Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Wayne Whitney
 
Posts: n/a
Default Electrical: when are loops at screw terminals allowed?

Hi,

I'm interested in when it is allowed (NEC) and advisable to make a
connection in an electrical box of a wire to a screw terminal by
looping the wire around and then using the free end for another
connection. Here's what I think I know:

1) It is NOT allowed to do this with the hot or neutral conductors and
the screw terminals on a device. Use pigtails.

2) It is allowed to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of a
metal box or strap. This is a good idea, because it makes a
neater, tighter installation.

So I think this only leaves the case of the EGC and the ground screw
on a device. Is looping allowed here? Is it a good idea?

Thanks,
Wayne

P.S. FWIW I'm just contemplating my three gang switch box and how to
handle the 8 grounds (5 cables and 3 screw terminals). One option
would be loop a ground around each of the 3 devices, and use a wire
nut on the 5 ground wires. Another is to use 3 pigtails; joining the
8 ground wires would require splitting them into two groups and using
two wire nuts with a jumper between them.



  #2   Report Post  
RBM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you are using a metal box, splice your grounds together and to the box.
Don't put them on switches. The neutral of a multiwire circuit (two hots
sharing a neutral) cannot be dependent on a device, but if you are looping
wire like you describe, it's not
"Wayne Whitney" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I'm interested in when it is allowed (NEC) and advisable to make a
connection in an electrical box of a wire to a screw terminal by
looping the wire around and then using the free end for another
connection. Here's what I think I know:

1) It is NOT allowed to do this with the hot or neutral conductors and
the screw terminals on a device. Use pigtails.

2) It is allowed to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of a
metal box or strap. This is a good idea, because it makes a
neater, tighter installation.

So I think this only leaves the case of the EGC and the ground screw
on a device. Is looping allowed here? Is it a good idea?

Thanks,
Wayne

P.S. FWIW I'm just contemplating my three gang switch box and how to
handle the 8 grounds (5 cables and 3 screw terminals). One option
would be loop a ground around each of the 3 devices, and use a wire
nut on the 5 ground wires. Another is to use 3 pigtails; joining the
8 ground wires would require splitting them into two groups and using
two wire nuts with a jumper between them.





  #3   Report Post  
blueman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wayne Whitney writes:
Hi,

I'm interested in when it is allowed (NEC) and advisable to make a
connection in an electrical box of a wire to a screw terminal by
looping the wire around and then using the free end for another
connection. Here's what I think I know:

1) It is NOT allowed to do this with the hot or neutral conductors and
the screw terminals on a device. Use pigtails.

2) It is allowed to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of a
metal box or strap. This is a good idea, because it makes a
neater, tighter installation.

So I think this only leaves the case of the EGC and the ground screw
on a device. Is looping allowed here? Is it a good idea?

Thanks,
Wayne


My electrician seems to love looping the hot wire from one switch to
another in a 2-gang box.
Is this fully against code or just not advisable?
  #5   Report Post  
Wayne Whitney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2005-03-14, blueman wrote:

Could someone please explain to me then what is "illegal" about the
"looping" that the OP is talking about?


Maybe it isn't, maybe it is just considered a questionable practice by
some (including some inspectors?).

Wayne (the OP)


  #6   Report Post  
Wayne Whitney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK, based on the comments so far, let me try to revise what I think I
know about looping a wire around a screw terminal (and continuing to
another connection):

1) It is not advisable to do this with an insulated conductor,
although I'm not too clear on the reasoning. One thing that is clear
to me is that if this is done, the requisite 6" of conductor should be
left before the first looped connection.

2) It is advisable to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of
a metal box or strap, because it makes a neater, tighter installation.

So that still leaves me with the question of whether it is a good idea
to do this with the EGC and the ground screw on a device.
Specifically, for a light switch, I'm considering looping the EGC of
the cable with the outbound switched hot around the ground screw of
the switch that serves it. What's the downside?

Thanks, Wayne
  #7   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As long as you remove a suffucuent length of insulation without nicking the
wire, it is hard to see ant downside. It should actully be very slightly
preferable as the total resistance to the last device on the line will be
slightly less. Each junction adds a little resistance.

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:52:01 -0600, Wayne Whitney
wrote:

OK, based on the comments so far, let me try to revise what I think I
know about looping a wire around a screw terminal (and continuing to
another connection):

1) It is not advisable to do this with an insulated conductor,
although I'm not too clear on the reasoning. One thing that is clear
to me is that if this is done, the requisite 6" of conductor should be
left before the first looped connection.

2) It is advisable to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of
a metal box or strap, because it makes a neater, tighter installation.

So that still leaves me with the question of whether it is a good idea
to do this with the EGC and the ground screw on a device.
Specifically, for a light switch, I'm considering looping the EGC of
the cable with the outbound switched hot around the ground screw of
the switch that serves it. What's the downside?

Thanks, Wayne


  #8   Report Post  
The Real Tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:25:37 GMT, blueman wrote:

Wayne Whitney writes:
Hi,

I'm interested in when it is allowed (NEC) and advisable to make a
connection in an electrical box of a wire to a screw terminal by
looping the wire around and then using the free end for another
connection. Here's what I think I know:

1) It is NOT allowed to do this with the hot or neutral conductors and
the screw terminals on a device. Use pigtails.

2) It is allowed to do this with the EGC and the grounding screw of a
metal box or strap. This is a good idea, because it makes a
neater, tighter installation.

So I think this only leaves the case of the EGC and the ground screw
on a device. Is looping allowed here? Is it a good idea?

Thanks,
Wayne


My electrician seems to love looping the hot wire from one switch to
another in a 2-gang box.
Is this fully against code or just not advisable?



I have switches like this, a single hot comes in, and it daisey
chained from one switch to another without ever being cut. It is the
ONLY time I have found a terminal screw used in my house. Everything
else is BACK STABBED.

later,

tom
  #9   Report Post  
The Real Tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:37:42 GMT, blueman wrote:

writes:
The NEC is silent on the issue. Basically it is legal

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 02:25:37 GMT, blueman wrote:

My electrician seems to love looping the hot wire from one switch to
another in a 2-gang box.
Is this fully against code or just not advisable?


Could someone please explain to me then what is "illegal"
about the "looping" that the OP is talking about?



Could be a 2002 110.3(b) violation. I just checked the instructions
on a box of NM-B and found it says to make connections at the end.

With some inspectors(I've heard of), that's is more than enough to
fail an inspection

hth,

tom
  #10   Report Post  
Bob
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Real Tom wrote:

Could be a 2002 110.3(b) violation. I just checked the instructions
on a box of NM-B and found it says to make connections at the end.


Could you elaborate on what that section covers? Does it deal
specifically with NM cable?

With conduit installations it's commonplace when running wires from box
to box to simply leave a loop in each box and cut off some insulation
from the loop and hook it around the screw terminal.


  #11   Report Post  
The Real Tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:19:45 GMT, Bob wrote:

The Real Tom wrote:

Could be a 2002 110.3(b) violation. I just checked the instructions
on a box of NM-B and found it says to make connections at the end.


Could you elaborate on what that section covers? Does it deal
specifically with NM cable?


Any NEC quotes are summaries, please read the code for yourself:

No, it's a general instruction: "Installation and Use of Equipment".
You need to follow the manufacturer's instruction. If the manufacture
says to only connect at the ends of insulated conductors, then you
need to do so.

With conduit installations it's commonplace when running wires from box
to box to simply leave a loop in each box and cut off some insulation
from the loop and hook it around the screw terminal.


Can't say it's too common. Simple since other people I run into, and
how I was taught, you cut, pigtail, and wirenut. If you are using a
greenie, then just cut, and wirenut. Now with the free end goes to
the ground screw.

The knawing of insulation in the middle of the wire run seemed to look
lazy/unprofessional, so I'm guessing an inspector can hit you as a
2002 NEC 110.12 violation.

Remeber i'm still learning, so I listen to what hapens to other
electricians and take note.

later,

tom


  #12   Report Post  
David Combs
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
The Real Tom Tom @ www.WorkAtHomePlans.com wrote:


I have switches like this, a single hot comes in, and it daisey
chained from one switch to another without ever being cut. It is the
ONLY time I have found a terminal screw used in my house. Everything
else is BACK STABBED.



later,

tom


Maybe naive question, but does "back stabbed" imply some particular
kind of wiring (defect?), and if so, what is that?

Thanks,

David

  #13   Report Post  
Bob
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Combs wrote:


Maybe naive question, but does "back stabbed" imply some particular
kind of wiring (defect?), and if so, what is that?


Many residential grade (cheap) wiring devices have holes where a 14
gauge solid wire can be "stabbed" in and a spring clamp will hold it in
place. It's a labor saving feature that can result in intermittent
connections.
  #15   Report Post  
The Real Tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:23:47 GMT, Bob wrote:

David Combs wrote:


Maybe naive question, but does "back stabbed" imply some particular
kind of wiring (defect?), and if so, what is that?


Many residential grade (cheap) wiring devices have holes where a 14
gauge solid wire can be "stabbed" in and a spring clamp will hold it in
place. It's a labor saving feature that can result in intermittent
connections.


technical term for arcing and flickering of lights, applances, etc....


thx,

tom


  #16   Report Post  
Chris Lewis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

According to The Real Tom tom @ www.Love-Calculators.com:

"back stabbing" is what I call when you strip the wire and push
through the tiny holes in the back of a device(switch, receptacle,
etc) that only uses spring pressure to hold onto the wire. So all you
do is stab it into the hole.


Scary things those.

This is different from what I call 'back wiring' where you insert the
wire into the back, under a pressure plate and tighten a screw.


Backwiring was described to me as the act of bending the ground
wire back over the cable sheath, and using the box clamp to "make
the ground" connection.

Ick.
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.
  #17   Report Post  
w_tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Back stab connections are legal. However the perspective is
human safety. Code is only concerned with human safety. You
have other concerns beyond human safety. Concerned not
addressed by code.

Intermittents created by back stab connections do not
adversely affect lights. But they can be catastrophic to
computer data. Notice the difference. Back stabbing is just
fine from the perspective of human safety. But a disaster for
data safety. Perspective.

David Combs wrote:
In article ,
The Real Tom Tom @ www.WorkAtHomePlans.com wrote:
I have switches like this, a single hot comes in, and it daisey
chained from one switch to another without ever being cut. It is the
ONLY time I have found a terminal screw used in my house. Everything
else is BACK STABBED.


Maybe naive question, but does "back stabbed" imply some particular
kind of wiring (defect?), and if so, what is that?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electrical inspector makes up new rules during inspection zxcvbob Home Repair 22 March 12th 04 05:54 PM
Overhead electrical service to a storage shed Timothy J. Trace Home Repair 3 December 3rd 03 05:21 AM
New Electrical Regs PoP UK diy 22 September 1st 03 09:41 PM
Installing Electrical Outlet In Sink Cabinet Matty Home Repair 0 August 27th 03 04:08 PM
Forthcoming Building Regulations on electrical work (Part P) Andrew McKay UK diy 42 July 30th 03 09:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"