Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In article ,
Graham. wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:38:19 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote: Halfords change them for free. You mean optional fitting is included in the inflated price they charge. When I picked one up in there on Saturday evening (stress purchase, spare was duff and I hate driving SWMBOs car at the best of times, let alone with a headlight out) they wanted 7 quid to change the bulb for me. Also, they'll only fit the easy ones - if it's difficult then they won't do it :-) Darren |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In article ,
Tim Watts wrote: Interestingly, the Police ANPR cameras log every single number plate & only flag up the ones without tax etc. That part ****es me right off. They know who hasn't got tax, MOT, insurance. They had the law changed so you need to declare a SORN if offroad, so the perps cannot use that as an excuse. So all they need to do is visit a fine on the registered keeper and take it from there. That's kinda assuming they vehicles are registered to a keeper... I suspect many of them are "anonymous". Darren |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In article ,
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Putting the bulbs in upside down will alter the beam setting. Which type of bulb can be fitted upside down if it matters? None I've seen. Wifes Pug 206 had odd lights when we got it (year old, from a main dealer). H7 headlamp bulb was upside down. It didn't "fit", but was easy enough to get the spring clip in place. When I used to work at a garage it wasn't that uncommon to see cars with them fitted upside down. Likewise the dual filament stop/side lamps - "I fitted a bulb and now my side light is too bright" being the normal complaint (assuming they even noticed). It was a bayonet cap with offset pins IIRC, but easy enough to force in if being ham fisted... Saying that, I've not had a car for years that used those, so maybe they've died out :-) Darren |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote:
Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. Have a closer look at the signage at any of your large supermarkets... Saves the contracted parking company having to pay a man to walk around with a note book and it'll get *every one* who overstays. -- Cheers Dave. |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
Dave Liquorice wrote:
Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. At the Aldi here you have to type your reg number into a terminal near the tills, otherwise you get charged regardless of how long you stay. |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham.
wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Probably an age related thing,many will be too young to remember when many vehicles had the light controls on a knob on the dash board and the dip switch on the floor . Would not have been impossible to briefly switch the lights on but not as easily as twitching a finger on a stalk on the steering column. It was the ease of doing so from those when most cars had acquired them that made the practice common. I can't actually remember if my first vehicle with a stalk had a flash position on it. Main and dip only I think,one with a flash position came later. G.Harman |
#47
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On 25/11/2012 22:20, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. Have a closer look at the signage at any of your large supermarkets... Saves the contracted parking company having to pay a man to walk around with a note book and it'll get *every one* who overstays. I worked with a woman who dropped someone off in the morning and dropped back in in the evening to go to the shops, only for her initial departure and second entry to be missed by the system, which decided that she'd stayed all day and tried to charge her. The fact that our workplace had a permanent on-site police presence and that they'd logged her car as being in the company car park all day rather dented their enthusiasm to persue the matter! SteveW |
#48
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:39:06 +0000 (UTC), Steve Firth
wrote: With mild disappointment that she didn't recognise the danger of serving around in a car with one working light. Ah, she was a barmaid. |
#49
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:26:59 +0000 (GMT), charles
wrote: The was the driver round here, a few years ago, who was prosecuted for: 1. Not displaying obligatory front lights 2. Not displaying obligatory rear lights 3. not dilluminating his rear number plate. The result was sufficient points for him to lose his licence. I think he must have annoyed the police who stopped him. I recall an account in the local rag where I grew up of a bloke who'd had his car gone over and the book thoroughly thrown at him for every little thing they could find. Even at the time, aged 17, I recognised a ****** who'd cheeked the coppers. It was something I bore in mind - most coppers are reasonable people, but if you take the **** they'll take it back. |
#50
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:00:25 +0000, Andy Burns
wrote: Other hates are drivers who park, often just over the brow of a small hill, on the wrong side of the road with the headlights on. Often these are taxis waiting outside restaurants. Clearly what is needed is legislation that restaurants must be on the correct side of the road and not situated near small hills. What is needed is legislation that forbids parking with the headlights on facing oncoming traffic. Oh wait, it's there already, is it not... |
#51
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On 25/11/2012 22:51, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:00:25 +0000, Andy Burns wrote: Other hates are drivers who park, often just over the brow of a small hill, on the wrong side of the road with the headlights on. Often these are taxis waiting outside restaurants. Clearly what is needed is legislation that restaurants must be on the correct side of the road and not situated near small hills. What is needed is legislation that forbids parking with the headlights on facing oncoming traffic. Oh wait, it's there already, is it not... And not having headlamps on when parked. -- Rod |
#52
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In article , SteveW
writes On 25/11/2012 22:20, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. Have a closer look at the signage at any of your large supermarkets... Saves the contracted parking company having to pay a man to walk around with a note book and it'll get *every one* who overstays. I worked with a woman who dropped someone off in the morning and dropped back in in the evening to go to the shops, only for her initial departure and second entry to be missed by the system, which decided that she'd stayed all day and tried to charge her. The fact that our workplace had a permanent on-site police presence and that they'd logged her car as being in the company car park all day rather dented their enthusiasm to persue the matter! There's a Lidl I visit occasionally that has ANPR recording and when I can be bothered I make sure I am slow enough to be recorded on entry but have been obscuring my rear plate on exit. They haven't bitten yet so I'm guessing I need to make a second visit later in the day, reversing the obscuring to waste some of their time and money. -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#53
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. I should have clarified that - it was a Police ANPR with a pair of coppers and a marked car. Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. Have a closer look at the signage at any of your large supermarkets... Saves the contracted parking company having to pay a man to walk around with a note book and it'll get *every one* who overstays. Yes - Cranbrook (Kent village) has a local tiny supermarket that has just got one fitted. Stupid thing is the car park is 1/2 empty most of the time and they will not let you pay to stay an hour longer, to say see a film at the new 1-screen wibbly cinema. The next car park is 1/2 mile up the road. -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/ "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." |
#54
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In article , D.M.Chapman dmc@puffin.?
writes In article , Graham. wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:38:19 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote: Halfords change them for free. You mean optional fitting is included in the inflated price they charge. When I picked one up in there on Saturday evening (stress purchase, spare was duff and I hate driving SWMBOs car at the best of times, let alone with a headlight out) they wanted 7 quid to change the bulb for me. Yep, that's my indirect experience too, rellie bought 8quid headlamp bulb (an H4 ffs!) and was offered an option to fit for another 8quid or so which was declined. Needless to say, rellie was unable to fit so I ended up doing it, not bad for a modern car but definitely needed a practiced hand to work the clips while working under the waterproofing boot. -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#55
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On 25/11/2012 23:07, Tim Watts wrote:
Dave Liquorice wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. I should have clarified that - it was a Police ANPR with a pair of coppers and a marked car. So there was a threat and they wanted to make sure people were safe. There are many good reasons why the police use ANPR. That also includes catching people without tax and insurance taking the kids out. |
#56
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:18:44 +0000 (UTC), Steve Firth
wrote: Which type of bulb can be fitted upside down if it matters? None I've seen. Just about all of them if one is hamfisted enough. My local garage reckons its one of the more significant causes of MoT failure. Not so much upside down, but on some H4 lampholders it's possible to work only by feel and think it's in, but it's not seated correctly. I'm not without a clue and yet managed to do that last winter or two ago. I didn't realise until the next night I used the headlights in earnest and the nearside wasn't showing a proper beam at all. |
#57
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On 25/11/2012 20:35, Tim Watts wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote: Interestingly, the Police ANPR cameras log every single number plate & only flag up the ones without tax etc. That part ****es me right off. They know who hasn't got tax, MOT, insurance. They had the law changed so you need to declare a SORN if offroad, so the perps cannot use that as an excuse. So all they need to do is visit a fine on the registered keeper and take it from there. And what of the more serious offences of driving without insurance, etc.? They should just be able to get away with it? |
#58
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:33:25 -0800 (PST), jgharston
wrote: polygonum wrote: Whilst I agree with your rant, it can also be medical issues that make one more sensitive to being dazzled by oncoming headlamps. Certainly This sounds really ridiculous as I type it, but I've taken to driving in the dark wearing my prescription sunglasses. Even then I flick my eyes from side to side to avoid the same piece of retina going to sleep. It could be because I only passed my test two years ago, but every time I fill up with petrol when it's dark I walk around the car and check all the lights. I passed my test two years and one week ago, so I'm no longer a probationary driver, so maybe I'll start getting slack and lazy now. JGH Tinted specs used to be marketed as night driving glasses, but they are not a good idea. I don't even use the "dimming" feature of my rear view mirror. I can switch it off on my current car, on previous ones I have resorted to blue-tack to blind the sensor. The danger is (eg) that cyclist in black with no lights, that is undertaking you as you turn left. Without the tint (glasses and/or mirror) you might just see him, with the tint he might disappear beneath the threshold where you might have seen him. There is an argument that you can dispense with dipped headlights and everyone drives with polarised full beam-headlights. The drivers wear polarised spectacles with a 90 degree relative polarisation, or better still have a windscreen made to that prescription. Now you can even turn off all the street lighting (topical!) This is not a new idea, I first came across it as a child in a book by J.B.S Haldene published in 1948, and the idea was not new then. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#59
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On 25/11/2012 23:39, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham. wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. The 50s and Lieutenant Scott's car... -- Rod |
#60
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In message , fred writes
In article , D.M.Chapman dmc@puffin.? writes In article , Graham. wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:38:19 +0000, The Medway Handyman wrote: Halfords change them for free. You mean optional fitting is included in the inflated price they charge. When I picked one up in there on Saturday evening (stress purchase, spare was duff and I hate driving SWMBOs car at the best of times, let alone with a headlight out) they wanted 7 quid to change the bulb for me. Yep, that's my indirect experience too, rellie bought 8quid headlamp bulb (an H4 ffs!) and was offered an option to fit for another 8quid or so which was declined. Had to replace the rear light cluster a while back. I ended up showing the ford garage apprentice how to do it -- Geoff |
#61
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In message , polygonum
writes On 25/11/2012 23:39, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham. wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. The 50s and Lieutenant Scott's car... http://www.robertopiecollection.com/...dal-cars/old-f ashioned-pedal-cars-GB.asp -- geoff |
#62
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:47:33 -0000, Bill wrote:
In message , Andrew Gabriel writes In many cars nowadays, the headlamps are not user replaceable because you have to remove other parts of the engine to get to them. That maybe why so many cars now drive with a headlamp out. I've been wondering whether the modern fetish for flashing lights to say "Come On", "Thanks" and so on isn't causing lamp failures. It's not a fetish it's politeness. I thought that when you apply volts to a cold filament, there is a sudden rush of amps. I flash a lot (with headlights as well), and I hardly ever have to replace bulbs. Other hates are drivers who park, often just over the brow of a small hill, on the wrong side of the road with the headlights on. Often these are taxis waiting outside restaurants. Someone did that to me when I was coming up a hill which was single file at that point (leaving a car park, he was in a layby on the right). I could hardly see a thing. I don't know if he was on full beam or it was just the angle - he had no need for headlights while being parked. I stopped and engaged my full beam (still couldn't see to get past him safely) until he (eventually) realised what was going on and switched them off. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com What should you do if you girlfriend starts smoking? Slow down and use a lubricant. |
#63
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:59:54 -0000, polygonum wrote:
On 25/11/2012 22:51, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:00:25 +0000, Andy Burns wrote: Other hates are drivers who park, often just over the brow of a small hill, on the wrong side of the road with the headlights on. Often these are taxis waiting outside restaurants. Clearly what is needed is legislation that restaurants must be on the correct side of the road and not situated near small hills. What is needed is legislation that forbids parking with the headlights on facing oncoming traffic. Oh wait, it's there already, is it not... And not having headlamps on when parked. Most cars I've had will switch to sidelights or parking lights when you turn off the ignition (for the above reason or to save the battery I'm not sure), but it doesn't help those ****ts who leave the engine running. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com 63% of men have had sex in the shower. The other 37% have never been to prison. |
#64
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:41:58 -0000, polygonum wrote:
On 25/11/2012 23:39, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham. wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. The 50s and Lieutenant Scott's car... Your mention of my name has got Opera's attention. I don't sit on the dashboard. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com I got into trouble on my last date. I didn't open the car door for her. I swam to the surface instead .... |
#65
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:27:10 -0000, harry wrote:
On Nov 25, 2:03 am, "Arfa Daily" wrote: Yes, I know I've had a bitch on here before about DIY headlight repairs, but I swear it's getting worse year on year. Since the evenings have got dark again, I've been blinded from the front and dazzled from the rear so many times that I've lost count. This is either because headlight bulbs have been fitted incorrectly, or the cretins behind the wheel don't know what the blue light on the dash means ... On top of this, on more than one occasion, I've almost run into the back of a motorbike that's turned out to be a car with the offside tail light out. Today, I had to drive to another town some thirty miles away, and for most of the time it was more or less foggy. At least one in three cars was not showing any lights. I think I saw about two that were actually using their rear fog lights. Funny how drivers always manage to find the tiresome things on a dark wet night when they are guaranteed to dazzle you, but never have them on when it's full daylight and thick fog ! Anyway, on the return trip, as I passed the main county police headquarters, a law car pulled out behind me. It had one headlight pointing into the ditch, and the other up into my rearview mirror. If it's now reached the point where even the coppers can't keep their own vehicles legal, we might as well all give up ... DIY headlight bulb replacement should be banned. You ought to have to take your car to approved garages where there is someone trained and certified to change the wretched things correctly :-( Rant over ... Arfa The problem is not the replacing of bulbs. It is the soft suspension of modern cars neccesitating headlight adjusters that work from the dashboard which some people don't bother with. I don't see the problem. I make sure my adjuster is at highest when I take it for an MOT. Then throughout the year if it shifts I can lower it whenever someone flashes me or I se it going into the rear window of the car in front. Or if I've got a few tonnes in the back. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com Q. What did the sign on the door of the whorehouse say? A. Beat it - we're closed. |
#67
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:31:03 -0000, Andy Burns wrote:
Dave Liquorice wrote: Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. At the Aldi here you have to type your reg number into a terminal near the tills, otherwise you get charged regardless of how long you stay. That would cause me not to shop at Aldi. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com "You, you, and you ... panic. The rest of you, come with me." - U.S. Marine Corp Gunnery Sgt. |
#68
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:15:53 -0000, dennis@home wrote:
On 25/11/2012 23:07, Tim Watts wrote: Dave Liquorice wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. I should have clarified that - it was a Police ANPR with a pair of coppers and a marked car. So there was a threat and they wanted to make sure people were safe. There are many good reasons why the police use ANPR. That also includes catching people without tax and insurance taking the kids out. Yes no tax is very dangerous indeed.... for the DVLA coffers. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com Researchers have recently unearthed the text of the first transcontinental telegraph message. Reportedly, it reads ENLARGE YOUR MALE MEMBER STOP GUARANTEED RESULTS STOP ... |
#69
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:20:40 -0000, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:33:48 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Took the kids to LegoLand (Windsor) this summer. One day, there was an ANPR inside the entrance logging everyone. I thought that was bloody off. Many car parks now have ANPR cameras on entrance and exit. Stay more than the X free hours allowed and they send the registered keeper a parking notice. Which you can presumably ignore like the motorway service station ones? -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com What's a diaphragm? A trampoline for dickheads. |
#70
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:17:32 -0000, dennis@home wrote:
On 25/11/2012 20:35, Tim Watts wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: Interestingly, the Police ANPR cameras log every single number plate & only flag up the ones without tax etc. That part ****es me right off. They know who hasn't got tax, MOT, insurance. They had the law changed so you need to declare a SORN if offroad, so the perps cannot use that as an excuse. So all they need to do is visit a fine on the registered keeper and take it from there. And what of the more serious offences of driving without insurance, etc.? They should just be able to get away with it? Yes. Although the guy that knocked my mirror off really should have stopped and given me the £50. Then he wouldn't have had the police round his door. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com Why do they rate a movie "R" for "adult language?" The only people I hear using that language are teenagers. |
#71
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:23:20 -0000, dennis@home wrote:
On 25/11/2012 13:54, Bill wrote: In message , fred writes Static ones are certainly illuminated with IR floods and you get the plate lighting up with the on axis reflection, just like cats eyes. Don't know about the mobile ones but it would be a bit of an omission if they didn't have them too. I recently fitted an ANPR camera for a customer, attached to their CCTV system. They are amazing, even in bright sunlight there is next to no image. As you say they have IR illumination and this is reflected back from the number plate. The effect is outstanding, the filter in front of the camera basically only allows the IR frequency of light through and the number plate shows perfectly, day or night. The mobile ones do appear to have IR illuminators too. Its done to make sure the idiots that fit reflective coatings on plates and other such junk get caught. What's idiotic about avoiding the ****ing GATSOs? -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |
#72
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 02:02:59 -0000, Arfa Daily wrote:
Yes, I know I've had a bitch on here before about DIY headlight repairs, but I swear it's getting worse year on year. Since the evenings have got dark again, I've been blinded from the front and dazzled from the rear so many times that I've lost count. This is either because headlight bulbs have been fitted incorrectly, or the cretins behind the wheel don't know what the blue light on the dash means ... It means the blue xenons are on. On top of this, on more than one occasion, I've almost run into the back of a motorbike that's turned out to be a car with the offside tail light out. You must have pretty poor eyesight, did the car not have reflectors? Were your headlights not on? Today, I had to drive to another town some thirty miles away, and for most of the time it was more or less foggy. At least one in three cars was not showing any lights. I think I saw about two that were actually using their rear fog lights. Funny how drivers always manage to find the tiresome things on a dark wet night when they are guaranteed to dazzle you, but never have them on when it's full daylight and thick fog ! I agree with yo on the lights, but not the fog lights. Fog lights look like brakes, I never use them. If you're following someone in the fog and they brake, you might not notice. Anyway, on the return trip, as I passed the main county police headquarters, a law car pulled out behind me. It had one headlight pointing into the ditch, and the other up into my rearview mirror. If it's now reached the point where even the coppers can't keep their own vehicles legal, we might as well all give up ... I would have pulled him over for a laugh. DIY headlight bulb replacement should be banned. You ought to have to take your car to approved garages where there is someone trained and certified to change the wretched things correctly :-( How can you replace a bulb wrong, they have ****ing notches! -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com NEWSFLASH!!! Bouncing elephantiasis woman destroys central Portsmouth |
#73
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In message op.wocs7ic0ytk5n5@i7-940, Lieutenant Scott
writes On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:52:54 -0000, geoff wrote: In message , polygonum writes On 25/11/2012 23:39, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham. wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. The 50s and Lieutenant Scott's car... http://www.robertopiecollection.com/...dal-cars/old-f ashioned-pedal-cars-GB.asp I think you mean http://www.robertopiecollection.com/...edal-cars/old- fashioned-pedal-cars-GB.asp I think thats what I posted ... -- geoff |
#74
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:14:42 -0000, geoff wrote:
In message op.wocs7ic0ytk5n5@i7-940, Lieutenant Scott writes On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:52:54 -0000, geoff wrote: In message , polygonum writes On 25/11/2012 23:39, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. The 50s and Lieutenant Scott's car... http://www.robertopiecollection.com/...dal-cars/old-f ashioned-pedal-cars-GB.asp I think you mean http://www.robertopiecollection.com/...edal-cars/old- fashioned-pedal-cars-GB.asp I think thats what I posted ... Yours wrapped. -- http://petersparrots.com http://petersphotos.com "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." -- Popular Mechanics, 1949 |
#75
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:39:25 +0000, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:41:05 +0000, Graham. wrote: Modern!?? Everyone was doing that in 1975. Probably before... Since cars have had electric lights at least! Don't think it was that common till around the 1970's and electric lights have been the norm for roughly 50 years before that. Plenty of drivers in the 60s would have been able to flash, even if only by flicking the lights on/off briefly. And cars with knobs on the dash board - that's the 50s you're thinking of. My current Skoda has the light selector knob on the dash, so did the selection of Focus's (Focii?) before that. The dip-switch has always been on a stalk even on my first car, a 1971 Vauxhall Viva, and that had a leaky push-button pump for the windscreen washer on the dash. My recollection is drivers uses to flash as an invitation, thanks, or silent rebuke much as they do now, perhaps my recollection is wrong. You would certainly get flashed if you had the audacity to turn on your lights in daylight irrespective of how hard it was pelting down with rain, Volvo had an advertising campaign that tried to educate drivers about this, and some Volvo owners had their lights modified so they could be switched off. It was common for bus drivers to flash the interior lights as a thanks to the driver behind, that's something I haven't seen for years. And before hazard warning lights bus drivers often had the good sense to lean something against the back of their broken down vehicle so you knew it was stranded. -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#76
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC), Steve Firth
wrote: "Arfa Daily" wrote: Yes, I know I've had a bitch on here before about DIY headlight repairs, but I swear it's getting worse year on year. I have to agree with you. It's also not helped by the general "can't give a toss" attitude of the majority of drivers who think that unless they drive around with fog lamps and main beam that their manhood will shrivel. It's fairly common on country roads to be followed by some duck who refuses to dip his headlights. As to bulb maintenance you're right again. In any queue of ten vehicles at least two will have one or more bulbs out. At least one will have bulbs in but probably upside down. The ubiquitous 5/21 watt tail/stoplight can often be forced into its holder arse about-face -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#77
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
In message , Grimly
Curmudgeon writes What is needed is legislation that forbids parking with the headlights on facing oncoming traffic. Oh wait, it's there already, is it not... One of the rows of restaurants around here ends at the Police Station just over the brow of the hill. The taxis often wait outside the Station headlights on, wrong side of road. Outside the restaurants they often double park to wait, admittedly facing the right way, forcing traffic into the right filter lane coming the other way and just by the brow of the hill. With luck, it'll be a police car that has the head on smash. -- Bill |
#78
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
"harry" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 2:03 am, "Arfa Daily" wrote: Yes, I know I've had a bitch on here before about DIY headlight repairs, but I swear it's getting worse year on year. Since the evenings have got dark again, I've been blinded from the front and dazzled from the rear so many times that I've lost count. This is either because headlight bulbs have been fitted incorrectly, or the cretins behind the wheel don't know what the blue light on the dash means ... On top of this, on more than one occasion, I've almost run into the back of a motorbike that's turned out to be a car with the offside tail light out. Today, I had to drive to another town some thirty miles away, and for most of the time it was more or less foggy. At least one in three cars was not showing any lights. I think I saw about two that were actually using their rear fog lights. Funny how drivers always manage to find the tiresome things on a dark wet night when they are guaranteed to dazzle you, but never have them on when it's full daylight and thick fog ! Anyway, on the return trip, as I passed the main county police headquarters, a law car pulled out behind me. It had one headlight pointing into the ditch, and the other up into my rearview mirror. If it's now reached the point where even the coppers can't keep their own vehicles legal, we might as well all give up ... DIY headlight bulb replacement should be banned. You ought to have to take your car to approved garages where there is someone trained and certified to change the wretched things correctly :-( Rant over ... Arfa The problem is not the replacing of bulbs. It is the soft suspension of modern cars neccesitating headlight adjusters that work from the dashboard which some people don't bother with. Headlights that are a bit high - maybe. Headlights straight in my face or right in my mirror - moron behind the wheel who doesn't know what a blue warning indicator means. One headlight in the ditch and one pointing at the moon - wrongly fitted bulbs. By far the vast majority of cases fall into the latter two categories, and the problem with the second of those two most definitely *is* in the replacing of the bulbs ... Arfa |
#79
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Arfa Daily wrote: DIY headlight bulb replacement should be banned. You ought to have to take your car to approved garages where there is someone trained and certified to change the wretched things correctly :-( Changing a bulb for one of the correct type won't alter the beam setting. What is more likely is the car has been damaged and repaired and the new unit not adjusted correctly. If a new car, this won't be picked up until the first MOT. When was the last time you changed a headlight bulb Dave ? They have offset locating 'tangs' on them to make sure that the main and dip filaments are correctly located in the reflector. Unfortunately, many modern headlamp units are so awkwardly located that bulb replacement can only be carried out by feel. In these cases, it is perfectly possible to get the bulb in place such that at least one of the locating tangs is not in its slot. Because the retaining clip is only made of a thin gauge spring steel wire, it is vanishingly easy to force it back into its clip, thus holding the bulb in its seat at an angle. The result of this is a beam pointing either at the ditch, or the moon ... Arfa -- *Work is for people who don't know how to fish. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#80
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
And now I've seen it all ...
"Steve Firth" wrote in message ... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , Steve Firth wrote: Changing a bulb for one of the correct type won't alter the beam setting. What is more likely is the car has been damaged and repaired and the new unit not adjusted correctly. If a new car, this won't be picked up until the first MOT. Putting the bulbs in upside down will alter the beam setting. Which type of bulb can be fitted upside down if it matters? None I've seen. Just about all of them if one is hamfisted enough. My local garage reckons its one of the more significant causes of MoT failure. -- €¢DarWin| _/ _/ Likewise at my local garage. Chris the tester, told me just a couple of weeks ago when I asked him, that he has to correctly refit DIY replaced bulbs on a daily basis Arfa |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|