Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Condensing Boiler efficency with existing radiators etc...
I am about to replace our 1960's Thorn M gas boiler
with a Condensing boiler.. Evidently condensing boilers run more efficiently than non-condensing boilers. But my understanding is that they rely on a return temperature of 55/60C ish (I'm not sure what a typical flow temp for a condensing boiler is - same as non condensing boiler ?) I believe that my system runs with a flow 82C of and a return of about 71C. Not checked but that would be typical. So what sort of efficiency am I going to get out of my brad new Condensing boiler? Surely not much better than my old Thorn M? Is there anything I can do to my system to help the situation. I had a plumber come in recently who told me that I should be fitting thermostatic controls to all radiators. Is that a regs requirement? Isn't that going to make the situation worse? Roy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Evidently condensing boilers run more efficiently
than non-condensing boilers. Yes. But my understanding is that they rely on a return temperature of 55/60C ish Nope. Whilst condensing boilers do like a low return temp, they do not require one. Although larger radiators will enable you to maintain output at lower temperatures, the electronics within the boiler are capable of reducing the temperature when it is not very cold, anyway, so your small rads can still run cooler. Even at exactly the same temperature, the condensing boiler will eat your old Thorn for breakfast in the efficiency stakes. So what sort of efficiency am I going to get out of my brad new Condensing boiler? Surely not much better than my old Thorn M? Loads better. I had a plumber come in recently who told me that I should be fitting thermostatic controls to all radiators. Is that a regs requirement? It is one way of meeting the regs requirement. The cheapest way, in fact. Isn't that going to make the situation worse? No, it will make it considerably better. Christian. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:00:58 +0100, "RzB"
wrote: I am about to replace our 1960's Thorn M gas boiler with a Condensing boiler.. Evidently condensing boilers run more efficiently than non-condensing boilers. But my understanding is that they rely on a return temperature of 55/60C ish (I'm not sure what a typical flow temp for a condensing boiler is - same as non condensing boiler ?) It will depend on the behaviour of the boiler controls. One thing to remember is that condensing boilers usually modulate, meaning that the burn rate is reduced when the heat requirement is less in warmer weather. One thing to realise is that the 54 degree dew point is not like finding the Holy Grail. On a condensing boiler, the efficiency improves with reducing return temperature. Above the dew point this happens at one rate with respect to temperature. It happens at a greater rate below the dew point. There is a graph on the data sheet of the Celsius boiler on Keston's web site which shows this. The second point is that the existing radiator sizings will have been designed on the basis of 82 flow, 70 return and a worst case outside temperature of -1 or -3 degrees. However, these days are relatively rare, and most of the time, the output needed to keep the place warm is a lot less. So for at least 9 months plus of a typical year, the boiler will modulate down as will temperatures to more efficient ranges. When needed, the boiler will be able to deliver 82/70. Even though it won't be condensing, because it will have a better heat exchanger anyway, it will be more efficient boiler than the old one. I believe that my system runs with a flow 82C of and a return of about 71C. Not checked but that would be typical. So what sort of efficiency am I going to get out of my brad new Condensing boiler? Surely not much better than my old Thorn M? The old boiler is likely to have a seasonal efficiency in the 50-60% range. Seasonal efficiency is described on the SEDBUK web site, but is basically the behaviour characterised for the typical UK climate over the whole year rather than simple lab optimised figures. Prior to the change in rules mandating condensing boilers in most cases, non-condensing boilers were reaching 78-80% on this scale, partly because of better heat exchangers, partly the use of fanned flues and partly absence of pilots (possibly others). Decent condensing boilers all achieve 90-91%. So, if you do nothing with radiators you could expect to achieve better than 80% and not 90%. Is there anything I can do to my system to help the situation. You could replace radiators with larger ones or ones having more panels, or do what I did and move some round and replace some. I had a plumber come in recently who told me that I should be fitting thermostatic controls to all radiators. This is worth doing anyway and is likely to provide a better ROI than radiator changing, so if you do one thing, that is it. Is that a regs requirement? Isn't that going to make the situation worse? No because the boiler will modulate output down when the heat isn't required. You leave one radiator where the room thermostat is located without a TRV Roy -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:39:33 +0100, Andy Hall wrote:
| The second point is that the existing radiator sizings will have been | designed on the basis of 82 flow, 70 return and a worst case outside | temperature of -1 or -3 degrees. However, these days are relatively | rare, and most of the time, the output needed to keep the place warm | is a lot less. So for at least 9 months plus of a typical year, the | boiler will modulate down as will temperatures to more efficient | ranges. When needed, the boiler will be able to deliver 82/70. Even | though it won't be condensing, because it will have a better heat | exchanger anyway, it will be more efficient boiler than the old one. My house is so well insulated that it stays nice and warm on radiators rated 3kw downstairs to which I switch another 1.5 kw upstairs in very cold weather. These are similar to Stelrad Elite P1 http://www.stelrad.com/UK/elite.html from which I cribbed the ratings. I did the heating calcs for these 25 years ago, since which I have improved the insulation, so I believe that I could now use smaller radiators. I have uses a 10 kw conventional boiler, for Central heating and domestic hot water, without problems for 25 years. My problem is that the smallest combi boiler I can find is the eco Hometec EC16S which is rated by SEBUK at 22.0kw regulating down to 3kw. The companies literature rates it at 16kw ish modulating down to 2.5 or 3.1kw. Clearly much too big for my house. Surely through most of the year, on minimum modulation this will cycle on and off and loose most of its condensing advantages. DHW is OK -- Dave Fawthrop dave hyphenologist co uk "Intelligent Design?" my knees say *not*. "Intelligent Design?" my back says *not*. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Fawthrop wrote:
My problem is that the smallest combi boiler I can find is the eco Hometec EC16S which is rated by SEBUK at 22.0kw regulating down to 3kw. The companies literature rates it at 16kw ish modulating down to 2.5 or 3.1kw. Clearly much too big for my house. Not really. If you replace it and don't go the combi route, you will need to replace the hot water storage cylinder as well with a fast recoivery one to comply with the building regs. That will swallow the 20kW output nicely and give fast recovery times. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My problem is that the smallest combi boiler I can find is the eco
Hometec EC16S which is rated by SEBUK at 22.0kw regulating down to 3kw. The companies literature rates it at 16kw ish modulating down to 2.5 or 3.1kw. Clearly much too big for my house. Not really. If you replace it and don't go the combi route, you will need to replace the hot water storage cylinder as well with a fast recoivery one to comply with the building regs. That will swallow the 20kW output nicely and give fast recovery times. I wasn't aware that the cylinder needed to be changed, only that if it was changed, it would have to be Part L1 compliant. Any existing cylinder kept would need to be fully pumped, with a thermostat added, though. Obviously, an ancient scaled up cylinder with only a crappy add on jacket is probably worth replacing anyway. Christian. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"John Rumm" wrote in message
Not really. If you replace it and don't go the combi route, you will need to replace the hot water storage cylinder as well with a fast recoivery one to comply with the building regs. Do you have a link to this requirement please John? I have seen people advise the use of fast recovery cylinders, but never stipulated as a requirement for Building Regs! TIA Phil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Do you have a link to this requirement please John?
I have seen people advise the use of fast recovery cylinders, but never stipulated as a requirement for Building Regs! L1 compliant cylinders must have a certain amount of insulation and a certain size of heat exchanger (so the boiler can heat it quickly and turn off, reducing primary circuit losses). A true rapid recovery cylinder will actually have a much larger heat exchanger than that mandated for L1, although the L1 is much better than the standard cylinders installed 10-20 years ago. I believe you only need to fit one when installing a new one, or replacing an old one. Christian. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TheScullster wrote:
Do you have a link to this requirement please John? http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/grou...reg_600288.pdf I have seen people advise the use of fast recovery cylinders, but never stipulated as a requirement for Building Regs! Yup sorry, I might have overstated the requirements slightly, reading the detail : "1.43 For systems incorporating integral or separate hot water storage vessels, ways of meeting the requirement include: a) arranging for hot water storage systems to meet the insulation requirements of BS 1566, BS 699, BS 3198, or BS 7206 (as appropriate); or b) in ordinary cases, insulating vessels with a 35mm thick, factory-applied coating of PU-foam having a minimum density of 30kg/m3. (For unvented hot water systems additional insulation should be provided to control the heat losses through the safety fittings and pipework but without impeding safe operation and visibility of warning discharges. (See Approved Document G.)" And: "1.44 Provisions should enable efficient operation without excessive boiler firing and primary circuit losses. A way of demonstrating compliance for indirectly heated hot water storage systems would be for the size of the heat exchanger to be at least that recommended in BS 1566, BS 3198, or BS 7206 (as appropriate) and for them to be served by a pumped primary system." I have not looked at BS1566, or 3198, but it looks like there is a rquirement to meet L1, but that does not need to be as fast as a "fast recovery" cylinder. Just well insulated and fast ish! -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:01:58 +0100, John Rumm
wrote: | Dave Fawthrop wrote: | | My problem is that the smallest combi boiler I can find is the eco Hometec | EC16S which is rated by SEBUK at 22.0kw regulating down to 3kw. The | companies literature rates it at 16kw ish modulating down to 2.5 or 3.1kw. | Clearly much too big for my house. | | Not really. If you replace it and don't go the combi route, you will | need to replace the hot water storage cylinder as well with a fast | recoivery one to comply with the building regs. That will swallow the | 20kW output nicely and give fast recovery times. I do not need hot water storage, the EC16S will give more DHW flow than I have at the moment. -- Dave Fawthrop dave hyphenologist co uk "Intelligent Design?" my knees say *not*. "Intelligent Design?" my back says *not*. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 11:48:25 +0100, Dave Fawthrop
wrote: On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:39:33 +0100, Andy Hall wrote: | The second point is that the existing radiator sizings will have been | designed on the basis of 82 flow, 70 return and a worst case outside | temperature of -1 or -3 degrees. However, these days are relatively | rare, and most of the time, the output needed to keep the place warm | is a lot less. So for at least 9 months plus of a typical year, the | boiler will modulate down as will temperatures to more efficient | ranges. When needed, the boiler will be able to deliver 82/70. Even | though it won't be condensing, because it will have a better heat | exchanger anyway, it will be more efficient boiler than the old one. My house is so well insulated that it stays nice and warm on radiators rated 3kw downstairs to which I switch another 1.5 kw upstairs in very cold weather. These are similar to Stelrad Elite P1 http://www.stelrad.com/UK/elite.html from which I cribbed the ratings. I did the heating calcs for these 25 years ago, since which I have improved the insulation, so I believe that I could now use smaller radiators. I have uses a 10 kw conventional boiler, for Central heating and domestic hot water, without problems for 25 years. My problem is that the smallest combi boiler I can find is the eco Hometec EC16S which is rated by SEBUK at 22.0kw regulating down to 3kw. The companies literature rates it at 16kw ish modulating down to 2.5 or 3.1kw. Clearly much too big for my house. Surely through most of the year, on minimum modulation this will cycle on and off and loose most of its condensing advantages. DHW is OK This is actually the MAN Heiztechnik Micromat. I have one of the larger versions, but of course not a combi. The control system is more sophisticated than most boilers in that there is also weather compensation and slope control. This means that it will modulate down such that the flow temperature is at around 40 degrees. The pump also reduces in power to as low as 20% of full run rate. Once you fall below the minimum 3kW modulation level, the boiler will cycle, but at this low temperature on a very long time constant. Since your existing boiler is a 10kW one, it will be cycling on the thermostat at full power and 82 degree operation. I would suspect that there is quite an overshoot on flow temperature as well. Running the burner at 3kW and 40 degrees means that the boiler is operating well into the high efficiency slope anyway and spare heat is distributed within the building. Much of the efficiency loss through cycling with conventional boilers cycling is flue loss when the boiler no longer should be providing heat. -- ..andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
RzB wrote:
I am about to replace our 1960's Thorn M gas boiler with a Condensing boiler.. Evidently condensing boilers run more efficiently than non-condensing boilers. But my understanding is that they rely on a return temperature of 55/60C ish (I'm not sure what a typical flow temp for a condensing boiler is - same as non condensing boiler ?) "Rely" is too strong a word in this circumstance. A modern boiler will be significantly more efficient than an older counterpart by virtue of more sophisticated control systems, and better design anyway. A condensing boiler even moreso as a result of its larger heat exchanger and its ability to recover what would otherwise be lost heat. I believe that my system runs with a flow 82C of and a return of about 71C. Not checked but that would be typical. Probably about right... So what sort of efficiency am I going to get out of my brad new Condensing boiler? Surely not much better than my old Thorn M? I would expect it to be significantly better - since the old boiler will be fairly poor by modern standards even if comparing against a non condenser. Is there anything I can do to my system to help the situation. I had a plumber come in recently who The boiler will do much of the work for you, since it will use its ability to modulate to actually match the heat it provides to the load. It can also use this capability to maximise the amount of time it spends condensing. In many cases it will run the system cooler, but for longer (which is preferable to bursts of full output, which result in overshooting the desired temperature, followed by gaps of zero output) told me that I should be fitting thermostatic controls to all radiators. Is that a regs requirement? Yes, the controls on the whole system will need to be up to spec. So TRVs on all reads except the one in the room with the room stat (which provides the interlock to turn the whole lot off when the demand is reacted (can also do it with all TRVs and a flow sensor)). Fast recovery cylinder, fully pumped, and zoned if it is a big house. Isn't that going to make the situation worse? Nope they will help. As the TRVs close down, the rate of flow through the rads falls, giving bigger temperature differentials across the rads and lower return temps - this improves boiler efficiency still further. As the system as a whole comes up to temp, there will be a time when the boiler sees a rise in the overall return temp (since the heat being dumped to the house is falling) this will allow the boiler to modulate down further. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Christian/Andy/John,
That sounds good news. Many thanks for your advice, Roy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Non-modulating condensing boilers? | UK diy | |||
Near death boiler + replacing a boiler | UK diy | |||
Another heating problem question! | UK diy | |||
Upgrade to a Condensing boiler - yes or no? | UK diy | |||
New Condensing Boiler and Shower | UK diy |