barry,
I have noticed that many if not all of your replies result in a broken thread. I would guess it may have something to do with the news reader you are using and-or the settings of that reader. I would believe that a number of people never see your replies to their questions since they are no longer joined. I am not complaining and there may not be anything you can do about it, but you may want to investigate the problem if you have not do so already. Joseph E. Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
barry,
I have noticed that many if not all of your replies result in a broken thread. Totally agree with Mr. Meehan. I rarely check a reply since it is usually an orphan post, sometimes way late from the OP. I fact, reading this one was virtually accidental since it was first in the list. IMO, if the threads aren't connected, the usefulness is marginalized. We should all work to keep the level of communication in this NG as focussed as possible, including editing for briefness to save bandwidth and storage space. My nickles worth. Joe |
Whoa! Does this mean no more clever, concise, albeit wise ass, responses?
Please say it isn't so. I promise never to visit, read or even mention the alt.hvac group ever again. "Joe Bobst" wrote in message ... barry, I have noticed that many if not all of your replies result in a broken thread. Totally agree with Mr. Meehan. I rarely check a reply since it is usually an orphan post, sometimes way late from the OP. I fact, reading this one was virtually accidental since it was first in the list. IMO, if the threads aren't connected, the usefulness is marginalized. We should all work to keep the level of communication in this NG as focussed as possible, including editing for briefness to save bandwidth and storage space. My nickles worth. Joe |
Joe Fabeitz wrote:
Whoa! Does this mean no more clever, concise, albeit wise ass, responses? Please say it isn't so. I promise never to visit, read or even mention the alt.hvac group ever again. "Joe Bobst" wrote in message ... barry, I have noticed that many if not all of your replies result in a broken thread. Totally agree with Mr. Meehan. I rarely check a reply since it is usually an orphan post, sometimes way late from the OP. I fact, reading this one was virtually accidental since it was first in the list. IMO, if the threads aren't connected, the usefulness is marginalized. We should all work to keep the level of communication in this NG as focussed as possible, including editing for briefness to save bandwidth and storage space. My nickles worth. Joe Has this become a Joe only question? :-) -- Joseph E. Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
At least you get "...MR. Meehan".
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in message ... Joe Fabeitz wrote: Whoa! Does this mean no more clever, concise, albeit wise ass, responses? Please say it isn't so. I promise never to visit, read or even mention the alt.hvac group ever again. "Joe Bobst" wrote in message ... barry, I have noticed that many if not all of your replies result in a broken thread. Totally agree with Mr. Meehan. I rarely check a reply since it is usually an orphan post, sometimes way late from the OP. I fact, reading this one was virtually accidental since it was first in the list. IMO, if the threads aren't connected, the usefulness is marginalized. We should all work to keep the level of communication in this NG as focussed as possible, including editing for briefness to save bandwidth and storage space. My nickles worth. Joe Has this become a Joe only question? :-) -- Joseph E. Meehan 26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter