Is it wrong?
 

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

Is it wrong?
 

In article , NONONOmisc07
@bigfoot.com says...

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?



That was back in the 'old west', maybe even as seen on TV.

Now about the only you could get away with shooting him in the back is
if he is shooting at someone and you just hapen to get behind him.
Unless he has a weapon out you probably can not shoot him at all by
todays standards.

Is it wrong?
 

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:12:38 -0400, micky
wrote:

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?


Yes.
I thnk it's one of those Bible commandments ..
but don'r let that stop you ..
John T.

Is it wrong?
 

On 8/14/2019 5:12 PM, micky wrote:
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?


Why do you want to shoot them?Â* Maybe the do-bad just needs a hug from a libtard?

--
Get off my lawn!

Is it wrong?
 

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:12:38 -0400, micky
wrote:

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

Ethically or legally?
It should be pointed out as recently as the 30s it was common for the
FBI to ambush criminals and shoot them in the back. Dillinger is a
good example. He was shot in the back of the head without a warning.
The rules are somewhat different now unless the HRT shows up. Then
bushwhack killings still go on. Ask Randy Weaver.

Is it wrong?
 

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:59:17 -0400, Ralph Mowery
wrote:

In article , NONONOmisc07
says...

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?



That was back in the 'old west', maybe even as seen on TV.

Now about the only you could get away with shooting him in the back is
if he is shooting at someone and you just hapen to get behind him.
Unless he has a weapon out you probably can not shoot him at all by
todays standards.

Unless you are in Texas and he is on your property???

Is it wrong?
 

On 8/14/19 4:12 PM, micky wrote:
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

No idea. What tickled me about the old westerns was the good guy
hauling
the dead bad guy to town on the bad guy's horse. The bad guy apparently
never got ripe during the trip.

Is it wrong?
 

Good point Dean.

Is it wrong?
 

"micky" wrote in message
...
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

Wanted posters don't say dead or alive anymore.

Is it wrong?
 

On 8/14/2019 5:12 PM, micky wrote:
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?


Today it is probably wrong. When I hear about a shooting of any sort
and the news reports the shooter was killed, I just figure, justice
served, quickly and cheaply.

Is it wrong?
 

On 8/14/2019 7:31 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 8/14/2019 5:12 PM, micky wrote:
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?


Today it is probably wrong.Â* When I hear about a shooting of any sort
and the news reports the shooter was killed, I just figure, justice
served, quickly and cheaply.

I just looked at a couple of posters for the FBI's most wanted and they
say caution they are dangerous but no Dead or Alive:

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten

I'd say police today would only shoot them in the back if they were
armed and posed a threat.

Is it wrong?
 

On 08/14/2019 04:39 PM, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On 8/14/19 4:12 PM, micky wrote:
If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

No idea. What tickled me about the old westerns was the good guy
hauling
the dead bad guy to town on the bad guy's horse. The bad guy apparently
never got ripe during the trip.

Long lead line.

Is it wrong?
 

In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:12:38 -0400, micky
wrote:

If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

It was a secret who killed him but his sons ppointed a gun at the head
of the hotel desk clerk (who had admitted to hearing the shot and
running to the door to see what had happened. The son said, Didn't you
hear shots every night. Why did you run to the door?). So threated to
kill him if he didn't talk. He resisted but finally said it was
Marshall Dillon.

So one of them is calling out Marshall Dillon, and he's telling them
they're making a mistake. Eventually their father admits that he shot
their brother.

I meant wrong, not illegal.

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:23:51 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


If someone is a gunfighter and bank robber or a highwayman, and in the
course of robbing banks or holding up stagecoaches, he kills 3 or 4
innocent people, and the Wanted poster for him says Dead or Alive, is it
wrong to shoot him in the back?

Wanted posters don't say dead or alive anymore.

That was easy to auto-contradict, wasn't it, you ridiculous, clinically
insane, auto-contradictor? BG

--
Kerr-Mudd,John addressing senile Rot:
"Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)"
MID: