Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default Help Needed, Interior Lighting

We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine

ky1k att pivot dott net


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2   Report Post  
Ian Stirling
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Albert wrote:
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started

snip
We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining

snip
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.


Random thoughts.
Recess the cans more than designed, make up little metal cylinders, and paint
dark.
I assume you've tried stuff like spiral tubes, which are lower
profile.


  #3   Report Post  
Dave L.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Albert,

I've seen some commercial offices and lobbies where they have pot lights that
were converted to CF lamps on their side. The aluminum reflector does it's job
of directing the light downward, but the bulb itself is quite recessed. A
commercial item not to be found at Home Depot. And the 2x6 construction may be a
problem.

Try a lighting store that sells nothing else.

Dave


In article , Albert wrote:

We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

  #4   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Recess the cans more than designed, make up little metal cylinders, and paint
dark.
I assume you've tried stuff like spiral tubes, which are lower
profile.


Thanks Ian,

Yes, we tried the spiral compact florescents, they are lower profile
which helps. But, not nearly enough.

A deeper enclosure would help, but we are limited by the size of the
floor joists, which are 2 by 6 inch. Can't go any 'deeper'.

Painting the enclosure a dark color helps, but only at the expense of
the light output. Dark trim rings nad black trim rings are available,
but the light output is MUCH lower.

The color of the housing makes little difference in our case, the
problem is that we can look up and see the light bulbs directly. Since
the lights are small and relatively high powered (as opposed to a
larger 4 foot florescent tube with lots of surface area), the problem
is a small (but intense) light source. We see spots after viewing the
bright lights.

If the same amount of light could appear to come from a 1 square foot
opening, it would not cause the problem, But, when looking at just the
tip of the lamp, you have just a few square inches and it's unbearably
bright.

A small horizontal tube mounted real close to the ceiling with a
mirrored enclosure to reflect the light downwards would be a big step
in the right direction too.

All comments apprecaited.

Art in Maine


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #5   Report Post  
Ian Stirling
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian Stirling wrote:
Albert wrote:
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started

snip
We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining

snip
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.


Random thoughts.
Recess the cans more than designed, make up little metal cylinders, and paint
dark.
I assume you've tried stuff like spiral tubes, which are lower
profile.


Further exhaustive testing with small aluminium pie tins, and a couple of
bits of paper-clip indicate that there might be a fairly simple solution.
Put the pie-tin so that it's 1-2cm below the bulb end, and extends 1-2cm
out from the tip, held there by hooks onto the bulb glass.

Now, work out some way to finish the bottom, and you're done.


  #6   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I've seen some commercial offices and lobbies where they have pot lights that
were converted to CF lamps on their side. The aluminum reflector does it's job
of directing the light downward, but the bulb itself is quite recessed. A
commercial item not to be found at Home Depot. And the 2x6 construction may be a
problem.

Try a lighting store that sells nothing else.


We went to the largest lighting Store in the State of Maine, which is
House of Lights in near Portland. It is a 100 plus mile drive from
here. They have tons of incandescent decorative lighting and alot of
high intensity halogen baaed track lighting.

We have low ceilings (7 foot 5 inch as opposed to the more standard 8
foot). So, anything that hangs from the ceilings is not ok as it just
accents our already low ceilings.

I must confess I haven't looked at halogen lights and don't know if
they are more efficient. They are certainly smaller and easier to
conceal. Additionally, they are dimmable, which might let us use a low
setting for sitting around watching tv and just crank up the dimmers
when we want to read or need higher light levels.

Maybe halogen lights are the answer?

Art in Maine




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #7   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Ian,

I did the exact same experiment last night and we got similar results
I think. There are some problems however::

The biggest problem is that the inside of the enclosure is not
mirrored, so the pie tin would shine a good portion of the light
upwards....never to exit at the bottom...in effect, creating a black
hole.

The losses are quite severe even though the paint inside is shiny
white.

In my particular cans, the top is open and some light exits through
the top-so any light reflected back 'up' would be wasted.

The system you are referring to is called a Cassagrain Feed and it's
used to feed microwave dishes and for telescopes. It only works when
the surface of the reflecting surfaces are nearly perfect, or else the
losses from the additional reflector take a big chunk of the output
and waste it.

This issue of the quality of the reflectors is even more critical in
an ap such as this-some of that light will take 4 or 5 bounces before
it exits, depending on the design of the radiator and the reflectors.

A new design with a no compromise reflector system would work well,
but I'm not seeing anything along those lines when I look in lighting
catalogs.

Art in Maine


Further exhaustive testing with small aluminium pie tins, and a couple of
bits of paper-clip indicate that there might be a fairly simple solution.
Put the pie-tin so that it's 1-2cm below the bulb end, and extends 1-2cm
out from the tip, held there by hooks onto the bulb glass.




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #8   Report Post  
m Ransley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Your lights were designed for halogen or incandesant spots not
flourescent, get one that is with deep recess or use power hungry
halogen, At least those you can dim easily

  #9   Report Post  
Ian Stirling
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Albert wrote:
snip
I must confess I haven't looked at halogen lights and don't know if
they are more efficient. They are certainly smaller and easier to
conceal. Additionally, they are dimmable, which might let us use a low
setting for sitting around watching tv and just crank up the dimmers
when we want to read or need higher light levels.

Maybe halogen lights are the answer?


....
They arn't much better than ordinary ones.
The tightness of the spots are the only good thing about them, and
that can rapidly become a problem if you try to light a room with them.
Are the fixtures you have returnable?
Anything that tries to use bulbs on their ends is going to be a problem.
You can flush mount some designs of 4' fixtures.

I'd be looking at nice dimmable ballasts and tubes, with well-chosen
phosphors, and go this way.

Have you thought of adding uplighters round the edge of the room, and
only using the cans for the middle, to fill in the dim spots?
  #10   Report Post  
Walter R.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Use a 2 foot by 4 foot panel for built-in fluorescents. Cut it up in 1 foot
square segments. Mount each segment underneath your recessed fixture,
suspending it about 1". You will have a 1 squarefoot light fixture. The key
is in diffusing the bright light. Probably will look like super-modern
lighting fixtures that nobody else can boast about.

--

Walter
The Happy Iconoclast www.rationality.net
-

Albert wrote in message ...
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine

ky1k att pivot dott net


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----





  #11   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Are the fixtures you have returnable?

Yes, I can return them....and I plan on doing so. But, my house is
torn apart and what do I use in the meantime?

You can flush mount some designs of 4' fixtures.


4 foot fixtures is what I just got done ripping out, although they
weren't flush mounted. The 4 foot tubes run 34 to 40 watts per tube,
and they have alot more surface area than a compact florescent. I can
stare at them without problems because they aren't as intense. But,
they don't fit well in the room. If I could get smaller tubes (say 15
to 18 inch long) and mount 4 in each room, I'd probably be happy.

We are using flush mount 4 foot tubes in the kitchen and dining rooms,
but had hoped for something a bit smaller and lower power in the open
area of the house.

Based on this experience, I can safely say the lighting industry has a
long way to go with their designs. Unfortunately, I need something
that's usable NOW, not 5 or 10 years from now.

Thanks,

Art


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #12   Report Post  
HA HA Budys Here
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Walter R."


Use a 2 foot by 4 foot panel for built-in fluorescents. Cut it up in 1 foot
square segments. Mount each segment underneath your recessed fixture,
suspending it about 1". You will have a 1 squarefoot light fixture. The key
is in diffusing the bright light. Probably will look like super-modern
lighting fixtures that nobody else can boast about.

--

Walter
The Happy Iconoclast
www.rationality.net

What about the remaining 36" of fixture?
How would one change a bulb?

-

Albert wrote in message ...
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine

ky1k att pivot dott net


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----











  #13   Report Post  
Albert
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Use a 2 foot by 4 foot panel for built-in fluorescents. Cut it up in
1 foot square segments. Mount each segment underneath your
recessed fixture, suspending it about 1". You will have a 1
squarefoot light fixture. The key is in diffusing the bright light.
Probably will look like super-modern lighting fixtures that
nobody else can boast about.


Hey Walter, you might be on to something. I see your reasoning! If I
can distribute the light so that it APPEARS to radiate from a 1 foot
square surface, then that might solve the problem.

Along these lines, I took one of the large prism plastic diffusers
from the new kitchen lighting (which is twin 4 foot tubes in a flush
mount box) and held it over the opening of the existing recessed
fixture. The area under the light got much darker however, indicating
that the prism diffuser absorbs alot of light. I used the light meter
in the camera and determined that the light loss is about 3 db or 50
percent. That sure blows the 'economical' aspect compact florescent
operation all to HELL.

The company makes 2 diffusers that accomplish the same thing. I just
got done testing them, one reduces the light output by 60 percent and
the other by 55 percent.

I was hoping for a lower loss solution.

Does anyone make a low loss prism type bezel????? Strictly speaking, a
prism type bezel should be nearly loss less. I wonder if a fresnel
lens placed close to the lamp would provide less loss and achieve the
same objective???

Regards,

Art in Maine


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #14   Report Post  
John Grabowski
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You didn't mention what type of bulbs you are using or the brand of fixture
and trim. I'm suggesting the use of silver ball bulbs:
http://www.nam.lighting.philips.com/...f/P-2543-B.pdf

You would be able to use them in the recessed lights that are already
installed. To to get the most light out of them you should use a trim with a
reflector. These bulbs have a built-in reflector that bounces the light
towards the base without seeing the direct brightness of the bulb. The
lighting is virtually glare free, but you will not get the lumens of direct
lighting
..

John Grabowski
http://www.mrelectrician.tv




Albert wrote in message ...
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine

ky1k att pivot dott net


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



  #15   Report Post  
Steve B.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:17:49 -0400, Albert wrote:

We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

If you want to use flourescnet bulbs they make can fixtures
specifically for them. The bulb installs sideways in the fixture and
are not in sight. Also consider that right now you are looking at the
bulbs but as you get used to them you quit doing that so the "seeing
stars" thing becomes a non issue.

When I put mine in I did the same thing and thought I had really
messed up for a while but now that we are used to them I like them
alot. You can also use dimmers with them which is another big help.

Steve B.


  #16   Report Post  
SQLit
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Albert wrote in message ...
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine


I assume you have checked inside the fixture and checked to see if the lamp
holder can be moved. Some can and some can not.
Me thinks it is time look for an different lamp. Try some of the smaller
"par" lamps that are used for architectural lighting. There are also some
shorter shanked "A" lamps.

http://www.electriciansupplies.com/i...ight_Bulbs.htm


Costco sells packs of spiral CF's that are BPCE13T/8
They are at least an inch shorter than the standard sized ones. I use them
in my ceiling lights for the same reason. Granted they put out less light
but they work.





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 9/24/2004


  #17   Report Post  
Joe Fabeitz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I suppose you know that the "bulb holding" mechanism can be adjusted inside
the can. Ensure it is recessed upward as far as possible.
Albert wrote in message ...
We are doing a major remodel and improvement on our house. It started
as a fixer-upper. After living in the house for 9 years, we finally
have the funds to do the job and a real good idea what improvements
are needed.

We are stuck on the living room/tv room/family room lighting however
and need help!!!!!!!!!

We spent $600 on recessed lighting. When we finally put bulbs in it,
it became painfully clear that it would not work. The lighting we
bought was recessed lighting cans for 2 by 6 construction. Since the
downstairs is all open, we can look from the living room to the dining
room (about 36' by 14') without interveening any walls. We placed
recessed cans per the manufacturers recommendations and put in some
additional cans on a separate electrical circuit for an extra boost
for times when we needed higher intensity lighting for reading.

The problem is with the glare, which is due to the light bulbs
protruding downward so that the tip of the bulb is actually directly
line of sight from the living room couch looking towards the far end
of the house. We have tried all types of compact florescent lights.
They are great for producing high light levels for the amount of power
they consume (very economical). .Even with 'low profile' lamps, it is
impossible to avoid looking directly at the very intense light from
the tip of the light bulb. Yes, we tried different trim rings and
diffusers. The trim rings help as they stick down and minimize how
much of the bulb is directly visible. The diffusers are a disaster
however, they all suck up alot of light, we find that we have to
double the amount of energy used in order to get the same light level,
which makes them very energy hungry.

In all cases, our problem is with direct viewing of the light bulb
itself. The units that are directly overhead don't produce a problem
because we don't look straight up. The lights that are 25 to 30 feet
away are not a problem because the trim rings stick down far enough to
prevent direct viewing of the bulbs. But, the lights in the 5 to 20
feet distance are a big+ problem because there is no way to prevent a
direct line of sight between the tip of the bulb and the human eye.

We lived for the last 5 years with 4 foot florescent tube basement
lights (commonly called 'worklights'). They were temporary, so we hung
them from the ceiling as one would do in a basement. They were ugly as
sin, but they put out good light and because the tube was long and had
alot of surface area, you could stare at the tube without seeing
spots. These compact florescent lights in the recessed lighting cans
are horrible because they are very high power with a relatively small
surface area, so any portion of the bulb that is directly viewable is
unbearably intense.

Our construction is on hold (can't put sheetrock/drywall up on the
ceilings) due to this problem, is there an answer?

Thanks,

Art in Maine

ky1k att pivot dott net


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



  #18   Report Post  
Ian Stirling
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Albert wrote:
Are the fixtures you have returnable?


Yes, I can return them....and I plan on doing so. But, my house is
torn apart and what do I use in the meantime?

You can flush mount some designs of 4' fixtures.


snip
Based on this experience, I can safely say the lighting industry has a
long way to go with their designs. Unfortunately, I need something
that's usable NOW, not 5 or 10 years from now.


Pretty, efficient, cheap.

Pick any two.


Good luck.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AC Advice Needed! unix-freak Home Ownership 27 June 14th 04 04:53 PM
If you had $400 and needed a router/lift setup.... Subw00er Woodworking 10 January 5th 04 03:40 AM
OT - More LED info needed Lane Metalworking 4 October 30th 03 12:17 PM
Box joints for speaker cabinets help needed Chris Berry Woodworking 15 August 28th 03 11:17 AM
T-shaped miter gauge bar - source needed Igor Woodworking 1 July 28th 03 07:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"