I looked at the reference, and it makes NO claim for a controlled
explosion. The only events were the plane impacts and the collapses.

Would these nutjobs calculate the number of demolition charges
required to bring down the towers AND calculate the building prep to
place those charges? It's not like the night janitor went up with a
stick of TNT in his lunchbox...

wrote:
WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld

In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition

REFERENCES

"Seismic Waves Generated By Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at
World Trade Center ", http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq...C_LDEO_KIM.pdf

Louis Ohland wrote:

I looked at the reference, and it makes NO claim for a controlled
explosion. The only events were the plane impacts and the collapses.

Would these nutjobs calculate the number of demolition charges
required to bring down the towers AND calculate the building prep to
place those charges? It's not like the night janitor went up with a
stick of TNT in his lunchbox...

wrote:

WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition
By Herman Schoenfeld

In this article we show that "top-down" controlled demolition


REFERENCES

"Seismic Waves Generated By Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at
World Trade Center ",
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq...C_LDEO_KIM.pdf


Why in the world does anyone even respond to this crap??????
...lew...