Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
Check out his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch
The second item (as of this moment) on his page is his share of an item from the Guardian (what?! gummer usually dismisses it as a commie rag) about how someone is being prosecuted for an intemperate threatening comment he made on his Facebook page. The story is interesting and alarming: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...tion?CMP=fb_us Anyway, what's more interesting than that story is that Wieber seems to be quite sensitive to it...as well he might be, given his history of much worse threats and suggestions here. |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On 5/20/2017 2:20 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Check out his Facebook page: Stop socking up, tRudy: 11 years ago, while posting under this current nym, Rudy Canoza, we had a discussion about a revised marketing claim concerning grass-fed beef from USDA. You claimed that you had written to and received a reply from William T. Sessions, Associate Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program. Here below is the post you wrote using the nym Rudy Canoza containing your correspondence with William Sessions. [start- Jon to me] Eat **** and bark at the moon, Dreck - the proposed standard has NOT been adopted. I wrote to William Sessions, the associate deputy administrator (how's that for a title) at the Livestock and Seed Program at USDA that is in charge of writing the standard for the "meat marketing claims"; his name, title and e-mail address are at a web page whose URL I gave yesterday, http://www.fass.org/fasstrack/news_i...p?news_id=1152 Here's his reply: From: "Sessions, William" To: jonball@[...] Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program -----Original Message----- From: jonball@[...] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:38 AM To: Sessions, William Subject: 2003 proposed standards for meat marketing claims I have read about the proposed standards, and I've seen many of the public comments sent to USDA. I cannot find anything to indicate if the standards were adopted. Were the standards as proposed in 2003 adopted? Thanks in advance. Jonathan Ball Pasadena, CA __________________________________________________ _ Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh [end] Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan Ball, you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to 5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731 Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8 and I won't die soon. Yeah you will. You're an old man who hasn't looked after himself. I wouldn't go around goading people if I was as small and as puny as you are, liar Jon. You ought to be very careful. You certainly have no means to hasten my death. Are you really serious, weed? you're just over 5 feet tall and 64 years old. You'll be 65 on December 2nd. You've got to stop threatening people and goading them to come after you. You're pathetic. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 4:21:00 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Check out his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch The second item (as of this moment) on his page is his share of an item from the Guardian (what?! gummer usually dismisses it as a commie rag) about how someone is being prosecuted for an intemperate threatening comment he made on his Facebook page. The story is interesting and alarming: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...tion?CMP=fb_us Anyway, what's more interesting than that story is that Wieber seems to be quite sensitive to it...as well he might be, given his history of much worse threats and suggestions here. It's a strange commentary that the Guardian article seems to think that threatening to kill someone is a first-amendment issue -- as long as it's on social media. Fortunately, prosecutors don't agree. Gunner is treading on much thinner ice than he seems to realize. For that matter, Larry, who has openly advocated threatening elected representatives with guns, clearly has crossed the line and is liable to prosecution for a felony. Court cases have gone both ways on this issue, but chancing that you won't run into one that takes a dim view of thinly-veiled threats is a fool's choice. -- Ed Huntress |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On 5/20/2017 2:57 PM, wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 4:21:00 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote: Check out his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch The second item (as of this moment) on his page is his share of an item from the Guardian (what?! gummer usually dismisses it as a commie rag) about how someone is being prosecuted for an intemperate threatening comment he made on his Facebook page. The story is interesting and alarming: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...tion?CMP=fb_us Anyway, what's more interesting than that story is that Wieber seems to be quite sensitive to it...as well he might be, given his history of much worse threats and suggestions here. It's a strange commentary that the Guardian article seems to think that threatening to kill someone is a first-amendment issue -- as long as it's on social media. Fortunately, prosecutors don't agree. Gunner is treading on much thinner ice than he seems to realize. For that matter, Larry, who has openly advocated threatening elected representatives with guns, clearly has crossed the line and is liable to prosecution for a felony. Court cases have gone both ways on this issue, but chancing that you won't run into one that takes a dim view of thinly-veiled threats is a fool's choice. Now Terrell has jumped in on Wieber's FB page. This is getting good! |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On 5/20/2017 4:47 PM, Matt Singer wrote:
Now Terrell has jumped in on Wieber's FB page. This is getting good! Stop socking up, tRudy: 11 years ago, while posting under this current nym, Rudy Canoza, we had a discussion about a revised marketing claim concerning grass-fed beef from USDA. You claimed that you had written to and received a reply from William T. Sessions, Associate Deputy Administrator, Livestock and Seed Program. Here below is the post you wrote using the nym Rudy Canoza containing your correspondence with William Sessions. [start- Jon to me] Eat **** and bark at the moon, Dreck - the proposed standard has NOT been adopted. I wrote to William Sessions, the associate deputy administrator (how's that for a title) at the Livestock and Seed Program at USDA that is in charge of writing the standard for the "meat marketing claims"; his name, title and e-mail address are at a web page whose URL I gave yesterday, http://www.fass.org/fasstrack/news_i...p?news_id=1152 Here's his reply: From: "Sessions, William" To: jonball@[...] Mr. Ball: Thanks for your message. The marketing claim standards are still under review by USDA. Accordingly, the standards have not been published in a final form for use. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if further information is needed. Thanks, William T. Sessions Associate Deputy Administrator Livestock and Seed Program -----Original Message----- From: jonball@[...] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:38 AM To: Sessions, William Subject: 2003 proposed standards for meat marketing claims I have read about the proposed standards, and I've seen many of the public comments sent to USDA. I cannot find anything to indicate if the standards were adopted. Were the standards as proposed in 2003 adopted? Thanks in advance. Jonathan Ball Pasadena, CA __________________________________________________ _ Jonathan Ball aka Rudy Canoza 08 Sep 2005 http://bit.ly/2cYknsh [end] Jonathan Ball. Pasadena, CA. Priceless! That email, posted from Jonathan Ball, you, and the return email sent to Jonathan Ball proves beyond all doubt that you are Jonathan Ball. Of course, you don't live in Pasadena since moving to 5327 Shepard Ave Sacramento, CA 95819-1731 Here's the proof Jonathan D Ball http://bit.ly/1LFy9t8 and I won't die soon. Yeah you will. You're an old man who hasn't looked after himself. I wouldn't go around goading people if I was as small and as puny as you are, liar Jon. You ought to be very careful. You certainly have no means to hasten my death. Are you really serious, weed? you're just over 5 feet tall and 64 years old. You'll be 65 on December 2nd. You've got to stop threatening people and goading them to come after you. You're pathetic. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On 5/20/2017 3:51 PM, Terron Musgrave wrote:
On 5/20/2017 4:47 PM, Matt Singer wrote: Now Terrell has jumped in on Wieber's FB page. This is getting good! Stop Hello, Poxed Pee-Pee! Why are you posting as "terron musgrave" (and "Schuman" and "Phil Laundry" and "andy memory") and using discredited bull**** from Derek Nash? |
Wieber is feeling the heat! (attn: whoyakidding and Ed Huntress)
On 5/20/2017 2:57 PM, wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2017 at 4:21:00 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote: Check out his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/GunnerAsch The second item (as of this moment) on his page is his share of an item from the Guardian (what?! gummer usually dismisses it as a commie rag) about how someone is being prosecuted for an intemperate threatening comment he made on his Facebook page. The story is interesting and alarming: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...tion?CMP=fb_us Anyway, what's more interesting than that story is that Wieber seems to be quite sensitive to it...as well he might be, given his history of much worse threats and suggestions here. It's a strange commentary that the Guardian article seems to think that threatening to kill someone is a first-amendment issue -- as long as it's on social media. Fortunately, prosecutors don't agree. Gunner is treading on much thinner ice than he seems to realize. For that matter, Larry, who has openly advocated threatening elected representatives with guns, clearly has crossed the line and is liable to prosecution for a felony. Court cases have gone both ways on this issue, but chancing that you won't run into one that takes a dim view of thinly-veiled threats is a fool's choice. I thought you might be interested to know that Michael Terrell has now deleted his comments from Wieber's Facebook post about the guy being prosecuted for unlawful threats. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter