Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing

--
for full context, visit https://www.polytechforum.com/metalw...ng-643557-.htm

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

"Wasantha" wrote
in message ...
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which
channel is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing

--
for full context, visit
https://www.polytechforum.com/metalw...ng-643557-.htm
http://www.unistrut.us/DB/PDF_Archive/No_12.pdf

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.

(ring, ring)
(click) Joe's Auto Body, Joe here.
(cough) Um, how much will it cost to fix my fender?

--
Now therefore, be it Resolved by the Fiftieth Annual Convention
of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, That we
hereby declare that we are unalterably opposed to any program
which would entail the surrender of any part of the sovereignty
of the United States of America in favor of a world government.

--Veterans of Foreign Wars

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.


True enough.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:44:50 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.


True enough.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Vertical or horizontal installation? formed channel or extruded?
aluminum or steel? what alloy? what kind of load? static or cyclic?
What thickness?

All elase being equal I would say 2.4 inch tubing, but seldome in
these kinds of questions is "all else equal", or the question would
not need to be even considered, much less asked, as the answer is SO
obvious.

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:10:15 -0500, Clare Snyder
wrote:

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:44:50 -0800, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.


True enough.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Vertical or horizontal installation? formed channel or extruded?
aluminum or steel? what alloy? what kind of load? static or cyclic?
What thickness?

All elase being equal I would say 2.4 inch tubing, but seldome in
these kinds of questions is "all else equal", or the question would
not need to be even considered, much less asked, as the answer is SO
obvious.

2.4" tubing is going to be a LOT sronger than 1.6" U-channel, in
bending, in torsion, in compression and in tension.

--
Ed Huntress

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

"Clare Snyder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:44:50 -0800, Gunner Asch

wrote:

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which
channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should
not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that
it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I
hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.


True enough.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Vertical or horizontal installation? formed channel or extruded?
aluminum or steel? what alloy? what kind of load? static or cyclic?
What thickness?

All elase being equal I would say 2.4 inch tubing, but seldome in
these kinds of questions is "all else equal", or the question would
not need to be even considered, much less asked, as the answer is SO
obvious.

The strength and stiffness of steel is beyond most peoples' experience
so they have no basis to estimate it.

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

"If your car is on fire, do not pull into service station"

On 2017-12-26, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:45:16 -0500, Bob Engelhardt
wrote:

On 12/26/2017 3:18 PM, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel
is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing


Is this for an industrial or commercial setting? If so, you should not
be the one making the decision. It is such a naive question that it
shows that you are nowhere near qualified enough. No offense, I hope -
just trying to keep you out of trouble.

(ring, ring)
(click) Joe's Auto Body, Joe here.
(cough) Um, how much will it cost to fix my fender?


--Veterans of Foreign Wars

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 12:18:06 PM UTC-8, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing

Devoid of any idea what 'load' is intended, what joint construction and bracing
methods, what material, and what environment, I'd say they
are both more suitable. So is bamboo, concrete, and titanium
forgings.

Celery stalks, however, suffer structurally in the "dryer" environment.

Strength between c-channel and square tubing
 

On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 23:58:19 -0800 (PST), whit3rd
wrote:

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 12:18:06 PM UTC-8, Wasantha wrote:
I would like to know for a machine frame(textile dryer) which channel is more
suitable for carrying load.
1.6" U-Channel
2.4" Square Tubing

Devoid of any idea what 'load' is intended, what joint construction and bracing
methods, what material, and what environment, I'd say they
are both more suitable. So is bamboo, concrete, and titanium
forgings.

Celery stalks, however, suffer structurally in the "dryer" environment.

Well...there is always Unobtainium. Just saying......shrug


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus