Ryobi Strimmer? Clutch or no clutch?
 

Any one used a Ryobi 2stroke?

McCulloch doesnt seem to be to popular in the group? How does the Ryobi
compare?

It is better to have a model with clutch or direct drive? What are the
advantages/disadvantages?

regards

john wrote:

Any one used a Ryobi 2stroke?

McCulloch doesnt seem to be to popular in the group? How does the Ryobi
compare?

It is better to have a model with clutch or direct drive? What are the
advantages/disadvantages?

regards


I have a 4 year old Ryobi 2 stroke 'power pack' i.e it will power a
strimmer, brushcutter (or hedgecutter but I don't bother) all from the
same unit.

I was bought it as a moving in present. It works fine but I found that
the shaft was not long enough and caused awful lower back ache (I'm
6'2'') when using the strimmer or brushcutter. Solved by making an
extension piece.

It does have a clutch.

The suppliers are what I'd call a serious garden tool firm - they stock
big lawn tractors and are a Stihl dealer. They freely admit that they
only stock the Ryobi kit for the low end of the domestic market - which
suited me fine.

Can't really say much more.

Richard

--
Real email address is RJSavage at BIGFOOT dot COM

The information contained in this post
may not be published in, or used by

http://www.diyprojects.info

john wrote:
Any one used a Ryobi 2stroke?

McCulloch doesnt seem to be to popular in the group? How does the
Ryobi
compare?

It is better to have a model with clutch or direct drive? What are
the
advantages/disadvantages?

regards

Ryobi are in general better than McCulloch.

I would go for a clutch because the line head doesn't spin round when
it is idling. This is better because it won't accidentally strim you if
you lay it down for a short while without stopping it and is easier to
start.

Alan.

In article . com,
says...
john wrote:
Any one used a Ryobi 2stroke?

McCulloch doesnt seem to be to popular in the group? How does the
Ryobi
compare?

It is better to have a model with clutch or direct drive? What are
the
advantages/disadvantages?

regards

Ryobi are in general better than McCulloch.

I would go for a clutch because the line head doesn't spin round when
it is idling. This is better because it won't accidentally strim you if
you lay it down for a short while without stopping it and is easier to
start.

Alan.


Be aware that Ryobi products are made in America and Japan.

American Ryobi is junk. The home brewed version is far superior.
--
Paul Mc Cann

"Paul Mc Cann" wrote in message
.. .
In article . com,
says...
john wrote:
Any one used a Ryobi 2stroke?

McCulloch doesnt seem to be to popular in the group? How does the
Ryobi
compare?

It is better to have a model with clutch or direct drive? What are
the
advantages/disadvantages?

regards

Ryobi are in general better than McCulloch.

I would go for a clutch because the line head doesn't spin round when
it is idling. This is better because it won't accidentally strim you if
you lay it down for a short while without stopping it and is easier to
start.

Alan.


Be aware that Ryobi products are made in America and Japan.

American Ryobi is junk. The home brewed version is far superior.


Not directly related to the specific topic of this thread (namely
strimmers), but Ryobi recently bought Milwaukee off Atlas Copco.

Will be interesting to see what happens there - whether it's kept as a
separate operating entity, whether Milwaukee quality goes downhill, or
whether it acts as an internal OEM to the rest of Ryobi tools & they make
serious inroads into the industrial power tool market.

Its a pity to those of us who own & love AC tools, because I expect that
they will essentially get out of the power tool market now. Don't know if
they own AEG Power Tools still, but AEG just don't cut it compared with the
AC/Milwaukee lines.

--
Richard Sampson

mail me at
richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk