Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:37:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two abnormal sociopathic idiots' latest idiotic drivel


--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:38:37 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two abnormal sociopathic idiots' latest idiotic drivel unread

--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too."

Message-ID:

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 09:35:54 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH 294 !!! lines of the two subnormal sociopathic trolls' latest
absolutely idiotic bull****

--
TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rot and sociopath
Birdbrain from August 26th:

Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers."

Senile Rot: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred that
you all have two heads."

Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?"

Senile Rot: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding that
produces two headed unemployables like you."

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?"

Senile Rot: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough to
shave their legs have."

Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true:
1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale.
2) You haven't learned what a razor is for."

Senile Rot: "Only a terminal ****wit or a woman shaves their legs."

Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your
body."

Senile Rot: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what you
are born with."

MID:

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:12:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 18:54:50 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:16:40 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 00:12:24 +0100, 2987pl wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:35:27 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 21:22:06 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 01:00:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message
...
On Fri, 03 May 2019 22:22:01 +0100, Mike

wrote:

On 5/3/2019 12:43 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok,
my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles?
I
can't
believe the "water" physically spread that evenly. And
I'm
unaware
of
any connection in an LCD monitor activating a circle -
wouldn't
I
short
out a horizontal band or something?
Dig out your polarized sunglasses and see if you learn
anything.
Might have damaged the front polarizer.

I don't have sunglasses.

Is the polarizer replaceable? I can find a few people
selling
the
film
to
replace it, but I'm not sure how easy it is or if it's worth
the
bother.
A couple of Youtube videos on changing one make it look like
a
work
of
art.

It still seems strange I'm getting very accurate circles.
Although
they're gradually expanding, and not always exactly
circular.
One
now
looks like a pacman shape, and another has little scrape
marks
next
to
it.

Likely just some quirk of the plastic that produces that
unusual
effect
with
****.

So you don't know then.

When I find out which cat did it, it's in big trouble.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-en...ondon-35363991

Good luck getting everyone registered.

It's the dogs that get registered, stupid.

I rephrase for you, pedant:
"Good luck getting everyone to register their dog."

Don't need to get everyone to register their dog to
be able to work out which dog owner didn't pick up
their dog's turd most of the time.

If I don't register my dog, how can the **** be traced to my dog?

I meant that most will register their dogs and so the **** of most
dogs can be traced by to their owner.

Goody two shoes that register their dogs will already be cleaning up
their
****.

Don't believe that

Either you're a good law abiding citizen or you're not.

Its not that black and white, most obviously with the
fools that hang their bags of dog **** on trees etc.

I see nothing wrong with that,

Yes, you actually are that stupid.

they're preventing someone from treading in it.

But now you can walk right into the turd.

It's in a bag on a tree, why on earth would you walk into that? Much less
likely than treading on the **** that isn't in a bag.

And it doesn't smell inside the bag.

If I blindfolded you, you wouldn't be able
to pick where a turd was on the ground.

Agreed, your point being?

That even you should be able to look where you are walking
and not actually roll in the turd like some dogs do.

and plenty of those fools hang the bag with the dog **** in it on a
tree or something,
even worse than leaving it on the ground.

I guess they think the council will collect them.

Much more likely that they don't want to carry it around.

Well it is ****ing disgusting. Animals should learn to use flush
toilets.

Turns out its quite easy to get a cat to do that, but you don't
bother. You let them **** in the neighbours gardens and yours.

Very few people have managed to train their cat to use a toilet,

Bull****.

let alone use the flush handle.

Even you should be able to manage that.

It does stop you standing on it.

I only stand on it once a decade or so and even you
should be able to work out how to get if off the
bottom of your shoe if someone was actually silly
enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.

I shouldn't have to look at every step I make.

You don't.

I have to to avoid **** that isn't in bags.

Nope, just keep track of whats where you are walking,
like you have to do to stay on the footpath etc.

Even you should be able to manage that.

And to be fair, some places could do with more bins - how far would
you
carry one?

I'm not actually silly enough to collect dog ****
and even you arent actually silly enough to collect
the **** your cats leave in the neighbour's gardens.

So you just leave it for someone to stand in?

No one is stupid enough to stand in it

Then why do you think there's a fine for letting your dog ****?

Because some fools love to have stupid rules.

Same with the even more stupid rule that
the dog must be on a lead at all times.

Only fools take any notice of stupid rules like that.

and you leave you cat **** for someone to stand in.

Cats tend to do it in flowerbeds. It doesn't get stood in, just all over
the hands of people weeding the garden :-)

Which is a lot worse than getting it on your shoe.

It's as daft as speedbumps, those that bother slowing down for them
were
already obeying the speed limit.

I don't.

Don't slow down for them or don't obey the speed limit?

Don't obey the speed limit but do slow down for them.

Are you one of those annoying people who slow down and speed up for
every one?

Depends on the bump. The ones down the
main street don't need to slow down much
and we only have one racetrack road which
has a 3 on it and those you don't have to
slow down if you are going at the speed limit.

Do you have those stupid square ones?

Nope, we arent that stupid. Ours are mostly part of the road.

The ones on the racetrack road are 3 big metal plates
bent in a hump bolted to the road. With those you can
center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down
each side of the plate and get no real bump at all.

If you straddle them well, you can go about double the limit.

We arent stupid enough to have any like that.

And for any bump, if you accelerate as you hit it, you lift the front of
your car up and glide over it.

Bull****.

It does make it easy to overtake though.

Nope, all of ours are on roads with only
one lane in each direction and the main
street is a fully divided road, no overtaking.

What do you mean fully divided?

Massive great double width carpark
down the center, with full sized trees.
https://goo.gl/maps/SWUsDGv3CP27Udsx7

Those buggers must be reading my posts,
the streetview has just been updated, 18
months after the car was visible here.

But only on the main street, the rest town is is still
11 years old. The camera must have broken while
zooming round town I spose because I did see it
where the street view hasn't been updated.

That pedestrian crossing is one of the speed bumps.

Nobody gonna stop me overtaking in a built up area.

They will there when the car in front of you is in the middle
of the road and they always are. There isnt room to get past.

They're all too new to show up on our ancient
street view which is now 10 years old.

I did see the google car about 18 months ago but it must
have had a major fault, the new footage never showed up.

Either that or some paranoid person blew it to bits or something.

There's some weird folk around here who must have requested privacy, as if
you look around the street views, some houses are blurred out.

In this case the whole street still has the old street view.
This is the racetrack with now has the new speed bumps
that arent visible on the street view.

The street view has been updated where I saw the car,
so they must have only bothered with the main streets.

Speeders like me ignore them and bounce over them.

And get to pay for the repairs to their cars.

Suspension is designed for that.

Wrong.

What do you think it's for?

Normal variations in the road surface.

It can handle much more than that.

Have fun explaining why potholes can **** it.

The only time I've had to replace suspension was when it was old and
rusty. It can take quite a knock otherwise.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that
you are no mechanic. It has nothing to do with rust.

Its normally the shock absorbers that get ****ed by fools
like you deliberately slamming into the road bumps.

Even easier for you to work out which of your cats did it
given that even you don't actually have a hundred cats yet.

I use a camera and know what each cat looks like.

But dna is easier to do after the event. Its unlikely that you
will have the cat caught in the act of ****ing on the monitor.

The camera runs continuously and has motion detection, so it doesn't
use
up the memory for a month.

Sure, but you are very unlikely to have the camera
pointing at where that cat chooses to ****.

They tend to choose favourite places.

Unlikely that particular cat did.

Why do you say that?

Because this is the only time its ****ed on that monitor.

No it isn't. It's just the only time it seeped into the LCD panel.

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 11:27:41 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH another 370 !!! lines of the two sociopathic dimwits' latest
absolutely idiotic bull**** unread again

--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too."

Message-ID:

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore,Strikes, AGAIN!
 

Peeler wrote on 6/05/2019 2:51 AM:
On Mon, 6 May 2019 00:03:19 +1000, Daniel60, another obviously mentally
challenged idiot, blathered:


Well, you senile asshole are obviously incapable of doing it even ONE WAY!
BG

Gee Whiz!! I've made two (count them TWO) responses to you and you've
determined I'm a 'senile asshole'!!

Quick to make judgements or what??

Quick to distract from the fact that you ARE obviously incapable of
understanding what "FLUSH" means, aren't you? It IS indicative of your
senility. tsk

No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!

--
Daniel

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore, Strikes, AGAIN!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 19:44:56 +1000, Daniel60 wrote:

Gee Whiz!! I've made two (count them TWO) responses to you and you've
determined I'm a 'senile asshole'!!

Quick to make judgements or what??

Quick to distract from the fact that you ARE obviously incapable of
understanding what "FLUSH" means, aren't you? It IS indicative of your
senility. tsk

No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!

Simple: I found out that ALL those that stand up for or keep engaging in
"discussions" with the very trolls they despise are without any exception
senile bored old fools (yes, they confirmed their age which is, it seems, is
always 70+ and WAY beyond that).

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 00:15:43 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:44:59 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 21:28:08 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 00:58:18 +0100, Frank "frank
wrote:

On 5/3/2019 3:43 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok, my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles?
I
can't
believe the "water" physically spread that evenly. And I'm
unaware
of
any connection in an LCD monitor activating a circle -
wouldn't
I
short
out a horizontal band or something?

Looks like you are not the first to have this problem:

https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-m...r-problem.html

Others mention similar cat problems.

I like the advice "upgrade from a cat to a dog". Trouble is you
have
to
walk them.

Nope, plenty of them are happy to walk themselves. When I was
building
the
house, one of the neighbours dogs used to have a regular circuit
every
single
day, regular as clockwork, around the same route, sniffing and
****ing
in
the
same places every day. Hilarious to watch.

Let them do that in the UK and the moronic authorities will snatch
them
up.

When I walked back to the place to pick up my car after getting a
wheel
alignment done,

Isn't that something garages do to rip you off? I've never found
it
necessary.

I did, the tire

You spell it the yank way?!

I actually spell it my way, like I do with most ys instead of ies
too.

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation, because it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot. Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is garages who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to change a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay.

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that.

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts, handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on his own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading bodies, and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars, it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW, that was reliable and cheap parts.

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2), then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and bailing up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious.

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still on the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog. Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a lead, they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad behaviour.

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting? And ****ting in the correct place? I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack (you).

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

I find most cats are trainable. If you get angry enough, they
eventually stop doing things.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:37:32 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:10:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:22:13 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®
wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok, my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles? I can't believe the "water" physically spread that
evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection in an LCD monitor
activating a circle - wouldn't I short out a horizontal band
or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles. You
wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet. Using
urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a bit
of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho..

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting flung
across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

No cat has ever torn my skin off, or tried to run up my leg either..

I used to get bitten a bit when I tormented
a cat as a kid but don't do that anymore.

I was scratched severely by one of my cats when I was trying to comb it.

I've never actually been stupid enough to comb a cat, or bath one either.

You would if one had fleas.

Nope, never did, used a flea collar instead.

The only two things I've found to ever work a
1) A comb.
2) A dish of soapy water with a 7W bulb above it.

It got ****ing belted.

No surprise there, psychopath.

It caused me pain, so obviously I did the same back.

Yep, you clearly are a psychopath.

You don't take revenge? If I walked up to you in the street and punched you, you're going to punch me back.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:38:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:19:24 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 05/05/2019 18:56, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:29:33 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®
wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander
Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok,
my cat "scented" it, which I assume is salty water) -
why the circles? I can't believe the "water" physically
spread that evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection
in an LCD monitor activating a circle - wouldn't I short
out a horizontal band or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting
flung across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 02:27:41 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:12:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 18:54:50 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:16:40 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Don't believe that

Either you're a good law abiding citizen or you're not.

Its not that black and white, most obviously with the
fools that hang their bags of dog **** on trees etc.

I see nothing wrong with that,

Yes, you actually are that stupid.

they're preventing someone from treading in it.

But now you can walk right into the turd.

It's in a bag on a tree, why on earth would you walk into that? Much less
likely than treading on the **** that isn't in a bag.

And it doesn't smell inside the bag.

If I blindfolded you, you wouldn't be able
to pick where a turd was on the ground.

Agreed, your point being?

That even you should be able to look where you are walking
and not actually roll in the turd like some dogs do.

Most people like to enjoy the scenery, not have to watch their feet.

If what you said was true, why is it even illegal to allow your dog to **** in public?

and plenty of those fools hang the bag with the dog **** in it on a
tree or something,
even worse than leaving it on the ground.

I guess they think the council will collect them.

Much more likely that they don't want to carry it around.

Well it is ****ing disgusting. Animals should learn to use flush
toilets.

Turns out its quite easy to get a cat to do that, but you don't
bother. You let them **** in the neighbours gardens and yours.

Very few people have managed to train their cat to use a toilet,

Bull****.

WTF? Most cats do not ever use a human toilet.

let alone use the flush handle.

Even you should be able to manage that.

But a cat lacks dexterity.

And to be fair, some places could do with more bins - how far would
you
carry one?

I'm not actually silly enough to collect dog ****
and even you arent actually silly enough to collect
the **** your cats leave in the neighbour's gardens.

So you just leave it for someone to stand in?

No one is stupid enough to stand in it

Then why do you think there's a fine for letting your dog ****?

Because some fools love to have stupid rules.

Or maybe they find **** disgusting.

Same with the even more stupid rule that
the dog must be on a lead at all times.

Only fools take any notice of stupid rules like that.

It's to prevent angry dogs hurting other dogs, or farm animals.

and you leave you cat **** for someone to stand in.

Cats tend to do it in flowerbeds. It doesn't get stood in, just all over
the hands of people weeding the garden :-)

Which is a lot worse than getting it on your shoe.

When you're weeding a flowerbed, you're paying attention to where your hands go.

It's as daft as speedbumps, those that bother slowing down for them
were
already obeying the speed limit.

I don't.

Don't slow down for them or don't obey the speed limit?

Don't obey the speed limit but do slow down for them.

Are you one of those annoying people who slow down and speed up for
every one?

Depends on the bump. The ones down the
main street don't need to slow down much
and we only have one racetrack road which
has a 3 on it and those you don't have to
slow down if you are going at the speed limit.

Do you have those stupid square ones?

Nope, we arent that stupid. Ours are mostly part of the road.

The ones on the racetrack road are 3 big metal plates
bent in a hump bolted to the road. With those you can
center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down
each side of the plate and get no real bump at all.

That's what I meant by square ones. The only ones that could make me slow down are those which go right across the road. Even with those, a lot of them have a gap on the edge to allow water flow, so I place one wheel there and the car just lifts on one side.

If you straddle them well, you can go about double the limit.

We arent stupid enough to have any like that.

You just said "With those you can center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down each side of the plate and get no real bump at all."

And for any bump, if you accelerate as you hit it, you lift the front of
your car up and glide over it.

Bull****.

Don't you understand the laws of physics? When you accelerate, the front of your car lifts. Angular momentum.

It does make it easy to overtake though.

Nope, all of ours are on roads with only
one lane in each direction and the main
street is a fully divided road, no overtaking.

What do you mean fully divided?

Massive great double width carpark
down the center, with full sized trees.
https://goo.gl/maps/SWUsDGv3CP27Udsx7

That's a rather heavily built up area.

Those buggers must be reading my posts,
the streetview has just been updated, 18
months after the car was visible here.

But only on the main street, the rest town is is still
11 years old. The camera must have broken while
zooming round town I spose because I did see it
where the street view hasn't been updated.

Maybe they're just behind schedule.

That pedestrian crossing is one of the speed bumps.

We have speed bumps with no warnings. Nothing painted on the road at all, or it's worn off. And some are three times the size of the others. There's a road near here with a 20mph limit. All the bumps except one, you can go about 30-40. But that one is a nasty bugger, anything over 5mph and you scrape your car to pieces. It's literally a foot high. I can't understand how anyone with a Porsche etc (and it's a posh area so there must be some) can get over it at all. I'd love to buy an expensive car, ground it on a bump, then get the council to pay for the £1000s of damage.

Nobody gonna stop me overtaking in a built up area.

They will there when the car in front of you is in the middle
of the road and they always are. There isnt room to get past.

Why would someone be driving in the middle of the road?

Speeders like me ignore them and bounce over them.

And get to pay for the repairs to their cars.

Suspension is designed for that.

Wrong.

What do you think it's for?

Normal variations in the road surface.

It can handle much more than that.

Have fun explaining why potholes can **** it.

Never had suspension fail on a pothole.

The only time I've had to replace suspension was when it was old and
rusty. It can take quite a knock otherwise.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that
you are no mechanic. It has nothing to do with rust.

Its normally the shock absorbers that get ****ed by fools
like you deliberately slamming into the road bumps.

No, every time I've had a shock replaced, I've seen the old one and it was rusted to hell. I've never busted a relatively new one.

Even easier for you to work out which of your cats did it
given that even you don't actually have a hundred cats yet.

I use a camera and know what each cat looks like.

But dna is easier to do after the event. Its unlikely that you
will have the cat caught in the act of ****ing on the monitor.

The camera runs continuously and has motion detection, so it doesn't
use
up the memory for a month.

Sure, but you are very unlikely to have the camera
pointing at where that cat chooses to ****.

They tend to choose favourite places.

Unlikely that particular cat did.

Why do you say that?

Because this is the only time its ****ed on that monitor.

No it isn't. It's just the only time it seeped into the LCD panel.

Wow! It's shrinking! I guess it hadn't peeled off the polarizer as I thought. Must just be damp and shorting something. It's drying out, it's going away!

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 00:15:43 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:44:59 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 21:28:08 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 00:58:18 +0100, Frank "frank
wrote:

On 5/3/2019 3:43 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok, my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles?
I
can't
believe the "water" physically spread that evenly. And I'm
unaware
of
any connection in an LCD monitor activating a circle -
wouldn't
I
short
out a horizontal band or something?

Looks like you are not the first to have this problem:

https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-m...r-problem.html

Others mention similar cat problems.

I like the advice "upgrade from a cat to a dog". Trouble is
you
have
to
walk them.

Nope, plenty of them are happy to walk themselves. When I was
building
the
house, one of the neighbours dogs used to have a regular
circuit
every
single
day, regular as clockwork, around the same route, sniffing and
****ing
in
the
same places every day. Hilarious to watch.

Let them do that in the UK and the moronic authorities will
snatch
them
up.

When I walked back to the place to pick up my car after getting
a
wheel
alignment done,

Isn't that something garages do to rip you off? I've never
found
it
necessary.

I did, the tire

You spell it the yank way?!

I actually spell it my way, like I do with most ys instead of ies
too.

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages

Had many fancy words imposed by those unspeakable
Normans with the worst of the grovellers to the Norman
invaders choosing to use norman words when english
already had perfectly serviceable words like **** and
arse and dick etc already.

and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

But had quite a bit of the world that used that language choose
to bin some of the sillier aspects of it and do their own.

And you lot have always had plenty of unique regional words
that hardly any of the rest of england, let alone the rest of the
world had even heard of too.

That's the way living languages work.

Only the stupid frogs have ever been actually stupid enough
to have a handful of stuffed shirts proclaim what words can
and cannot be used and how they must be spelt.

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation, because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot.

Only a few fools like you.

Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

My energy doesn't have a tread or wear on just one side either.

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is garages
who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to change
a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

Dunno given that I can't remember what it was.

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

If they keep stock of whatever they have ever been asked for,
that will obviously cost more than only keeping the most popular
tires in stock and ordering in the unusual ones as required. So they
will obviously be able to flog me the tires I use cheaper.

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay.

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that.

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered
taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

But most don't know as little about cars as you do. Or dogs either.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts, handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on his
own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading bodies,
and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

No luck involved.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars, it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW,

Same here.

that was reliable

Nothing like as reliable as the Getz which had no warranty claims what
so ever. The Golf did, and more than one as well. Important ones too.

But since my 73 Golf, things got much worse.

and cheap parts.

Yeah, but the Getz is even cheaper.

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2), then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and bailing up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious.

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still on
the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog.

I have never been silly enough to walk any dog like that.

Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a lead,
they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

I have enough of a clue to be selective about the breeds I have.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad behaviour.

Not ****ing on things you havent. You'll
never train a male dog to never do that
when out walking not on a lead.

Or to not sniff things either.

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting?

Yep, do it regularly.

And ****ting in the correct place?

Plenty of dogs do choose to do what they decide that
their master wants them to do. Cats don't work like that.

I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack (you).

That's not why they fetch. They like chasing things and bring
it back so you can chuck it again and they can chase it again.

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

Nope, they arent into getting humans to chuck
something so they can bring it back endlessly.

Some of them do bring you a present of something
they have killed. Dogs don't do that instinctively.

I find most cats are trainable. If you get angry enough, they
eventually stop doing things.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:37:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:10:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:22:13 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®

wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok, my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles? I can't believe the "water" physically spread
that
evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection in an LCD
monitor
activating a circle - wouldn't I short out a horizontal
band
or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You
wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using
urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit
of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting flung
across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

No cat has ever torn my skin off, or tried to run up my leg either.

I used to get bitten a bit when I tormented
a cat as a kid but don't do that anymore.

I was scratched severely by one of my cats when I was trying to comb
it.

I've never actually been stupid enough to comb a cat, or bath one
either.

You would if one had fleas.

Nope, never did, used a flea collar instead.

The only two things I've found to ever work a
1) A comb.
2) A dish of soapy water with a 7W bulb above it.

Then you are too stupid to use a well designed flea collar.

It got ****ing belted.

No surprise there, psychopath.

It caused me pain, so obviously I did the same back.

Yep, you clearly are a psychopath.

You don't take revenge?

Nope, I'm not a psychopath.

If I walked up to you in the street and punched you, you're going to punch
me back.

Wrong, again. It has in fact happened to me and I didn't.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:38:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:19:24 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 05/05/2019 18:56, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:29:33 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®
wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander
Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok,
my cat "scented" it, which I assume is salty water) -
why the circles? I can't believe the "water" physically
spread that evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection
in an LCD monitor activating a circle - wouldn't I short
out a horizontal band or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting
flung across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

I don't have a ****ing cat and never will do.

I don't walk my cat. You have to walk your dog.

I do not have to walk my dog, I like to walk my dog.

You have a choice?

Of course I do. The daily 30 mile

You misspelt 3 mile.

walk is good for an

You missed a couple of verys in there.

old man.

And if you didn't the dog would become unwell and/or agitated.

Wrong. Plenty of dogs do fine without any walks.

So what's this obsession everyone has with walking their dog?

Just another example of people that don't have a ****ing clue, like
you charging over speed bumps and ****ing your car in the process.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:00:11 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages

Had many fancy words imposed by those unspeakable
Normans with the worst of the grovellers to the Norman
invaders choosing to use norman words when english
already had perfectly serviceable words like **** and
arse and dick etc already.

We still use **** and arse and dick, what are you talking about?

and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

But had quite a bit of the world that used that language choose
to bin some of the sillier aspects of it and do their own.

Yeah the stoopid yanks ****ed everything up, they call solder sodder. There is an L!

And you lot have always had plenty of unique regional words
that hardly any of the rest of england, let alone the rest of the
world had even heard of too.

And we laugh at those morons, specifically the Glaswegians.

That's the way living languages work.

Only the stupid frogs have ever been actually stupid enough
to have a handful of stuffed shirts proclaim what words can
and cannot be used and how they must be spelt.

France has regional dialects too. I met a bloke who said sink instead of sank (as in the number 5, cinq).

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation, because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot.

Only a few fools like you.

No, most people laugh at those who can't spell.

Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

My energy doesn't have a tread or wear on just one side either.

Why should I have to work out which word you mean from context? Just use the right one in the first place.

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is garages
who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to change
a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

Dunno given that I can't remember what it was.

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

If they keep stock of whatever they have ever been asked for,
that will obviously cost more than only keeping the most popular
tires in stock and ordering in the unusual ones as required. So they
will obviously be able to flog me the tires I use cheaper.

Or add the price onto the unusual ones only.

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay..

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that.

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered
taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

But most don't know as little about cars as you do. Or dogs either.

Most people have no clue how to fix anything on a car.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts, handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on his
own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading bodies,
and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

No luck involved.

It's a saying.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars, it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW,

Same here.

that was reliable

Nothing like as reliable as the Getz which had no warranty claims what
so ever. The Golf did, and more than one as well. Important ones too.

But since my 73 Golf, things got much worse.

and cheap parts.

Yeah, but the Getz is even cheaper.

Never owned a Hyundai so I don't know what they're like. But if it makes me drive half the speed limit like the rest of the moronic owners around here, no thanks!

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2), then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and bailing up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious..

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still on
the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog.

I have never been silly enough to walk any dog like that.

Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a lead,
they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

I have enough of a clue to be selective about the breeds I have.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad behaviour.

Not ****ing on things you havent. You'll
never train a male dog to never do that
when out walking not on a lead.

Or to not sniff things either.

If you kick it hard enough, it'll never do it again.

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting?

Yep, do it regularly.

Only when they feel like it.

And ****ting in the correct place?

Plenty of dogs do choose to do what they decide that
their master wants them to do. Cats don't work like that.

Mine do. 8 of my 9 cats now **** correctly.

I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack (you).

That's not why they fetch. They like chasing things and bring
it back so you can chuck it again and they can chase it again.

The stupid dogs fetch it then run off with it. You have to train it to bring it to you.

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

Nope, they arent into getting humans to chuck
something so they can bring it back endlessly.

Because they don't see the point. I don't either, I wouldn't enjoy throwing something for my dog over and over again.

Some of them do bring you a present of something
they have killed. Dogs don't do that instinctively.

A couple of mine did that twice each. They won't do it again.

I find most cats are trainable. If you get angry enough, they
eventually stop doing things.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:03:01 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:37:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:10:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:22:13 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®

wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok, my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles? I can't believe the "water" physically spread
that
evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection in an LCD
monitor
activating a circle - wouldn't I short out a horizontal
band
or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You
wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using
urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit
of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting flung
across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

No cat has ever torn my skin off, or tried to run up my leg either.

I used to get bitten a bit when I tormented
a cat as a kid but don't do that anymore.

I was scratched severely by one of my cats when I was trying to comb
it.

I've never actually been stupid enough to comb a cat, or bath one
either.

You would if one had fleas.

Nope, never did, used a flea collar instead.

The only two things I've found to ever work a
1) A comb.
2) A dish of soapy water with a 7W bulb above it.

Then you are too stupid to use a well designed flea collar.

I've tried all sorts of things, nothing works. Tablets, sprays, drops, etc, etc.

It got ****ing belted.

No surprise there, psychopath.

It caused me pain, so obviously I did the same back.

Yep, you clearly are a psychopath.

You don't take revenge?

Nope, I'm not a psychopath.

If I walked up to you in the street and punched you, you're going to punch
me back.

Wrong, again. It has in fact happened to me and I didn't.

You just allow yourself to be beaten up? I'll have to do that if I ever see you. You just stand there?!

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:04:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:38:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:19:24 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 05/05/2019 18:56, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:29:33 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®
wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander
Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok,
my cat "scented" it, which I assume is salty water) -
why the circles? I can't believe the "water" physically
spread that evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection
in an LCD monitor activating a circle - wouldn't I short
out a horizontal band or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet..
Using urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting
flung across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

I don't have a ****ing cat and never will do.

I don't walk my cat. You have to walk your dog.

I do not have to walk my dog, I like to walk my dog.

You have a choice?

Of course I do. The daily 30 mile

You misspelt 3 mile.

walk is good for an

You missed a couple of verys in there.

old man.

And if you didn't the dog would become unwell and/or agitated.

Wrong. Plenty of dogs do fine without any walks.

So what's this obsession everyone has with walking their dog?

Just another example of people that don't have a ****ing clue, like
you charging over speed bumps and ****ing your car in the process.

The only things that fail on my car are old rusty parts.

And there's no ****ing way I'm going to waste my time slowing down for bumps which shouldn't be there in the first place, and in the process waste a tonne of fuel.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 02:27:41 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:12:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 18:54:50 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:16:40 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Don't believe that

Either you're a good law abiding citizen or you're not.

Its not that black and white, most obviously with the
fools that hang their bags of dog **** on trees etc.

I see nothing wrong with that,

Yes, you actually are that stupid.

they're preventing someone from treading in it.

But now you can walk right into the turd.

It's in a bag on a tree, why on earth would you walk into that? Much
less
likely than treading on the **** that isn't in a bag.

And it doesn't smell inside the bag.

If I blindfolded you, you wouldn't be able
to pick where a turd was on the ground.

Agreed, your point being?

That even you should be able to look where you are walking
and not actually roll in the turd like some dogs do.

Most people like to enjoy the scenery, not have to watch their feet.

Most can actually manage to enjoy the scenery and not trip over
something that happens to be where they are walking towards.

If what you said was true, why is it even illegal to allow your dog to
**** in public?

Because you fools like to tell everyone what they can and cannot do.

Like walk around the shops stark naked etc.

Tho in your case that so everyone else doesn't die laughing.

and plenty of those fools hang the bag with the dog **** in it on a
tree or something,
even worse than leaving it on the ground.

I guess they think the council will collect them.

Much more likely that they don't want to carry it around.

Well it is ****ing disgusting. Animals should learn to use flush
toilets.

Turns out its quite easy to get a cat to do that, but you don't
bother. You let them **** in the neighbours gardens and yours.

Very few people have managed to train their cat to use a toilet,

Bull****.

WTF? Most cats do not ever use a human toilet.

Separate issue to how many have tried to train them to do that.

let alone use the flush handle.

Even you should be able to manage that.

But a cat lacks dexterity.

That's why you do that, stupid.

And to be fair, some places could do with more bins - how far would
you
carry one?

I'm not actually silly enough to collect dog ****
and even you arent actually silly enough to collect
the **** your cats leave in the neighbour's gardens.

So you just leave it for someone to stand in?

No one is stupid enough to stand in it

Then why do you think there's a fine for letting your dog ****?

Because some fools love to have stupid rules.

Or maybe they find **** disgusting.

Your poor toilet training is your problem.

Same with the even more stupid rule that
the dog must be on a lead at all times.

Only fools take any notice of stupid rules like that.

It's to prevent angry dogs hurting other dogs, or farm animals.

Nope. And the dogs arent angry.

and you leave you cat **** for someone to stand in.

Cats tend to do it in flowerbeds. It doesn't get stood in, just all
over
the hands of people weeding the garden :-)

Which is a lot worse than getting it on your shoe.

When you're weeding a flowerbed, you're paying attention to where your
hands go.

But cat **** isnt always that obvious.

It's as daft as speedbumps, those that bother slowing down for
them
were
already obeying the speed limit.

I don't.

Don't slow down for them or don't obey the speed limit?

Don't obey the speed limit but do slow down for them.

Are you one of those annoying people who slow down and speed up for
every one?

Depends on the bump. The ones down the
main street don't need to slow down much
and we only have one racetrack road which
has a 3 on it and those you don't have to
slow down if you are going at the speed limit.

Do you have those stupid square ones?

Nope, we arent that stupid. Ours are mostly part of the road.

The ones on the racetrack road are 3 big metal plates
bent in a hump bolted to the road. With those you can
center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down
each side of the plate and get no real bump at all.

That's what I meant by square ones.

OK.

The only ones that could make me slow down are those which go right across
the road. Even with those, a lot of them have a gap on the edge to allow
water flow, so I place one wheel there and the car just lifts on one side.

That doesn't work with parked cars.

If you straddle them well, you can go about double the limit.

We arent stupid enough to have any like that.

You just said "With those you can center the car over the plate, have the
wheels go down each side of the plate and get no real bump at all."

And for any bump, if you accelerate as you hit it, you lift the front of
your car up and glide over it.

Bull****.

Don't you understand the laws of physics? When you accelerate, the front
of your car lifts.

No it doesn't with front wheel drive car.

Angular momentum.

Not with a front wheel drive car.

It does make it easy to overtake though.

Nope, all of ours are on roads with only
one lane in each direction and the main
street is a fully divided road, no overtaking.

What do you mean fully divided?

Massive great double width carpark
down the center, with full sized trees.
https://goo.gl/maps/SWUsDGv3CP27Udsx7

That's a rather heavily built up area.

Unsurprising given that it's the main street.

Those buggers must be reading my posts,
the streetview has just been updated, 18
months after the car was visible here.

But only on the main street, the rest of town is is still 11 years old.
The camera must have broken while zooming round town I spose because I
did see it where the street view hasn't been updated.

Maybe they're just behind schedule.

By 11 years ?

In fact when checking the dates I discovered something
I hadn't noticed previously, that some parts of town were
done in 2008 and some in 2010. No obvious reason for
that that its in the wilds of rural australia.

That pedestrian crossing is one of the speed bumps.

We have speed bumps with no warnings. Nothing painted on the road at all,

We do too, but there are signs on polls before those.
All too new to be on the latest street view that only
covers a few of the main roads which don't have
speed bumps except down the main street.

or it's worn off. And some are three times the size of the others.

We only have the two types and only 3 lots of what
you call square ones, all on the one raceway road.

There's a road near here with a 20mph limit.

We do have 40kmph limits outside schools but
the limit only applys for 90 minutes at the start
and end of the school day so no speed bumps.

All the bumps except one, you can go about 30-40. But that one is a nasty
bugger, anything over 5mph and you scrape your car to pieces. It's
literally a foot high.

Show us the streetview.

I can't understand how anyone with a Porsche etc (and it's a posh area so
there must be some) can get over it at all.

Not just a posh car, there isnt a foot clearance under the
Getz as I discovered, even the shortest bottle jacks don't fit.

I'd love to buy an expensive car, ground it on a bump, then get the
council to pay for the £1000s of damage.

The magistrate would tell you to go and ****
yourself in appropriately bureaucratic language.

Nobody gonna stop me overtaking in a built up area.

They will there when the car in front of you is in the middle
of the road and they always are. There isnt room to get past.

Why would someone be driving in the middle of the road?

Because that road isnt wide enough for two lanes of traffic.

Speeders like me ignore them and bounce over them.

And get to pay for the repairs to their cars.

Suspension is designed for that.

Wrong.

What do you think it's for?

Normal variations in the road surface.

It can handle much more than that.

