Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On 06/16/2020 01:33 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. https://miningawareness.wordpress.co...rd-fraud-more/ Take it with the usual grain of salt but if he was paroled because of COVID he probably would have been violated back in. I don't know about GA law but I would assume he chalked up a few felonies on his way out. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:56:11 -0600, rbowman
wrote: On 06/16/2020 01:33 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. https://miningawareness.wordpress.co...rd-fraud-more/ Take it with the usual grain of salt but if he was paroled because of COVID he probably would have been violated back in. I don't know about GA law but I would assume he chalked up a few felonies on his way out. This is all conjecture. What we FO know is he was shot while running away - he was no longer a threat and the shooting was "unwarranted" according to the law. We also know the 2 officers involved had spotty records, at best.This was the 48th "officer-involved shooting" investigated by the GBI in 2020, fifteen of which were fatal. Brooks' criminal record, shows several charges of theft, obstructing an officer, battery on a family member, and other misdemeanors. His work record was excellent. No DUI or drug charges on his record either in Georgia or Ohio. |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
Clare Snyder submitted this idea :
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:56:11 -0600, rbowman wrote: On 06/16/2020 01:33 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. https://miningawareness.wordpress.co...rd-fraud-more/ Take it with the usual grain of salt but if he was paroled because of COVID he probably would have been violated back in. I don't know about GA law but I would assume he chalked up a few felonies on his way out. This is all conjecture. What we FO know is he was shot while running away ....and firing a weapon at police. - he was no longer a threat and the shooting was "unwarranted" according to the law. We also know the 2 officers involved had spotty records, at best.This was the 48th "officer-involved shooting" investigated by the GBI in 2020, fifteen of which were fatal. Brooks' criminal record, shows several charges of theft, obstructing an officer, battery on a family member, and other misdemeanors. His work record was excellent. No DUI or drug charges on his record either in Georgia or Ohio. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:42:16 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote: Clare Snyder submitted this idea : On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:56:11 -0600, rbowman wrote: On 06/16/2020 01:33 PM, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? He already HAD backup. There were two of Atlanta's worst on scene -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. With a much higher number of complaints against either of them than any police force here would stand for without sidelining them There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. https://miningawareness.wordpress.co...rd-fraud-more/ One case 7 years ago - appears to have been a domestic with 4 charges. Another case a year previous - 3 charges. - appears to all be related to him being in posession of some stolen goods -which appear to have been "government property" - which got him unto a dispute with the cops Both cases would likely have netted a white guy in georgia less than 2 years in jail. The domestic APPEARS to hve been related to custody or access to a child after just getting out of jail All in all definitely NOT a dangerous offender - and he kept his nose clean for the several years he was in Ohio. It appears Atlanta was "toxic" to him Take it with the usual grain of salt but if he was paroled because of COVID he probably would have been violated back in. I don't know about GA law but I would assume he chalked up a few felonies on his way out. This is all conjecture. All racist stereotype conjecture - and NO indication he was parolled out because of covid. Your ASS U Mtions are clearly noted. What we FO know is he was shot while running away ...and firing a weapon at police. - he was no longer a threat and the shooting was "unwarranted" according to the law. We also know the 2 officers involved had spotty records, at best.This was the 48th "officer-involved shooting" investigated by the GBI in 2020, fifteen of which were fatal. Brooks' criminal record, shows several charges of theft, obstructing an officer, battery on a family member, and other misdemeanors. His work record was excellent. No DUI or drug charges on his record either in Georgia or Ohio. The cop had comitted MORE actual crimes than the victim, prior to their interaction. More cases of assoult and simple battery - and quite likely more cases of recieving stolen goods and even dui. Look up the record of each cop involved anf get back to us. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On 06/16/2020 10:42 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
Brooks' criminal record, shows several charges of theft, obstructing an officer, battery on a family member, and other misdemeanors. His work record was excellent. No DUI or drug charges on his record either in Georgia or Ohio. Yeah, he was a good boy, dindu nuthin. Well, maybe there was that beating the **** out of kid thang, but he was a hard worker and showed up at work most days. Sung in the choir too. Now if you were looking at the Dallas guy who actually did sing in the choir you might have something. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On 06/17/2020 06:23 AM, Clare Snyder wrote:
All racist stereotype conjecture - and NO indication he was parolled out because of covid. Your ASS U Mtions are clearly noted. Your ASS U Mtions would fill a 400 page book. Do black felons excite you? |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 10:44:55 PM UTC-4, Bod wrote:
On 16/06/2020 20:33, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. Ok, but the way I saw it, the guy just wanted to get away from the cops. I would've let him go and called for backup. If you let him go, why do you need backup? And if you find him 10 mins later, with the taser, what's different then? I agree the cops could have handled it differently, but when you turn around and point a taser that can put an eye out at a cop and you wind up dead, it's death by stupidity and I doubt you'll find a jury that will convict the cop. I think the cop that shot him was not the cop that lost the taser. The defense could be that the cop didn't know what the perp had grabbed, that he thought it was or could have been his fellow officer's pistol. The cops had his car and video evidence. Yes the guy was very stupid, but didn't warrant shooting him, especially when he was obviously running away, IMO. Stupid doesn't warrant shooting. Pointing a taser or anything similar at a cop likely does. -- Bod |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
trader_4 formulated on Wednesday :
On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 10:44:55 PM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 20:33, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. Ok, but the way I saw it, the guy just wanted to get away from the cops. I would've let him go and called for backup. If you let him go, why do you need backup? And if you find him 10 mins later, with the taser, what's different then? I agree the cops could have handled it differently, but when you turn around and point a taser that can put an eye out at a cop and you wind up dead, it's death by stupidity and I doubt you'll find a jury that will convict the cop. I think the cop that shot him was not the cop that lost the taser. The defense could be that the cop didn't know what the perp had grabbed, that he thought it was or could have been his fellow officer's pistol. The cops had his car and video evidence. Yes the guy was very stupid, but didn't warrant shooting him, especially when he was obviously running away, IMO. Stupid doesn't warrant shooting. Pointing a taser or anything similar at a cop likely does. Then again, it would have been better for me had they shown the whole thing where he goes up to the dying man and kicks him and/or stands on the dying man's shoulders. I think we should wait for the trial on this one too. No need for any new signage, just use the old lame "Hand's up don't shoot!" one's - they are always in style. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
trader_4 formulated on Wednesday : On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 10:44:55 PM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 20:33, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. Ok, but the way I saw it, the guy just wanted to get away from the cops. I would've let him go and called for backup. If you let him go, why do you need backup? And if you find him 10 mins later, with the taser, what's different then? I agree the cops could have handled it differently, but when you turn around and point a taser that can put an eye out at a cop and you wind up dead, it's death by stupidity and I doubt you'll find a jury that will convict the cop. I think the cop that shot him was not the cop that lost the taser. The defense could be that the cop didn't know what the perp had grabbed, that he thought it was or could have been his fellow officer's pistol. The cops had his car and video evidence. Yes the guy was very stupid, but didn't warrant shooting him, especially when he was obviously running away, IMO. Stupid doesn't warrant shooting. Pointing a taser or anything similar at a cop likely does. Then again, it would have been better for me had they shown the whole thing where he goes up to the dying man and kicks him and/or stands on the dying man's shoulders. I think we should wait for the trial on this one too. No need for any new signage, just use the old lame "Hand's up don't shoot!" one's - they are always in style. One thing that sure looks clear to me is that the prosecutors also charging the cop who didn't shoot him is nothing more than mob rule. Only one cop shot him, WTF did the other one do that was wrong, that deserves being charged? Cops in Atlanta are starting to call out sick and the lameo mayor just appealed to them to honor their duties. I suggest she's the one that should honor her duties and not be throwing cops under the bus, like this poor ******* that just got charged. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
trader_4 explained :
On Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 11:33:19 AM UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote: trader_4 formulated on Wednesday : On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 10:44:55 PM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 20:33, wrote: On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT), trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 9:27:28 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: On 16/06/2020 14:15, trader_4 wrote: On Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 8:36:56 AM UTC-4, Bod wrote: Kerik says Rayshard Brooks 'would be alive today if he didn't resist and he didn't disarm the police officers' https://www.foxnews.com/media/bernar...-disarm-police At what point did Rayshard Brooks disarm the officer? I wonder how the officer shot Mr Brooks without his gun. -- Bod -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com What he means is that he would be alive if he hadn't resisted arrest and taken the officers's taser and pointed it at him. He may have fired it too. He also assaulted the cops trying to arrest him for DWI. He's another example of death by stupidity, but sadly they don't learn. It's highly unlikely a jury will convict that cop of anything. Would you stand there and allow him to taser you? Tasers can and have killed. Suppose he puts your eye out? Are you prepared to live with that, because some jerk chooses to go crazy? Brooks was running away from the officer. Why not let him run and then call for backup? -- Bod And what are the backup cops going to do that the two there could not do? Heh, come help us! He has a taser and we're not going to get close to him! Yeah, they could have handled it by just letting him run away and catch up with him another day. But that isn't what cops generally do and if you start doing it, then every bad guy will just run away, knowing you're not going to pursue. If you want to get upset about that, the place to start is with all the high speed pursuits. Many of those start with the cops trying to pull someone over for making an illegal turn or similar, they won't stop, so the cops chase them down at 100MPH on public roads. That puts many lives at risk, but the cops do it regularly and sometimes innocent people, the cops or the perp are killed. Again, this is an example of a highly toxic, volatile situation created not by the cops, but by a very stupid guy. He had hours to think about getting drunk and maybe drugged up and driving. He had minutes to think about complying and allowing the cops to arrest him for a DWI, a relatively minor charge. Instead he chose to resist and then grab the cop's taser, that created the awful situation for everyone involved. And the cop that fired, he had a second or so to react, to decide what to do, not hours or minutes. Another death by stupidity. But sadly the black community won't make that part of their BLM campaign, to message everyone that they need to cooperate with police. Instead it's all supposed to be the fault of racist, white cops. There is an argument to be made that this guy really wasn't going anywhere and they could find him later, the same argument that tells police not to get in high speed pursuits for non violent criminals but that is not really how cops think. If you point a weapon at them, they are going to shoot. Maybe the real answer is to make resisting arrest and fighting with the cops a more serious offense if you are not going to let the cops fight back. Without an evidentiary test, usually performed at the station, the roadside test is really only to provide probable cause for an arrest and is usually not enough to convict on the DUI, so running and taking the misdemeanor for eluding might have been a better thing to do, at least in this guy's mind. That would be particularly true if this is not his first DUI. Ok, but the way I saw it, the guy just wanted to get away from the cops. I would've let him go and called for backup. If you let him go, why do you need backup? And if you find him 10 mins later, with the taser, what's different then? I agree the cops could have handled it differently, but when you turn around and point a taser that can put an eye out at a cop and you wind up dead, it's death by stupidity and I doubt you'll find a jury that will convict the cop. I think the cop that shot him was not the cop that lost the taser. The defense could be that the cop didn't know what the perp had grabbed, that he thought it was or could have been his fellow officer's pistol. The cops had his car and video evidence. Yes the guy was very stupid, but didn't warrant shooting him, especially when he was obviously running away, IMO. Stupid doesn't warrant shooting. Pointing a taser or anything similar at a cop likely does. Then again, it would have been better for me had they shown the whole thing where he goes up to the dying man and kicks him and/or stands on the dying man's shoulders. I think we should wait for the trial on this one too. No need for any new signage, just use the old lame "Hand's up don't shoot!" one's - they are always in style. One thing that sure looks clear to me is that the prosecutors also charging the cop who didn't shoot him is nothing more than mob rule. Only one cop shot him, WTF did the other one do that was wrong, that deserves being charged? Apparently neither cops rendered aid to the victim after he was shot. I heard the 'other' cop is going to testify against the first one, but I don't know what for yet. Cops in Atlanta are starting to call out sick and the lameo mayor just appealed to them to honor their duties. I suggest she's the one that should honor her duties and not be throwing cops under the bus, like this poor ******* that just got charged. With that defunding thing, I think many cops will be glad to not have to go on 'domestic dispute' calls anymore. Now, how many social workers have to die before they have the legal standing to protect themselves. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On 06/18/2020 12:35 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
With that defunding thing, I think many cops will be glad to not have to go on 'domestic dispute' calls anymore. Now, how many social workers have to die before they have the legal standing to protect themselves. There have been a few cops in my family and I think they would rather respond to an active shooter than a domestic. Most of the time the husband and wife will declare a truce to attack the cop. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
More bull**** from FOX NEWS report
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:15:16 -0600, rbowman
wrote: On 06/18/2020 12:35 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: With that defunding thing, I think many cops will be glad to not have to go on 'domestic dispute' calls anymore. Now, how many social workers have to die before they have the legal standing to protect themselves. There have been a few cops in my family and I think they would rather respond to an active shooter than a domestic. Most of the time the husband and wife will declare a truce to attack the cop. Yup - brother-on-law, nephew, 2 cousins and uncle all HATED domestics - said they were the most dangerous because they were so emotionally charged and unpredictable - with nobody thinking straight |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More bullshit from FOX NEWS report | Home Repair | |||
More bullshit from FOX NEWS report | Home Repair | |||
More bullshit from FOX NEWS report | Home Repair | |||
Fox News - 9/11: The Israeli Connection - NOW CENSORED!!! It was pulled off FOX website 2 days after it aired in Dec 2001 and they never referred to it again. MEMORY HOLED!!! | Home Repair | |||
Fox Blocker - blocks FOX News | Metalworking |