Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:20:00 -0800, Robin S. wrote:
Max limit in France seems to be about 130 km/h, and (surprise) everyone drives at 130 km/h in good weather - just like they do here! (Canadian freeway speed limit is 100km/h) In Alberta somewhat more at 110 km/h and on the #1 in BC too. Mind you, German roads are kept in fantastic condition. As are the roads on Alberta, wish I could say the same for BC - especially in the North, but then we're beyond Hope :-) BCer's joke. Apparently the autobahn asphalt is roughly twice as thick as our freeways are. You really notice the difference at 160km/h in a hatchback. MIke in BC |
#42
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner
wrote on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800 in rec.crafts.metalworking : This is not completely correct. CA has a basic speed law that prohibits driving faster than is safe. That is applicable on any road. On roads that have a "maximum speed" posted, this can be enforced regardless of better than average conditions. A prime example of this is in Gunner's back yard. Trucks going down the grapevine have a maximum speed limit of 35 MPH. Enforcement begins at 36 MPH. Indeed. and they DO enforce a 1mph overspeed. And its VERY expensive. 1-5 mph over on the Grapevine as I recall, costs a trucker $471 to start off with and goes up from there. Of course the Grapevine has had a LONG history of incredibly horrific deaths on it as the result of truck traffic. Dad's story was from the CHP officer who had it floored, was doing over a hundred and climbing, lights and siren going - when the truck passed him. I've also been told, if you were really, really, extremely "use up a lifetime supply, eight and a half of your nine lives", lucky, you might make it shiny side up, down onto the flat, and then coast to Bakersfield. Coast, 'cause you had no brakes. But that was back in the good old days, before they straightened the curves. -- pyotr filipivich "I had just been through hell and must have looked like death warmed over walking into the saloon, because when I asked the bartender whether they served zombies he said, ‘Sure, what'll you have?'" from I Hear America Swinging by Peter DeVries |
#43
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:01:04 GMT, Michael Gray
wrote: On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:20:00 -0800, Robin S. wrote: Max limit in France seems to be about 130 km/h, and (surprise) everyone drives at 130 km/h in good weather - just like they do here! (Canadian freeway speed limit is 100km/h) In Alberta somewhat more at 110 km/h and on the #1 in BC too. Mind you, German roads are kept in fantastic condition. As are the roads on Alberta, wish I could say the same for BC - especially in the North, but then we're beyond Hope :-) BCer's joke. Apparently the autobahn asphalt is roughly twice as thick as our freeways are. You really notice the difference at 160km/h in a hatchback. MIke in BC Since last fall, around here, if you're caught driving 50km/hr. over the limit, it costs you $2000.00 and you lose the car and your licence for a week - if it's a rental car, you get to pay an extra week rental; if it's your mothers car, she gets to walk along side you unless she can borrow daddy's car. Gerry :-)} London, Canada |
#44
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
"SteveB" meagain@rockvilleUSA wrote in message ... In Utah, today, a new law is closer to reality. If you have more than 5 vehicles behind you, you must pull out at the first safe place and let them pass, EVEN IF ALL OF YOU ARE EXCEEDING THE SPEED LIMIT. I foresee lawsuits on this one. Massive pileups with "people driving under permission from the State of Utah to exceed the speed limit." It's only logical. They have the same law in Ontario. The cop can either charge you with speeding or obstructing traffic or both at the same time, depending on whether the cop got lucky last night. If they ever outlaw nose picking, I'm just going to park my truck and shoot it. Steve |
#45
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:55:58 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, "Ed
Huntress" quickly quoth: I have to admit I've never gotten out in front of my cars with the fog lights on to see what they look like, comin' attacha. Of course, I don't use them except in snow, heavy rain or fog anyway (and only rarely then), so it hasn't mattered to me. But now I'm curious. I'll see what it looks like. Drive up to your garage some night and turn 'em on. You'll see where they point in relation to the low and high beams. For fog, the amber beams must be aimed low to avoid highlighting the fog like the high beams do. They can be used safely, if properly aimed (which 90% aren't) with traffic around. Driving light, OTOH, must be aimed high to show you what your high beams can't beam out to. All oncoming traffic would be blinded by them when properly aimed. Hey, as a deterrent, howzbout someone building and selling us a nice little taser unit which disables (like the police units they're testing) the oncoming vehicle which blinded us? A side-shot from the rear of the vehicle would blast it and force them to the side of the road. Instant Karma! (Don, got some time in between LED bike light manufacturing tasks?) -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris |
#46
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:21:09 -0800, "T.Alan Kraus"
wrote: When talking about driving, a majority envisions driving on freeways and forgets the enormous amount of divided secondary and rural roads. Where I live, these roads are in the majority and also curvy and variably shaded by trees. There is a constant light play and driving with lights on affords a few milliseconds of recognition advantage to the other car driver. It is amazing how many driving silver or green painted cars blend so well into the pavement or sourroundings. To old eyes like mine, if their headlights are on, they become immediately very visible. cheers T.Alan Today at the westbound Pasadena 210 split, I nearly nailed an elderly woman in a tan car, who pulled out in front of me at about 5mph from the slow lane to the hot lane, not bothering to check her mirrors. My headlights WERE on and I had to swerve into the next lane, fortunately empty. I was traveling at around 50mph , hauling a trailer with about 1000s of Stuff on it, the roads were slick and if Id locked em up..it would have been a hell of a go round as the trailer and truck swapped ends in 8 lanes (one way) of traffic. When I went by..I gave her the fickle finger of fate, a long blast of the horn, and noticed the red temporary handicapped plate hanging from her mirror..an her chatting on the cell phone. Im surprised they give those that badly retarded drivers licenses. Gunner "Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire. Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us) off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give them self determination under "play nice" rules. Think of it as having your older brother knock the **** out of you for torturing the cat." Gunner |
#47
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:34:57 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm,
Gerald Miller quickly quoth: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:39:11 -0800, "SteveB" meagain@rockvilleUSA wrote: I can see having lights on during the day for safety purposes. But criminently, it doesn't have to be high beams or fog lights (four lights). And when the visibility is good, the fog lights at night are just plain ignorant. If these were just a pair of daylight driving lights, and there were only two of them, I can see that. But why do they have to turn these on during the day and have four headlights? At night, the four lights are just borderline as bright as high beam. I have them on my truck. The only thing they illuminate when I put them on is the three feet in front of the bumper, and the guardrail. I usually focus on areas other than that and see no use in illuminating that area, except if I were out four wheeling at night and wanted to see right in front of my truck. Not, if it were foggy, that would be another story. Steve I liked the headlight system on my '90 Lumina APV - low beams at reduced output when the engine is running during daylight. Enter a low light area or block the sensor and all lights come on full brightness - high or low controlled by the driver. When SWMBO picked up the vehicle, the salesman showed her the light switch and told her "never touch it" My new Tundra has a timed relay for the lights. I love it already since I run with headlights at all times. The little amber daylight running lamps don't quite cover it. no more dead battery until the teens discovered the reading lights. And you can't use the 94 on them, can you? sigh Time to buy a hand-crank battery charger which takes 2 hours of hard work to restore your battery. Make the teen perp crank it until charged. It just might reinforce your request that they turn off the lights before disembarking the vehicle. Most of the A'holes with "driving lamps" want them within 6" of the road, showing more lighted area than the factory installed system, and on when the vehicle is occupied. A Winchester 94 with a filtered scope would improve these "Driving Lamps" greatly. A Barrett .50 through the block would make the owners think twice. -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris |
#48
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:21:24 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm,
pyotr filipivich quickly quoth: I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner wrote on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800 in rec.crafts.metalworking : This is not completely correct. CA has a basic speed law that prohibits driving faster than is safe. That is applicable on any road. On roads that have a "maximum speed" posted, this can be enforced regardless of better than average conditions. A prime example of this is in Gunner's back yard. Trucks going down the grapevine have a maximum speed limit of 35 MPH. Enforcement begins at 36 MPH. Indeed. and they DO enforce a 1mph overspeed. And its VERY expensive. 1-5 mph over on the Grapevine as I recall, costs a trucker $471 to start off with and goes up from there. Of course the Grapevine has had a LONG history of incredibly horrific deaths on it as the result of truck traffic. Dad's story was from the CHP officer who had it floored, was doing over a hundred and climbing, lights and siren going - when the truck passed him. I've also been told, if you were really, really, extremely "use up a lifetime supply, eight and a half of your nine lives", lucky, you might make it shiny side up, down onto the flat, I was heading to Sandy Eggo with a buddy in his built 65 Goat, a 389 with 3 2-bbl carbs on it and a 3.03 rear end. We had just entered I-5 south from Oceanside, CA when he sped up to 70 or so, back when it was a 55mph California. A CHP officer pulled up next to us and pointed for us to pull over. Phil laughed, hit a long burn in second gear, and we were off to the races. I **** a brick, thinking we'd be in jail in minutes. He caught rubber in third and we were leaving the CHP behind us long before he caught 4th. He leveled off at 140, ran for about a minute there, and then backed her down. It was then that he told me he knew the CHP officer and they did that every once in awhile for kicks. I liked to have killed him for that, but it was a very memorable evening. and then coast to Bakersfield. Coast, 'cause you had no brakes. But that was back in the good old days, before they straightened the curves. I had fun driving I-8 to Phoenix back before it was turned into a real freeway and they removed all the nice twists and turns. sob Ah, those were the days. I remember one time, beer between legs, when I'd dropped off a buddy in my '70 AMC Javelin. It was a Mark Donahue Special with the 390cid, 375hp, 420ft# V-8, Borg Warner T-10 close ratio 4-sp trans, and 4.11 rear end. What a FUN car! He indicated that I should light 'em up, so when I went around the corner, I squealed 'em a bit, then caught second with a full burn. About then, I noticed that the headlights coming up behind me were coming increasingly fast. I kept on the throttle through the curves for about a mile and hit a side street. I moved up a block and pulled over, shutting off the lights and motor with him a good 1/4 mile behind me. As the CHP officer in the Dodge Interceptor went by on the other street, I saw his emblem glow in the moon and was glad I'd pulled off. I finished my beer, got rid of the can, and retraced my steps as soon as he was out of sight again. Whew! He'd have hit his siren and lights as soon as he'd caught up to me and seen my license plate, but that never happened. Oh, and I didn't spill a single drop of beer during that high speed pursuit, either. vbg I'm glad the drunken days are over. Speed is fun, but a bit less fun once you get gray. -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris |
#49
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:25:27 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm,
Gunner Asch quickly quoth: On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:21:09 -0800, "T.Alan Kraus" wrote: When talking about driving, a majority envisions driving on freeways and forgets the enormous amount of divided secondary and rural roads. Where I live, these roads are in the majority and also curvy and variably shaded by trees. There is a constant light play and driving with lights on affords a few milliseconds of recognition advantage to the other car driver. It is amazing how many driving silver or green painted cars blend so well into the pavement or sourroundings. To old eyes like mine, if their headlights are on, they become immediately very visible. cheers T.Alan Today at the westbound Pasadena 210 split, I nearly nailed an elderly woman in a tan car, who pulled out in front of me at about 5mph from the slow lane to the hot lane, not bothering to check her mirrors. My Headlights only work for the sighted, Gunner. --snip-- Its the little old lady from pasadena Go granny, go granny, go granny go Got a pretty little flower bed of white gardenias Go granny, go granny, go granny go But parked in her rickety old garage Is a brand new shiny red super-stock dodge And everybodys saying theres nobody meaner Than the little old lady from pasadena She drives real fast and she drives real hard Shes a terror out on colorado boulevard Its the little old lady from pasadena --snip-- headlights WERE on and I had to swerve into the next lane, fortunately empty. I was traveling at around 50mph , hauling a trailer with about 1000s of Stuff on it, the roads were slick and if Id locked em up..it would have been a hell of a go round as the trailer and truck swapped ends in 8 lanes (one way) of traffic. That tends to get messy, doesn't it? When I went by..I gave her the fickle finger of fate, a long blast of the horn, and noticed the red temporary handicapped plate hanging from her mirror..an her chatting on the cell phone. Im surprised they give those that badly retarded drivers licenses. What kind of pulse will kill a cell phone? Maybe one of the ex-electronics experts here can come up with a phone disgronifier so we can all make the streets around us safer places to be, without the idiots on cell phones threatening at every intersection and beyond. -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris |
#50
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
Larry Jaques wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:55:58 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, "Ed Huntress" quickly quoth: I have to admit I've never gotten out in front of my cars with the fog lights on to see what they look like, comin' attacha. Of course, I don't use them except in snow, heavy rain or fog anyway (and only rarely then), so it hasn't mattered to me. But now I'm curious. I'll see what it looks like. Drive up to your garage some night and turn 'em on. You'll see where they point in relation to the low and high beams. For fog, the amber beams must be aimed low to avoid highlighting the fog like the high beams do. They can be used safely, if properly aimed (which 90% aren't) with traffic around. Driving light, OTOH, must be aimed high to show you what your high beams can't beam out to. All oncoming traffic would be blinded by them when properly aimed. Hey, as a deterrent, howzbout someone building and selling us a nice little taser unit which disables (like the police units they're testing) the oncoming vehicle which blinded us? A side-shot from the rear of the vehicle would blast it and force them to the side of the road. Instant Karma! (Don, got some time in between LED bike light manufacturing tasks?) -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris Polarizers on the driving lights, and crosspolarizers on windshields! An idea I have had for along time, but wouldn't know how to implement universally. cheers T.Alan |
#51
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
"Ed Huntress" wrote:
Sorry. Every once in a while, the little conservative inside of me has to come out and play. d8-) You should let him out more often. |
#52
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
"Wes" wrote in message ... "Ed Huntress" wrote: Sorry. Every once in a while, the little conservative inside of me has to come out and play. d8-) You should let him out more often. The little ******* gives me a rash and indigestion. -- Ed Huntress |
#53
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Larry Jaques
wrote on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:07:04 -0800 in rec.crafts.metalworking : On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:21:24 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, pyotr filipivich quickly quoth: I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner wrote on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800 in rec.crafts.metalworking : This is not completely correct. CA has a basic speed law that prohibits driving faster than is safe. That is applicable on any road. On roads that have a "maximum speed" posted, this can be enforced regardless of better than average conditions. A prime example of this is in Gunner's back yard. Trucks going down the grapevine have a maximum speed limit of 35 MPH. Enforcement begins at 36 MPH. Indeed. and they DO enforce a 1mph overspeed. And its VERY expensive. 1-5 mph over on the Grapevine as I recall, costs a trucker $471 to start off with and goes up from there. Of course the Grapevine has had a LONG history of incredibly horrific deaths on it as the result of truck traffic. Dad's story was from the CHP officer who had it floored, was doing over a hundred and climbing, lights and siren going - when the truck passed him. I've also been told, if you were really, really, extremely "use up a lifetime supply, eight and a half of your nine lives", lucky, you might make it shiny side up, down onto the flat, I was heading to Sandy Eggo with a buddy in his built 65 Goat, a 389 with 3 2-bbl carbs on it and a 3.03 rear end. We had just entered I-5 south from Oceanside, CA when he sped up to 70 or so, back when it was a 55mph California. A CHP officer pulled up next to us and pointed for us to pull over. Phil laughed, hit a long burn in second gear, and we were off to the races. I **** a brick, thinking we'd be in jail in minutes. He caught rubber in third and we were leaving the CHP behind us long before he caught 4th. He leveled off at 140, ran for about a minute there, and then backed her down. It was then that he told me he knew the CHP officer and they did that every once in awhile for kicks. I liked to have killed him for that, but it was a very memorable evening. Had a friend, bran new fast car. Coming back to Tucson from SD, there's a nice flat stretch of desert. So he's tooling down the highway, and notices there's a cop car behind him, lights going. Looks down - doing an excessive rate of speed, 90 plus. "oops" and pulls over. He's all apologetic, road hypnosis, hadn't realized how fast he'd speeded up, and blah, blah. Cop tells him that if he hadn't slowed down, he would not have caught up to him. Said he'd been clocked at around 140 earlier, "way out in front". Ooops. Let him go with a warning, as I recall. Dang, I can remember his face (big hair and mustache - it was 1974) but not his name. Long ago and far away. -- pyotr filipivich "I had just been through hell and must have looked like death warmed over walking into the saloon, because when I asked the bartender whether they served zombies he said, ‘Sure, what'll you have?'" from I Hear America Swinging by Peter DeVries |