Have fun explaining why potholes can **** it.

Never had suspension fail on a pothole.

You don't understand what potholes do
to shock absorbers. It doesn't snap off.

The only time I've had to replace suspension was when it was old and
rusty. It can take quite a knock otherwise.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that
you are no mechanic. It has nothing to do with rust.

Its normally the shock absorbers that get ****ed by fools
like you deliberately slamming into the road bumps.

No, every time I've had a shock replaced, I've seen the old one and it was
rusted to hell.

Rust on outside of a shock absorber is irrelevant.

I've never busted a relatively new one.

You have in fact ****ed them all by tearing across speed bumps.

Even easier for you to work out which of your cats did it
given that even you don't actually have a hundred cats yet.

I use a camera and know what each cat looks like.

But dna is easier to do after the event. Its unlikely that you
will have the cat caught in the act of ****ing on the monitor.

The camera runs continuously and has motion detection, so it
doesn't
use
up the memory for a month.

Sure, but you are very unlikely to have the camera
pointing at where that cat chooses to ****.

They tend to choose favourite places.

Unlikely that particular cat did.

Why do you say that?

Because this is the only time its ****ed on that monitor.

No it isn't. It's just the only time it seeped into the LCD panel.

Wow! It's shrinking! I guess it hadn't peeled off the polarizer as I
thought.

Yeah, looks more like liquid between layers of plastic.

Must just be damp and shorting something. It's drying out, it's going
away!

The cat will be along soon to **** on it again.

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 05:03:01 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH another 132 of the two abnormal sociopathic sickos latest absolutely
idiotic bull****

....and much better air in here again!

--
Another retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're
broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an
eye on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rot: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 05:04:27 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the unbelievably idiotic sickos latest absolutely idiotic bull****

--
Another retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rot:

Senile Rot: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

FLUSH another 418 !!! Lines of the Two Abnormal Sociopathic Idiots' Latest Absolutely Idiotic Bullshit!
 

....and nothing's left!


--
Another retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rot:

Senile Rot: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:00:11 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it
that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages

Had many fancy words imposed by those unspeakable
Normans with the worst of the grovellers to the Norman
invaders choosing to use norman words when english
already had perfectly serviceable words like **** and
arse and dick etc already.

We still use **** and arse and dick, what are you talking about?

and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

But had quite a bit of the world that used that language choose
to bin some of the sillier aspects of it and do their own.

Yeah the stoopid yanks ****ed everything up, they call solder sodder.
There is an L!

And you lot have always had plenty of unique regional words
that hardly any of the rest of england, let alone the rest of the
world had even heard of too.

And we laugh at those morons, specifically the Glaswegians.

That's the way living languages work.

Only the stupid frogs have ever been actually stupid enough
to have a handful of stuffed shirts proclaim what words can
and cannot be used and how they must be spelt.

France has regional dialects too. I met a bloke who said sink instead of
sank (as in the number 5, cinq).

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation, because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot.

Only a few fools like you.

No, most people laugh at those who can't spell.

Try facebook and twitter sometime.

Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

My energy doesn't have a tread or wear on just one side either.

Why should I have to work out which word you mean from context?

Its automatic for anyone who isnt brain dead.

Just use the right one in the first place.

There is no right one. FAR more use tire instead of tyre.

You get to like that or lump it.

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is garages
who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to
change
a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock
and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

Dunno given that I can't remember what it was.

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

If they keep stock of whatever they have ever been asked for,
that will obviously cost more than only keeping the most popular
tires in stock and ordering in the unusual ones as required. So they
will obviously be able to flog me the tires I use cheaper.

Or add the price onto the unusual ones only.

Not going to work when they never sell another of those.

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay.

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that.

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered
taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed
doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

But most don't know as little about cars as you do. Or dogs either.

Most people have no clue how to fix anything on a car.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and
they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts, handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on his
own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading bodies,
and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

No luck involved.

It's a saying.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars,
it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW,

Same here.

that was reliable

Nothing like as reliable as the Getz which had no warranty claims what
so ever. The Golf did, and more than one as well. Important ones too.

But since my 73 Golf, things got much worse.

and cheap parts.

Yeah, but the Getz is even cheaper.

Never owned a Hyundai so I don't know what they're like. But if it makes
me drive half the speed limit like the rest of the moronic owners around
here,

It doesn't. Only one of the garage salers
can keep up with me and she's dead now.

no thanks!

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2), then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something
very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street
verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and bailing
up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious.

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still on
the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog.

I have never been silly enough to walk any dog like that.

Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a
lead,
they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

I have enough of a clue to be selective about the breeds I have.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad behaviour.

Not ****ing on things you havent. You'll
never train a male dog to never do that
when out walking not on a lead.

Or to not sniff things either.

If you kick it hard enough, it'll never do it again.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Try that with mine and you'd end up dead, quite literally.

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting?

Yep, do it regularly.

Only when they feel like it.

Nope, also when they know they will
be rewarded for doing that like with
the drug and currency sniffing dogs

And ****ting in the correct place?

Plenty of dogs do choose to do what they decide that
their master wants them to do. Cats don't work like that.

Mine do. 8 of my 9 cats now **** correctly.

Not when you tell them to.

I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack (you).

That's not why they fetch. They like chasing things and bring
it back so you can chuck it again and they can chase it again.

The stupid dogs fetch it then run off with it.

Nope, dogs don't do that.

You have to train it to bring it to you.

Bull**** you do with the worst of them.

They bring it to you to get you to chuck it again.

I've even had dogs at garage sales do it, bring
you something they want you to chuck for them.

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

Nope, they arent into getting humans to chuck
something so they can bring it back endlessly.

Because they don't see the point. I don't either, I wouldn't enjoy
throwing something for my dog over and over again.

Irrelevant to why dogs like to do that.

Some of them do bring you a present of something
they have killed. Dogs don't do that instinctively.

A couple of mine did that twice each. They won't do it again.

Because you are a psychopath.

I find most cats are trainable. If you get angry enough,
they
eventually stop doing things.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:03:01 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:37:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:10:32 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:22:13 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®

wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander
Kinsey
wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet (ok,
my
cat
"scented" it, which I assume is salty water) - why the
circles? I can't believe the "water" physically spread
that
evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection in an LCD
monitor
activating a circle - wouldn't I short out a horizontal
band
or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect circles.
You
wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using
urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get a
bit
of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting
flung
across the room when their claws ends up through my skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

No cat has ever torn my skin off, or tried to run up my leg either.

I used to get bitten a bit when I tormented
a cat as a kid but don't do that anymore.

I was scratched severely by one of my cats when I was trying to comb
it.

I've never actually been stupid enough to comb a cat, or bath one
either.

You would if one had fleas.

Nope, never did, used a flea collar instead.

The only two things I've found to ever work a
1) A comb.
2) A dish of soapy water with a 7W bulb above it.

Then you are too stupid to use a well designed flea collar.

I've tried all sorts of things, nothing works. Tablets, sprays, drops,
etc, etc.

You clearly ****ed up using those.

It got ****ing belted.

No surprise there, psychopath.

It caused me pain, so obviously I did the same back.

Yep, you clearly are a psychopath.

You don't take revenge?

Nope, I'm not a psychopath.

If I walked up to you in the street and punched you, you're going to
punch
me back.

Wrong, again. It has in fact happened to me and I didn't.

You just allow yourself to be beaten up?

I wasn't beaten up.

I'll have to do that if I ever see you. You just stand there?!

Nope, I walked off. There were more of them
than me, obviously trying to pick a fight.
I'm not stupid enough to get involved.
Plenty have ended up dead in that situation.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:04:27 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:38:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:19:24 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 05/05/2019 18:56, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:29:33 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2019 09:36:36 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 04 May 2019 23:20:51 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message
...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 22:17:53 +0100, 2987pl
wrote:


"Commander Kinsey" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 04 May 2019 19:38:56 +0100, Tekkie®
wrote:
trader_4 posted for all of us...

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:43:55 PM UTC-4, Commander
Kinsey wrote:
I'm interested as to how this happened:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/elnf9fysu2...rcles.JPG?dl=0
Perfectly formed circles, after the monitor got wet
(ok,
my cat "scented" it, which I assume is salty water) -
why the circles? I can't believe the "water"
physically
spread that evenly. And I'm unaware of any connection
in an LCD monitor activating a circle - wouldn't I
short
out a horizontal band or something?

Very weird, especially how they are such perfect
circles.
You wouldn't think
urine would even penetrate an LCD screen. But I guess
the
bottom line is
you're hosed.

In more ways then one :)

It's why cats aren't the dominant species on the planet.
Using urine to mark territory, ffs.

Their paws don't do flags and fences too well.

There aren't enough of them to require territory.

And yes their paws suck. You should see them trying to get
a
bit of food out of the edge of a dish.

They work well for running up the vertical trunk of a tree
tho.

They don't work well for running up me. They end up getting
flung across the room when their claws ends up through my
skin.

Like I did say, you are a bully.

So you'd just allow a cat to tear your skin off?

I don't have a ****ing cat and never will do.

I don't walk my cat. You have to walk your dog.

I do not have to walk my dog, I like to walk my dog.

You have a choice?

Of course I do. The daily 30 mile

You misspelt 3 mile.

walk is good for an

You missed a couple of verys in there.

old man.

And if you didn't the dog would become unwell and/or agitated.

Wrong. Plenty of dogs do fine without any walks.

So what's this obsession everyone has with walking their dog?

Just another example of people that don't have a ****ing clue, like
you charging over speed bumps and ****ing your car in the process.

The only things that fail on my car are old rusty parts.

Bull****. Most obviously with that frog steaming turd with
wheels that was a writeoff when you were too stupid to
even notice the engine overheating light until it died.

And there's no ****ing way I'm going to waste my time slowing down for
bumps which shouldn't be there in the first place, and in the process
waste a tonne of fuel.

And that why you end up with and endless series of writeoffs.

FLUSH 360 !!! Lines of the Two Sociopathic Trolls' Endless Idiotic BULLSHIT!
 

....and nothing's left, again!

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're
broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rot: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:29:50 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 02:27:41 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:12:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 18:54:50 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:16:40 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Don't believe that

Either you're a good law abiding citizen or you're not.

Its not that black and white, most obviously with the
fools that hang their bags of dog **** on trees etc.

I see nothing wrong with that,

Yes, you actually are that stupid.

they're preventing someone from treading in it.

But now you can walk right into the turd.

It's in a bag on a tree, why on earth would you walk into that? Much
less
likely than treading on the **** that isn't in a bag.

And it doesn't smell inside the bag.

If I blindfolded you, you wouldn't be able
to pick where a turd was on the ground.

Agreed, your point being?

That even you should be able to look where you are walking
and not actually roll in the turd like some dogs do.

Most people like to enjoy the scenery, not have to watch their feet.

Most can actually manage to enjoy the scenery and not trip over
something that happens to be where they are walking towards.

Your eyes cannot clearly view ahead and below simultaneously.

If what you said was true, why is it even illegal to allow your dog to
**** in public?

Because you fools like to tell everyone what they can and cannot do.

No, because **** STINKS.

Like walk around the shops stark naked etc.

Tho in your case that so everyone else doesn't die laughing.

I have no objection to people wearing clothes, so why should they object to me being naked?

and plenty of those fools hang the bag with the dog **** in it on a
tree or something,
even worse than leaving it on the ground.

I guess they think the council will collect them.

Much more likely that they don't want to carry it around.

Well it is ****ing disgusting. Animals should learn to use flush
toilets.

Turns out its quite easy to get a cat to do that, but you don't
bother. You let them **** in the neighbours gardens and yours.

Very few people have managed to train their cat to use a toilet,

Bull****.

WTF? Most cats do not ever use a human toilet.

Separate issue to how many have tried to train them to do that.

I've heard of very few.

let alone use the flush handle.

Even you should be able to manage that.

But a cat lacks dexterity.

That's why you do that, stupid.

Every time a cat goes?

And to be fair, some places could do with more bins - how far would
you
carry one?

I'm not actually silly enough to collect dog ****
and even you arent actually silly enough to collect
the **** your cats leave in the neighbour's gardens.

So you just leave it for someone to stand in?

No one is stupid enough to stand in it

Then why do you think there's a fine for letting your dog ****?

Because some fools love to have stupid rules.

Or maybe they find **** disgusting.

Your poor toilet training is your problem.

Why should I have to train the stupid ****ers how to do the most basic bodily function?

Same with the even more stupid rule that
the dog must be on a lead at all times.

Only fools take any notice of stupid rules like that.

It's to prevent angry dogs hurting other dogs, or farm animals.

Nope. And the dogs arent angry.

Well a lot of them are ****ing vicious for one reason or another. I've often seen one person's dog attack another person's dog, both still on leads, both owners frantically trying to stop them. And no, neither were "known vicious breeds".

and you leave you cat **** for someone to stand in.

Cats tend to do it in flowerbeds. It doesn't get stood in, just all
over
the hands of people weeding the garden :-)

Which is a lot worse than getting it on your shoe.

When you're weeding a flowerbed, you're paying attention to where your
hands go.

But cat **** isnt always that obvious.

I can smell it a mile away.

It's as daft as speedbumps, those that bother slowing down for
them
were
already obeying the speed limit.

I don't.

Don't slow down for them or don't obey the speed limit?

Don't obey the speed limit but do slow down for them.

Are you one of those annoying people who slow down and speed up for
every one?

Depends on the bump. The ones down the
main street don't need to slow down much
and we only have one racetrack road which
has a 3 on it and those you don't have to
slow down if you are going at the speed limit.

Do you have those stupid square ones?

Nope, we arent that stupid. Ours are mostly part of the road.

The ones on the racetrack road are 3 big metal plates
bent in a hump bolted to the road. With those you can
center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down
each side of the plate and get no real bump at all.

That's what I meant by square ones.

OK.

The only ones that could make me slow down are those which go right across
the road. Even with those, a lot of them have a gap on the edge to allow
water flow, so I place one wheel there and the car just lifts on one side.

That doesn't work with parked cars.

I had a go at the council once for that. The only place left to park in a busy street was straddling a bump. This meant my car was tilted over, so when I opened the door it scraped against the pavement. I sent them the bill for some paint and never heard back. Councils operate above the law.

If you straddle them well, you can go about double the limit.

We arent stupid enough to have any like that.

You just said "With those you can center the car over the plate, have the
wheels go down each side of the plate and get no real bump at all."

And for any bump, if you accelerate as you hit it, you lift the front of
your car up and glide over it.

Bull****.

Don't you understand the laws of physics? When you accelerate, the front
of your car lifts.

No it doesn't with front wheel drive car.

Yes it does. Most of my cars have been front wheel drive, and they all lift the nose when accelerating and drop when braking. It's simple angular momentum, you're rotating the wheels forwards, so the car wants to rotate backwards. Front or rear wheel drive won't make a blind bit of difference to this. Are you seriously telling me when you do an emergency stop your car doesn't tilt forwards?!?

It does make it easy to overtake though.

Nope, all of ours are on roads with only
one lane in each direction and the main
street is a fully divided road, no overtaking.

What do you mean fully divided?

Massive great double width carpark
down the center, with full sized trees.
https://goo.gl/maps/SWUsDGv3CP27Udsx7

That's a rather heavily built up area.

Unsurprising given that it's the main street.

Too busy to overtake on main streets anyway, I was talking about quieter roads.

Those buggers must be reading my posts,
the streetview has just been updated, 18
months after the car was visible here.

But only on the main street, the rest of town is is still 11 years old.
The camera must have broken while zooming round town I spose because I
did see it where the street view hasn't been updated.

Maybe they're just behind schedule.

By 11 years ?

In fact when checking the dates I discovered something
I hadn't noticed previously, that some parts of town were
done in 2008 and some in 2010. No obvious reason for
that that its in the wilds of rural australia.

Who knows how many staff thy have or what other jobs they have to do.

That pedestrian crossing is one of the speed bumps.

We have speed bumps with no warnings. Nothing painted on the road at all,

We do too, but there are signs on polls before those.
All too new to be on the latest street view that only
covers a few of the main roads which don't have
speed bumps except down the main street.

The problem is the paint wears off in a few years, and they don't replace it.

or it's worn off. And some are three times the size of the others.

We only have the two types and only 3 lots of what
you call square ones, all on the one raceway road.

My council likes to use many many different types, presumably to catch us unawares. Ambulances hate them, but the council ignores their wishes too.

There's a road near here with a 20mph limit.

We do have 40kmph limits outside schools but
the limit only applys for 90 minutes at the start
and end of the school day so no speed bumps.

Apparently the temporary 20 limits around schools here are only advisory.. I take great delight in going 30 past the speed camera they put there during school lunchtimes.

Don't you have any permanent 20mph limits? We have them in about half the built up areas.

All the bumps except one, you can go about 30-40. But that one is a nasty
bugger, anything over 5mph and you scrape your car to pieces. It's
literally a foot high.

Show us the streetview.

https://goo.gl/maps/bWv8y7JTQQvCr5Kh8

It doesn't actually look violent from the camera, but I've gone over it at 20mph (the speed limit) and almost destroyed my car. It must be combination of the height and the width of it, at 20 your car lifts up suddenly then drops again, the front bumper actually hits the road. Every the bump on the road is about three times less violent - which is what makes that one so bad, you're not expecting it. I actually have to go between 5 and 10 to get over it without nasty scraping noises.

I can't understand how anyone with a Porsche etc (and it's a posh area so
there must be some) can get over it at all.

Not just a posh car, there isnt a foot clearance under the
Getz as I discovered, even the shortest bottle jacks don't fit.

Don't you have trouble with speedbumps? My Golf had been lowered by the previous owner, I scraped the engine cover on every bump, even slowing to the limit. I refused to go slower than the limit.

I'd love to buy an expensive car, ground it on a bump, then get the
council to pay for the £1000s of damage.

The magistrate would tell you to go and ****
yourself in appropriately bureaucratic language.

They shouldn't. The council is criminally damaging cars. If you cannot drive every single road legal car over a bump at the speed limit, then the bump is wrongly designed.

Nobody gonna stop me overtaking in a built up area.

They will there when the car in front of you is in the middle
of the road and they always are. There isnt room to get past.

Why would someone be driving in the middle of the road?

Because that road isnt wide enough for two lanes of traffic.

What happens when someone comes the other way?

Speeders like me ignore them and bounce over them.

And get to pay for the repairs to their cars.

Suspension is designed for that.

Wrong.

What do you think it's for?

Normal variations in the road surface.

It can handle much more than that.

Have fun explaining why potholes can **** it.

Never had suspension fail on a pothole.

You don't understand what potholes do
to shock absorbers. It doesn't snap off.

Only time I've replaced shock absorbers was when they snapped, and they were always old rusty ones.

The only time I've had to replace suspension was when it was old and
rusty. It can take quite a knock otherwise.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that
you are no mechanic. It has nothing to do with rust.

Its normally the shock absorbers that get ****ed by fools
like you deliberately slamming into the road bumps.

No, every time I've had a shock replaced, I've seen the old one and it was
rusted to hell.

Rust on outside of a shock absorber is irrelevant.

I've never busted a relatively new one.

You have in fact ****ed them all by tearing across speed bumps.

No, they were clearly all old and rusted a long way through.

Even easier for you to work out which of your cats did it
given that even you don't actually have a hundred cats yet..

I use a camera and know what each cat looks like.

But dna is easier to do after the event. Its unlikely that you
will have the cat caught in the act of ****ing on the monitor.

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 05:48:49 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two stinking trolls' latest troll****

....and much better air in here again!


--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're
broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rot: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore,Strikes, AGAIN!
 

On 5/6/2019 2:44 AM, Daniel60 wrote:
Peeler wrote on 6/05/2019 2:51 AM:
On Mon, 6 May 2019 00:03:19 +1000, Daniel60, another obviously mentally
challenged idiot, blathered:


Well, you senile asshole are obviously incapable of doing it even
ONE WAY!
BG

Gee Whiz!! I've made two (count them TWO) responses to you and you've
determined I'm a 'senile asshole'!!

Quick to make judgements or what??

Quick to distract from the fact that you ARE obviously incapable of
understanding what "FLUSH" means, aren't you? It IS indicative of your
senility. tsk

No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!


Keep trying. Maybe YOU can be the first person in history to get a
reasonable answer from the troll clown.

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 05:51:38 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two abnormal retarded trolls' latest idioitic bull**** unread
again

....and nothing's left!

--
Another retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rot:

Senile Rot: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

FLUSH another 427 !!! Lines of the Two Abnormal Sociopathic Idiots' Latest Absolutely Idiotic Bullshit!
 

....and much better air in here again!


--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rot:

Senile Rot: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rot: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore, Strikes, AGAIN!
 

On Mon, 6 May 2019 14:28:46 -0700, Bob F, obviously another senile idiot,
blathered:


No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!


Keep trying. Maybe YOU can be the first person in history to get a
reasonable answer from the troll clown.

Admit it, you felt personally addressed when "senile asshole" was mentioned!
And most likely RIGHTLY so! VBG

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:44:56 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:00:11 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it
that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages

Had many fancy words imposed by those unspeakable
Normans with the worst of the grovellers to the Norman
invaders choosing to use norman words when english
already had perfectly serviceable words like **** and
arse and dick etc already.

We still use **** and arse and dick, what are you talking about?

and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

But had quite a bit of the world that used that language choose
to bin some of the sillier aspects of it and do their own.

Yeah the stoopid yanks ****ed everything up, they call solder sodder.
There is an L!

And you lot have always had plenty of unique regional words
that hardly any of the rest of england, let alone the rest of the
world had even heard of too.

And we laugh at those morons, specifically the Glaswegians.

That's the way living languages work.

Only the stupid frogs have ever been actually stupid enough
to have a handful of stuffed shirts proclaim what words can
and cannot be used and how they must be spelt.

France has regional dialects too. I met a bloke who said sink instead of
sank (as in the number 5, cinq).

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation, because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:29:50 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 02:27:41 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:12:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 18:54:50 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:16:40 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Don't believe that

Either you're a good law abiding citizen or you're not.

Its not that black and white, most obviously with the
fools that hang their bags of dog **** on trees etc.

I see nothing wrong with that,

Yes, you actually are that stupid.

they're preventing someone from treading in it.

But now you can walk right into the turd.

It's in a bag on a tree, why on earth would you walk into that? Much
less
likely than treading on the **** that isn't in a bag.

And it doesn't smell inside the bag.

If I blindfolded you, you wouldn't be able
to pick where a turd was on the ground.

Agreed, your point being?

That even you should be able to look where you are walking
and not actually roll in the turd like some dogs do.

Most people like to enjoy the scenery, not have to watch their feet.

Most can actually manage to enjoy the scenery and not trip over
something that happens to be where they are walking towards.

Your eyes cannot clearly view ahead and below simultaneously.

They don't need to. The turd will be visible long before you get
to it and even you should then be able to avoid stepping on it.

If what you said was true, why is it even illegal to allow your dog to
**** in public?

Because you fools like to tell everyone what they can and cannot do.

No, because **** STINKS.

Like I said, even you wouldn't be able to tell me when there
is a turd around if I blindfolded you when out walking
and led you around on a lead like the dog you are.

If you could, there would be no need for anyone to collect
dog turds because you could smell them coming and could
THEN stare just in front of your feet until the smell was gone.

Like walk around the shops stark naked etc.

Tho in your case that so everyone else doesn't die laughing.

I have no objection to people wearing clothes, so why should they object
to me being naked?

Because they don't want to have to collect all the
corpses of those who have died laughing and do
the paperwork listing why they died there etc.

and plenty of those fools hang the bag with the dog **** in it on
a
tree or something,
even worse than leaving it on the ground.

I guess they think the council will collect them.

Much more likely that they don't want to carry it around.

Well it is ****ing disgusting. Animals should learn to use flush
toilets.

Turns out its quite easy to get a cat to do that, but you don't
bother. You let them **** in the neighbours gardens and yours.

Very few people have managed to train their cat to use a toilet,

Bull****.

WTF? Most cats do not ever use a human toilet.

Separate issue to how many have tried to train them to do that.

I've heard of very few.

Because most don't bother to even try.

let alone use the flush handle.

Even you should be able to manage that.

But a cat lacks dexterity.

That's why you do that, stupid.

Every time a cat goes?

Every time before you need to use it yourself.

And to be fair, some places could do with more bins - how far
would
you
carry one?

I'm not actually silly enough to collect dog ****
and even you arent actually silly enough to collect
the **** your cats leave in the neighbour's gardens.

So you just leave it for someone to stand in?

No one is stupid enough to stand in it

Then why do you think there's a fine for letting your dog ****?

Because some fools love to have stupid rules.

Or maybe they find **** disgusting.

Your poor toilet training is your problem.

Why should I have to train the stupid ****ers how to do the most basic
bodily function?

It was the lousy toilet training that your 'parents'
did that's the problem.

Same with the even more stupid rule that
the dog must be on a lead at all times.

Only fools take any notice of stupid rules like that.

It's to prevent angry dogs hurting other dogs, or farm animals.

Nope. And the dogs arent angry.

Well a lot of them are ****ing vicious for one reason or another.

**** all of them are. The ones that are were bred like that.

I've often seen one person's dog attack another person's dog, both still
on leads, both owners frantically trying to stop them.

I've only seen it a couple of times and that's
over twice as long as you've been doing it for.

And no, neither were "known vicious breeds".

and you leave you cat **** for someone to stand in.

Cats tend to do it in flowerbeds. It doesn't get stood in, just all
over
the hands of people weeding the garden :-)

Which is a lot worse than getting it on your shoe.

When you're weeding a flowerbed, you're paying attention to where your
hands go.

But cat **** isnt always that obvious.

I can smell it a mile away.

Don't believe you. If you could, you wouldn't keep stepping on it.

It's as daft as speedbumps, those that bother slowing down for
them were already obeying the speed limit.

I don't.

Don't slow down for them or don't obey the speed limit?

Don't obey the speed limit but do slow down for them.

Are you one of those annoying people who slow down and speed up for
every one?

Depends on the bump. The ones down the
main street don't need to slow down much
and we only have one racetrack road which
has a 3 on it and those you don't have to
slow down if you are going at the speed limit.

Do you have those stupid square ones?

Nope, we arent that stupid. Ours are mostly part of the road.

The ones on the racetrack road are 3 big metal plates
bent in a hump bolted to the road. With those you can
center the car over the plate, have the wheels go down
each side of the plate and get no real bump at all.

That's what I meant by square ones.

OK.

The only ones that could make me slow down are those which go right
across
the road. Even with those, a lot of them have a gap on the edge to
allow
water flow, so I place one wheel there and the car just lifts on one
side.

That doesn't work with parked cars.

I had a go at the council once for that. The only place left to park in a
busy street was straddling a bump. This meant my car was tilted over, so
when I opened the door it scraped against the pavement. I sent them the
bill for some paint and never heard back.

Cant imagine why for the life of me.

Councils operate above the law.

Nope, the law says that if you do something
that stupid, you get to pay for the paint yourself.

If you straddle them well, you can go about double the limit.

We arent stupid enough to have any like that.

You just said "With those you can center the car over the plate, have
the
wheels go down each side of the plate and get no real bump at all."

And for any bump, if you accelerate as you hit it, you lift the front
of
your car up and glide over it.

Bull****.

Don't you understand the laws of physics? When you accelerate, the
front
of your car lifts.

No it doesn't with front wheel drive car.

Yes it does.

Corse it doesn't.

Most of my cars have been front wheel drive, and they all lift the nose
when accelerating

Bull**** they do.

and drop when braking. It's simple angular momentum,

Nope.

you're rotating the wheels forwards, so the car wants to rotate backwards.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something.

Front or rear wheel drive won't make a blind bit of difference to this.

Corse it does when the driven wheels are at a different end.

Are you seriously telling me when you do an emergency stop your car
doesn't tilt forwards?!?

I am seriously telling you that when I accelerate the front of
the car doesn't go any higher with a front wheel drive car.

It does make it easy to overtake though.

Nope, all of ours are on roads with only
one lane in each direction and the main
street is a fully divided road, no overtaking.

What do you mean fully divided?

Massive great double width carpark
down the center, with full sized trees.
https://goo.gl/maps/SWUsDGv3CP27Udsx7

That's a rather heavily built up area.

Unsurprising given that it's the main street.

Too busy to overtake on main streets anyway, I was talking about quieter
roads.

You normally can't overtake on this one either.
https://goo.gl/maps/oUpaxRZ4X32eXbCh6

Those buggers must be reading my posts,
the streetview has just been updated, 18
months after the car was visible here.

But only on the main street, the rest of town is is still 11 years old.
The camera must have broken while zooming round town I spose because I
did see it where the street view hasn't been updated.

Maybe they're just behind schedule.

By 11 years ?

In fact when checking the dates I discovered something
I hadn't noticed previously, that some parts of town were
done in 2008 and some in 2010. No obvious reason for
that that its in the wilds of rural australia.

Who knows how many staff thy have or what other jobs they have to do.

That isnt the problem, it makes no sense to drive the long
distances to get to my town more often than you need to.

That pedestrian crossing is one of the speed bumps.

We have speed bumps with no warnings. Nothing painted on the road at
all,

We do too, but there are signs on poles before those.
All too new to be on the latest street view that only
covers a few of the main roads which don't have
speed bumps except down the main street.

The problem is the paint wears off in a few years, and they don't replace
it.

We do with the pedestrian crossings and we don't
paint the full width speed bumps in the first place.

or it's worn off. And some are three times the size of the others.

We only have the two types and only 3 lots of what
you call square ones, all on the one raceway road.

My council likes to use many many different types, presumably to catch us
unawares.

More likely to see which ones last longer.

Ambulances hate them,

Ours don't and a mate of mine is an ambulance driver.

but the council ignores their wishes too.

Because they realise that its only physical devices
like that that have any effect on fools like you.

There's a road near here with a 20mph limit.

We do have 40kmph limits outside schools but
the limit only applys for 90 minutes at the start
and end of the school day so no speed bumps.

Apparently the temporary 20 limits around schools here are only advisory.
I take great delight in going 30 past the speed camera they put there
during school lunchtimes.

Don't you have any permanent 20mph limits?

We do have a couple where there are sometimes
massive numbers of parked cars and kids going
from the parked cars, like here.
https://goo.gl/maps/6rPrL96KbnqDpM1s8

That now has a carpark and big collection of
exercise equipment right on the corner that
went in well after that street view.


We have them in about half the built up areas.

We don't have anything like but the all
those streets do have a 50kmph limit;.

All the bumps except one, you can go about 30-40. But that one is a
nasty
bugger, anything over 5mph and you scrape your car to pieces. It's
literally a foot high.

Show us the streetview.

https://goo.gl/maps/bWv8y7JTQQvCr5Kh8

That one isnt a foot high and you can see that by comparing it with the
curb.

It doesn't actually look violent from the camera, but I've gone over it at
20mph (the speed limit) and almost destroyed my car.

Don't believe that it almost destroyed your car.

It must be combination of the height and the width of it, at 20 your car
lifts up suddenly then drops again, the front bumper actually hits the
road.

In which model car ? Must be one of those steaming turd with wheels frog
cars.

Every the bump on the road is about three times less violent - which is
what makes that one so bad, you're not expecting it. I actually have to
go between 5 and 10 to get over it without nasty scraping noises.

Only because it's a steaming turd with wheels frog car.

I do catch the air dam on the front of the Getz
at this one unless I go thru it at about 20kmph.
As you can see ifs on the road down from the
hill and has quite a river down it in a deluge.


I can't understand how anyone with a Porsche etc (and it's a posh area
so there must be some) can get over it at all.

Not just a posh car, there isnt a foot clearance under the
Getz as I discovered, even the shortest bottle jacks don't fit.

Don't you have trouble with speedbumps?

Nope.

My Golf had been lowered by the previous owner,

At the front ?

I scraped the engine cover on every bump, even slowing to the limit. I
refused to go slower than the limit.

And that's why you ****ed it. Smart move.

I'd love to buy an expensive car, ground it on a bump, then get the
council to pay for the £1000s of damage.

The magistrate would tell you to go and ****
yourself in appropriately bureaucratic language.

They shouldn't. The council is criminally damaging cars.

Don't believe it with that one. And legally it isnt criminal damage.

If you cannot drive every single road legal car over a bump at the speed
limit, then the bump is wrongly designed.

Not possible check that all legal cars can get over
it at the speed limit and that's why the magistrate
will tell you to go and **** yourself.

Nobody gonna stop me overtaking in a built up area.

They will there when the car in front of you is in the middle
of the road and they always are. There isnt room to get past.

Why would someone be driving in the middle of the road?

Because that road isnt wide enough for two lanes of traffic.

What happens when someone comes the other way?

That's a fully divided road, the cars coming the
other way are on the other side of those cars
parked in the middle at right angles to the traffic.

Speeders like me ignore them and bounce over them.

And get to pay for the repairs to their cars.

Suspension is designed for that.

Wrong.

What do you think it's for?

Normal variations in the road surface.

It can handle much more than that.

Have fun explaining why potholes can **** it.

Never had suspension fail on a pothole.

You don't understand what potholes do
to shock absorbers. It doesn't snap off.

Only time I've replaced shock absorbers was when they snapped,

Because you are actually stupid enough to tear over
the speed bumps at twice the speed limit, on purpose.

and they were always old rusty ones.

That wasn't why they snapped.

The only time I've had to replace suspension was when it was old and
rusty. It can take quite a knock otherwise.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that
you are no mechanic. It has nothing to do with rust.

Its normally the shock absorbers that get ****ed by fools
like you deliberately slamming into the road bumps.

No, every time I've had a shock replaced, I've seen the old one and it
was
rusted to hell.

Rust on outside of a shock absorber is irrelevant.

I've never busted a relatively new one.

You have in fact ****ed them all by tearing across speed bumps.

No, they were clearly all old and rusted a long way through.

Must be the frog cars.

Even easier for you to work out which of your cats did it
given that even you don't actually have a hundred cats yet.

I use a camera and know what each cat looks like.

But dna is easier to do after the event. Its unlikely that you
will have the cat caught in the act of ****ing on the monitor.

The camera runs continuously and has motion detection, so it
doesn't
use
up the memory for a month.

Sure, but you are very unlikely to have the camera
pointing at where that cat chooses to ****.

They tend to choose favourite places.

Unlikely that particular cat did.

Why do you say that?

Because this is the only time its ****ed on that monitor.

No it isn't. It's just the only time it seeped into the LCD panel.

Wow! It's shrinking! I guess it hadn't peeled off the polarizer as I
thought.

Yeah, looks more like liquid between layers of plastic.

Odd that it makes the image completely black.

Presumably its where the **** is in electrical
contact with the lcd and stops them being
transparent to the backlight there.

That's why I thought it was the polarizer as someone else suggested.

Must just be damp and shorting something. It's drying out, it's going
away!

The cat will be along soon to **** on it again.

The camera is at the ready.

Why wasn't it at the ready when the cat ****ed on
it given that you say it has ****ed on it before ?

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:44:56 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:00:11 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 17:20:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...

The trouble with putting a tire on your car is it's not
distinguishable
from running out of energy.

Of course its distinguishable from the context.

It still makes you look like an American dumbass.

Only to fools like you.

I use proper English.

I couldn't care less what stupid poms claim is proper english.

Do you also say aloominum, erb, stoopid, stoodent?

Nope, and I say tire the same way you do too.

But I know how to spell it properly.

I know how you poms spell it and arent silly enough to spell it
that
way.

We invented the language.

Nope, you stole it from everyone else.

It's called English, because it's from England.

Wrong again, and it isnt from that soggy little
frigid island anyway, its stolen from all sorts
of places all over the world, even from the pakis.

We combined several languages

Had many fancy words imposed by those unspeakable
Normans with the worst of the grovellers to the Norman
invaders choosing to use norman words when english
already had perfectly serviceable words like **** and
arse and dick etc already.

We still use **** and arse and dick, what are you talking about?

and made the universal language that most of the world uses.

But had quite a bit of the world that used that language choose
to bin some of the sillier aspects of it and do their own.

Yeah the stoopid yanks ****ed everything up, they call solder sodder.
There is an L!

And you lot have always had plenty of unique regional words
that hardly any of the rest of england, let alone the rest of the
world had even heard of too.

And we laugh at those morons, specifically the Glaswegians.

That's the way living languages work.

Only the stupid frogs have ever been actually stupid enough
to have a handful of stuffed shirts proclaim what words can
and cannot be used and how they must be spelt.

France has regional dialects too. I met a bloke who said sink instead
of
sank (as in the number 5, cinq).

Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation,
because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot.

Only a few fools like you.

No, most people laugh at those who can't spell.

Try facebook and twitter sometime.

A quick note to somebody I can excuse.

IMO its mad to be wasting lots of time teaching
kids how to spell correctly with a language which
has stolen so many words from all sorts of foreign
languages. What matters is whether the meaning is
clear, not if every word is spelt correctly, particularly
with the more obscure stuff like its and it's etc.

But if you type whole sentences in an email or newsgroup post, I expect
something more adult.

More fool you. Doesn't matter if a facebook
post is telling a chest of drawers or says draws.

In spades when the bulk of the english speaking world
uses tires instead of tyres or color instead of colour.

Mind you I've recently closed my Facebook account,

More fool you. It still be best place to find cheap
or free stuff local people are getting rid of etc.

all it was full of is friends of friends of friends I've never heard of
posting photos of their MacDonalds meal.

Only one of my friends ever does that and facebook
is a convenient way to keep track of what those who
have moved away from this town are currently up to.

Waste of ****ing time. Anyone I actually want to know, I phone, email, or
speak to in person.

Plenty use messenger just as effectively
and plenty don't have an email.

And you don't get to see most who are getting
rid of what they don't need anymore without
the local facebook buy swap sell groups.

As for twitter, ****ty designed rubbish, no threads or anything, just
"tweets" which aren't related to any conversation.

The real world is about more than just conversations;

I don't personally use twitter because
I think the character limit is stupid.

Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

My energy doesn't have a tread or wear on just one side either.

Why should I have to work out which word you mean from context?

Its automatic for anyone who isnt brain dead.

Now make every word have two possibilities.

But its normally obvious from the context which is intended.

Just use the right one in the first place.

There is no right one. FAR more use tire instead of tyre.

You get to like that or lump it.

Only yanks use the wrong one.

Wrong, as always. Most whose
first language isnt english do too.

They have a lower IQ, look up the stats.

So do you hairy legged cross dressing haggis gorgers.

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is
garages
who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me
a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to
change
a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock
and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're
cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

Dunno given that I can't remember what it was.

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

If they keep stock of whatever they have ever been asked for,
that will obviously cost more than only keeping the most popular
tires in stock and ordering in the unusual ones as required. So they
will obviously be able to flog me the tires I use cheaper.

Or add the price onto the unusual ones only.

Not going to work when they never sell another of those.

Then they shouldn't buy another.

They need at least 4 of anything they might
sell because plenty change all 4 or 5 at once.

They should tell the owner of the weird car to buy a normal one.

Great way to get the customer to come back for their future tires.

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay.

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that.

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered
taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed
doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

But most don't know as little about cars as you do. Or dogs either.

Most people have no clue how to fix anything on a car.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and
they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts,
handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on
his
own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading
bodies,
and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

No luck involved.

It's a saying.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars,
it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over
time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW,

Same here.

that was reliable

Nothing like as reliable as the Getz which had no warranty claims what
so ever. The Golf did, and more than one as well. Important ones too.

But since my 73 Golf, things got much worse.

and cheap parts.

Yeah, but the Getz is even cheaper.

Never owned a Hyundai so I don't know what they're like. But if it
makes
me drive half the speed limit like the rest of the moronic owners around
here,

It doesn't. Only one of the garage salers
can keep up with me and she's dead now.

Why is it every Hyundai I've seen in the UK is driving very slowly?

Don't believe that and it certainly doesn't happen here.

They're like Rover and Volvo owners.

Doesn't happen with volvos here either.

Ours are mostly driven by what we call squatters,
the rich end of farmers and the don't crawl along
in their volvos.

no thanks!

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an
exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2),
then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both
things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something
very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street
verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and
bailing
up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious.

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still
on
the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog.

I have never been silly enough to walk any dog like that.

Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a
lead,
they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

I have enough of a clue to be selective about the breeds I have.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad
behaviour.

Not ****ing on things you havent. You'll
never train a male dog to never do that
when out walking not on a lead.

Or to not sniff things either.

If you kick it hard enough, it'll never do it again.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Try that with mine and you'd end up dead, quite literally.

So you don't have control over your own pet?

I'm not actually stupid enough to try kicking an immense
great alsatian that weighs almost as much as me.

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting?

Yep, do it regularly.

Only when they feel like it.

Nope, also when they know they will
be rewarded for doing that like with
the drug and currency sniffing dogs

Slave labour.

You are too.

They ought to rebel and refuse to hunt down people using naturally
occuring plants.

Currency isnt a naturally occurring plant, unfortunately.

And ****ting in the correct place?

Plenty of dogs do choose to do what they decide that
their master wants them to do. Cats don't work like that.

Mine do. 8 of my 9 cats now **** correctly.

Not when you tell them to.

Because I tell them to. They know if they do it in the wrong place I get
angry.

Hasn't stopped that cat ****ing on your monitor.

I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack
(you).

That's not why they fetch. They like chasing things and bring
it back so you can chuck it again and they can chase it again.

The stupid dogs fetch it then run off with it.

Nope, dogs don't do that.

I was at a friend's house the other day, I threw a toy across the room and
it picked it up. It wouldn't give it back to me. Or my friend. She said
it always does that.

Yeah, plenty of dogs operate like that, it's a game to them.

They do it with other dogs too, have a tug of war.

That's the way those drug and currency sniffer dogs
are rewarded, they get to have a tug of war with
the handler over a big sewn up cloth/canvas thing.

You have to train it to bring it to you.

Bull**** you do with the worst of them.

They bring it to you to get you to chuck it again.

Actually that's pretty stupid. They already possess the toy, why give it
to you so you can give it back?

It isnt the giving back, they enjoy chasing
it when you throw it and want you to
throw it more so they can chase it more.

I've even had dogs at garage sales do it, bring
you something they want you to chuck for them.

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

Nope, they arent into getting humans to chuck
something so they can bring it back endlessly.

Because they don't see the point. I don't either, I wouldn't enjoy
throwing something for my dog over and over again.

Irrelevant to why dogs like to do that.

Why do they like it?

They like chasing things. Cats like tormenting small things like mice.

Some of them do bring you a present of something
they have killed. Dogs don't do that instinctively.

A couple of mine did that twice each. They won't do it again.

Because you are a psychopath.

No, I prefer to not have local wildlife murdered.

All you are doing is stopping them bring the corpse
to you as a gift. They still murder the wildlife.

They get food out of a tin, they don't need to kill birds.

But they enjoy doing that anyway.

FLUSH another 601 !!! Lines of the Two Abnormal Sociopathic Idiots' Latest Absolutely Idiotic Bullshit!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 10:54:01 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH another load of the two abnormal sociopathic cretins' latest
TROLL**** unread

....and much better air in here again!

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rot: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rot: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rot Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rot Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore,Strikes, AGAIN!
 

Bob F wrote on 7/05/2019 7:28 AM:
On 5/6/2019 2:44 AM, Daniel60 wrote:
Peeler wrote on 6/05/2019 2:51 AM:
On Mon, 6 May 2019 00:03:19 +1000, Daniel60, another obviously mentally
challenged idiot, blathered:


Well, you senile asshole are obviously incapable of doing it even
ONE WAY!
BG

Gee Whiz!! I've made two (count them TWO) responses to you and you've
determined I'm a 'senile asshole'!!

Quick to make judgements or what??

Quick to distract from the fact that you ARE obviously incapable of
understanding what "FLUSH" means, aren't you? It IS indicative of your
senility. tsk

No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!

Keep trying. Maybe YOU can be the first person in history to get a
reasonable answer from the troll clown.

No, he's beaten me down!!

Plonk Peeler!!
--
Daniel

CAUTION!!! Birdbrain, the Abnormal Pathological Attention Whore, Strikes, AGAIN!
 

On Tue, 7 May 2019 19:52:27 +1000, Daniel60 wrote:


No 'distraction', just trying to ascertain why you might think I'm a
'senile asshole' after just two (count them TWO) posts!!

Keep trying. Maybe YOU can be the first person in history to get a
reasonable answer from the troll clown.

No, he's beaten me down!!

Plonk Peeler!!

LOL Hilarious!

Circles on water damaged monitor?
 

On Tue, 07 May 2019 02:49:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:44:56 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 20:00:11 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 06 May 2019 00:35:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 May 2019 19:08:24 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
Why copy a yank instead of a Brit?

I don't copy anyone. I do what makes sense.

That's why I don't fart around with ies and use ys instead.

I am logical with some words. I say and write pronounciation,
because
it
comes from pronounce, not pronunce.

I couldn't care less where it comes from.

What matters is whether the individual reading it knows what I
am referring to, and they do when I spell it tire, from the context.

They also think you're a ****ing idiot.

Only a few fools like you.

No, most people laugh at those who can't spell.

Try facebook and twitter sometime.

A quick note to somebody I can excuse.

IMO its mad to be wasting lots of time teaching
kids how to spell correctly with a language which
has stolen so many words from all sorts of foreign
languages. What matters is whether the meaning is
clear, not if every word is spelt correctly, particularly
with the more obscure stuff like its and it's etc.

I agree on its and it's. In fact I often deliberately write it's if something belongs to it.

Oh and spelt instead of spelled too. Why have more than one past tense?

But if you type whole sentences in an email or newsgroup post, I expect
something more adult.

More fool you. Doesn't matter if a facebook
post is telling a chest of drawers or says draws.

Every so often you get ambiguousness.

In spades when the bulk of the english speaking world
uses tires instead of tyres or color instead of colour.

No, only the stoopid yanks.

Mind you I've recently closed my Facebook account,

More fool you. It still be best place to find cheap
or free stuff local people are getting rid of etc.

No, I get free and cheap local big stuff on freecycle, freegle, and gumtree. Smaller things I get on Ebay. Facebook just isn't designed for selling, it's a chatroom.

all it was full of is friends of friends of friends I've never heard of
posting photos of their MacDonalds meal.

Only one of my friends ever does that and facebook
is a convenient way to keep track of what those who
have moved away from this town are currently up to.

Can't you communicate with them directly? I talk to my friends by email and phone.

Waste of ****ing time. Anyone I actually want to know, I phone, email, or
speak to in person.

Plenty use messenger just as effectively
and plenty don't have an email.

Everybody has email, apart from those not on the internet at all.

As for twitter, ****ty designed rubbish, no threads or anything, just
"tweets" which aren't related to any conversation.

The real world is about more than just conversations;

What's the point in a tweet without a reply?

I don't personally use twitter because
I think the character limit is stupid.

Agreed on that.

Did you run out of energy when changing the wheel?

My energy doesn't have a tread or wear on just one side either.

Why should I have to work out which word you mean from context?

Its automatic for anyone who isnt brain dead.

Now make every word have two possibilities.

But its normally obvious from the context which is intended.

All of what you've written in this thread is perfectly intelligible. You're not making an arse of your spelling like most Facebook users do.

Just use the right one in the first place.

There is no right one. FAR more use tire instead of tyre.

You get to like that or lump it.

Only yanks use the wrong one.

Wrong, as always. Most whose
first language isnt english do too.

They have a lower IQ, look up the stats.

So do you hairy legged cross dressing haggis gorgers.

Only if you include Glasgow. Someone please bomb it.

was wearing on one side and so needed to
be replaced sooner than it would otherwise need to be.

The alignment was well out and I don't get that effect
anymore now that the alignment has been fixed.

Ah, fair enough, I did that once too. What annoys me is
garages
who
seem
to think it should be done every time you replace a tyre.

I've never had one do that but I mostly use the cheapest tire
specialist
when I need a new tire.

The one that wanted to align it was Kwik Fit. They also sold me
a
brand
new battery which registered 4 volts, and didn't know how to
change
a
brake calliper (we only do the pads mate).

Clearly an operation best avoided.

Most garages are best avoided.

I havent found that with any of them, but then I do almost
all of the work myself and only get stuff like the tires done
for free because I don't have the equipment to do a proper
dynamic balance or wheel alignment myself and can't
justify the cost of that equipment when I need stuff like a
wheel alignment so rarely. Just the once in 60 years in fact.
And it costs peanuts to get it done by a pro who knows
what he is doing and did a brilliant job. Cost just $66 and
he identified why I was getting a significant wheel tramp
at a particular speed which neither me or my mate who is
also an excellent mechanic didn't realise what the cause was.

I often went to SMS for tyres, since they have every size in stock
and
fit
it while you wait without booking, just turn up, and they're
cheap.

Same with the operation I use except I did notice that one customer
had to have their tires ordered. Dunno how common that is with
them. Cant even remember what those tires were for.

That can happen with sporty BMWs with unusual tyres.

I don't recall it was one of those, one of the smaller
asian things that someone had got for his daughter
and she turned her nose up at and signed up for a new
car just after starting her first job with a bank loan.

The point is, is it a rare car for that area?

Dunno given that I can't remember what it was.

But if you have a car many others have, hey should be in stock.

Mine have always been and most of the time others have
showed up while I was there, theirs has been in stock too.
Not always tho. I don't care if they don't have some in stock
and so can charge lower prices for the common tires like mine.

How do those things link together?

If they keep stock of whatever they have ever been asked for,
that will obviously cost more than only keeping the most popular
tires in stock and ordering in the unusual ones as required. So they
will obviously be able to flog me the tires I use cheaper.

Or add the price onto the unusual ones only.

Not going to work when they never sell another of those.

Then they shouldn't buy another.

They need at least 4 of anything they might
sell because plenty change all 4 or 5 at once.

They don't all wear out at once. I change one at a time.

They should tell the owner of the weird car to buy a normal one.

Great way to get the customer to come back for their future tires.

Who cares about someone who has different tyres to everyone else?

One day I got them to fix my brakes - they charged me £93
(before labour) for a calliper I could have got for £30 on Ebay.

So you should have checked that before you got them to do that..

At that time the car was almost undriveable, I couldn't be bothered
taking
it back home and in again.

And you know so little about cars that you didn't know what needed
doing.

Not everyone knows everything.

But most don't know as little about cars as you do. Or dogs either..

Most people have no clue how to fix anything on a car.

Another garage, Farmer's Autocare, I took the car for an MOT, and
they
gave me a list of what needed doing. I bought all the parts,
handed
them to the guy, and he refused to fit them, he wanted markup on
his
own
parts. I called them cowboys, reported them to a few trading
bodies,
and
went to Foz Sports, who did the work without question.

We fit them ourselves.

I'm a **** mechanic. I've never even replaced a brake.

I've done a lot more than that, including wheel bearings.

Lucky you.

No luck involved.

It's a saying.

That mate of mine has just bought a Merc C180 for
just $1500 which had a bit of miss in the engine and
got the non genuine part needed to fix it for peanuts.

But after what Clare and 'Arlen' have said about high end kraut cars,
it
will be interesting to see what else ends up needing fixing over
time.

Him and his son had previously had 3 Hyundai Grandeurs
that also cost them peanuts and ended up with 2 good ones
and have cost them nothing because they have sold what
parts they didn't need themselves of the third on ebay etc.

Only German car I've had was VW,

Same here.

that was reliable

Nothing like as reliable as the Getz which had no warranty claims what
so ever. The Golf did, and more than one as well. Important ones too.

But since my 73 Golf, things got much worse.

and cheap parts.

Yeah, but the Getz is even cheaper.

Never owned a Hyundai so I don't know what they're like. But if it
makes
me drive half the speed limit like the rest of the moronic owners around
here,

It doesn't. Only one of the garage salers
can keep up with me and she's dead now.

Why is it every Hyundai I've seen in the UK is driving very slowly?

Don't believe that and it certainly doesn't happen here.

It certainly does here. It's the sort of attitude some people have. They buy cars which are good value, and also adhere to rules like speed limits. People like me who drive fast tend to either drive sports cars or old bangers.

They're like Rover and Volvo owners.

Doesn't happen with volvos here either.

Ours are mostly driven by what we call squatters,
the rich end of farmers and the don't crawl along
in their volvos.

Rich farmers here drive Range Rovers, and yes they go fast.

no thanks!

I go to Foz all the time now, the last visit, he replaced an
exhaust
bracket (£3.50) and topped up the gearbox oil (a litre for £2),
then
only charged me half an hour labour on top of that for both
things.

came across a big alsatian out on its own doing something
very
similarly with most of the trees and gates on the street
verge,
and going right down the driveway of some houses and
bailing
up
the dog behind the gate at the end of the drive. Hilarious.

What annoys me is when people allow their dogs (while still
on
the
lead!)
to **** on people's property.

You've clearly never walked a dog on a lead.
There is no way to stop that dog behaviour.

You pull the dog away from where it's ****ing.

Doesn't stop it ****ing on the next one.

Pull it again, if it continues, kick it.

Doesn't stop it, psychopath.

They prefer not to get beaten.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Any animal or human will avoid what makes it be punished.

I'm not actually stupid enough to have a
dog on a lead when out walking with a dog.

Then I guess you have a well behaved dog.

I have never been silly enough to walk any dog like that.

Some dogs are so ****ing stupid that if you take them out without a
lead,
they attack, maim, injure, or kill other dogs.

I have enough of a clue to be selective about the breeds I have.

Why do you think people smack their kids?

Dogs work differently to kids.

No, they learn just like us.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had one.

I know many people with dogs and have seen them train out bad
behaviour.

Not ****ing on things you havent. You'll
never train a male dog to never do that
when out walking not on a lead.

Or to not sniff things either.

If you kick it hard enough, it'll never do it again.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you have never had a dog.

Try that with mine and you'd end up dead, quite literally.

So you don't have control over your own pet?

I'm not actually stupid enough to try kicking an immense
great alsatian that weighs almost as much as me.

Why did you buy a pet you cannot control?

Why do you think you can make them sit, fetch, etc?

Because they like doing it with fetching.

And they like sitting?

Yep, do it regularly.

Only when they feel like it.

Nope, also when they know they will
be rewarded for doing that like with
the drug and currency sniffing dogs

Slave labour.

You are too.

I am nobody's slave.

They ought to rebel and refuse to hunt down people using naturally
occuring plants.

Currency isnt a naturally occurring plant, unfortunately.

I was clearly referring to the drugs. And you tell me to use context.....

And ****ting in the correct place?

Plenty of dogs do choose to do what they decide that
their master wants them to do. Cats don't work like that.

Mine do. 8 of my 9 cats now **** correctly.

Not when you tell them to.

Because I tell them to. They know if they do it in the wrong place I get
angry.

Hasn't stopped that cat ****ing on your monitor.

I've never told it not to. It no longer goes where I've told it not to.

I doubt it. They do it because it pleases the leader of the pack
(you).

That's not why they fetch. They like chasing things and bring
it back so you can chuck it again and they can chase it again.

The stupid dogs fetch it then run off with it.

Nope, dogs don't do that.

I was at a friend's house the other day, I threw a toy across the room and
it picked it up. It wouldn't give it back to me. Or my friend. She said
it always does that.

Yeah, plenty of dogs operate like that, it's a game to them.

They do it with other dogs too, have a tug of war.

That's the way those drug and currency sniffer dogs
are rewarded, they get to have a tug of war with
the handler over a big sewn up cloth/canvas thing.

I wonder what the IQ of a dog is. I just saw one on Youtube try TEN times to get a long stick through a narrow doorway sideways.

You have to train it to bring it to you.

Bull**** you do with the worst of them.

They bring it to you to get you to chuck it again.

Actually that's pretty stupid. They already possess the toy, why give it
to you so you can give it back?

It isnt the giving back, they enjoy chasing
it when you throw it and want you to
throw it more so they can chase it more.

Chasing an inanimate object is almost as stupid as when they chase their own tails.

I've even had dogs at garage sales do it, bring
you something they want you to chuck for them.

And can't teach a cat to fetch, for a reason.

Lack of dexterity.

Nope, they arent into getting humans to chuck
something so they can bring it back endlessly.

Because they don't see the point. I don't either, I wouldn't enjoy
throwing something for my dog over and over again.

Irrelevant to why dogs like to do that.

Why do they like it?

They like chasing things. Cats like tormenting small things like mice.

Indeed: https://youtu.be/-TB0AMkEtk0

That was filmed a while ago, she's just given birth to 5 kittens.

Some of them do bring you a present of something
they have killed. Dogs don't do that instinctively.

A couple of mine did that twice each. They won't do it again.

Because you are a psychopath.

No, I prefer to not have local wildlife murdered.

All you are doing is stopping them bring the corpse
to you as a gift. They still murder the wildlife.

No they don't, as they can't be bothered eating it with feathers on, they prefer prepared meat.

They get food out of a tin, they don't need to kill birds.

But they enjoy doing that anyway.

No, they do it because they think they're giving me raw materials to make the catfood.