Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving of the
front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point where it is now
sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is irregular, approximates
to 14 square metres and is presently carpetted with a carpet that reflects
fully the ravages of the previous building works! My question is which is
most likely to give us good service - a top end laminate or real wood given
that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has strong
attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at the front door
to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past because our
sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Thanks

Peter

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

"peter" wrote in message
...
Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving of
the front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point where it
is now sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is irregular,
approximates to 14 square metres and is presently carpetted with a carpet
that reflects fully the ravages of the previous building works! My
question is which is most likely to give us good service - a top end
laminate or real wood given that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has strong
attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at the front
door to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past because our
sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Ceramic or porcelain tiles?

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

On 2006-11-10 18:18:55 +0000, "peter" said:

Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving of
the front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point where
it is now sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is
irregular, approximates to 14 square metres and is presently carpetted
with a carpet that reflects fully the ravages of the previous building
works! My question is which is most likely to give us good service - a
top end laminate or real wood given that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has strong
attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at the front
door to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past because
our sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Thanks

Peter

I have hard floors throughout the ground floor with the occasional rug
in specific places. The main thoroughfares such as entry ways and
through ways are large slate tiles, while rooms where people sit are
oiled and waxed solid oak floors. The stairs are oak as well with
treads oiled but not waxed.

This was all done with animals in mind - principally cats but it is
Sloberador resistant as well.

I wouldn't entertain the idea of laminate floors anywhere in the house
because regardless of price because they all seem to have an unnatural
plasticy appearance and clacky sound underfoot.
To me, the difference between this and a proper wood floor is like the
difference between closing the door of a Skoda vs. a BMW - clang vs.
thud.

I think you could use real wood as a floor for the high traffic areas,
although to keep maintenance sensible, this would probably need to be
finished in a pretty serious varnish. Unfortunately this usually has
the effect of making the surface shiny or very shiny, which personally
I think is a shame to do with wood because it again veers to the
plasticy appearance. Moreover, when it needs to be attended to, the
whole lot has to be sanded off, usually and started again.

It was these factors that led to our mixed choice of stone for higher
traffic areas and oiled and waxed wood for the lower ones.

The slate areas can be wiped or completely washed quickly and easily,
or for more typical dry dust and grit, vacuumed up very rapidly indeed
- very animal practical. The finish is important. In order to
achieve a good colour rendition but without gloss, there are a good
range of products from Lithofin which work very well and take a lot of
punishment.

The layout of the house is such that animals with wet paws have dry
paws before they reach any rooms with wooden floors, but are not
explicitly barred. These floors are maintained by quick vacuuming
and then periodically with beeswax using a good floor polisher. Over
time this richens to a superb appearance. If anything is accidentally
spilled, it can be wiped up easily and small areas can be rubbed with
more oil and wax so there is not the issue that the whole floor would
need to be redone for a small problem area.

With cats only and no small kids, I might consider using an oiled and
waxed floor in the hallway, but probably not with dogs. I wouldn't
personally go for a varnished solid wood floor either but that would be
infinitely preferable to laminate.

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
peter wrote:

Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving
of the front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point
where it is now sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is
irregular, approximates to 14 square metres and is presently
carpetted with a carpet that reflects fully the ravages of the
previous building works! My question is which is most likely to give
us good service - a top end laminate or real wood given that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has
strong attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at
the front door to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past
because our sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Thanks

Peter

We replaced our hall carpet a few years ago with an engineered wood floor -
and have been very pleased with the results.

This is a thin layer of hardwood (about 3mm) bonded onto 10 or 11mm of
softwood. You install it in the same way as laminated flooring. It is
thicker than laminate - but should fit without any major door shaving if you
currently have carpet with underlay. It has a wipe clean surface, and is
very easy to maintain. If it gets slightly damaged, the backing doesn't show
through - unlike laminate. Apparently it can even be sanded and re-sufaced -
but only once!

In my view, it is an acceptable compromise between nasty (even if not cheap)
laminate and very expensive solid hardwood.

It goes without saying - but I'm saying it anyway(!) - that, to do a proper
job, you need to remove the skirting boards, and undercut the doorframes and
architraves, before fitting the flooring - and then replace or renew the
skirtings once the new floor is down. The expansion gaps are then completely
hidden without any need to use beading - which is always a dead give-away of
a retro-fit job.
--
Cheers,
Roger
______
Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly
monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks.
PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP!

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...

To me, the difference between this and a proper wood floor is like the
difference between closing the door of a Skoda vs. a BMW - clang vs. thud.

BMWs have better seals these days so they clunk just like Skodas used to.

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:27:32 -0000, "Roger Mills"
wrote:

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
peter wrote:

Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving
of the front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point
where it is now sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is
irregular, approximates to 14 square metres and is presently
carpetted with a carpet that reflects fully the ravages of the
previous building works! My question is which is most likely to give
us good service - a top end laminate or real wood given that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has
strong attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at
the front door to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past
because our sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Thanks

Peter

We replaced our hall carpet a few years ago with an engineered wood floor -
and have been very pleased with the results.

This is a thin layer of hardwood (about 3mm) bonded onto 10 or 11mm of
softwood. You install it in the same way as laminated flooring. It is
thicker than laminate - but should fit without any major door shaving if you
currently have carpet with underlay. It has a wipe clean surface, and is
very easy to maintain. If it gets slightly damaged, the backing doesn't show
through - unlike laminate. Apparently it can even be sanded and re-sufaced -
but only once!

In my view, it is an acceptable compromise between nasty (even if not cheap)
laminate and very expensive solid hardwood.

It goes without saying - but I'm saying it anyway(!) - that, to do a proper
job, you need to remove the skirting boards, and undercut the doorframes and
architraves, before fitting the flooring - and then replace or renew the
skirtings once the new floor is down. The expansion gaps are then completely
hidden without any need to use beading - which is always a dead give-away of
a retro-fit job.


Expensive solid hardwood? :-)


£12.00 a square yard.


Mark S.

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

Mark S. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:27:32 -0000, "Roger Mills"
wrote:
In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
peter wrote:

Following the upgrading of our kitchen and bathroom and blockweaving
of the front garden of our chalet bungalow we are now at the point
where it is now sensible to replace our hall flooring. The shape is
irregular, approximates to 14 square metres and is presently
carpetted with a carpet that reflects fully the ravages of the
previous building works! My question is which is most likely to give
us good service - a top end laminate or real wood given that:-

1. We have two west highland terriers - an easy wipe surface has
strong attraction although of course we will have a suitable mat at
the front door to trap mud/grit.!
2. As a hallway leading to all other rooms / upstairs the location is
obviously high wear although possibly less so than in the past
because our sons have grown up

Comments / advice please.

Thanks

Peter

We replaced our hall carpet a few years ago with an engineered wood floor -
and have been very pleased with the results.

This is a thin layer of hardwood (about 3mm) bonded onto 10 or 11mm of
softwood. You install it in the same way as laminated flooring. It is
thicker than laminate - but should fit without any major door shaving if you
currently have carpet with underlay. It has a wipe clean surface, and is
very easy to maintain. If it gets slightly damaged, the backing doesn't show
through - unlike laminate. Apparently it can even be sanded and re-sufaced -
but only once!

In my view, it is an acceptable compromise between nasty (even if not cheap)
laminate and very expensive solid hardwood.

It goes without saying - but I'm saying it anyway(!) - that, to do a proper
job, you need to remove the skirting boards, and undercut the doorframes and
architraves, before fitting the flooring - and then replace or renew the
skirtings once the new floor is down. The expansion gaps are then completely
hidden without any need to use beading - which is always a dead give-away of
a retro-fit job.


Expensive solid hardwood? :-)


£12.00 a square yard.


Mark S.

Chap on ebay does 100 cuft of assorted oak for just over £2 a cu ft. I
want some. Dont have the space to store it though.

NT

Laminate vs real or machined wood
 

dennis@home wrote:
"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...

To me, the difference between this and a proper wood floor is like the
difference between closing the door of a Skoda vs. a BMW - clang vs. thud.

BMWs have better seals these days so they clunk just like Skodas used to.




Andy must have an older Skoda