On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where these guys are very strong.

On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

On 7/28/2015 5:31 PM, Captain Obvious wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

10,000,000 miles. gummer is close to 62. Let's say that in keeping
with all of his other extravagant lies, gummer began driving at age 12,
so 50 years of driving - too much time, given that gummer told his ten
million lie a few years ago and he didn't start driving as 12. Anyway,
that's 200,000 per year, every year. 20K-25K per year is what someone
with an exceptionally long commute might drive, or perhaps someone who
drives a large sales territory.

gummer lives in Taft and says he used to do a lot of work in Long Beach,
which is 142 miles distant. If gummer had made the round trip *twice*
per day every day of the year for the last 42 years (since age 20), that
would still amount only to 8.7 million miles.

These aren't tall tales gummer is telling. It's an unbroken string of
pathological lying.

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

10,000,000 miles. gummer is close to 62. Let's say that in keeping
with all of his other extravagant lies, gummer began driving at age 12,
so 50 years of driving - too much time, given that gummer told his ten
million lie a few years ago and he didn't start driving as 12. Anyway,
that's 200,000 per year, every year. 20K-25K per year is what someone
with an exceptionally long commute might drive, or perhaps someone who
drives a large sales territory.

gummer lives in Taft and says he used to do a lot of work in Long Beach,
which is 142 miles distant. If gummer had made the round trip *twice*
per day every day of the year for the last 42 years (since age 20), that
would still amount only to 8.7 million miles.

These aren't tall tales gummer is telling. It's an unbroken string of
pathological lying.

Harold, no offense, but get a life. Don't be a dicklessKidding.

On 7/28/2015 6:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

10,000,000 miles. gummer is close to 62. Let's say that in keeping
with all of his other extravagant lies, gummer began driving at age 12,
so 50 years of driving - too much time, given that gummer told his ten
million lie a few years ago and he didn't start driving as 12. Anyway,
that's 200,000 per year, every year. 20K-25K per year is what someone
with an exceptionally long commute might drive, or perhaps someone who
drives a large sales territory.

gummer lives in Taft and says he used to do a lot of work in Long Beach,
which is 142 miles distant. If gummer had made the round trip *twice*
per day every day of the year for the last 42 years (since age 20), that
would still amount only to 8.7 million miles.

These aren't tall tales gummer is telling. It's an unbroken string of
pathological lying.

Harold, no offense, but get a life. Don't be a dicklessKidding.

I have a life, a fulfilling life, and beating up on the nutless asshole
gummer is only a small part of it. But it's a part, make no mistake.
Remember: gummer has been threatening to have me killed since 2007.
That's not a "tall tale" - that's the mark of a sick, dysfunctional
wreck of a human being.

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?
I was doing 30-40 chinups in college, was unlikely to be able to do any 1 armed, bec endurance doesn't often translate into raw strength. And like I said elsewhere, powerlifters have trouble with chinups.

Get a life. Swinging from Gummer's dick is not a life. Altho it seems to be fagKidding's life.

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:00:21 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 6:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

10,000,000 miles. gummer is close to 62. Let's say that in keeping
with all of his other extravagant lies, gummer began driving at age 12,
so 50 years of driving - too much time, given that gummer told his ten
million lie a few years ago and he didn't start driving as 12. Anyway,
that's 200,000 per year, every year. 20K-25K per year is what someone
with an exceptionally long commute might drive, or perhaps someone who
drives a large sales territory.

gummer lives in Taft and says he used to do a lot of work in Long Beach,
which is 142 miles distant. If gummer had made the round trip *twice*
per day every day of the year for the last 42 years (since age 20), that
would still amount only to 8.7 million miles.

These aren't tall tales gummer is telling. It's an unbroken string of
pathological lying.

Harold, no offense, but get a life. Don't be a dicklessKidding.

I have a life, a fulfilling life, and beating up on the nutless asshole
gummer is only a small part of it.

If you had ANYTHING of a fulfilling life, you wouldn't spend 10 secs on this bull****.


But it's a part, make no mistake.
Remember: gummer has been threatening to have me killed since 2007.
That's not a "tall tale" - that's the mark of a sick, dysfunctional
wreck of a human being.

I don't know... maybe you DESERVE to be killed? Not saying you do, but maybe Gummer's right? Just spitballin....

And yet, you haven't been killed. So wtf is your problem? Move on. Obviously Gummer is just ****ing with you.

On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't. He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc. gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

On 7/28/2015 7:32 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:00:21 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 6:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic
level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles.
Frank Medrano might be one who can.

A year or so ago I could manage 1 or two barely-controllable negative reps one-handed, at 6', 180 lbs.
So unpleasant to do, haven't done them since, sure I'd have to practice like crazy to do them again
. Easy to tear a bicep doing these, proly not advisable to even try anymore, esp with age.

This will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCOah6uN5ro
Funny, these guys didn't look particularly cut up/developed, but wow...
The last guy, even tho he topped the list, is doing some Crossfit kipping bull****, which proly gave him
an extra 5 reps or so. Still, all enormously impressive, these guys disguise the true difficulty of this move.

Keep in mind, this is as much shoulder/lats as it is bicep, maybe more. You can prove this by testing your max
curl with weights, proly manage half your bodyweight, the rest comes from lats/shoulders. This is proly where
these guys are very strong.

How many of those guys insist they've ridden a motorcycle at 264 mph,
and claim to have driven more than 900 miles every day for 30 years?

10,000,000 miles. gummer is close to 62. Let's say that in keeping
with all of his other extravagant lies, gummer began driving at age 12,
so 50 years of driving - too much time, given that gummer told his ten
million lie a few years ago and he didn't start driving as 12. Anyway,
that's 200,000 per year, every year. 20K-25K per year is what someone
with an exceptionally long commute might drive, or perhaps someone who
drives a large sales territory.

gummer lives in Taft and says he used to do a lot of work in Long Beach,
which is 142 miles distant. If gummer had made the round trip *twice*
per day every day of the year for the last 42 years (since age 20), that
would still amount only to 8.7 million miles.

These aren't tall tales gummer is telling. It's an unbroken string of
pathological lying.

Harold, no offense, but get a life. Don't be a dicklessKidding.

I have a life, a fulfilling life, and beating up on the nutless asshole
gummer is only a small part of it.

If you had ANYTHING of a fulfilling life, you wouldn't spend 10 secs on this bull****.

Beating up on the liar gummer in no way impinges on my fulfilling life.


But it's a part, make no mistake.
Remember: gummer has been threatening to have me killed since 2007.
That's not a "tall tale" - that's the mark of a sick, dysfunctional
wreck of a human being.

I don't know... maybe you DESERVE to be killed?

Not in the least. I leave people alone. I may - and do - bash the
stupids in Usenet, but that doesn't materially affect anyone's life.

And yet, you haven't been killed. So wtf is your problem? Move on. Obviously Gummer is just ****ing with you.

Obviously gummer is just a lying impotent incompetent asshole, and I get
some pleasure out of pointing that out here in Usenet. No big deal...

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 7:57:02 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his hundreds of alias lied:

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.


He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc.

which is allowed in a set. AND, the rests were VERY short, still under full bodyweight. The bigger complaint is the kipping.

gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

I certainly wouldn't bet a large amount on Gummer, unless you gave me great odds. But then I would have lost my shirt of the 400 lb guy who banged out 15 chins. And so would you. But I learned. You haven't.

And how do you know he could NEVER do one? You don't. You may have odds in your favor, because it is a relatively rare feat, but you don't know.

But, since Gummer bashing is the lot of your miserable li'l life, you could never entertain otherwise, right? OK, I understand.

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.

On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.


He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc.

which is allowed in a set. AND, the rests were VERY short, still under full bodyweight. The bigger complaint is the kipping.

gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

I certainly wouldn't bet a large amount on Gummer, unless you gave me great odds. But then I would have lost my shirt of the 400 lb guy who banged out 15 chins. And so would you. But I learned. You haven't.

And how do you know he could NEVER do one? You don't. You may have odds in your favor, because it is a relatively rare feat, but you don't know.

But, since Gummer bashing is the lot of your miserable li'l life, you could never entertain otherwise, right? OK, I understand.

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:28:45 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.

On 7/28/2015 9:03 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:28:45 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.


He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc.

which is allowed in a set. AND, the rests were VERY short, still under full bodyweight. The bigger complaint is the kipping.

gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

I certainly wouldn't bet a large amount on Gummer, unless you gave me great odds. But then I would have lost my shirt of the 400 lb guy who banged out 15 chins. And so would you. But I learned. You haven't.

And how do you know he could NEVER do one? You don't. You may have odds in your favor, because it is a relatively rare feat, but you don't know.

But, since Gummer bashing is the lot of your miserable li'l life, you could never entertain otherwise, right? OK, I understand.

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

Dood, you (and Harold) couldn't even properly interpret the simple fukn video I linked, and now you assholes are to be trusted on your interpretation of what is a lie and what isn't? You and your crystal ball?

I'm not defending Gummer and his assertions. I'm saying it's not worth the stalking.

No "stalking." That's settled. You need to move on to something else.

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 9:10:35 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his many aliases lied:

No "stalking." That's settled. You need to move on to something else.

The only thing that's settled is that you have no metalworking skills and you don't belong in this newsgroup.

Hit the road, Ball before you **** me the **** off and I kick you to the curb like I did last time.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:10:35 AM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 9:03 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:28:45 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.


He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc.

which is allowed in a set. AND, the rests were VERY short, still under full bodyweight. The bigger complaint is the kipping.

gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

I certainly wouldn't bet a large amount on Gummer, unless you gave me great odds. But then I would have lost my shirt of the 400 lb guy who banged out 15 chins. And so would you. But I learned. You haven't.

And how do you know he could NEVER do one? You don't. You may have odds in your favor, because it is a relatively rare feat, but you don't know.

But, since Gummer bashing is the lot of your miserable li'l life, you could never entertain otherwise, right? OK, I understand.

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

Dood, you (and Harold) couldn't even properly interpret the simple fukn video I linked, and now you assholes are to be trusted on your interpretation of what is a lie and what isn't? You and your crystal ball?

I'm not defending Gummer and his assertions. I'm saying it's not worth the stalking.



No "stalking." That's settled.

Oh, OK, you are not a stalker, so you must be the RCM Caped Crusader for Truth, Justice, and the Merkin Way?? You and the dumb**** Captain Oblivious? With his Chevy Volt and Cliff notes on Gummer?? OK.

You need to move on to something else.

Oh, OK. But... But.... YOU started this thread!! AND, you couldn't even properly interpret the chinup vid that I provided.
So, is it time to move on because your fundamental position is simply fulla****?
OK. We'll move on, then.

On 7/28/2015 9:38 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 12:10:35 AM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 9:03 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:28:45 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
"Though I tried a fast rep of 25 pull ups [chortle] and started getting
some chest pressure at 20 [chortle], yesterday. I cant do more than
about 5 one handed pull ups anymore..sigh..old age is creeping up."

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...o/rOC-Y63ENh8J

A scant three years later:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450


gummer has never done even a single one-handed pullup, of course.
gummer has never been able to do 25 pullups. At age 53, 210 lb, gummer
couldn't do *one* two-handed pullup.

Awwww, Gummer, Moi is proly yer biggest fan here. Only fan?? LOL
But goddamm, 1-handed pullups?? Those are hard to find even on youtube! You need gymnastic level strength/wt ratios to pull these off. The guys that can do these are sinewy bean poles. Frank Medrano might be one who can.

Not so hard to find:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EndhsgC2wCU

This guy did 10 before he had to stop. He's not a beanpole; gymnast's
build, probably about 150 lb.. He looks to be about 30 or so. gummer
said that at age 53, 210 lb, he could do five. Bull****.

I never attempted any, but I bet I could have done a couple in my early
30s. I went on a big pullup kick then, and got to where I could do 19;
never quite reached 20. I was about 150 lb, and lifted weights
regularly. I should have tried it. Today, I'd dislocate a shoulder for
sure.

Dood, u didn't see my link where the last guy did 22?

Not all in one set he didn't.

Dood, what fukn video were u watching? It was one set. You are allowed "rests" as long as u don't leave the bar. The rules vary with the contest and/or calisthenic. ALL the sets shown in that vid were for 1 continuous set.


He did a bunch, rested, did a bunch more,
rested some more, etc.

which is allowed in a set. AND, the rests were VERY short, still under full bodyweight. The bigger complaint is the kipping.

gummer claimed to do five in one lump at age 53
and 210 lb. He didn't do it. As I said, it is not credible that he
*ever* did so much as a *single* one-armed pullup.

