Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
How to REALLY cut US taxes - ID, deporting
Here in Texas, if you give a false name - e.g. another persons name as yourself,
it is a felony and when found guilty a jail sentence is due. Serious stuff. I found this out when a guy in town had xx DWI's and identified himself as his brother. His brother (not present) complained when interviewed the next day. The lying brother is spending 6 months in state jail. Martin Martin H. Eastburn @ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net TSRA, Endowed; NRA LOH & Patron Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot's Medal. NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member. http://lufkinced.com/ Ed Huntress wrote: "Ed Huntress" wrote in message news:... "John R. Carroll" wrote in message ... snip You aren't required to carry ID anywhere. That isn't how this works. What you are required to do is produce identification when requested by duly authorized personel. The legal basis for this is that if you have acted in a manner that draws attention, probable cause exists. A lot of this has come about through changes in search and seizure procedures regarding vehicles. I've been following up since yesterday and I see that a Supreme Court case from 2004 (HIIBEL v. SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al.) set the new standard. The police no longer need "probable cause" to require identification. Now it's a "reasonable suspicion," which is a lower standard. If a state requires that you show ID to a cop under those circumstances, it can be a crime not to show it. There are 18 states that require you to show it, but not showing it is not a criminal offense in all of them. I don't know the status for federal crimes, but Hiibel set the rule for state cases. -- Ed Huntress I read the Hiibel case and, contrary to what the analyses that I read said, it appears that Hiibel did not determine that a person has to identify himself with papers. It's clear from the Court's actual decision that the case involved the defendent's refusal to *state* his name, not to show ID. So it doesn't appear that this case sets a standard for how one has to identify himself. -- Ed Huntress ----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to REALLY cut US taxes | Metalworking | |||
How to REALLY cut US taxes | Metalworking | |||
New woodturning taxes announced ! | Woodturning | |||
OT - Halliburton and Taxes | Metalworking |