Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

Economists polled by Reuters are expecting the U.S.-China trade war will
worsen or, at best, relations will stay the same in the near term.

Close to 80 percent of the economists said they didnt expect any
improvement in relations between the two countries by the end of next
year, Reuters reported. Theyre lacking optimism about the trade
situation as more tariffs are scheduled to take effect in October and
December.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...hina-trade-war

Captain Bull****: "trade wars are easy to win"
--
Bod

Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

On 9/13/19 12:24 AM, Bod wrote:
Economists polled by Reuters are expecting the U.S.-China trade war will worsen or, at best, relations will stay the same in the near term.

Close to 80 percent of the economists said they didnt expect any improvement in relations between the two countries by the end of next year, Reuters reported. Theyre lacking optimism about the trade situation as more tariffs are scheduled to take
effect in October and December.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...hina-trade-war

Captain Bull****:Â* "trade wars are easy to win"



How's your boy Boris doing? How's your brexit kerfuffle?

Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

On 13/09/2019 10:49, Theresa Maynot wrote:
On 9/13/19 12:24 AM, Bod wrote:
Economists polled by Reuters are expecting the U.S.-China trade war
will worsen or, at best, relations will stay the same in the near term.

Close to 80 percent of the economists said they didnt expect any
improvement in relations between the two countries by the end of next
year, Reuters reported. Theyre lacking optimism about the trade
situation as more tariffs are scheduled to take effect in October and
December.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/...hina-trade-war

Captain Bull****:Â* "trade wars are easy to win"



How's your boy Boris doing?Â* How's your brexit kerfuffle?

Still in a mess.

--
Bod

Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

In article ,
says...

Yesterday Trump said that he's open to some kind of interim agreement with
China. While in France he admitted that he was having second thoughts
about his trade war with China. With the election just over a year away,
Trump is growing desperate, so maybe a solution will be found. He's
gotten rid of Bolton, that voice has been silenced.



I am still waiting on my man Trump to get the income tax form down to
the size of a post card. There is no reason to have all the rules and
loop holes for the tax.

Someone wanted to tax the stock market trades. I don't see that
hapening just because of the big boys money would take a big hit on
that. With all the shares trading every day we could probalby eliminate
personal income tax.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 10:28:36 AM UTC-4, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article ,
says...

Yesterday Trump said that he's open to some kind of interim agreement with
China. While in France he admitted that he was having second thoughts
about his trade war with China. With the election just over a year away,
Trump is growing desperate, so maybe a solution will be found. He's
gotten rid of Bolton, that voice has been silenced.



I am still waiting on my man Trump to get the income tax form down to
the size of a post card. There is no reason to have all the rules and
loop holes for the tax.

Of course there is. It's those loopholes that have Trump paying low rates,
maybe no tax at all.





Someone wanted to tax the stock market trades. I don't see that
hapening just because of the big boys money would take a big hit on
that. With all the shares trading every day we could probalby eliminate
personal income tax.


We don't need new taxes, we need to control spending. Sadly the new
Republican Party, the Trump Party, doesn't agree. Which is why we
now have the first $1 tril deficit again. Only difference is when we
last had that size deficit it was right after the 2008 economic decline.
Today the economy is doing fine.

Economists see no end to US-China trade war: Poll
 

In article ,
says...

We don't need new taxes, we need to control spending. Sadly the new
Republican Party, the Trump Party, doesn't agree. Which is why we
now have the first $1 tril deficit again. Only difference is when we
last had that size deficit it was right after the 2008 economic decline.
Today the economy is doing fine.






I sure do agree that the spending needs to be under control. Too bad
there is not some form of oversight to determin how much the US can
borrow. Years ago if you went to a bank to borrow money you had to list
you debt and how much you could pay back on a loan.


A few months ago my wife went to a large chain store and found out that
if you applied for a store credit card you would get so much off what
she was buying. A month later she got a letter back being denied the
card as she did not have enough income. That is because she did not lie
on on the form. Her income is just social security. We have a car that
is 2 years old financed in her name that takes a big part of that
income number.

The only reason the car is financed is because it at 0% and for 7 years
so we could keep most of that money for the first few years making money
in the stock market/IRA. Every thing else is paid for and my IRA is
requiring me to take out more money that we want to spend.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus