Forrest Service can no longer use fire slurry on forest fires
 

On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:36:27 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:

Well, at least mankind won't be killing cutsie wootsie wittle animals with
that slurry.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

"Ray Keller" LEFTARD TROLLS ARE DESPERATE wrote in message
om...
You got to be kidding me!! Sounds like "let it burn, it is nature's
way" -lite!

"The change is opposed by several Western Republican lawmakers, who say it
will significantly hamper efforts to contain fires, and elevates the welfare
of animals and fish above people and property. [Their] Nov. 10 letter
pre-addressed the decision, but a spokesman for Gallegly said their concerns
still stand. California Republican Reps. Dan Lungren?, Duncan Hunter?, Jerry
Lewis?, Gary Miller?, Jeff Denham? and Jeff Flake of Arizona also signed the
letter.

snip

"With some exceptions, the guideline prohibits use of retardants [on]
about 0.80 percent of national forest system lands."

http://summitcountyvoice.com/2011/12...re-retardants/

Off they go again, in all directions at once, looking for some
conspiracy to complain about, and from which to make some political
hay.

Read the darned decision, Ray. When you see what it says, you'll
realize that you're in cloud-cuckooland, once again. The same goes for
Chris.

--
Ed Huntress