#54
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 21:09:08 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, "Ed
Huntress" quickly quoth: "Wes" wrote in message ... "Ed Huntress" wrote: Sorry. Every once in a while, the little conservative inside of me has to come out and play. d8-) You should let him out more often. The little ******* gives me a rash and indigestion. Yet you keep swearing that you're not a liberal. Hmmm... -- An idealist believes the short run doesn't count. A cynic believes the long run doesn't matter. A realist believes that what is done or left undone in the short run determines the long run. -- Sydney J. Harris |
#55
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 21:09:08 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, "Ed Huntress" quickly quoth: "Wes" wrote in message ... "Ed Huntress" wrote: Sorry. Every once in a while, the little conservative inside of me has to come out and play. d8-) You should let him out more often. The little ******* gives me a rash and indigestion. Yet you keep swearing that you're not a liberal. Hmmm... You don't want to know what the little liberal gives me, when he comes out. It's not something you want to hear about before breakfast. d8-) -- Ed Huntress |
#56
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:15:07 -0800, pyotr filipivich
wrote: Had a friend, bran new fast car. Coming back to Tucson from SD, there's a nice flat stretch of desert. So he's tooling down the highway, and notices there's a cop car behind him, lights going. Looks down - doing an excessive rate of speed, 90 plus. "oops" and pulls over. He's all apologetic, road hypnosis, hadn't realized how fast he'd speeded up, and blah, blah. Cop tells him that if he hadn't slowed down, he would not have caught up to him. Said he'd been clocked at around 140 earlier, "way out in front". Ooops. Let him go with a warning, as I recall. Dang, I can remember his face (big hair and mustache - it was 1974) but not his name. Long ago and far away. Chap I knew slightly; to look at him, (short, bald, well worn clothes in his early 60's) you would expect him to be driving a rusty Chevy pickup with at least one fender held in place with baling wire; had the first Toyota MR2 I had seen. I asked him how fast it would go and he replied that he didn't know because the police quit following him at 160. Gerry :-)} London, Canada |
#57
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
Gerald Miller wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:15:07 -0800, pyotr filipivich wrote: Had a friend, bran new fast car. Coming back to Tucson from SD, there's a nice flat stretch of desert. So he's tooling down the highway, and notices there's a cop car behind him, lights going. Looks down - doing an excessive rate of speed, 90 plus. "oops" and pulls over. He's all apologetic, road hypnosis, hadn't realized how fast he'd speeded up, and blah, blah. Cop tells him that if he hadn't slowed down, he would not have caught up to him. Said he'd been clocked at around 140 earlier, "way out in front". Ooops. Let him go with a warning, as I recall. Dang, I can remember his face (big hair and mustache - it was 1974) but not his name. Long ago and far away. Chap I knew slightly; to look at him, (short, bald, well worn clothes in his early 60's) you would expect him to be driving a rusty Chevy pickup with at least one fender held in place with baling wire; had the first Toyota MR2 I had seen. I asked him how fast it would go and he replied that he didn't know because the police quit following him at 160. Gerry :-)} London, Canada Oh, kilometers! I was about to call him a liar |
#58
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
"Ed Huntress" wrote:
You don't want to know what the little liberal gives me, when he comes out. It's not something you want to hear about before breakfast. d8-) I keep my little inner liberal on a chain. For some strange reason it seems to like that. Wes |
#59
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
Rex wrote:
Oh, kilometers! I was about to call him a liar I think my Saturn SL1 could do that. |
#60
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
One more law
Wes wrote:
"Ed Huntress" wrote: You don't want to know what the little liberal gives me, when he comes out. It's not something you want to hear about before breakfast. d8-) I keep my little inner liberal on a chain. For some strange reason it seems to like that. Wes 'Inner liberal'? Shoot the little *******! -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |