temperature C or F, the moons phase, day/month day. It has four buttons on the front - Set time, up, down and a C/F button. It can be wall hung or a fold out metal bracket allows it to stand on a desk. It has a switch on the rear CET / UK. CET makes it one hour fast and 24 hour clock, UK makes it show UK time, but am/pm 12 hour. I think that lack of UK with 24 hour format was why it got forgotten. I wonder if anyone might recognise it. Lidl and Aldi ones are always tuned to DCF77 in my experience. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
"Chris Hogg" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:28:05 +0100, Graham. wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:42:03 +0100, Harry Bloomfield wrote: In the loft/come shack I spotted a radio controlled clock I had bought maybe a decade before - so I thought slap some batteries in and try it. I think it was an Aldi/Lidl purchase, most likely Aldi.... Lidl and Aldi ones are always tuned to DCF77 in my experience. When we've left the EU, will they still be allowed to receive the Frankfurt time signal? :-) Corse not, Merkel is furiously working out how to make them all implode spectacularly. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:53:22 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? The DAB clock display should be accurate as it uses a separate data stream. However, while some receivers show accurate time others appear to be out by a fixed amount which can be 5-10 seconds adrift. The separate GMT audio hour "pips" are not accurate on DAB as the processing delay can be 2-8 seconds. The radio controlled clock will synchronise with the time reference (DCF or MSF) once or twice a day, usually at midday/midnight plus or minus 1 hour. In between these times it relies upon its own internal clock but shouldn't be out by more than a fraction of a second. PC internal clocks are (by timekeeping standards) very inaccurate. PC clock can drift by seconds a day. Modern versions of windows can synchronise with a time server but by default only do it once a week. (You can't easily alter this either) so can be out by 10's of seconds. Using the free Meinberg NNTP software https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/sw/ntp.htm you can alter the synchronisation interval to any time. Time shown on any GPS device will usually be accurate. So who is right comes down to GPS - always, Radio Controlled clock - usually to within less than a second, DAB - display - may gave fixed error, audio time signals always several seconds out. PC with standard synchronisation, very poor. With Meinberg NNTP and very short re-synch interval - pretty accurate. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:53:22 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: Who is right? Forgot to say you can check your Mac/PC clock against a time server by going to Time.is (no www or anything else - just Time.is in a browser address bar). |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
"Peter Parry" wrote in message ... On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:53:22 +0100, "Brian Gaff" wrote: However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? The DAB clock display should be accurate as it uses a separate data stream. However, while some receivers show accurate time others appear to be out by a fixed amount which can be 5-10 seconds adrift. The separate GMT audio hour "pips" are not accurate on DAB as the processing delay can be 2-8 seconds. The radio controlled clock will synchronise with the time reference (DCF or MSF) once or twice a day, usually at midday/midnight plus or minus 1 hour. In between these times it relies upon its own internal clock but shouldn't be out by more than a fraction of a second. PC internal clocks are (by timekeeping standards) very inaccurate. PC clock can drift by seconds a day. Modern versions of windows can synchronise with a time server but by default only do it once a week. (You can't easily alter this either) You can actually. so can be out by 10's of seconds. Using the free Meinberg NNTP software https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/sw/ntp.htm you can alter the synchronisation interval to any time. Time shown on any GPS device will usually be accurate. So who is right comes down to GPS - always, Radio Controlled clock - usually to within less than a second, DAB - display - may gave fixed error, audio time signals always several seconds out. PC with standard synchronisation, very poor. With Meinberg NNTP and very short re-synch interval - pretty accurate. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
In article ,
Graham. wrote: Lidl and Aldi ones are always tuned to DCF77 in my experience. Central European time isn't much use in the UK. Lidl did once sell a clock set to that which couldn't be adjusted to BST, etc, though. But only once that I know of. -- *It IS as bad as you think, and they ARE out to get you. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 20:15:53 +1000, MKF wrote:
PC internal clocks are (by timekeeping standards) very inaccurate. PC clock can drift by seconds a day. Modern versions of windows can synchronise with a time server but by default only do it once a week. (You can't easily alter this either) You can actually. so can be out by 10's of seconds. Using the free Meinberg NNTP software https://www.meinbergglobal.com/english/sw/ntp.htm you can alter the synchronisation interval to any time. I think you mean NTP, not NNTP! Yes, I use the Meinberg stuff and have for a long time. I run my own stratum 3 NTP servers anyway. -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Graham. wrote: Lidl and Aldi ones are always tuned to DCF77 in my experience. Central European time isn't much use in the UK. Lidl did once sell a clock set to that which couldn't be adjusted to BST, etc, though. But only once that I know of. I bought one from Lidl which could be adjusted and our Village Hall has a clock using a DCF receiver for the correct time. It's going to be fun if we move our summer time dates away from the EU ones ;-) -- from KT24 in Surrey, England |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Chris Hogg a écrit :
Apparently not. Mine's reading BST ATM, and a little 'S' comes up on the display to distinguish when it's showing BST from GMT. The change is automatic, with no input from me. I presume they're made and set up for the UK market. Frankfurt time is currently 1 hour ahead of BST. Perhaps the S on mine means BST then, rather than the in Sync which I assumed. MSF sends GMT, but an extra bit indicates whether it is currently GMT or BST. I have not explored the German data, but no reason why it would be any different and from that the clock can work out the correct UK offset. I thought that maybe the CET/UK switch on the rear, might switch it from MSF to Frankfurt reception. It obviously doesn't, because the displayed time changes instantly rather than taking a while to grab fresh data. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Brian Gaff a écrit :
Chuckle. I do hope so. However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? I also have a phone which every so often moves an hour backwards for no apparent reason. My (RC) watch, RC clocks, phone and computers time are always in sync, unless they have failed to for some reason to sync for several days. Your PC does need to be running, when it decides it ought to grab fresh data from a time server - the default is once per day, but you can adjust that to as frequent as 10minutes or so with a little utility. Your PC runs tests to determine the network delays to the time server, then works out how to offset to get an accurate time. Your phone may need a setting to be made, to allow it it sync via the cell network. Between resyncs, they all rely upon a crystal controlled timebase to keep the clock accurate, though some can be of quite poor accuracy. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
On 22 Jul 2016 10:49:45 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:
I think you mean NTP, not NNTP! Indeed, I blame the cat on the keyboard. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
In article ,
Brian Gaff wrote: However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? Any digitally based transmission system has latency. Each time the signal is processed it is delayed - even slightly. DAB is a particularly bad offender - perhaps through using early technology. A radio controlled clock should be pretty accurate at the time of synchronisation. If the server is. I'd say. -- *When blondes have more fun, do they know it? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Brian Gaff wrote However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. Each time the signal is processed it is delayed - even slightly. DAB is a particularly bad offender - perhaps through using early technology. A radio controlled clock should be pretty accurate at the time of synchronisation. If the server is. I'd say. time.is says that my smartphone is spot on. The PC is a couple of seconds out and I have that synch daily. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
En el artículo , Brian Gaff
escribió: However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? I'd say the radio clock is going to be the most accurate one. I also have a phone which every so often moves an hour backwards for no apparent reason. Your phone is getting its time from the network operator. The phone has changed cells to one owned by an operator which is sending the incorrect time. I see this a lot in Spain, and it's a pain in the arse as you can't rely on your phone to be telling you the right time. -- (\_/) (='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10 (")_(") |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
En el artículo , MKF
escribió: [crapectomy] **** off, Rod. -- (\_/) (='.'=) systemd: the Linux version of Windows 10 (")_(") |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
In article ,
Rod Speed wrote: Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. No it isn't. If you'd know if you had any experience of digital microphones. Which aren't the norm for that very reason. Only some radio mics where absolute phase stability may not matter. -- *Many people quit looking for work when they find a job * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Rod Speed wrote Dave Plowman (News) wrote Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. No it isn't. Corse it is, that's what NTP does. If you'd know if you had any experience of digital microphones. Irrelevant to what can be done with digital time synchronisation. Which aren't the norm for that very reason. Only some radio mics where absolute phase stability may not matter. Irrelevant to what can be done with digital time synchronisation. |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Rod Speed a écrit :
Dave Plowman (News) wrote Brian Gaff wrote However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. Each time the signal is processed it is delayed - even slightly. DAB is a particularly bad offender - perhaps through using early technology. A radio controlled clock should be pretty accurate at the time of synchronisation. If the server is. I'd say. time.is says that my smartphone is spot on. The PC is a couple of seconds out and I have that synch daily. Atomic.exe is a run once utility, which allows you to change of frequently Windows checks in with a time server. Once the frequency is set, it remains set. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Rod Speed a écrit :
Dave Plowman (News) wrote Rod Speed wrote Dave Plowman (News) wrote Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. No it isn't. Corse it is, that's what NTP does. When Windows does its NTP time check, it checks the delays through the network several times before actually setting your RTC - using an offset to take care of the average network delay. |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message ... Rod Speed a écrit : Dave Plowman (News) wrote Brian Gaff wrote However, I often have a laugh at the difference in time between radio controlled clock, DAB clock and the internet bassed one on the pc. Several seconds quite often. Who is right? Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. Each time the signal is processed it is delayed - even slightly. DAB is a particularly bad offender - perhaps through using early technology. A radio controlled clock should be pretty accurate at the time of synchronisation. If the server is. I'd say. time.is says that my smartphone is spot on. The PC is a couple of seconds out and I have that synch daily. Atomic.exe is a run once utility, which allows you to change of frequently Windows checks in with a time server. Once the frequency is set, it remains set. I use http://www.pretentiousname.com/timesync/ with Win7. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Old radio controlled clock
Harry Bloomfield wrote
Rod Speed wrote Dave Plowman (News) wrote Rod Speed wrote Dave Plowman (News) wrote Any digitally based transmission system has latency. But it is perfectly possible to compensate for that. No it isn't. Corse it is, that's what NTP does. When Windows does its NTP time check, it checks the delays through the network several times before actually setting your RTC - using an offset to take care of the average network delay. Yeah, that's what I meant. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio controlled clock an hour fast | UK diy | |||
"Repairing" a Lidl Radio Controlled Alarm Clock - long | UK diy | |||
[OT] Radio controlled clocks | UK diy | |||
Resetting MSF radio-controlled clock after refitting hands. | Electronics Repair | |||
Radio controlled clock question | UK diy |