|
OT Ethernet Cable
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable
(Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Regards John |
OT Ethernet Cable
"DerbyBoy" wrote in message ... I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Regards John Sorry - the actual wording in the manual is "LAN Cable (Shielded)" |
OT Ethernet Cable
DerbyBoy wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Regards John No - you do not need screened cable for regular ethernet upto 1 gig/sec over medium distances. HTH Tim -- Tim Watts |
OT Ethernet Cable
|
OT Ethernet Cable
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:09:44 -0000, DerbyBoy wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Ethernet cable (normally Cat5e) isn't normally screened. For most applications screening isn't required. I doubt that a Smart TV in a domestic enviroment needs screening on it's ethernet connection. What maybe an issue is any RFI generated in the TV getting out on an unscreened cable. Our panny set came with a couple of large ferrite cores to put around the ethernet cable. -- Cheers Dave. |
OT Ethernet Cable
|
OT Ethernet Cable
|
OT Ethernet Cable
On 04/01/2012 17:09, DerbyBoy wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. No, generally 10/100/1000 Mbit/sec ethernet uses Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cables. However you can get Shielded Twisted Pair (STP). You may find suitable leads labelled as CAT6 STP rather than the more common CAT5E. Having said that, you will find it will almost certainly work fine with normal CAT5E UTP cables. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT Ethernet Cable
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:09:44 -0000, DerbyBoy No-one wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Regards John My Smart TV (well, TV that can talk Internet) works just fine on a standard Cat 5e cable. I would be amazed if you need anything better. -- Rod |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 04/01/2012 19:51, DerbyBoy wrote:
I have ordered one of these: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Shielded-Net...6527&s r=1-11 It will at least be tidier that the 3 metre lead I have - which may not be shielded. Yup, although the STP stuff is a bit stiffer and harder to get to stay where you want it ;-) I have a tech prob and want to be sure I have met the instructions in the manual. Fair enough... -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT Ethernet Cable
Mike Causer wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:23:07 -0000 "DerbyBoy" No-one wrote: Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Sorry - the actual wording in the manual is "LAN Cable (Shielded)" Modern "twisted pair" cabling (aka 10baseT) has no shielding. Some has shielding This is what is commonly available now, and often known as "Cat 5". Older ethernet cables were shielded co-ax, the common ones being 10base5 (aka "thickwire") and 10base2 (aka "thinwire" or "BNC" from the connectors used). You're going to need a better description from the supplier, preferably with a reference to an actual specification. Mike |
OT Ethernet Cable
|
OT Ethernet Cable
Paul D Smith wrote:
If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin |
OT Ethernet Cable
On Jan 5, 12:46*pm, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Not really. The Ethernet in a smart TV is mostly for streaming content from the web which, for most people, will be limited by their broadband connection. MBQ |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 04/01/2012 17:09, DerbyBoy wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. This is made for Denon, but probably will work just as well as many others. "Denon AKDL1 Dedicated Link Cable" http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000I1X6PM A keen review ... "Believe me I didn't need any more convincing but when I listened the digital remix of 'Snoop Dog Plays Vivaldi' well, words simply cannot describe." -- Adrian C |
OT Ethernet Cable
Man at B&Q wrote:
On Jan 5, 12:46 pm, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Not really. The Ethernet in a smart TV is mostly for streaming content from the web which, for most people, will be limited by their broadband connection. well yes and no. Wifi is not full duplex for a start, and if other people are using it it can become a limiting factor. As can the DSL connection if while you are watching that HD video, your email client wakes up and starts downloading a huge email attachment.. DSL itself is good for about one decent HD video stream and nothing else. (well my sort of 4Mbps BRAS type DSL anyway). WiFi is good for 2 or three such... Wifi is a best efforts 50Mbps or so half duplex *shared* connection.. 100Mbps Ethernet is a guaranteed 100MBPS FULL DUPLEX link to wherever. MBQ |
OT Ethernet Cable
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:46:51 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Ethernet will run out to 100m in an single segment. How long is your "really long cable"? I think you'd be pushing WiFi to work through 100m of building, at least at a sensible speed. That ethernet would be 100Mbps full duplex. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Depends what you mean by "TV (video) data". If you mean iPlayer type stuff that only needs about 2Mbps but is only just watchable, OK for catch up of something you missed but otherwise it's not that good. If you mean streaming a ripped HD bluray disc from a local media server then you need not far short of 50Mbps. If you mean watching stuff as it come out the back of a broadcast HD camera you need over 1Gbps. -- Cheers Dave. |
OT Ethernet Cable
In article 20120104181526.7bf3475e@surya,
says... On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:23:07 -0000 "DerbyBoy" No-one wrote: Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Sorry - the actual wording in the manual is "LAN Cable (Shielded)" Modern "twisted pair" cabling (aka 10baseT) has no shielding. This is what is commonly available now, and often known as "Cat 5". Oh! I must be dreaming this Cat 5 SHIELDED cable connecting this laptop to my router, then! And take a look at this: http://uk.farnell.com/te-connectivit...0-1/plug-rj45- emt/dp/4739504 or http://tinyurl.com/8xb88to which clearly has a metal screen with cable entry designed to crimp on to cable with a braided screen (other cables use a foil screen and drain wire and use slightly different connectors). If you at this current list ... http://tinyurl.com/6tjzg9n (I'm not even going to attempt posting a 605 character link on here!) .... and hover over he thumbnails one by one, you'll see a lot of the connectors have screens (obviously, connectors intended for use on unscreened cables don't have them). Unfortunately, despite allowing you to filter your search by any number of parameters, Farnell don't offer the option of shielded/un-shielded! You're going to need a better description from the supplier, preferably with a reference to an actual specification. That would certainly help. It would also help if you gave some detail of what you are doing - the length of the cable run and if it is going to be in an (electrically) hostile environment, for example. I have a number of fully screened Cat 5 patch cords here - free to a good home. [1] But they are only 3m long, which may be a tad short for your purposes! [1] Genuine offer. Brand new and unused. Probably around 20 to 30 available, possibly more. Location: SW Essex/NE London. E-mail me if interested: cat5patch (at) tiscali (dot) co (dot) uk -- Terry |
OT Ethernet Cable
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:46:51 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Ethernet will run out to 100m in an single segment. How long is your "really long cable"? I think you'd be pushing WiFi to work through 100m of building, at least at a sensible speed. That ethernet would be 100Mbps full duplex. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Depends what you mean by "TV (video) data". If you mean iPlayer type stuff that only needs about 2Mbps but is only just watchable, OK for catch up of something you missed but otherwise it's not that good. If you mean streaming a ripped HD bluray disc from a local media server then you need not far short of 50Mbps. If you mean watching stuff as it come out the back of a broadcast HD camera you need over 1Gbps. BBC HD i-player/internet stream is about 4Mbps for comparison. And its very watchable - I managed to catch one of the formula one practices. Very nice EXCEPT when they were panning past loads of spectators..the spectators sort of turned into a smear of multicoloured vomit. I guess the picture was simply changing too fast for the compression algo to do a decent job... |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT Ethernet Cable
Dave Liquorice wrote:
What maybe an issue is any RFI generated in the TV getting out on an unscreened cable. Our panny set came with a couple of large ferrite cores to put around the ethernet cable. Speculating wildly, I wonder if the set is just about on its permitted RFI limits, and specifying STP enables them to creep under the threshold. They know that nobody's going to use STP, but they put it in the manual to tick the regulatory box. Same reason that your set came with ferrite cores... as a quick'n'dirty fix. Theo |
OT Ethernet Cable
On Jan 5, 1:29*pm, The Natural Philosopher