I certainly wouldn't bet a large amount on Gummer, unless you gave me great odds. But then I would have lost my shirt of the 400 lb guy who banged out 15 chins. And so would you. But I learned. You haven't.

And how do you know he could NEVER do one? You don't. You may have odds in your favor, because it is a relatively rare feat, but you don't know.

But, since Gummer bashing is the lot of your miserable li'l life, you could never entertain otherwise, right? OK, I understand.

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

Dood, you (and Harold) couldn't even properly interpret the simple fukn video I linked, and now you assholes are to be trusted on your interpretation of what is a lie and what isn't? You and your crystal ball?

I'm not defending Gummer and his assertions. I'm saying it's not worth the stalking.



No "stalking." That's settled.

Oh, OK, you are not a stalker, so you must be the RCM Caped Crusader

Nope. Just someone who likes to go after self-identified liars and
blowhards.

You need to move on to something else.

Oh, OK. But... But.... YOU started this thread!!

Yes. So?

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 20:28:42 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

On 7/28/2015 8:14 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 10:53:10 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On 7/28/2015 7:18 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:
On 7/28/2015 3:16 PM, Grokman Grokman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 2:13:18 PM UTC-4, Harold McKinney wrote:

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel
entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

As you can see with the witless crackpot comment about 125 = 256, you
are responding to the former "proctologically violated." His M.O. is
to write endless posts complaining about someone1 complaining about
someone2. Since he's doing exactly what he complains about, he has no
choice but to make excuses for someone2. He insists this makes sense
the same way that Wieber insists his claims of making $75 an hour make
sense. PV gets very rabid very fast. He's already foaming at the mouth
and by his own definition "stalking." He won't stop, he'll even make
excuses for Banquer (who he's bashed extensivly) if he has to. The
funniest part about PV, Banquer and Weiber is that each has zero
respect for other two, but all will pretend enough to make feeble
excuses for each other when it suits. Keep up the Wieber bashing and
the spit will be flying!

On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 9:44:10 PM UTC-7, Jonathan Ball using one of his hundreds of aliases lied:

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel
entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

As you can see with the witless crackpot comment about 125 = 256, you
are responding to the former "proctologically violated." His M.O. is
to write endless posts complaining about someone1 complaining about
someone2. Since he's doing exactly what he complains about, he has no
choice but to make excuses for someone2. He insists this makes sense
the same way that Wieber insists his claims of making $75 an hour make
sense. PV gets very rabid very fast. He's already foaming at the mouth
and by his own definition "stalking." He won't stop, he'll even make
excuses for Banquer (who he's bashed extensivly) if he has to. The
funniest part about PV, Banquer and Weiber is that each has zero
respect for other two, but all will pretend enough to make feeble
excuses for each other when it suits. Keep up the Wieber bashing and
the spit will be flying!

No, the funny part is that YEARS later, you are still posting your Cliff notes.
If swinging from Gummer's dick for years on end isn't funny -- and pathetic -- I don't know what is.
Really, give the Wife my condolances, I can't imagine a worse hell than living with a self-important splenic bitch like you, can't imagine it.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 6:48:51 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:13:08 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:



And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel
entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

As you can see with the witless crackpot comment about 125 = 256, you
are responding to the former "proctologically violated." His M.O. is
to write endless posts complaining about someone1 complaining about
someone2. Since he's doing exactly what he complains about, he has no
choice but to make excuses for someone2. He insists this makes sense
the same way that Wieber insists his claims of making $75 an hour make
sense. PV gets very rabid very fast. He's already foaming at the mouth
and by his own definition "stalking." He won't stop, he'll even make
excuses for Banquer (who he's bashed extensivly) if he has to. The
funniest part about PV, Banquer and Weiber is that each has zero
respect for other two, but all will pretend enough to make feeble
excuses for each other when it suits. Keep up the Wieber bashing and
the spit will be flying!

No, the funny part is that YEARS later, you are still posting your Cliff notes.
If swinging from Gummer's dick for years on end isn't funny -- and pathetic -- I don't know what is.
Really, give the Wife my condolances, I can't imagine a worse hell than living with
a self-important splenic bitch like you, can't imagine it.

How many years have you been singing this same song? LOL Keep
practicing, someday you might be as good at Wieber in the bull****
department. By good I mean bad of course.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 7:25:40 AM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed to grasp the reality of what he truly is:

And the motorcycle thing. So what if 264 was misrepresented. Maybe it was 175. So what?
Have you ever done 125 mph on a bike? I have, and then some. It was such a feat I'd feel
entitled to up to 264. So what. Get a fukn life, unless swinging from Gummer's dick IS your life.


gummer is a liar. you ought to find better things to do with your time
than to defend a chronic and congenital liar.

As you can see with the witless crackpot comment about 125 = 256, you
are responding to the former "proctologically violated." His M.O. is
to write endless posts complaining about someone1 complaining about
someone2. Since he's doing exactly what he complains about, he has no
choice but to make excuses for someone2. He insists this makes sense
the same way that Wieber insists his claims of making $75 an hour make
sense. PV gets very rabid very fast. He's already foaming at the mouth
and by his own definition "stalking." He won't stop, he'll even make
excuses for Banquer (who he's bashed extensivly) if he has to. The
funniest part about PV, Banquer and Weiber is that each has zero
respect for other two, but all will pretend enough to make feeble
excuses for each other when it suits. Keep up the Wieber bashing and
the spit will be flying!

No, the funny part is that YEARS later, you are still posting your Cliff notes.
If swinging from Gummer's dick for years on end isn't funny -- and pathetic -- I don't know what is.
Really, give the Wife my condolances, I can't imagine a worse hell than living with
a self-important splenic bitch like you, can't imagine it.

How many years have you been singing this same song? LOL Keep
practicing, someday you might be as good at Wieber in the bull****
department. By good I mean bad of course.

Well, nothing really to practice: Here it is, ****ing YEARS later, and you are STILL with the cliff notes on Gummer!!

But, I must say, you are indeed a pretty good hustler, you have Ed H. fooled. But that's only bec Ed don't like gummer, methinks. You are a fraud, plain and simple, and your debating "techniques" prove it.

Why don't you write some cliff notes on my Theorem? It's there in black and white, and you are soooo demonstrably smarter than EVERYONE here, despite the fact that Steve W. plainly pointed out your ignorance -- to which you never responded, so quite your Don Rickle's style.
Show us how much math you know. Let's see your intellect shine.

Maybe, if you thought really really really hard, you could IMPROVE my Theorem?
Oh, but that's right, you don't contribute or produce anything of worth, your existence is simply to bring everyone else down to your fraudulent level..

So show us how smart you are.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:44:09 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:


So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 1:15:19 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" failed:

So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

No, see, once again you twist the history. I'm giving YOU a chance to show everybody how smart you are, AND I'm giving you a chance to thoroughly discredit me. Get it, now? And I gave you 10 ways to do it.

So, that's all that's holding your pompous but incredibly dumbass back, going to rec.running?
There's a version rahcheer:
Ping Ig, Ed: More unified field theory: The Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn
July 22.

It's not as complete as the rec.running version, but since you're going to hold your breath 'til your face turns blue, might as well look at this one.
No matter, you won't have a clue, altho you certainly will pretend.
No procrastination, now! Study hard!

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:45:12 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:



So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

No, see, once again you twist the history. I'm giving YOU a chance to show everybody how smart you are,
AND I'm giving you a chance to thoroughly discredit me. Get it, now? And I gave you 10 ways to do it.

So, that's all that's holding your pompous but incredibly dumbass back, going to rec.running?
There's a version rahcheer:
Ping Ig, Ed: More unified field theory: The Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn
July 22.

It's not as complete as the rec.running version, but since you're going to hold your breath
'til your face turns blue, might as well look at this one.
No matter, you won't have a clue, altho you certainly will pretend.
No procrastination, now! Study hard!

Your straw men are getting weaker.

On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 1:49:30 PM UTC-7, Anonymous posting pussy "Captain Obvious" lied:

So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

No, see, once again you twist the history. I'm giving YOU a chance to show everybody how smart you are,
AND I'm giving you a chance to thoroughly discredit me. Get it, now? And I gave you 10 ways to do it.

So, that's all that's holding your pompous but incredibly dumbass back, going to rec.running?
There's a version rahcheer:
Ping Ig, Ed: More unified field theory: The Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn
July 22.

It's not as complete as the rec.running version, but since you're going to hold your breath
'til your face turns blue, might as well look at this one.
No matter, you won't have a clue, altho you certainly will pretend.
No procrastination, now! Study hard!

Your straw men are getting weaker.

As are your excuses, Cap'n. I guess you didn't do so well in maf? lol
Makes sense tho. Anyone who deliberately twists everything they can to win an argument would never do well in maf.

Oh, I don't like those numbers, they interfere with my argerment. Let's change them!!

Dat's m'boi Kidding!!

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:31:28 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:




So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

No, see, once again you twist the history. I'm giving YOU a chance to show everybody how smart you are,
AND I'm giving you a chance to thoroughly discredit me. Get it, now? And I gave you 10 ways to do it.

So, that's all that's holding your pompous but incredibly dumbass back, going to rec.running?
There's a version rahcheer:
Ping Ig, Ed: More unified field theory: The Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn
July 22.

It's not as complete as the rec.running version, but since you're going to hold your breath
'til your face turns blue, might as well look at this one.
No matter, you won't have a clue, altho you certainly will pretend.
No procrastination, now! Study hard!

Your straw men are getting weaker.

As are your excuses, Cap'n. I guess you didn't do so well in maf? lol
Makes sense tho. Anyone who deliberately twists everything they can to win an argument would never do well in maf.

Oh, I don't like those numbers, they interfere with my argerment. Let's change them!!

Dat's m'boi Kidding!!

You can't cure your problem of needing straw men by coming up with
more straw men. But keep trying. I remember when I used to think you
were bright. Did you have a stroke or OD on kale or something?

So show us how smart you are.

Take your own advice. Say something sensible for a change. And don't
bother telling me to go somewhere else to look for it. If you want me
to see you being smart, you have unlimited space (and time apparently)
to do it right here.

No, see, once again you twist the history. I'm giving YOU a chance to show everybody how smart you are,
AND I'm giving you a chance to thoroughly discredit me. Get it, now? And I gave you 10 ways to do it.

So, that's all that's holding your pompous but incredibly dumbass back, going to rec.running?
There's a version rahcheer:
Ping Ig, Ed: More unified field theory: The Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn
July 22.

It's not as complete as the rec.running version, but since you're going to hold your breath
'til your face turns blue, might as well look at this one.
No matter, you won't have a clue, altho you certainly will pretend.
No procrastination, now! Study hard!

Your straw men are getting weaker.

As are your excuses, Cap'n. I guess you didn't do so well in maf? lol
Makes sense tho. Anyone who deliberately twists everything they can to win an argument would never do well in maf.

Oh, I don't like those numbers, they interfere with my argerment. Let's change them!!

Dat's m'boi Kidding!!

You can't cure your problem of needing straw men by coming up with
more straw men. But keep trying. I remember when I used to think you
were bright. Did you have a stroke or OD on kale or something?

Kidding, you're so witty!! So clever!!! And, I'm so crushed...
And the hoot will be, since I'm so stupid, that you will be even dumber, when you can't make heads or tails over PV's Theorem.
But it's right here on RCM, so you have no more excuses, straw men or not. And btw, WHAT straw man?

And yet you continue balk and distort, as you've done several times already, conceding, finally, that steering dampers ARE useful. And since you never know when resonance will occur.... Oh, but YOU know everything, so you know f'sure resonance will never occur, right? Right.

So again, you think I'm stupid, so go prove it. The post is there, my cards are on the (mathematical) table, you are so much smarter than me, so disprove the theorem.
And, recall my offer: I'll suck your shriveled dick if you can even discuss the Theorem intelligently. A sure bet if I ever made one.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:18:30 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:


So again, you think I'm stupid, so go prove it.

Why? Never do for someone what they're willing and able to do for
themselves.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:18:30 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:


Kidding, you're so witty!! So clever!!!

It only seems that way to you. Like when a child believes he can jump
to the moon.

So again, you think I'm stupid, so go prove it.

Why? Never do for someone what they're willing and able to do for
themselves.

PV's Theorem awaits the genius scrutiny of Cap'n Oblivious.
Oh, The Terror.... The Terror.... (marlon brando, apocalypse now)....
The Terror of being shown the idiot I am, by one PV....
All because I couldn't grok calculus....
The Terror.....

Yeah, but kudos to you, Cap'n Oblivious, you are a clever and witty idiot, yes indeedy, ergo it goes largely undetected. Good arm flailing, too.

Say, can you explain that really sneaky bit about the landing gear of planes and steering dampers for bikes? I'm sure other people missed it too.
That was a really good one.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:23:48 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:



So again, you think I'm stupid, so go prove it.

Why? Never do for someone what they're willing and able to do for
themselves.

PV's Theorem awaits the genius scrutiny of Cap'n Oblivious.
Oh, The Terror.... The Terror.... (marlon brando, apocalypse now)....
The Terror of being shown the idiot I am, by one PV....
All because I couldn't grok calculus....
The Terror.....

Yeah, but kudos to you, Cap'n Oblivious, you are a clever and witty idiot, yes indeedy, ergo it goes largely undetected. Good arm flailing, too.

Say, can you explain that really sneaky bit about the landing gear of planes and steering dampers for bikes? I'm sure other people missed it too.
That was a really good one.

Wouldn't it have been easier for you to google friction damper than
write all that nonsense? You'd rather bull**** than learn, right?

So again, you think I'm stupid, so go prove it.

Why? Never do for someone what they're willing and able to do for
themselves.

PV's Theorem awaits the genius scrutiny of Cap'n Oblivious.
Oh, The Terror.... The Terror.... (marlon brando, apocalypse now)....
The Terror of being shown the idiot I am, by one PV....
All because I couldn't grok calculus....
The Terror.....

Yeah, but kudos to you, Cap'n Oblivious, you are a clever and witty idiot, yes indeedy, ergo it goes largely undetected. Good arm flailing, too.

Say, can you explain that really sneaky bit about the landing gear of planes and steering dampers for bikes? I'm sure other people missed it too.
That was a really good one.

Wouldn't it have been easier for you to google friction damper than
write all that nonsense? You'd rather bull**** than learn, right?

I didn't know planes had handlebars with tank slap. What plane would that be again? An Orville Wright original?

And GEE, Kidding, I though steering dampers were, as you put it, RUBBISH? Now it turns out bikes of all types use them, bicycles, and now planes? Boy, that's a lot of rubbish, eh?

PV's Fundamental Theorem of Maximum Fat Burn, striking terror into the hearts of the bull****ters.
Aren't you supposed to be discrediting me, instead of yourself?

Hey, I'll tell you what, kidding. I already gave you 10 strategies you could use to discredit me. How bout now I give you a crash course in calculus, then you can pretend you know advanced calculus, and then you'll have even more bull**** ammunition, with which to mount your faux attacks.
Yeah, I know, I discredit myself, but gee kidding, you're so brite, I'm sure you could do an even better job.

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:05:46 -0700 (PDT), Grokman Grokman
wrote:



I didn't know planes had handlebars with tank slap.

What you don't know is the relationship to castering nosewheels,
despite seeing it in print. And you'd rather jabber than learn. Do you
actually believe that foaming at the mouth makes more sense than
figuring out something so simple and obvious?

I didn't know planes had handlebars with tank slap.

What you don't know is the relationship to castering nosewheels,
despite seeing it in print. And you'd rather jabber than learn. Do you
actually believe that foaming at the mouth makes more sense than
figuring out something so simple and obvious?

Good point. I wasn't paying attention to castering, and indeed there could be resonance.
So you proved my initial assertion, you know, that rubbish of steering dampening on bike.
Altho, by sheer geometry, you can see that a castering nosewheel likely has far fewer requirements for dampening than a bike wheel. Esp if they are double nosewheels.

See, Cap'n Ahole/Ahab, you can do it, you can do it, I know you can!! Run over to rec. running.... oh, sorry, too much work... scroll down here to july 22 and poke as many holes in PV's Fundamental Theorem of Max Fat Burning as you can.
Report back. We so value your opinion. And your integrity. And your lifestyle.
You are our collective hero.
If I'm lucky, you might catch a typo or two. You proly shoulda been a proofreader, but al-ass, even that requires some character and honesty.