OT Sports car?
http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1
What does the panel think about this unknown make? |
OT Sports car?
harry wrote:
http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? It looks like you dont know how to write a web page, harry. No surprises there, then -- To people who know nothing, anything is possible. To people who know too much, it is a sad fact that they know how little is really possible - and how hard it is to achieve it. |
OT Sports car?
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
harry wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? or maybe non-decipherable image? -- Davey. |
OT Sports car?
Davey wrote:
wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? or maybe non-decipherable image? Nah, just shagged MIME types on the server "Content-Type: text/plain" Tineye found the same image on other servers http://www.tribine.lv/upload/16005/i...prikoli-19.jpg |
OT Sports car?
Andy Burns wrote:
Davey wrote: wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? or maybe non-decipherable image? Nah, just shagged MIME types on the server because someone renamed a .jpg to a .nothing probably. "Content-Type: text/plain" Tineye found the same image on other servers http://www.tribine.lv/upload/16005/i...prikoli-19.jpg -- To people who know nothing, anything is possible. To people who know too much, it is a sad fact that they know how little is really possible - and how hard it is to achieve it. |
OT Sports car?
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT), harry
wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? #%$""!&+7/&)4)!"0A149;%.DICH7=;ÿÛ?C ****ing rare, indeed. |
OT Sports car?
On May 28, 1:36*am, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? # %$" "!&+7/&)4)!"0A149;%.DICH7=;ÿÛ?C ****ing rare, indeed. The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. |
OT Sports car?
harry wrote:
On May 28, 1:36 am, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? # %$" "!&+7/&)4)!"0A149;%.DICH7=;ÿÛ?C ****ing rare, indeed. The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. You don't say? I'm amazed no one spotted that. Tim |
OT Sports car?
harry wrote:
On May 28, 1:36 am, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:23:58 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: http://images.stupidvideos.com/image...523_m730_____1 What does the panel think about this unknown make? # %$" "!&+7/&)4)!"0A149;%.DICH7=;ÿÛ?C ****ing rare, indeed. The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. You don't say? I'm amazed no one spotted that. Tim Never, I thought it was a car painted in semi invisibility paint. Mike |
OT Sports car?
On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote:
The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? |
OT Sports car?
Jules Richardson wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote: The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van.. But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it? -- To people who know nothing, anything is possible. To people who know too much, it is a sad fact that they know how little is really possible - and how hard it is to achieve it. |
OT Sports car?
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Jules Richardson wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote: The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van.. But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it? Can we be sure it isn't a van built onto the back of a painting? Tim |
OT Sports car?
In message
-sep tember.org, Tim writes The Natural Philosopher wrote: Jules Richardson wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote: The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van.. But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it? Can we be sure it isn't a van built onto the back of a painting? Tim A Van Gogh perhaps? -- hugh |
OT Sports car?
On Wed, 30 May 2012 20:52:50 +0100
hugh ] wrote: In message -sep tember.org, Tim writes The Natural Philosopher wrote: Jules Richardson wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote: The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van.. But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it? Can we be sure it isn't a van built onto the back of a painting? Tim A Van Gogh perhaps? That sounds even better in American. -- Davey. |
OT Sports car?
In message
-sep tember.org, Tim writes The Natural Philosopher wrote: Jules Richardson wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:06:01 -0700, harry wrote: The car is actually painted on to the van behind it. As the car doesn't exist, the van can't be behind it, can it? well it exists as a layer of paint IN FRONT OF the van.. But this isn't alt.metaphsyics is it? Can we be sure it isn't a van built onto the back of a painting? I rather think its a collective hallucination -- geoff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter