On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 05:17:52 -0500, the infamous "Buerste"
scrawled the following:


"nraclaptrap" wrote in message
7.131...
awthrawthr wrote in
:


Unlimited funding for office from unions.
Buy your rethugs now !!!
--
Cliff

WRONG!! Read the ruling and get your facts straight.
"The direct political contribution prohibition in McCain-Feingold
that prevents corporations, labor unions, and advocacy groups from
giving money directly to candidates was not challenged in this
case, thus its constitutionality was not an issue before the
court."

So corporations could spend unlimited amounts of money, they'd just
have to give it to a third party who supports the candidate and
produces commercials and buys airtime etc to elect the candidate,
they just can't hand the check to the candidate or his staff
personally. They hand the check to a guy standing right next to the
candidate and that guy spends the money that benefits the candidate.

Slicker'n **** through a goose, eh Mr. Brownoser?

We should change the election system so the Federalist Society Branch
of the US Supreme Court can't steal our ****ing votes.

Wrong, bozo, as usual.

The ruling allows coprorations to be on equal footing with unions.

Oh, then unions should get government subsidies so they can compete with
the virtually unlimited funds that corporations have; then the
corporations and unions would be equally able to influence elections?

Never mind.


--


NRACLAPTRAP

Unions are heavily subsidized by the government, don't you ever read
anything other than "Fringe Left Talking Points Weekly"?

http://fwd4.me/Dfg As Michelle Malkin points out, they gave to O and
now he's giving back...

--
Imagination is the beginning of creation. You imagine what you desire,
you will what you imagine and at last you create what you will.
-- George Bernard Shaw