Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's
work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 9:26*am, Karl Townsend
wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work:http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics:http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl You could try looping the cable through a ferrite core. http://www.antennex.com/shack/Dec99/beads.htm jsw |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On 4/16/2011 9:26 AM, Karl Townsend wrote:
I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl Start with the basics. Is the cable shielded with the shields terminated? You should be running shielded twisted pair, and the cable signal lines should be terminated at both ends. Are the circuit boards in a grounded metal enclosure? If the system is shielded, the next step will be to wrap a few turns of the cables around a ferrite attenuator core, as Jim suggests. If it were in my heart and lung machine I would add .1uF monolythic ceramic capacitors to the output of the DTS line at the computer and the input of the voltage regulator on the board. Separation of the data cable and the AM antenna will help. Running the cable close to the ground or in metallic conduit will help. An external AM antenna for the radio (away from the data line) will help. Kevin Gallimore |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 11:26*pm, Karl Townsend
wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work:http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics:http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf Karl You didnt say if it worked....assume it did.... Short of a lot of stuffing around, the clamp on ferrite interference cores are worth a try - then try if the cables you have run have spare conductors, ground them all at each end. Maybe double up on the power one on pin 8 - the thing gets its power from the receiving computer, could be a bit iffy what with voltage drop on your feed cable... Oh, and BTW Karl - you are aware you are committing a Federal Offense by running an unlicensed radio transmitter causing interference to your wifes radio. Possibly a lot of other radios as well.. Tsk tsk....G.. Andrew VK3BFA. |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
Andrew VK3BFA wrote:
On Apr 16, 11:26 pm, Karl wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work:http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics:http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf Karl You didnt say if it worked....assume it did.... Short of a lot of stuffing around, the clamp on ferrite interference cores are worth a try - then try if the cables you have run have spare conductors, ground them all at each end. Maybe double up on the power one on pin 8 - the thing gets its power from the receiving computer, could be a bit iffy what with voltage drop on your feed cable... Oh, and BTW Karl - you are aware you are committing a Federal Offense by running an unlicensed radio transmitter causing interference to your wifes radio. Possibly a lot of other radios as well.. Tsk tsk....G.. Andrew VK3BFA. Same for all those CFL users. /mark in BC |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend
wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Buy her a bloody FM radio! Better yet, a sat radio, with none of the farkin' commercials playing all the time. -- Threee days before Tucson, Howard Dean explained that the tea party movement is "the last gasp of the generation that has trouble with diversity." Rising to the challenge of lowering his reputation and the tone of public discourse, Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Let us hope that Dean is the last gasp of the generation of liberals whose default position in any argument is to indict opponents as racists. This McCarthyism of the left -- devoid of intellectual content, unsupported by data -- is a mental tic, not an idea but a tactic for avoiding engagement with ideas. It expresses limitless contempt for the American people, who have reciprocated by reducing liberalism to its current characteristics of electoral weakness and bad sociology. --George Will 14 JAN 2011 Article titled "Tragedies often spark plenty of analysis" |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl Put the PC in the greenhouse as the local sensor node controller, and connect it to the house on WiFi. |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
Mark F wrote: Andrew VK3BFA wrote: On Apr 16, 11:26 pm, Karl wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work:http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics:http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf Karl You didnt say if it worked....assume it did.... Short of a lot of stuffing around, the clamp on ferrite interference cores are worth a try - then try if the cables you have run have spare conductors, ground them all at each end. Maybe double up on the power one on pin 8 - the thing gets its power from the receiving computer, could be a bit iffy what with voltage drop on your feed cable... Oh, and BTW Karl - you are aware you are committing a Federal Offense by running an unlicensed radio transmitter causing interference to your wifes radio. Possibly a lot of other radios as well.. Tsk tsk....G.. Andrew VK3BFA. Same for all those CFL users. /mark in BC Those are not "intentional radiators". |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Buy her a bloody FM radio! Better yet, a sat radio, with none of the farkin' commercials playing all the time. -- Threee days before Tucson, Howard Dean explained that the tea party movement is "the last gasp of the generation that has trouble with diversity." Rising to the challenge of lowering his reputation and the tone of public discourse, Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Let us hope that Dean is the last gasp of the generation of liberals whose default position in any argument is to indict opponents as racists. This McCarthyism of the left -- devoid of intellectual content, unsupported by data -- is a mental tic, not an idea but a tactic for avoiding engagement with ideas. It expresses limitless contempt for the American people, who have reciprocated by reducing liberalism to its current characteristics of electoral weakness and bad sociology. --George Will 14 JAN 2011 Article titled "Tragedies often spark plenty of analysis" Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message ... "Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Buy her a bloody FM radio! Better yet, a sat radio, with none of the farkin' commercials playing all the time. -- Threee days before Tucson, Howard Dean explained that the tea party movement is "the last gasp of the generation that has trouble with diversity." Rising to the challenge of lowering his reputation and the tone of public discourse, Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Let us hope that Dean is the last gasp of the generation of liberals whose default position in any argument is to indict opponents as racists. This McCarthyism of the left -- devoid of intellectual content, unsupported by data -- is a mental tic, not an idea but a tactic for avoiding engagement with ideas. It expresses limitless contempt for the American people, who have reciprocated by reducing liberalism to its current characteristics of electoral weakness and bad sociology. --George Will 14 JAN 2011 Article titled "Tragedies often spark plenty of analysis" Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. So those who support the tea party are significantly more likely to hold racist views as compared to those who don't ? --Wow I never would have guessed ! |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
Karl Townsend wrote:
I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? 20 mA current loop, with shielded twisted pair. Maybe RS-485 for that distance, although I've run cat5 LAN cable 100 feet before. The secret to minimizing interference to the radio is twisted pair and shielding. I recommend you get enough conductors so that you can also use DTR/DSR and RTS/CTS, if only for the sake of completeness. And again, use twisted pairs and shield the cable. Ground the shield ONLY at the host end, so that you don't get a mongo ground loop. Good Luck! Rich |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message news:GqWdne7LAIc0TjTQnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@scnresearch. com... "Ed Huntress" wrote in message ... "Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Buy her a bloody FM radio! Better yet, a sat radio, with none of the farkin' commercials playing all the time. -- Threee days before Tucson, Howard Dean explained that the tea party movement is "the last gasp of the generation that has trouble with diversity." Rising to the challenge of lowering his reputation and the tone of public discourse, Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Let us hope that Dean is the last gasp of the generation of liberals whose default position in any argument is to indict opponents as racists. This McCarthyism of the left -- devoid of intellectual content, unsupported by data -- is a mental tic, not an idea but a tactic for avoiding engagement with ideas. It expresses limitless contempt for the American people, who have reciprocated by reducing liberalism to its current characteristics of electoral weakness and bad sociology. --George Will 14 JAN 2011 Article titled "Tragedies often spark plenty of analysis" Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. So those who support the tea party are significantly more likely to hold racist views as compared to those who don't ? --Wow I never would have guessed ! g Yeah, it falls into the category of whether blondes or brunettes are more likely to show dark roots. You don't really need a fancy study to know the general shape of the answer. d8-) -- Ed Huntress |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
Larry Jaques wrote:
Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Shouldn't the President of the United States be an _AMERICAN_ American? I try not to be racist, but I hate anyone who puts another country, or a whole bloody continent, before America! Thanks, Rich |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Apr 16, 1:53*pm, Rich Grise wrote:
I try not to be racist Try harder. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"Karl Townsend" wrote in message ... I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl Hi Karl, I've been running a 1 wire system using DS18S20s driven by a DS9097U for over three years and haven't had any AM radio interference. I am a AM radio listener with about six radios that are spread around the house. I have two bedside radios I use at night for weak signals, so if I had interference I would have tracked it down in short order. I have 13 freezers that I monitor on a real time basis, although the program I use will save and graph data. You might look up the DS9097U as a driver unit. But I think now they have went to USB connections so the numbers may change. The program I use is Lampomitari, it does exactly what I wanted but probably not the best or easiest program to use. I'll check in when I have more time to see if I can get you more info. Miikek |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
"Rich Grise" wrote in message ... Larry Jaques wrote: Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Shouldn't the President of the United States be an _AMERICAN_ American? No such thing, unless you are a racist. I try not to be racist, but I hate anyone who Obama is a natural born American citizen. puts another country, or a whole bloody continent, before America! Your favorite cake... http://www.wedding-todays.com/wp-con...it-cake-01.jpg -- |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
PrecisionmachinisT wrote: "Rich Grise" wrote in message ... Larry Jaques wrote: Dean smeared tea partiers as racists: They oppose Obama's agenda, Obama is African-American, ergo... Shouldn't the President of the United States be an _AMERICAN_ American? No such thing, unless you are a racist. I try not to be racist, but I hate anyone who Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. I still do not support Obummer, and I am certainly no racist. Though as a centrist I do agree with his positions on some issues, I disagree with his positions on enough issues to not be able to support him. |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 12:54*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress It would be interesting if the same questions were asked about white folks. It could be that members of the Tea Party have a lower opinion about everyone. In fact I would expect members of a group that thinks the government is not hard working, trustworthy, or intelligent, would also think everyone is the same way. Dan |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 12:54 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote: Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress It would be interesting if the same questions were asked about white folks. It could be that members of the Tea Party have a lower opinion about everyone. In fact I would expect members of a group that thinks the government is not hard working, trustworthy, or intelligent, would also think everyone is the same way. Dan That's an interesting thought. I'd like to see such a study, too. -- Ed Huntress |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Apr 16, 12:54*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote: Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress It would be interesting if the same questions were asked about white folks. It could be that members of the Tea Party have a lower opinion about everyone. In fact I would expect members of a group that thinks the government is not hard working, trustworthy, or intelligent, would also think everyone is the same way. Dan Racists like the Rev. Wright, and Al Sharpton and so forth? Those kinds of racists? Gunner, who is NOT white. -- "If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight, it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified) |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C."
wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. Im surprised you are ignorant of the subject.. A pity indeed. Why Obama cannot be a natural born Citizen A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP by Jim Delaney John A. Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was intended to confer U.S. citizenship to the children of slaves born in the U.S. (Apr. 5, 2010) — Obama, born in 1961 of a U.S. Citizen mother and a British Citizen (born in Kenya) father, was born a “U.S. Citizen” by virtue of his mother’s U.S. Citizenship; however, since Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and thus not “attached to the U.S.,” Obama, even if born of a U.S. Citizen mother within the jurisdiction of the United States, is not, by definition and Constitutional intent, a “natural born Citizen” as is specifically required by Article II, Section 1 (the Presidential Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, and is, therefore, ineligible to serve as President. British citizenship was conferred to Obama at birth by act of British law. Thus, he is born of dual citizenship. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution stipulates that “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of the President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Within the context of the Framers’ actual meaning (letter of the law) and express purpose (spirit of the law), being a “natural born Citizen” requires that citizenship must be passed on by the constitutionally pertinent principle of natural law (see Law of Nations by E. Vattel, 1758, which consistently and profoundly influenced the Framers’ intent when fashioning the Constitution), which assumes that citizenship is inherited from one’s father’s citizenship. The intent of the Framers with respect to the meaning of “natural born Citizen” (vs. “born in the U.S.” or U.S. Citizen”) within the context of the Presidential Clause specifically takes into account the father’s allegiance and citizenship at the time of a child’s birth. Thus, the father’s citizenship and, thus, his “attachment to the U.S.” at the time of the child’s birth, carried more weight than merely the geographic location of the child’s birth. Why? Still reeling from British rule, the Framers, as represented by the words of John Jay in a July 1787 letter to George Washington, who presided over the Constitutional Convention, wanted to avoid dual citizenship or dual loyalties of any future Commander-in-Chief by declaring expressly “that the Commander-in-Chief…shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born citizen,” thus to insure future leadership’s freedom from foreign influences. This correspondence directly influenced how Article II, Section 1 was subsequently written, which holds that “no person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.” (Notice the distinction.) The first Nationality Act in 1790 declared that “the children of citizens [plural] of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.” (Notice what appeared to be the central importance of the father’s status — even if both parents were U.S. Citizens at the time of the child’s birth.) However, the Naturalization Act of 1795 stated that children born to citizens beyond the seas are citizens of the United States but are not legally considered “natural born citizens” of the United States, a more exclusionary definition which adds the geographic requirement as well. Per the 14th Amendment, wherein the distinction between “natural born” and “U.S. Citizen” is never defined, a person born within the jurisdiction of the United States to non-citizens who “are employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” is automatically (by law) a U.S. Citizen. The prevailing view regarding citizenship was again drawn from E. Vattel’s Law of Nations, which stated that “natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens,” and that “as society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.” Further, the primary author of the citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment, Sen. Jacob Howard, declared that the clause of the Amendment was, again, by virtue of “natural law” and not by “act of law.” This would mean that a child born to a U.S. Citizen father was “natural born. In 1871, Rep. John Bingham, a Framer of the 14th Amendment, stated that a child is a U.S. Citizen if born of naturalized parents inasmuch as a naturalized father, as part of the naturalization oath, “absolutely renounces and abjure all allegiance and fidelity” to other sovereignties, thus establishing his firm “attachment to the United States” as well. Therefore, born of U.S. Citizen parents within the jurisdiction are the overriding factors in determining “natural born citizenship.” U.S. Title 8, Sec 1401 provides that U.S. Citizenship alone is not sufficient to qualify one for President or Vice President, the clear inference being that he or she must be natural born. Additionally, the 12th Amendment states that “No person constitutionally ineligible to the Office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States.” In 1800, Charles Pinkney, a Framer of the Constitution and, later, governor of South Carolina, said that the Presidential Clause was designed to firmly “insure attachment to the country.” (No dual loyalties on the part of either parent.) Article IV, Section 2 provided that no act of Congress was required to make citizens of the individual states citizens of the U.S.; only State Legislatures had authority to grant State citizenship which, in turn, conferred upon them U.S. Citizenship. Further, in Savage vs. Umphries (TX) 118 S.W. 893, 909, the court ruled that “as a man is a citizen of the country to which his father owes allegiance, it is incumbent on one alleging in an election contest that a voter is not a citizen of the U.S. to show that such voter’s father was not a citizen thereof during his son’s minority.” In 1820, Rep. A. Smith (VA), stated that “when we apply the term citizens to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him.” In 1866, per the 14th Amendment, the terms “subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.” was defined as meaning “not owing allegiance to any other sovereignty.” In the same year, Sec. 1992 of the U.S. Revised Statutes declared that “all persons born in the U.S. and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the U.S.” John Bingham, commenting on Sec. 1992, stated that “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. of parents [plural] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Very definitive for purposes both of the 14th Amendment and the Presidential Clause.) See Perkins vs. ELG, US 325 (1939) ruling which provides the two criteria expressed by Rep. John Bingham must exist before one can be called a “natural born citizen.” on June 22, 1874, Congress issued a joint resolution that stated the “United States has not recognized a double allegiance.” Of contemporaneous interest is that according to the U.S. State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (7 FAM 1131.6-2 Eligibility for Presidency), “the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute (“natural born citizen” and “by statute” is incongruous) does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.” The incongruity created by the statement’s use of “natural born citizen” and “by statute” notwithstanding, it appears that a naturalized citizen (by law/statute) is not eligible to assume the office of the President, but it seems to be generally agreed that children born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. of naturalized parents are considered to be “natural born citizens” since that child’s parents are, as part of the naturalization process, required “to renounce and abjure any allegiance or fidelity to any foreign sovereignty” and, thus, are, at the time of the child’s birth, “attached to the U.S.” Similarly, and more obviously, a child born within U.S. jurisdiction of two U.S. citizen parents is also considered a “natural born citizen.” So it appears that there is no better way to insure “attachment to the U.S.” than to require the President to have inherited his American citizenship from his U.S. Citizen father. The Framers’ rationale for this would be that any child born in the U.S. of an alien father, or a father of dual allegiance, can be removed by their father to be raised in another country only to be returned later in life bringing with him/her foreign influences. Thus, for purposes of complying with the Presidential Clause, a person born of dual citizenship/allegiance cannot be said to be a natural born citizen. Again, and within the context of the Presidential Clause, the child inherits natural born citizenship from the father alone because, through the laws of nature, the child inherits the condition of the father. Within the meaning of the Presidential Clause, one can accurately say that there are essentially two types of citizenship: 1) “natural born citizenship,” meaning one who, by operation of nature (descent), was born of an American citizen father, or, as further expanded upon in successive legislation and opinion, was born of two U.S. Citizen parents, and 2) a “U.S. Citizen” meaning one who, through operation of law (statutory) was granted citizenship through naturalization, either automatically at time of birth or voluntarily some time after birth (see John Bingham opinion above). The Wrotnowski vs. Bysiewica stay request which was denied by SCOTUS on December 15, 2008 asserts that President Chester A. Arthur’s father was a British citizen at the time of Chester’s birth–and the facts appear to clearly substantiate that assertion–and that, therefore, Chester A. Arthur was ineligible under Article II, Section 1 to assume the office of President. And since the facts of the Arthur case were very similar to that of Obama’s, it was the plantiff’s hope to force the Court to review Obama’s eligibility to be President as well. So, even if Obama verifies his birth within the jurisdiction of the U.S., he is a U.S. Citizen by virtue of his mother’s American citizenship, but he is not a natural born citizen because he was born of an alien father and is, therefore, not, by definition and intent of the Presidential Clause, a natural born citizen. And if President Chester A. Arthur was ineligible to be President because his father was a British citizen at the time of Chester’s birth, should the Supreme Court rule Chester Arthur’s breach of law a defensible precedent for granting Presidential eligibility to Obama since his father too was a British citizen at the time of Obama’s birth in 1961? On this question, the Framers’ method for repairing the breach is per constitutional amendment. Clearly, the Framers did not want a President at birth to be born of dual citizenship. As someone once said, “Making errors in the past does not mean that we need to repeat them in the future.” From this summary of law, I think it can be most reasonably concluded that since a child derives his attachment to the U.S. from his U.S. Citizen parents, a child born of U.S. Citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the U.S., inclusive of those U.S. parents who were naturalized U.S. citizens at the time of the child’s birth, is very clearly a “natural born citizen.” Finally, Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to Judge Wm. Johnson in 1823: “On every question of construction of the Constitution, let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable intent in which it was passed.” And this from President George Washington in his Farewell Address in 1796: “If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular way wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by ursurpation; for through this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.” -- "If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight, it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified) |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C."
wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. It's not just Obama's original birth certificate at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records. Read mo Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105347#ixzz1Jj5mAfrF -- "If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight, it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified) |
#23
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend
wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl Thanks for all the tips, everybody. I'll first move up to twisted pair shielded cable and ground the shield at the computer end. I'll test it just laying out the window. If it still gives trouble, I'll change from the office computer to the sales room computer for monitoring. Its 40 yards from the house. |
#24
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C."
wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. http://truebluenz.wordpress.com/2011...t-to-collapse/ Update Obama Birth Certificate- Web of lies about to collapse? Posted on January 19, 2011 by Redbaiter In all the discussions that have covered Obama’s Presidential elegibility, there have been a number of statements by Obama’s supporters that have been difficult to argue against. They are 1) That Obama’s Certificate has been posted on line, and that is the real certificate, and 2) That there is information on file in Hawaii that proves Obama’s birth. In fact Hawaiian Health Dept officials have stated that they have seen Obama’s Birth certificate on file. The claim in item 1 above has been pretty much proven as false. The online document is an unsigned unstamped digital image of no legal worth. Item 2 above now takes a serious hit. Hawaii’s new governor, Neil Abercrombie, recently announced he was keen to clear the issue up as widespread doubts on the President eligibility were damaging Obama’s re-election prospects. He said he would try and find the documentation necessary to prove Obama was born in Hawaii. ( a strange enough thing to say itself, about something apparently beyond doubt) This promise was made around Christmas day last year. Abercrombie was interviewed yesterday by his local newspaper, The Star Advertiser. He was asked about that promise. Q: You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plans to release more information regarding President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. How is that coming? A: I got a letter from someone the other day who was genuinely concerned about it; it is not all just political agenda. They were talking on Olelo last night about this; it has a political implication for 2012 that we simply cannot have. (Abercrombie said there is a recording of the birth in the State Archives and he wants to use that.) It was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down … …What I can do, and all I have ever said, is that I am going to see to it as governor that I can verify to anyone who is honest about it that this is the case. If there is a political agenda then there is nothing I can do about that, nor can the president. This mumbling and incoherent reply is code for “there is no Birth Certificate on file”. Time to haul the arrogant dissembling Health officials who said there was up on charges I reckon. Charges like conspiracy to defraud the American people. This whole web of deceit that the mainstream media have been complicit in weaving is going to collapse because bloggers have stuck to the task of searching for the truth. The US is governed by a criminal gang and that gang has tentacles that stretch way into the mainstream media. Bloggers will continue to investigate, and we will bring this whole corrupt cronyist crooked edifice down around the ears of that arrogant Kenyan born impostor and his thug acolytes. In government and in the media. Link to interview. http://www.staradvertiser.com/editor..._endeavor.html Update: October 31st 2008- [DOH Director] Fukino said she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate. “Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures,” Fukino said. Fukino said that no state official, including Gov. Linda Lingle, ever instructed that Obama’s certificate be handled differently from any other. Link to PDF of actual press release. http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf July 27th 2009- In an attempt to quash persistent rumors that President Obama was not born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, Hawaii’s health director reiterated Monday afternoon that she has personally seen Obama’s birth certificate in the Health Department’s archives: “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago Link to PDF of actual press release. http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2009/09-063.pdf 11th November 2009- Journalist Lou Dobbs fired from CNN soon after demanding on air that any material held in Hawaii pertaining to Obama’s birth be released to the public. O # Oswald Bastable says: January 19, 2011 at 17:21 Any officials who have lied, covered up or been deliberately evasive SHOULD be facing treason charges- alongside the pretender. # Scumsucker says: January 19, 2011 at 19:01 …and then hanged. # Oswald Bastable says: January 19, 2011 at 19:25 Goes without saying! ;-) So if its clearly been proven true that no one can find the Obamassiahs birth certificate....didnt the people that claimed they saw it...lie? Democrats one assumes. But then..thats normal for them. Gunner -- "If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight, it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified) |
#25
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 6:18*pm, Karl Townsend
wrote: ... My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. .. Karl Thanks for all the tips, everybody. I'll first move up to twisted pair shielded cable and ground the shield at the computer end. I'll test it just laying out the window. If it still gives trouble, I'll change from the office computer to the sales room computer for monitoring. Its 40 yards from the house.- Twisted pair without the shield might work, since AM ferrite rod antennas receive the magnetic component of the RF wave. You could twist up some wire with a drill to test it before buying expensive cable. jsw |
#26
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Apr 16, 6:24*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
A whole lot of cut & paste drivel which included: 11th November 2009- Journalist Lou Dobbs fired from CNN soon after demanding on air that any material held in Hawaii pertaining to Obama s birth be released to the public. Perhaps Lou Dobbs was fired because CNN finally realized that the word "Journalist" really doesn't fit in a conversation about Lou Dobbs. Perhaps he was a journalist once upon a time, but not anymore. How fitting it is that this should come up under the subject line "Radio Interference." |
#27
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 6:18*pm, Karl Townsend
wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:26:42 -0500, Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Karl Thanks for all the tips, everybody. I'll first move up to twisted pair shielded cable and ground the shield at the computer end. I'll test it just laying out the window. If it still gives trouble, I'll change from the office computer to the sales room computer for monitoring. Its 40 yards from the house I'm coming in kinda late here, but how rapidly do you expect your greenhouse temperature to change? a "constant beep beep beep" suggests that you're taking temperature readings, well, constantly. I'd think that sampling every few minutes would be more than often enough, and your wife wouldn't notice the single "beeps" if they were sufficiently spaced. No hardware changes required. All you have to do is awitch DTR high when you want data and low when you don't. Hope this helps. |
#28
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C." wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. Im surprised you are ignorant of the subject.. A pity indeed. Why Obama cannot be a natural born Citizen Snip ============ In many ways, promoting obsession with Barack's/Berry's citizenship is a highly successful tactic to divert attention as your/our pockets are being picked. While this is hugely entertaining/titillating to large numbers of people, it is also a huge diversion from the actual problems. Consider the following: (1) Even if Barry/Barack is proven to be a space alien with three eyes, and is removed from the presidency, Joe Biden and not John McCain will become president. (2) Even if John "bomb bomb bomb Iran" McCain was to be named as president, the problems of gross governmental deficits at all levels, grotesque governmental debt at all levels, a financial/fiscal system rotten from top to bottom, two endless/pointless wars, three if we count Libya, consequential affordable healthcare and pension reform, tax reform, and dependence on imported oil and other strategic commodities such as rare earths, will not be addressed in any meaningful way, shape, form or fashion, although the deckchairs on the Titanic may indeed be rearranged in new and interesting patterns as the band plays on. (3) Stealing from the dependent, such as the very young, the very old and the handicapped cannot solve these problems, nor will turning millions of people out on the streets to starve, many through bogus foreclosure suits. IMNSHO a far more useful effort would be to mandate annual audits of the FRB by the GAO, and the establishment by Congress of ranges of interest and other items set by the FRB, for example the minimum interest commercial banks must pay on checking/savings accounts, say the rate of inflation + 3%, to prevent the prudent savers by being raped by the FRB efforts to inflate the money supply. Another useful change would be to amend the IRS code to require the use of CPI adjusted values when taxing capital gains or interest income, even if the CPI has been compromised/recalibrated to about 1/2 the real rate of inflation. -- Unka George (George McDuffee) ............................... The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there. L. P. Hartley (1895-1972), British author. The Go-Between, Prologue (1953). |
#29
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
"rangerssuck" wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 6:24 pm, Gunner Asch wrote: A whole lot of cut & paste drivel which included: 11th November 2009- Journalist Lou Dobbs fired from CNN soon after demanding on air that any material held in Hawaii pertaining to Obama s birth be released to the public. Perhaps Lou Dobbs was fired because CNN finally realized that the word "Journalist" really doesn't fit in a conversation about Lou Dobbs. Perhaps he was a journalist once upon a time, but not anymore. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_831033.html "Lou Dobbs will start his new Fox Business show on March 14, the network announced Thursday." "The show will be titled "Lou Dobbs Tonight," and will air at 7 PM Eastern. That just happens to be the same title and time-slot that Dobbs' CNN show had." "Dobbs left CNN in 2009 after mounting tension between him and the network over his increasingly outspoken political views. He announced that he was joining Fox Business in November of last year." |
#30
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
"F. George McDuffee" wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:02:36 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C." wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. Im surprised you are ignorant of the subject.. A pity indeed. Why Obama cannot be a natural born Citizen Snip ============ In many ways, promoting obsession with Barack's/Berry's citizenship is a highly successful tactic to divert attention as your/our pockets are being picked. While this is hugely entertaining/titillating to large numbers of people, it is also a huge diversion from the actual problems. Consider the following: (1) Even if Barry/Barack is proven to be a space alien with three eyes, and is removed from the presidency, Joe Biden and not John McCain will become president. (2) Even if John "bomb bomb bomb Iran" McCain was to be named as president, the problems of gross governmental deficits at all levels, grotesque governmental debt at all levels, a financial/fiscal system rotten from top to bottom, two endless/pointless wars, three if we count Libya, consequential affordable healthcare and pension reform, tax reform, and dependence on imported oil and other strategic commodities such as rare earths, will not be addressed in any meaningful way, shape, form or fashion, although the deckchairs on the Titanic may indeed be rearranged in new and interesting patterns as the band plays on. (3) Stealing from the dependent, such as the very young, the very old and the handicapped cannot solve these problems, nor will turning millions of people out on the streets to starve, many through bogus foreclosure suits. IMNSHO a far more useful effort would be to mandate annual audits of the FRB by the GAO, and the establishment by Congress of ranges of interest and other items set by the FRB, for example the minimum interest commercial banks must pay on checking/savings accounts, say the rate of inflation + 3%, to prevent the prudent savers by being raped by the FRB efforts to inflate the money supply. Another useful change would be to amend the IRS code to require the use of CPI adjusted values when taxing capital gains or interest income, even if the CPI has been compromised/recalibrated to about 1/2 the real rate of inflation. Have you seen this: Budget Panel Eyes End to VA Care for 1.3 Million Vets The House Budget Committee, chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), has told a veterans' group it is studying a plan to save $6 billion annually in VA health care costs by canceling enrollment of any veteran who doesn't have a service-related medical condition and is not poor. Committee Republicans, searching for ways to curb federal deficits and rein in galloping VA costs, are targeting 1.3 million veterans who claim priority group 7 or 8 status and have access to VA care. Priority group 8 veterans have no service-connected disabilities and annual incomes, or net worth, that exceed VA means-test thresholds and VA "geographic income" thresholds, which are set by family size. Priority Group 7 veterans also have no service-connected disabilities and their incomes are above the means-test thresholds. But their incomes or net worth fall below the geographic index. In other words, because of where they live, in high cost areas, they likely struggle financially. Joseph Violante, national legislative director for Disabled American Veterans, said he first learned of the committee's interest in possibly narrowing access to VA clinics and hospitals from a DAV member from Wisconsin, chairman Ryan's home state. Violante and other DAV officials arranged their own meeting with a staff member for the committee. He confirmed growing interest in a cost-saving initiative to push priority 7 and 8 veterans out of VA health care. As this budget committee staffer reminded Violante, proponents for opening VA health care to all veterans had argued it would be cost neutral to VA. That's because VA would charge these vets modest co-payments for their care. Also VA would bill these veterans' private health insurance plans for the cost of their VA care. That argument from 1996 turned out to be wrong. Co-payments collected from low-priority veterans and private insurance plan billings today cover only 18 percent of the cost of care for group 7 and 8 veterans. By 2009, the annual net cost to VA to treat these veterans totaled $4.4 billion or 11 percent of VA's annual medical appropriation. The figures come from the Congressional Budget Office's annual report to Congress, "Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options." Among options it presented this year to the new Congress for reducing VA spending is one to close enrollment in VA care for all veterans in groups 7 and 8 and to cancel the enrollment of veterans currently in two low priority groups. CBO said this would save VA $62 billion in the first 10 years, from 2012 to 2021. But the net savings to the government over the same period, CBO said, would be about half that amount. That's because many of the veterans bumped from VA are old enough or poor enough to use Medicare or Medicaid, which would drive up the cost of those programs. We asked a committee spokesman for comment, both by e-mail and voice mail, but none came in time for this column's deadline. Until the mid-1990s, VA had denied health care to priority 7 and 8 veterans. Congress changed that during the Clinton administration, enacting the Veterans' Health Care Eligibility Act of 1996. The law directed VA to build many more clinics across the country. To ensure enough patients to fill these clinics, the VA secretary was given authority to expand care eligibility. The ban on group 7 and 8 veterans was ended by 1999. Over the next three years their enrollment climbed to 30 percent of total enrollees. By 2003, then-VA Secretary Anthony Principi stopped allowing any more group 8 enrollments, saying their numbers strained the system for higher priority veterans, including wounded returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. It's possible that, in sharing what the budget committee eyed do to lower VA health costs, the professional staffer assumed DAV would embrace cancellation of 7 and 8 enrollments because few DAV members would be impacted. But Violante said DAV is concerned, for two reasons. One, some DAV members separated from service with disabilities rated at 0 percent do have access to VA health care as group 7 or 8 veterans. A bigger concern for his members, Violante said, is that tossing 1.3 million veterans from VA care would leave the system without the "critical mass" of patients needed to provide "a full continuum of care." DAV officials worried that an initiative to narrow VA enrollment would be included in the House Republican budget plan unveiled this week. Ryan titled it "Path to Prosperity" and the full committee endorsed it on a straight party line vote April 6. The budget package, however, doesn't mention any change to enrollment eligibility nor call for significant cuts to VA budgets. Violante said DAV wants to talk House committees out of taking any action to reduce VA enrollment. CBO presented pros and cons for cancelling 7 and 8 enrollments. An advantage is VA could refocus services on "its traditional group of patients -- those with the greatest needs or fewest financial resources." It noted 90 percent of group 7 and 8 enrollees had other health care coverage, either Medicare or private insurance. So the "vast majority" cut loose would have ready access to other coverage. Those who don't could be eligible for health insurance exchanges to be set up in the future said CBO. One disadvantage is that many veterans who have come to rely on VA for at least part of their medical care would see that care interrupted. The Obama administration and Congress actually had been moving in the opposite direction, to expand VA enrollment, until Republicans won the House. As Obama took office in 2009, VA announced that up to 266,000 veterans with no service-connected health conditions would be allowed to enroll in VA health care. Rep. Chet Edwards (D-Texas) had fought successfully to add $350 million to the 2009 VA budget so income thresholds controlling priority 8 enrollments could be raised 10 percent. Edwards lost his reelection bid last year. And new priority 8 enrollees haven't rushed to join the system as VA officials had expected. Group 8 and 7 veterans using VA care pay $15 per outpatient visit and a little more for specialty care. Inpatient fees also are modest. The most popular benefit for many enrollees is discounted prescription drugs. The co-pay usually is $8 for a 30-day supply. Tim Tetz with American Legion said his organization and many veterans groups would strongly oppose tossing out group 7 and 8 veterans. He credits their enrollment since 1999 as helping to improve VA care. "If as great of a health care system as we have, shouldn't we let all of our veterans have access to it, in some manner," Tetz asked. While deficit hawks weigh this issue, VA still is enrolling new group 8 veterans who fall below its income thresholds. Those without dependents and living outside high-cost areas, for example, must have income below a means test threshold of $32,342. More information on group 8 enrollment is online at www.va.gov/healtheligibility or call (877) 222-VETS (8387). -- You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's Teflon coated. |
#31
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
"Gunner Asch" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C." wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. Im surprised you are ignorant of the subject.. A pity indeed. Why Obama cannot be a natural born Citizen A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP by Jim Delaney John A. Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was intended to confer U.S. citizenship to the children of slaves born in the U.S. (Apr. 5, 2010) - Obama, born in 1961 of a U.S. Citizen mother and a British Citizen (born in Kenya) father, was born a "U.S. Citizen" by virtue of his mother's U.S. Citizenship... The 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868. Just how old is this guy, anyway? d8-) ; however, since Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen and thus not "attached to the U.S.," Obama, even if born of a U.S. Citizen mother within the jurisdiction of the United States, is not, by definition and Constitutional intent, a "natural born Citizen" as is specifically required by Article II, Section 1 (the Presidential Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, and is, therefore, ineligible to serve as President. British citizenship was conferred to Obama at birth by act of British law. Thus, he is born of dual citizenship. snip John Bingham, commenting on Sec. 1992, stated that "every human being born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. of parents [plural] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen." (Very definitive for purposes both of the 14th Amendment and the Presidential Clause.) Except that John Bingham was a congressman from Ohio, not a Justice of the Supreme Court. See Perkins vs. ELG, US 325 (1939) ruling which provides the two criteria expressed by Rep. John Bingham must exist before one can be called a "natural born citizen." Perkins vs. ELG, US 325 (1939), from the Court's opinion, citing precedents: "Young Steinkauler is a native-born American citizen. There is no law of the United States under which his father or any other person can deprive him of his birthright. He can return to America at the age of twenty-one, and in due time, if the people elect, he can become President of the United States." "United States v. Wong Kim Ark, supra, p. 169 U. S. 668. As municipal law determines how citizenship may be acquired, it follows that persons may have a dual nationality. [Footnote 1] And the mere fact that the plaintiff may have acquired Swedish citizenship by virtue of the operation of Swedish law on the resumption of that citizenship by her parents does not compel the conclusion that she has lost her own citizenship acquired under our law. As at birth she became a citizen of the United States, that citizenship must be deemed to continue unless she has been deprived of it through the operation of a treaty or congressional enactment or by her voluntary action in conformity with applicable legal principles. "Second. It has long been a recognized principle in this country that, if a child born here is taken during minority to the country of his parents' origin, where his parents resume their former allegiance, he does not thereby lose his citizenship in the United States provided that, on attaining majority he elects to retain that citizenship and to return to the United States to assume its duties. [Footnote 2] " The writer is a sophist and a phony -- just your kind of guy, Gunner. You've really got to start being skeptical of these wingers who try to overwhelm you with citations. If they run more than a few hundred words, it's pretty consistent that they're just trying to give you a snow job. Here, the clown you quote from has the audacity to make misrepresentative quotes, attempting to show that the case says one thing, when its conclusion was just the opposite. The whole ELG case is a flat contradiction of the birther argument. Better luck next time, Gunner. Or, better yet, read the damned things you're quoting from third-hand. -- Ed Huntress |
#32
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 12:54 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote: Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress It would be interesting if the same questions were asked about white folks. It could be that members of the Tea Party have a lower opinion about everyone. In fact I would expect members of a group that thinks the government is not hard working, trustworthy, or intelligent, would also think everyone is the same way. Dan That's an interesting thought. I'd like to see such a study, too. -- Ed Huntress There was study on racism performed in Nov, 2008. About 95% of blacks voted for a black for president over a white. Mikek |
#33
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
"amdx" wrote in message ... "Ed Huntress" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Apr 16, 12:54 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote: Professor Will appears to have jumped the gun. Here's the latest example: " [R]espondents were asked whether they agreed with various characterizations of different racial groups. Only 35 percent of those who strongly approve of the tea party agreed that blacks are hardworking, compared with 55 percent of those who strongly disapprove of the tea party. On whether blacks were intelligent, 45 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 59 percent of the tea-party opponents. And on the issue of whether blacks were trustworthy, 41 percent of the tea-party supporters agreed, compared with 57 percent of the tea-party opponents. "The survey, which included about 1,000 respondents in six battleground states (like Michigan and Nevada) and California, found similar margins on questions regarding Latinos." http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/mssrp_table.pdf George tends to fall in love with his own rhetorical skills and to go off half-cocked when he thinks he has a great insight. His "insight" this time appears to be that the Tea Party is the second coming of his beloved Burkean conservatives, with a strong libertarian bent. The evidence is that not everyone in the Tea Party is a racist, but that racists seem to gravitate toward the Tea Party -- something like Muslims and terrorists. -- Ed Huntress It would be interesting if the same questions were asked about white folks. It could be that members of the Tea Party have a lower opinion about everyone. In fact I would expect members of a group that thinks the government is not hard working, trustworthy, or intelligent, would also think everyone is the same way. Dan That's an interesting thought. I'd like to see such a study, too. -- Ed Huntress There was study on racism performed in Nov, 2008. About 95% of blacks voted for a black for president over a white. Mikek So did I. That's smart. What's dumb is blue-collar white men voting for a washed-up old Republican. -- Ed Huntress |
#34
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:49:04 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Budget Panel Eyes End to VA Care for 1.3 Million Vets The House Budget Committee, chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), has told a veterans' group it is studying a plan to save $6 billion annually in VA health care costs by canceling enrollment of any veteran who doesn't have a service-related medical condition and is not poor. Committee Republicans, searching for ways to curb federal deficits and rein in galloping VA costs, are targeting 1.3 million veterans who claim priority group 7 or 8 status and have access to VA care. =========== Old gag -- Nothing is too good for our citizens that served in the military -- so thats what we gave them... Now about those promises of lifetime medical care... (1) your checks in the mail (2) Of course I will respect you in the morning (3) I'm from the gumment and I'm here to help you... -- Unka George (George McDuffee) ............................... The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there. L. P. Hartley (1895-1972), British author. The Go-Between, Prologue (1953). |
#35
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On 2011-04-16, Karl Townsend wrote:
I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. O.K. First off -- I would shield the run to the computer -- at 2400 baud, the data rate should be able to handle 50 feet with no problems. Ground the shield (pin 5 on the connector shown), and connect the other two wires to the shielded twisted pair. How far are the sensors from the board? If you are using only one sensor, and it is mounted on the board, this should be enough. (Put the board and sensor in a cage made of brass screen material soldered at the seams and connected to the gound pin. If you are using multiple sensors, use another shielded twisted pair to each sensor -- again with the ground pin (pin 1) connected to the shield. I don't know how fast the data on pin 2 is, but that and the capacitance between the pin 2 lead and the shield would determine the maximum safe line length. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. This is probably the communication between the sensors and the board. The longer the wires, the greater the amount of radiation. Find some shielded twisted pair to shield each run from the board to the sensors, and from the board to the computer. This will probably reduce the maximum line length but if you aren't using really long lines anyway, it should work. You can use some of the cable used for Cat5 network runs between the hub/switch and the wall jacks for the ethernet -- if there is a foil shield around the twisted pair -- usually with an uninsulated drain wire making contact with the foil shield. Just make sure that this is connected to the ground pin on each connector, and you should be in pretty good shape. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? Try the shielded lines first. They will probably fix most of the problems. Enjoy, DoN. -- Remove oil spill source from e-mail Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#36
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 8:23*pm, "DoN. Nichols" wrote:
On 2011-04-16, Karl Townsend wrote: I built a serial port temp. sensor years ago based on this fella's work: http://quozl.netrek.org/ts/ And just bought kit 145 from carl's electronics: http://www.kitsrus.com/pdf/k145.pdf The unit uses DS1820 temp sensors and connects to the pc serial port. There is a fifty foot run from the computer to the sensor. * * * * O.K. *First off -- I would shield the run to the computer -- at 2400 baud, the data rate should be able to handle 50 feet with no problems. *Ground the shield (pin 5 on the connector shown), and connect the other two wires to the shielded twisted pair. * * * * How far are the sensors from the board? *If you are using only one sensor, and it is mounted on the board, this should be enough. *(Put the board and sensor in a cage made of brass screen material soldered at the seams and connected to the gound pin. * * * * If you are using multiple sensors, use another shielded twisted pair to each sensor -- again with the ground pin (pin 1) connected to the shield. *I don't know how fast the data on pin 2 is, but that and the capacitance between the pin 2 lead and the shield would determine the maximum safe line length. My better half made me quit using it because of AM radio interference. There is a constant beep beep beep. * * * * This is probably the communication between the sensors and the board. *The longer the wires, the greater the amount of radiation. Find some shielded twisted pair to shield each run from the board to the sensors, and from the board to the computer. *This will probably reduce the maximum line length but if you aren't using really long lines anyway, it should work. * * * * You can use some of the cable used for Cat5 network runs between the hub/switch and the wall jacks for the ethernet -- if there is a foil shield around the twisted pair -- usually with an uninsulated drain wire making contact with the foil shield. *Just make sure that this is connected to the ground pin on each connector, and you should be in pretty good shape. I'm once again in need of 24 X 7 temp. logging. Is there an easy way to salvage this unit? Or am I better off to just start over with some sort of analog unit? * * * * Try the shielded lines first. *They will probably fix most of the problems. * * * * Enjoy, * * * * * * * * DoN. -- * * * * * * * * * Remove oil spill source from e-mail *Email: * | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 * * * * * (too) near Washington D.C. |http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html * * * * * *--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- Don (and everyone else) - Seriously, folks. If Karl REALLY needs to monitor the temperature CONSTANTLY, then all this shielding and grounding and filtering would be the way to go, BUT, how fast is the temperature going to change? A couple of lines of code and you can toggle DTR when you want a reading. I can't imagine any drastic temperature changes occurring in less than a few minutes. Just take a reading and go to sleep for a while. Nobody's going to notice a tiny burst of RF every 15 minutes. |
#37
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
Seriously, folks. If Karl REALLY needs to monitor the temperature CONSTANTLY, then all this shielding and grounding and filtering would be the way to go, BUT, how fast is the temperature going to change? A couple of lines of code and you can toggle DTR when you want a reading. I can't imagine any drastic temperature changes occurring in less than a few minutes. Just take a reading and go to sleep for a while. Nobody's going to notice a tiny burst of RF every 15 minutes. yep, I need ten readings an hour. This unit has a chip programmed to sample constantly. The computer fires up once every six minutes and records a reading. I played with 1wire, a DS1820, and visual basic. I was not able to make it work. Not my area of expertise. I'm going to get another chance as i need to read an anolog voltage for a leaf wetness meter too. I should be able to install a shielded cable in a couple hours. Karl |
#38
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference!
Gunner Asch on Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:05:43 -0700
typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:21 -0500, "Pete C." wrote: Obama is a natural born American citizen. The only American citizens who are not "natural born" are those who immigrated (legally) and then did the whole citizenship thing. Being born in another country is still "natural born" if one or both of your parents are American citizens. The "birthers" whining about this are simply morons, whether they are racist or not. It's not just Obama's original birth certificate at issue. WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records. Read mo Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105347#ixzz1Jj5mAfrF Hmmm, it is starting to appear that Obama isn't ral, but could just be a sock puppet, hired to play a role. At least the actor hired in "Double Star" was able to conclude an important treaty with the locals. tschus pyotr -- pyotr filipivich We will drink no whiskey before its nine. It's eight fifty eight. Close enough! |
#39
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Apr 16, 9:57*pm, Karl Townsend
wrote: Seriously, folks. If Karl REALLY needs to monitor the temperature CONSTANTLY, then all this shielding and grounding and filtering would be the way to go, BUT, how fast is the temperature going to change? A couple of lines of code and you can toggle DTR when you want a reading. I can't imagine any drastic temperature changes occurring in less than a few minutes. Just take a reading and go to sleep for a while. Nobody's going to notice a tiny burst of RF every 15 minutes. yep, I need ten readings an hour. This unit has a chip programmed to sample constantly. The computer fires up once every six minutes and records a reading. I played with 1wire, a DS1820, and visual basic. I was not able to make it work. Not my area of expertise. I'm going to get another chance as i need to read an anolog voltage for a leaf wetness meter too. I should be able to install a shielded cable in a couple hours. Karl If, between readings, you make sure that DTR goes low, the remote unit will have no power and won't transmit anything. |
#40
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
radio interference
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT), rangerssuck
wrote: On Apr 16, 9:57*pm, Karl Townsend wrote: Seriously, folks. If Karl REALLY needs to monitor the temperature CONSTANTLY, then all this shielding and grounding and filtering would be the way to go, BUT, how fast is the temperature going to change? A couple of lines of code and you can toggle DTR when you want a reading. I can't imagine any drastic temperature changes occurring in less than a few minutes. Just take a reading and go to sleep for a while. Nobody's going to notice a tiny burst of RF every 15 minutes. yep, I need ten readings an hour. This unit has a chip programmed to sample constantly. The computer fires up once every six minutes and records a reading. I played with 1wire, a DS1820, and visual basic. I was not able to make it work. Not my area of expertise. I'm going to get another chance as i need to read an anolog voltage for a leaf wetness meter too. I should be able to install a shielded cable in a couple hours. Karl If, between readings, you make sure that DTR goes low, the remote unit will have no power and won't transmit anything. Would you be willing to provide an example in visual basic? If I could get an example of how to shut it off for five minutes and then take a reading, I could take it from there. Sorry VB6 is the only language I have ANY knowledge. Karl |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trane furnace radio/TV interference | Home Repair | |||
radio interference from cordless phone | Electronics Repair | |||
Radio interference from flowshare valve | UK diy | |||
Radio Frequency Interference | UK diy | |||
PC interference affects radio and Plasma tv | Electronics Repair |