replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Direct cylinders are proving to be hard to come by.

Is there any consequences of replacing our knackered 'direct' one with
a new 'indirect' one?

Guy at City Plumbing didn't seem to think there was....

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

On 5 Jan 2006 05:43:54 -0800, "Russ"
wrote:

Direct cylinders are proving to be hard to come by.

Is there any consequences of replacing our knackered 'direct' one with
a new 'indirect' one?

Guy at City Plumbing didn't seem to think there was....

When you say "direct" do you mean a primatic one?

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

"direct" as in it's got an immersion heater only

"indirect" being the tanks with the additional connections on the side
and the coil inside, into which you'd feed water from the boiler.

All we've got is immersion heated water.

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Russ wrote:
"direct" as in it's got an immersion heater only

"indirect" being the tanks with the additional connections on the side
and the coil inside, into which you'd feed water from the boiler.

All we've got is immersion heated water.

then having a heat exchanger inside it will have no effect. You could
use an insulated removed used one, which would not comply if heated
indirectly.

NT

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

sorry, I don't understand what you mean?

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Russ wrote:
Direct cylinders are proving to be hard to come by.


Santon do one, the PremierPlus.

Rob

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

but I/we may change our heating system in teh future, as the hot air
heating system might be able to be modified such that it heats the
water (like the Johnson Starley system we had in our previous house).

So, hence I am wondering now if I can use an indirect tank, thus
allowing for future changes to the system.

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

On 5 Jan 2006 06:14:17 -0800, "Russ"
wrote:

"direct" as in it's got an immersion heater only

"indirect" being the tanks with the additional connections on the side
and the coil inside, into which you'd feed water from the boiler.

All we've got is immersion heated water.

You should be fine with an indirect cylinder then, you would simply
ignore the extra plumbing for where the boiler coil would normally go.
A new one should have the cold feed from the tank in the bottom, the
top central pipe for the HW and expansion, and of course. the
immersion heater boss on top as usual.

New cylinders are decently insulated and should save a bit on running
costs.

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

On 5 Jan 2006 06:45:46 -0800 someone who may be "Russ"
wrote this:-

but I/we may change our heating system in teh future, as the hot air
heating system might be able to be modified such that it heats the
water (like the Johnson Starley system we had in our previous house).

So, hence I am wondering now if I can use an indirect tank, thus
allowing for future changes to the system.

That's a somewhat different angle to your original question. The
answer is yes, the coil will simply remain unused.

If you are thinking ahead then how about installing a solar
cylinder? These have an extra coil for solar water heating and
better insulation levels.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

In article .com,
Russ wrote:
"direct" as in it's got an immersion heater only

"indirect" being the tanks with the additional connections on the side
and the coil inside, into which you'd feed water from the boiler.

All we've got is immersion heated water.

No harm in doing this and you've got the correct cylinder if you decide
later to have central heating.

--
*The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
Russ wrote:

"direct" as in it's got an immersion heater only

"indirect" being the tanks with the additional connections on the side
and the coil inside, into which you'd feed water from the boiler.

All we've got is immersion heated water.

In that case, the terms "direct" and "indirect" don't have any relevance to
your situation. They both apply to situations where the water is heated by
an external source rather than by an internal immersion heater.

With a direct cylinder - often used with back boilers behind coal fires -
the water which circulates between the boiler and the cylinder is the *same*
water as comes out of your hot taps. With an indirect cylinder, there is an
internal coil/heat exchanger through which water from the boiler circulates,
heating the water in the cylinder *indirectly* without mixing with it.

If you use an indirect cylinder, you will simply have an unused heater
exchanger sitting inside it - it matters not one jot. In fact, it will
provide a modicum of future-proofing in case you ever want to convert to an
external water heating system.
--
Cheers,
Set Square
______
Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid.

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Thanks Dave & Set Square

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Lol!

THis is quite amusing.....

after all my worrying about direct or indirect tank, I've bought an
indirect one - thinking our one at home here is Direct.....and it's
not!

I've just checked it all roudn again now I'm at home, and sure enough,
hidden away (very difficult to see, as the tank sits righ back in a
cupboard it practically fills) are the 2 connections for the indirect
heating!

Looks like the new tank I've got here has connections in EXACTLY the
same points, which should hopefully make swapping the tanks over a bit
easier!

Thanks for you help on here chaps, I like this forum!

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 06:38:12 -0800, Russ wrote:

sorry, I don't understand what you mean?

I think he means a skip-grade one (provided it's not leaking).
You often find sound but aged cylinders removed where someone's up*graded
to a combi or whatever. They're OK to use if they're foam-lagged but their
heat echanger coils may not be up to current regs.

Another option with a direct cylinder might be to use it as a thermal
store with a plate heat echanger, flow switch and pump to give hot water.
It's something I've been plotting but not yet done.


* or 'down' if you're Dave P & co ;-)

replacing a 'direct' hot water cylinder with an 'indirect' one....
 

Is there any consequences of replacing our knackered 'direct' one with
a new 'indirect' one?

(a) Direct cylinders are perfectly easy to come by.
(b) Indirect ones can be used anyway.

If there is any possibility of connecting it up to a boiler in the future,
get an indirect one.

Christian.