wrote: Man at B&Q wrote: On Jan 5, 12:46 pm, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Not really. The Ethernet in a smart TV is mostly for streaming content from the web which, for most people, will be limited by their broadband connection. well yes and no. Like I said not really. Wifi is not full duplex for a start, and if other people are using it it can become a limiting factor. As can the DSL connection if while you are watching that HD video, your email client wakes up and starts downloading a huge email attachment.. The question was about the WiFi link. Why do you think I said that most peoples broadband will be the limit? DSL itself is good for about one decent HD video stream and nothing else. (well my sort of 4Mbps BRAS type DSL anyway). Indeed. Except we get 16Mbps+ to the exchange from here. WiFi is good for 2 or three such... So, like I said, the limit will be the broadband connection, not the WiFi. Wifi is a best efforts 50Mbps or so half duplex *shared* connection.. Still many times most peoples broadband connection. 100Mbps Ethernet is a guaranteed 100MBPS FULL DUPLEX link to wherever. The point being that smart TVs, for most users, don't do "to wherever". Do you have anything of value to contribute? MBQ |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 05/01/2012 17:52, Theo Markettos wrote:
Dave wrote: What maybe an issue is any RFI generated in the TV getting out on an unscreened cable. Our panny set came with a couple of large ferrite cores to put around the ethernet cable. Speculating wildly, I wonder if the set is just about on its permitted RFI limits, and specifying STP enables them to creep under the threshold. They know that nobody's going to use STP, but they put it in the manual to tick the regulatory box. Same reason that your set came with ferrite cores... as a quick'n'dirty fix. Theo I have a portable Sony Minidisc recorder like that. MZ-RH910. It came with a whole kit of ferrite cores (3!) with instructions for the user to wind small loops around each for microphone, power and line input connections when the recorder is connected to a computer via USB. The reason is plainy stated in the manual as "You must attach a clamp filter to comply with the applicable EMC standards" - and that's it. No proper explanation to the consumer on what on earth EMC is all about, and why Sony couldn't have resolved this in a neater fashion. Guess the goods were a bit too close to leaving the factory gates ... -- Adrian C |
OT Ethernet Cable
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. The laptop will be doing other things over WiFi at the same time. I can be streaming a HD video into the laptop and then out to my TV, both over the same WiFi without any problems. That is on either band although I prefer to use the 5G band. |
OT Ethernet Cable
Man at B&Q wrote:
On Jan 5, 1:29 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote: Man at B&Q wrote: On Jan 5, 12:46 pm, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Not really. The Ethernet in a smart TV is mostly for streaming content from the web which, for most people, will be limited by their broadband connection. well yes and no. Like I said not really. Wifi is not full duplex for a start, and if other people are using it it can become a limiting factor. As can the DSL connection if while you are watching that HD video, your email client wakes up and starts downloading a huge email attachment.. The question was about the WiFi link. Why do you think I said that most peoples broadband will be the limit? DSL itself is good for about one decent HD video stream and nothing else. (well my sort of 4Mbps BRAS type DSL anyway). Indeed. Except we get 16Mbps+ to the exchange from here. WiFi is good for 2 or three such... So, like I said, the limit will be the broadband connection, not the WiFi. Wifi is a best efforts 50Mbps or so half duplex *shared* connection.. Still many times most peoples broadband connection. 100Mbps Ethernet is a guaranteed 100MBPS FULL DUPLEX link to wherever. The point being that smart TVs, for most users, don't do "to wherever". Do you have anything of value to contribute? MBQ You have totally missed the point which was,. if the wifi is being used by other machines to talk to each other at the same time then its NOT good enough. I now you spend YOUR time talking to ourself, but here at least my wife and I share a server and we found WiFi simply not good enough to watch videos off it, if someone else was using it to do - say - a file save onto the server. |
OT Ethernet Cable
dennis@home wrote:
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. I can saturate my wifi with a single file transfer. The laptop will be doing other things over WiFi at the same time. I can be streaming a HD video into the laptop and then out to my TV, both over the same WiFi without any problems. That is on either band although I prefer to use the 5G band. |
OT Ethernet Cable
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... dennis@home wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. I can saturate my wifi with a single file transfer. So? That's not what the OP is likely to do. And if that causes you a problem then run some better software which prioritises the AV stuff so it works. The laptop will be doing other things over WiFi at the same time. I can be streaming a HD video into the laptop and then out to my TV, both over the same WiFi without any problems. That is on either band although I prefer to use the 5G band. |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 05/01/2012 19:38, dennis@home wrote:
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. Sometimes... much depends on if you are running 802.11 n or g. And with g, in particular how many folks in the neighbourhood you are being forced to share spectrum with. That is before you start taking into account losses due to range or attenuation from the building fabric. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. The laptop will be doing other things over WiFi at the same time. I can be streaming a HD video into the laptop and then out to my TV, both over the same WiFi without any problems. That is on either band although I prefer to use the 5G band. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT Ethernet Cable
dennis@home wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... dennis@home wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. I can saturate my wifi with a single file transfer. So? That's not what the OP is likely to do. And if that causes you a problem then run some better software which prioritises the AV stuff so it works. now how do I do that on a shared wifi ethernet? |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 05/01/2012 19:31, Man at B&Q wrote:
On Jan 5, 1:29 pm, The Natural wrote: Man at B&Q wrote: On Jan 5, 12:46 pm, Timothy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Not really. The Ethernet in a smart TV is mostly for streaming content from the web which, for most people, will be limited by their broadband connection. well yes and no. Like I said not really. Wifi is not full duplex for a start, and if other people are using it it can become a limiting factor. As can the DSL connection if while you are watching that HD video, your email client wakes up and starts downloading a huge email attachment.. The question was about the WiFi link. Why do you think I said that most peoples broadband will be the limit? No idea. If I am streaming a movie from my media server to a couple of TVs, I can't see what it has to do with my broadband. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT Ethernet Cable
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... dennis@home wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... dennis@home wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... On 05/01/2012 12:46, Timothy Murphy wrote: Paul D Smith wrote: If you need a really long cable, you might consider WiFi instead. Something like a DLink DAP 1160 will convert "wired" to "wireless" and I happily stream HD iPlayer over exactly that from my Dlink WiFi router/ADSL modem which is some inconvenient distance form the TV. Does the lower speed of WiFi compared with ethernet become relevant when dealing with TV (video) data? Potentially yes... but it does depend on what you are using the ethernet connection for. If all you want is access to Youtube via the internet, then it makes little difference, since whatever wifi speed you get will still be well in excess of most broadband connections. If however you have a DLNA media server stuffed full of HD movies etc, and you want to stream them to the TV, you may find the wifi ruyns out of puff. Hence the popularity of "Homeplug AV" data over mains gizmos for this application. WiFi is quite quick. I can saturate my 18M DSL connection with ease using WiFi. I can saturate my wifi with a single file transfer. So? That's not what the OP is likely to do. And if that causes you a problem then run some better software which prioritises the AV stuff so it works. now how do I do that on a shared wifi ethernet? 802.11n supports QOS but even you could put in two access points and split the use. |
OT Ethernet Cable
Zapp Brannigan wrote:
I have an application (Smart TV) which calls for a "Ethernet Cable (Screened)". Are they all screened as a quick look on Amazon doesn't make any differentiation. Try an ordinary cable, it'll likely work fine. I'm using an ordinarly ethernet cable to attach my Samsung Smart TV (D5520) to a PC, and it seems to work perfectly. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin |
OT Ethernet Cable
On 07/01/2012 13:19, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm using an ordinarly ethernet cable to attach my Samsung Smart TV (D5520) to a PC, and it seems to work perfectly. And I'm using one for my Sony. Quite a long one as it happens - the direct path might only be 20ft, but it goes via the loft. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter