Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday?
I hope and pray reason will prevail. But I thought McCain would win. Go figger. Steve |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:44 -0700, the infamous "Steve B"
scrawled the following: Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? Those fools just might do it. I hope and pray reason will prevail. In WASHINGTON, D.C.? What were you thinking? ------------------- If it passes, I'll bet you can count the seconds before a 2nd American Revolution starts thundering through our country. I think I'll stock up on groceries and get more water today, JIC. -- Adults are obsolete children. --Dr. Seuss (Theodore Geisel, 1904-1991) -- |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
Larry Jaques wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:44 -0700, the infamous "Steve B" scrawled the following: Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? Those fools just might do it. I hope and pray reason will prevail. In WASHINGTON, D.C.? What were you thinking? ------------------- If it passes, I'll bet you can count the seconds before a 2nd American Revolution starts thundering through our country. I think I'll stock up on groceries and get more water today, JIC. -- Adults are obsolete children. --Dr. Seuss (Theodore Geisel, 1904-1991) -- There is so much money involved, I doubt they can keep their hands off. -- Richard Lamb http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb/ |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:08:16 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:44 -0700, the infamous "Steve B" scrawled the following: Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? Those fools just might do it. I hope and pray reason will prevail. In WASHINGTON, D.C.? What were you thinking? ------------------- If it passes, I'll bet you can count the seconds before a 2nd American Revolution starts thundering through our country. I think I'll stock up on groceries and get more water today, JIC. And some extra ammo...... -- Adults are obsolete children. --Dr. Seuss (Theodore Geisel, 1904-1991) "First Law of Leftist Debate The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter to his preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot, homophobe approaches infinity. This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to the subject." Grey Ghost |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? Those fools just might do it. I hope and pray reason will prevail. In WASHINGTON, D.C.? What were you thinking? ------------------- If it passes, I'll bet you can count the seconds before a 2nd American Revolution starts thundering through our country. I think I'll stock up on groceries and get more water today, JIC. And some extra ammo...... I don't know why. You have nothing anybody would want to take. That means you have nothing to protect or fear. The last thing you'll ever need is more ammo. Food, yeah. Hawke |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
Gunner Asch fired this volley in
: And some extra ammo...... Look what Harry Reid Hid deep in the Health Care Bill Unbelievable - Harry Reid Hidden deep in the Health Care Bill this passage. They never stop, they will keep trying to shove this down our throats until they get it through...pass this on to everyone... Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the maxim that darkness hates the light. Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation! Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: ". it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!! Note that the subsection at issue here concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to "reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending." That is precisely the kind of open-ended grant of regulatory power that effectively establishes the IMAB as the ultimate arbiter of the cost, quality and quantity of health care to be made available to the American people. And Reid wants the decisions of this group of unelected federal bureaucrats to be untouchable for all time. No wonder the majority leader tossed aside assurances that senators and the public would have at least 72 hours to study the text of the final Senate version of Obamacare before the critical vote on cloture. And no wonder Reid was so desperate to rush his amendment through the Senate, even scheduling the key tally on it at 1 a.m., while America slept. True to form, Reid wanted to keep his Section 3403 poison pill secret for as long as possible, just as he negotiated his bribes for the votes of Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bernie Sanders of Vermont behind closed doors. The final Orwellian touch in this subversion of democratic procedure is found in the ruling of the Reid-controlled Senate Parliamentarian that the anti-repeal provision is not a change in Senate rules, but rather of Senate "procedures." Why is that significant? Because for 200 years, changes in the Senate's standing rules have required approval by two- thirds of those voting, or 67 votes rather than the 60 Reid's amendment received. Reid has flouted two centuries of standing Senate rules to pass a measure in the dead of night that no senator has read, and part of which can never be changed. If this is not tyranny, then what is? LLoyd |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
"Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote in message
. 3.70... Gunner Asch fired this volley in : And some extra ammo...... Look what Harry Reid Hid deep in the Health Care Bill Unbelievable - Harry Reid Hidden deep in the Health Care Bill this passage. They never stop, they will keep trying to shove this down our throats until they get it through...pass this on to everyone... Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the maxim that darkness hates the light. Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation! (snip) What scholars (not!) are you cutting and pasting this from? This has been in the bill for months and it does not mean that no future congress can repeal this section. see here for the facts http://www.factcheck.org/2010/01/med...-unrepealable/ |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:35:58 -0500, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!! As far as I know, an act of Congress cannot limit the actions of a future Congress. -- Ned Simmons |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
"Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote in message . 3.70... Gunner Asch fired this volley in : And some extra ammo...... Look what Harry Reid Hid deep in the Health Care Bill Unbelievable - Harry Reid Hidden deep in the Health Care Bill this passage. They never stop, they will keep trying to shove this down our throats until they get it through...pass this on to everyone... Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the maxim that darkness hates the light. Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation! Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: ". it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!! snip This is not true, Lloyd. It's an amateurish misreading of the text by RedState, which was in turn picked up by Sarah ("Death Panel") Palin, our Idiot-in-Chief. Then the Washington Times and the right-wing blogosphere revved up their engines and drove over the cliff. Here's the real story. This kind of *rules* limitation has been done several times in the past. It is not a *legislation* limitation. Congress can overturn the whole thing any time they want to, with a regular vote: http://www.neutralsource.org/content/blog/detail/1452/ It is not Constitutional for Congress to pass a law that says future congresses can't overturn it. It wouldn't stand up if they tried. -- Ed Huntress |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
For those interested in estimating chances of Obamacare legislation
passing, here's an interesting page: http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/t...elConID=709242 Intrade is a prediction market, and participants, who are betting with real money, currently estimate the chance of it passing as 84%. i |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
"Ed Huntress" fired this volley in
: It is not Constitutional for Congress to pass a law that says future congresses can't overturn it. It wouldn't stand up if they tried. I already knew that. This is a regularly-circulated chain letter from the abjectly right-ish folks who can't actually figure out how to go vote. I do. I will. November 2012... the end of an error. G LLoyd |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Mar 19, 9:22*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
"Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote in messagenews:Xns9D40D18DF3337lloydspmindspringcom@2 16.168.3.70... Gunner Asch fired this volley in : And some extra ammo...... Look what Harry Reid Hid deep in the Health Care Bill *Unbelievable - Harry Reid Hidden deep in the Health Care Bill this passage. *They never stop, they will keep trying to shove this down our throats until they get it through...pass this on to everyone... *Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the maxim that darkness hates the light. *Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation! *Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: ". it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection." *In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section 3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in Congress wish otherwise!! snip This is not true, Lloyd. It's an amateurish misreading of the text by RedState, which was in turn picked up by Sarah ("Death Panel") Palin, our Idiot-in-Chief. Then the Washington Times and the right-wing blogosphere revved up their engines and drove over the cliff. Here's the real story. This kind of *rules* limitation has been done several times in the past. It is not a *legislation* limitation. Congress can overturn the whole thing any time they want to, with a regular vote: http://www.neutralsource.org/content/blog/detail/1452/ It is not Constitutional for Congress to pass a law that says future congresses can't overturn it. It wouldn't stand up if they tried. -- Ed Huntress If that is the case, why did they bother to put the words in the bill? Dan |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Mar 19, 9:22*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
This is not true, Lloyd. It's an amateurish misreading of the text by RedState, which was in turn picked up by Sarah ("Death Panel") Palin, our Idiot-in-Chief. Then the Washington Times and the right-wing blogosphere revved up their engines and drove over the cliff. -- Ed Huntress- - Show quoted text - There you go again, Ed. You make fun of Sarah Palin for her "Death Panel" statements, just after you admit that those death panels already exist - "They're called Medical Directors in the insurance industry." The federal government wants to be in the health care business and will be before too long - anyone who thinks the public option has been forgotten simply isn't paying attention. And when we do get there, we will have bureaucrats making the same decisions that are made by the insurance companies' Medical Directors. There will always have to be someone to say "no", and sometimes that will be to an expensive procedure that might prolong a life. So, which is it? Was Sarah on target, or will the taxpayers be footing the bill for every possible procedure and drug that might even slightly benefit a patient? You can't have it both ways. John Martin |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Mar 19, 8:08*pm, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:08:16 -0700, Larry Jaques wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:44 -0700, the infamous "Steve B" scrawled the following: Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? Those fools just might do it. I hope and pray reason will prevail. In WASHINGTON, D.C.? *What were you thinking? ------------------- If it passes, I'll bet you can count the seconds before a 2nd American Revolution starts thundering through our country. I think I'll stock up on groceries and get more water today, JIC. And some extra ammo...... Are you at all serious about ANYTHING that you write? Do you really expect an "end of the world" over this legislation, which replaces, formalizes and funds some of the charity care which has kept you alive the past few years? Seriously? Maybe you should consider stocking up on tin foil. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
In , on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:44
-0700, Steve B, wrote: Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? I hope and pray reason will prevail. But I thought McCain would win. Go figger. In one thread, you've got a bunch of people all clamoring for a police state, then this one decrying government intervention. The power to require ID is the same power to require health care. "Go figger." Indeed. |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
I hope (but do not pray) that reason will prevail and that everyone
would have access to some level of medical care. i |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:47:57 -0500, the infamous Ignoramus4239
scrawled the following: I hope (but do not pray) that reason will prevail and that everyone would have access to some level of medical care. And you trust CONgresscritters to accomplish that? GET REAL, Ig. -- Adults are obsolete children. --Dr. Seuss (Theodore Geisel, 1904-1991) -- |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
"Ignoramus4239" wrote in message ... I hope (but do not pray) that reason will prevail and that everyone would have access to some level of medical care. i We do now. |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On 3/18/2010 6:49 PM, Steve B wrote:
Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? I hope and pray reason will prevail. But I thought McCain would win. Go figger. Steve Not so hard really. You just don't understand the issue you're talking about. That explains why you were wrong about McCain as you were about Bush and Obama. You just have lousy judgment. You prove it once again with this point of view. The current system is in the process of failing. Nothing is going to stop that, so the wise thing to do is change it before it collapses. That is what the Democrats are in the process of doing. The ignorant people are so afraid of changing they are ****ting their pants. The rest of us welcome the change from a corrupt, inefficient, and unfair system to a much more rational one. The problem is that you can't see that. And you listen to way too much republican propaganda. If you could you'd not have your usual off target prediction. I predict the bill passes. Want to bet who's right? Hawke |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
On Mar 18, 9:49*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? I hope and pray reason will prevail. *But I thought McCain would win. Go figger. Steve To whom or what are you praying, and do you think that entity values your tax dollar more than the health and lives of those who can't afford the current bull**** we call "health insurance?" |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What's your take? OT
Probably not this time. But, then, the socialists will keep
trying until they do enact it. Note, I didn't say "pass" the socialized medicine. I wrote "enact" it. They might deem it to been passed, or executive order, or some other trickery. But, they will keep trying until we lose the freedom to manage our own health care. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "Steve B" wrote in message news Do you think this fiasco will pass Sunday? I hope and pray reason will prevail. But I thought McCain would win. Go figger. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|