|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:11:36 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:47:01 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 3:11:36 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied: That's awfully feeble, Bonkers. If you're going to get your needle stuck, can't you at least move it to a different groove every once in a while? For example, you could bring back one of your oldies: Ed, The newsgroup badly needs someone who is as articulate as you are. Keep me on my toes and correct me where ever you think it's appropriate,as I respect what you have to say based on what you have already posted. I will certainly take the time to think about whatever correction, advice, etc. you post. - Jon Banquer - Jun 23, 2002 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt....I/t2qa5vNd-rQJ |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 4:03:43 PM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote:
Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:01:23 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:
Gee, there's a good anecdotal source for deciding who to vote for president. -- Ed Huntress Just one anecdote among thousands. Why do you think polls show most Americans do not trust Hillary? Dan |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Oh, that's easy Jon, as you've proven many times by your inability ever to identify a single "lie" that I've told online. And that's no surprise, because I don't lie online. You, on the other hand, have left a well-documented slime trail. g -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:13:48 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:01:23 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote: Gee, there's a good anecdotal source for deciding who to vote for president. -- Ed Huntress Just one anecdote among thousands. Why do you think polls show most Americans do not trust Hillary? Because the Republicans have spent millions to spin the story and make it stick. When you have the time, read "Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative," by David Brock. He was a paid right-wing political hatchet man and the front man for "The Arkansas Project." He tells explicitly how he lied about the Clintons, who paid him, and why he got away with it. It's quite a story. Oh, he also wrote "The Real Anita Hill," a pack of lies for which he eventually apologized to her. He was a real son of a bitch. He probably still is, but now he's on the other side. -- Ed Huntress Dan |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:54:49 -0400, Tom Gardner
wrote: On 10/30/2015 12:24 PM, wrote: I would support someone selected at random from the Boston phone directory before Hillary. Dan One of my best political theories is that ALL public offices shall be filled by picking out random names from the phone book and all get one term. We would be sooo much better off! It'd sure change CONgress overnight. Y'know, if we could only get them to institute zero-tolerance and mandatory drug testing for all gov't employees, half (or more of) our problems would be solved instantly! -- Sound character provides the power with which a person may ride the emergencies of life instead of being overwhelmed by them. Failure is... the highway to success. --Og Mandino |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:38:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied about the many times he has lied.
Slow eddy is a lying, fraud. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:13:50 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Just one anecdote among thousands. Why do you think polls show most Americans do not trust Hillary? Dan Many Americans are a lot smarter than a lying fraud like slow eddy and they can figure out what this means: https://www.opensecrets.org/politici...9&cycle=Career |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:46:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy made himself look like the fool he truly is by saying most Americans are influenced by David Brock:
Hillary Clinton is a big Wall St. bank puppet who is a follower not a leader. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:38:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied about the many times he has lied. Slow eddy is a lying, fraud. Of course, Bonkers, the known lying fraud, can never come up with an example, because there aren't any. Regarding Bonkers, though, there is a whole catalog of them. This is one of my favorites: "July 8, 2007 -- I had to close this blog post to further comments and to remove the personal attacks between Jon and some other newsgroups readers. Before the interview, I made an agreement with Jon about the style of the interview and the way to handle it. Jon didn’t respect our agreement, posting comments under fake names. Jon’s authentic and fake comments are all posted from the same IP address, 72.199.251.224. I can now see that my trust in Jon was misplaced." -- Franco Folini, Novedge blog http://blog.novedge.com/2007/07/an-interview-wi.html Jon has since gone into full attack mode against Folini and Novedge, in a feeble attempt to blunt his ignominy by demeaning Folini, in typical Banquer style. -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:46:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy tried to make lame excuses for who Hillary Clinton really is:
David Brock this you ignorant, lying fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtdwcbqeE5s |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:02:39 PM UTC-7, slow eddy continued to lie and fail. slow eddy is a fraud.
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:02:41 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:46:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy tried to make lame excuses for who Hillary Clinton really is: David Brock this you ignorant, lying fraud: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtdwcbqeE5s She sounds like a pretty strong business woman there, Bonkers. As the report says, she also was a voice for the environment and for US production of Wal-Mart's goods. When they didn't deliver, she quit the board. Do you have a problem with that? Or would you rather the company was turned over to the employees and everyone was paid that same? -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:11:26 PM UTC-7, slow eddy demonstrated why he will always make excuses for corporate puppets like Hillary Clinton:
Lying sleazeball Chris Christie is your man. He's just like you slow eddy: A liar and a fraud. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:28:11 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:11:26 PM UTC-7, slow eddy demonstrated why he will always make excuses for corporate puppets like Hillary Clinton: Lying sleazeball Chris Christie is your man. He's just like you slow eddy: A liar and a fraud. Nah, he's mostly just a jerk. Bonkers, are you ever going to try to come up with a "lie" or an example of "fraud" that you can pin on me? Or did you give up long ago? -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 5:38:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied about the many times he has lied. Slow eddy is a lying, fraud. Not to get too fussy about this, but there should be no comma between "lying" and "fraud." If you're going to be a slandering prick, Bonkers, you should get your grammar and punctuation right. -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:36:20 PM UTC-7, slow eddy lied about all the lying he's told:
Chris Christie is a liar and a fraud just like slow eddy is: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:43:09 PM UTC-7, slow eddy, the lying fraud, failed again like he always does:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:03:45 -0400, Tom Gardner
wrote: On 10/30/2015 1:49 PM, wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 1:25:59 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote: You don't know who I vote for, you lying, shiftless, four-flushing asshole. I've been a registered Republican for over a quarter-century, to begin with. -- Ed Huntress You are correct I do not know who you vote for. Being a registered Republican is pretty meaningless. It is who you support and vote for that counts. Dan I registered as a Democrat in '73 'cuz that was the thing to do as a freshman at OU, a very liberal college. I'm financially conservative yet socially liberal. I think Ed's close to a mirror image in a lot of ways and I bet neither of us vote straight D or R. I've always gazed with awe at democratic elections. I understand that the 2015 budget request is for $3.9 trillion and the U.S. government seems to be employing some 4 million people. Walmart, which seems to be the largest "company" in the world has revenues in the vicinity of 480 million dollars and employees about 2,200,000. While I see people saying "OH! I like this girl" or "that guy" but I wonder whether any of the candidates would be considered a logical selection for G.M. of Walmart? -- cheers, John B. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:01:31 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:43:09 PM UTC-7, slow eddy, the lying fraud, failed again like he always does: Failed at what? I just corrected your punctuation. I do some of that for a living. I'm good at it. I was trying to help you out, because you're semi-literate and a snot. That's a bad combination. -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:28:47 PM UTC-7, slow eddy who is both a liar and a fraud failed again:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On 10/30/2015 7:28 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:01:31 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:43:09 PM UTC-7, slow eddy, the lying fraud, failed again like he always does: Failed at what? I just corrected your punctuation. I do some of that for a living. I'm good at it. I was trying to help you out, because you're semi-literate and a snot. That's a bad combination. I'm not sure why you bother. He can't be as much fun to pound on as gummer is for me. gummer at least says some bull**** that's worth refuting. banqueer never says anything of substance - I mean, literally nothing. Did he get fired from Qualcomm? There was a post a couple of years ago saying he was, and the thread contained a post indicating he was having a fire sale of his "tools" on E-bay. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:33:24 PM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote:
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Last time I checked, Ed Huntress had not filed any paperwork to run for President of the US. I truly don't understand your obsession, but that obsession is yours to enjoy. Meanwhile, your expressed intent to throw away your vote should Clinton win the nomination demonstrates a contempt for society. Nobody here really gives a damn about what you think, other than to use it against you. NOBODY in the white house even cares whether you're alive except on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, every four years. And yet you are prepared to throw your vote away in protest. What a waste. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, Sometimes you go to the General election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you wanted to have. I picture the POTUS in negotiations with Putin. Picturing any of the Republican candidates in such a situation is just chilling. I would think that Biden, Sanders or Clinton would do fine. Clinton really showed her stuff at last week's 11-hour Benghazi grilling. Had I been in her place, I expect I would have lost my cool very early in the game, telling them all to go **** themselves. But she held her ground and her composure. I think that is a serious addition to her resume. As Ed said, I'm not buying a used car from any of them, just as no one was going to have a beer with Bush Jr. We're electing a president of a country, not an aluminum siding contractor. Grow up, Jon. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:46:47 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:13:48 -0700 (PDT), " Just one anecdote among thousands. Why do you think polls show most Americans do not trust Hillary? Because the Republicans have spent millions to spin the story and make it stick. Ed Huntress That and the numerous things she has done to earn that mistrust. The Republcans did not do the things, Hillary did it herself. Dan |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 5:00:41 AM UTC-7, wrote:
That and the numerous things she has done to earn that mistrust. The Republcans did not do the things, Hillary did it herself. Dan Bingo! Sadly too complex for idiot slow eddy, the lying fraud, to understand. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:38:37 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball lied:
Jonathan Ball will never recover from the pounding I gave him a few years back. He's still lying face down in the gutter from how badly I whipped his ass. Never forget that Jonathan Ball was brought to this group by Mark "**** bag" Wieber and is now propped up by fellow liar slow eddy. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote:
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:33:24 PM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Last time I checked, Ed Huntress had not filed any paperwork to run for President of the US. I truly don't understand your obsession, but that obsession is yours to enjoy. Meanwhile, your expressed intent to throw away your vote should Clinton win the nomination demonstrates a contempt for society. Nobody here really gives a damn about what you think, other than to use it against you. NOBODY in the white house even cares whether you're alive except on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, every four years. And yet you are prepared to throw your vote away in protest. What a waste. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, Sometimes you go to the General election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you wanted to have. I picture the POTUS in negotiations with Putin. Picturing any of the Republican candidates in such a situation is just chilling. I would think that Biden, Sanders or Clinton would do fine. Clinton really showed her stuff at last week's 11-hour Benghazi grilling. Had I been in her place, I expect I would have lost my cool very early in the game, telling them all to go **** themselves. But she held her ground and her composure. I think that is a serious addition to her resume. As Ed said, I'm not buying a used car from any of them, just as no one was going to have a beer with Bush Jr. We're electing a president of a country, not an aluminum siding contractor. Grow up, Jon. A corporate puppet is a corporate puppet whether they are a Democrat or a Republican. The time has come to take America back. Idiots like you compromise you integrity election after election. Some of us know when to say enough is enough. Try and remember not everyone is as weak and helpless as you are. slow eddy is a lying fraud and he's just the kind of person morons like you need to validate themselves. I'm not the one who needs to grow the **** up. You are. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:38:33 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote: On 10/30/2015 7:28 PM, Ed Huntress wrote: On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:01:31 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 6:43:09 PM UTC-7, slow eddy, the lying fraud, failed again like he always does: Failed at what? I just corrected your punctuation. I do some of that for a living. I'm good at it. I was trying to help you out, because you're semi-literate and a snot. That's a bad combination. I'm not sure why you bother. He can't be as much fun to pound on as gummer is for me. gummer at least says some bull**** that's worth refuting. banqueer never says anything of substance - I mean, literally nothing. Well, as I've said before, if I ignore Bonkers, he just keeps sniping away with lies and slurs. If I don't whack him down every once in a while he keeps upping the ante. I don't start anything with him. Eventually, though, he'll snipe away with some nonsense, so I bop him on the head for a while until he slows down. He seems to run out of gas in a reall hurry these days. He used to keep it up for months at a time. It's not something I enjoy. As you say, there's nothing there of interest. Did he get fired from Qualcomm? There was a post a couple of years ago saying he was, and the thread contained a post indicating he was having a fire sale of his "tools" on E-bay. I wasn't very active here at the time so I never got the whole story. It seems likely, because he was bragging about his great job at Qualcomm for a while and then he suddenly shut up about it. -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 6:00:08 AM UTC-7, slow eddy lied:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote:
Snipped a lot of worthless bull**** Idiots like you and slow eddy aren't real bright. Perhaps some visuals will help morons like you: http://s737.photobucket.com/user/Joe...Out_2.jpg.html |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote:
Bull**** snipped More visual aid help for morons like you and slow eddy who keep helping to elect corporate puppet after corporate puppet: http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/x...ate_Puppet.jpg |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 05:38:19 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:33:24 PM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Last time I checked, Ed Huntress had not filed any paperwork to run for President of the US. I truly don't understand your obsession, but that obsession is yours to enjoy. Meanwhile, your expressed intent to throw away your vote should Clinton win the nomination demonstrates a contempt for society. Nobody here really gives a damn about what you think, other than to use it against you. NOBODY in the white house even cares whether you're alive except on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, every four years. And yet you are prepared to throw your vote away in protest. What a waste. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, Sometimes you go to the General election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you wanted to have. I picture the POTUS in negotiations with Putin. Picturing any of the Republican candidates in such a situation is just chilling. I would think that Biden, Sanders or Clinton would do fine. Clinton really showed her stuff at last week's 11-hour Benghazi grilling. Had I been in her place, I expect I would have lost my cool very early in the game, telling them all to go **** themselves. But she held her ground and her composure. I think that is a serious addition to her resume. As Ed said, I'm not buying a used car from any of them, just as no one was going to have a beer with Bush Jr. We're electing a president of a country, not an aluminum siding contractor. Grow up, Jon. A corporate puppet is a corporate puppet whether they are a Democrat or a Republican. The time has come to take America back. Who is this who wants America "back"? Welfare recipients? You never had it and you aren't getting it, any more than Gunner, Larry, and the other shoot-em-up nutjobs are getting it. You wingers never will have it. Meantime, you're politically castrating yourself by voting for him for president. Some people take themselves out by not voting; others take themselves out by supporting candidates who are out on a fringe and don't have a chance. Either way, if you're going to take yourself out of the real process, it probably means that we're better off without you involved in the process to begin with. Bernie is a great guy. We need him -- in the Senate, where we benefit from his perspective. For the same reason, we need Vermont, as an example of what works and what doesn't. But Vermont isn't America and Bernie isn't a president, any more than Texas is America and Ted Cruz is a president. If you want to do something useful, get the big money out of presidential elections. That will solve half our problems. I'm not the one who needs to grow the **** up. You are. He's right. You're wrong. -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 6:46:18 AM UTC-7, slow eddy, who is a lying fraud, failed:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote:
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:33:24 PM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Last time I checked, Ed Huntress had not filed any paperwork to run for President of the US. I truly don't understand your obsession, but that obsession is yours to enjoy. Meanwhile, your expressed intent to throw away your vote should Clinton win the nomination demonstrates a contempt for society. Nobody here really gives a damn about what you think, other than to use it against you. NOBODY in the white house even cares whether you're alive except on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, every four years. And yet you are prepared to throw your vote away in protest. What a waste. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, Sometimes you go to the General election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you wanted to have. I picture the POTUS in negotiations with Putin. Picturing any of the Republican candidates in such a situation is just chilling. I would think that Biden, Sanders or Clinton would do fine. Clinton really showed her stuff at last week's 11-hour Benghazi grilling. Had I been in her place, I expect I would have lost my cool very early in the game, telling them all to go **** themselves. But she held her ground and her composure. I think that is a serious addition to her resume. As Ed said, I'm not buying a used car from any of them, just as no one was going to have a beer with Bush Jr. We're electing a president of a country, not an aluminum siding contractor. Grow up, Jon. Ralph Nader has a message for worthless sellouts like you and slow eddy: http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/x...alph_Nader.jpg |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 10:49:56 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:58:15 PM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 7:33:24 PM UTC-4, jon_banquer wrote: On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 10:56:57 AM UTC-7, rangerssuck wrote: Because you really think that the US would be better off with with Trump or perhaps Christie in the Oval Office? Hard to tell who lies more, slow eddy or Chris Christie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...lan-raise-you/ Last time I checked, Ed Huntress had not filed any paperwork to run for President of the US. I truly don't understand your obsession, but that obsession is yours to enjoy. Meanwhile, your expressed intent to throw away your vote should Clinton win the nomination demonstrates a contempt for society. Nobody here really gives a damn about what you think, other than to use it against you. NOBODY in the white house even cares whether you're alive except on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, every four years. And yet you are prepared to throw your vote away in protest. What a waste. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, Sometimes you go to the General election with the candidate you have, not the candidate you wanted to have. I picture the POTUS in negotiations with Putin. Picturing any of the Republican candidates in such a situation is just chilling. I would think that Biden, Sanders or Clinton would do fine. Clinton really showed her stuff at last week's 11-hour Benghazi grilling. Had I been in her place, I expect I would have lost my cool very early in the game, telling them all to go **** themselves. But she held her ground and her composure. I think that is a serious addition to her resume. As Ed said, I'm not buying a used car from any of them, just as no one was going to have a beer with Bush Jr. We're electing a president of a country, not an aluminum siding contractor. Grow up, Jon. Ralph Nader has a message for worthless sellouts like you and slow eddy: http://i737.photobucket.com/albums/x...alph_Nader.jpg That's quite a bunch of left-wingers you're accumulating for Bernie, Bonkers. Cornel West, Thom Hartman, and now Ralph Nader. Who's next? Jeremiah Wright? -- Ed Huntress |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 11:19:43 AM UTC-7, slow eddy failed:
|
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On 10/30/2015 8:48 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
It'd sure change CONgress overnight. Y'know, if we could only get them to institute zero-tolerance and mandatory drug testing for all gov't employees, half (or more of) our problems would be solved instantly! -- The other half solved by term limits. |
Would you buy a used car from this woman
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 18:35:01 -0400, Tom Gardner
wrote: On 10/30/2015 8:48 PM, Larry Jaques wrote: It'd sure change CONgress overnight. Y'know, if we could only get them to institute zero-tolerance and mandatory drug testing for all gov't employees, half (or more of) our problems would be solved instantly! -- The other half solved by term limits. NOT _EVEN_! But the two would give us a good headstart. -- Sound character provides the power with which a person may ride the emergencies of life instead of being overwhelmed by them. Failure is... the highway to success. --Og Mandino |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter