Charlie Gard: New York hospital agrees to admit stricken infant
 

On 11/07/2017 10:20, abelard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:11:48 +0100, The Todal
wrote:

On 10/07/2017 23:19, Fredxxx wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:52, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:38, The Todal wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:34, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 21:50, The Todal wrote:

The parents have stated that if the money isn't used it will be
given to
charity. Even if Charlie lives he will be heavily disabled so the
money
will be needed.

Personally they can do what they want with my donation. Go to the
pub'
with it if that makes them feel better.


Oh yes? Do you feel the same about the donations to the campaign to
find Madeleine McCann? Betcha you don't.


No because I believe the child is dead and that her parents know why
she is dead.

The two parents are simpletons and I no longer have any sympathy for
them.

Perhaps if your own child was sick you would be under almighty
pressure too?


If my child was sick I'd take medical advice and I'd understand it.
The two parents seem to have convinced themselves that this seriously
brain-damaged baby has a chance of living a worthwhile life and that
their moral obligation is to keep applying to the court. They have
disrespected the doctors and the hospital and have shamelessly drummed
up public support from the gullible and superstitious. Selfish and
irresponsible.

You really are a piece of **** aren't you?

Why?

Do you enjoy watching children suffer?

Would you advocate withdrawal of the morphine painkiller he's on?


It seems that most of the nation enjoys emoting in sympathy with these
rude, manipulative parents. At one time I felt sorry for them. But now
they are simply acting like spoiled brats.

When the hospitals lawyer, Katie Gollop QC, was speaking, Gard, 33,
shouted: €œWhen are you going to stop lying?€�

Earlier, the judge rejected a suggestion by a lawyer representing the
babys parents that he should remove himself from the case.

At the high court on Monday, Grant Armstrong suggested Franciss
previous ruling against the parents in April raised questions about his
capability to hear the latest case fairly.

A statement on behalf of the hospital read in court said the legal
proceedings had not only placed €œextreme strain and stress on those that
are treating him€�

then let those who will treat him be allowed to relieve their 'strain'

but has been €œdesperately unfair to Charlie€�.

did the child say that it is 'unfair'/

if the child is brain dead, where is the problem?

The child is not 'brain dead' he has a developmental problem.
There is an outside chance that like a Newt grows back a lost limb
the child's brain may rejuvenate with the US treatment. Would you take
such a slim chance on life were it your child?

Charlie Gard: New York hospital agrees to admit stricken infant
 

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 4:16:12 PM UTC-4, Graham T wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:20, abelard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:11:48 +0100, The Todal
wrote:

On 10/07/2017 23:19, Fredxxx wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:52, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:38, The Todal wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:34, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 21:50, The Todal wrote:

The parents have stated that if the money isn't used it will be
given to
charity. Even if Charlie lives he will be heavily disabled so the
money
will be needed.

Personally they can do what they want with my donation. Go to the
pub'
with it if that makes them feel better.


Oh yes? Do you feel the same about the donations to the campaign to
find Madeleine McCann? Betcha you don't.


No because I believe the child is dead and that her parents know why
she is dead.

The two parents are simpletons and I no longer have any sympathy for
them.

Perhaps if your own child was sick you would be under almighty
pressure too?


If my child was sick I'd take medical advice and I'd understand it.
The two parents seem to have convinced themselves that this seriously
brain-damaged baby has a chance of living a worthwhile life and that
their moral obligation is to keep applying to the court. They have
disrespected the doctors and the hospital and have shamelessly drummed
up public support from the gullible and superstitious. Selfish and
irresponsible.

You really are a piece of **** aren't you?

Why?

Do you enjoy watching children suffer?

Would you advocate withdrawal of the morphine painkiller he's on?


It seems that most of the nation enjoys emoting in sympathy with these
rude, manipulative parents. At one time I felt sorry for them. But now
they are simply acting like spoiled brats.

When the hospitals lawyer, Katie Gollop QC, was speaking, Gard, 33,
shouted: €œWhen are you going to stop lying?€�

Earlier, the judge rejected a suggestion by a lawyer representing the
babys parents that he should remove himself from the case.

At the high court on Monday, Grant Armstrong suggested Franciss
previous ruling against the parents in April raised questions about his
capability to hear the latest case fairly.

A statement on behalf of the hospital read in court said the legal
proceedings had not only placed €œextreme strain and stress on those that
are treating him€�

then let those who will treat him be allowed to relieve their 'strain'

but has been €œdesperately unfair to Charlie€�.

did the child say that it is 'unfair'/

if the child is brain dead, where is the problem?

The child is not 'brain dead' he has a developmental problem.

One that has advanced to the point that he has no quality of life
and never will.


There is an outside chance that like a Newt grows back a lost limb
the child's brain may rejuvenate with the US treatment. Would you take
such a slim chance on life were it your child?

Can you show us even one case where a child with the same disease
has recovered? Meanwhile the child is suffering from seizures.
You brought up that the infant is not brain dead. Well the same
"outside chance" applies to a brain dead infant too, people could
argue that there is a rare chance that one day it can recover.
So, should those be kept perpetually alive too? If it were my
child, I would accept facts and let the infant die as peacefully
as possible, not perform a medical experiment.

Charlie Gard: New York hospital agrees to admit stricken infant
 

On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 5:29:05 PM UTC-5, trader_4 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 4:16:12 PM UTC-4, Graham T wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:20, abelard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:11:48 +0100, The Todal
wrote:

On 10/07/2017 23:19, Fredxxx wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:52, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:38, The Todal wrote:
On 10/07/2017 22:34, Ted wrote:
On 10/07/2017 21:50, The Todal wrote:

The parents have stated that if the money isn't used it will be
given to
charity. Even if Charlie lives he will be heavily disabled so the
money
will be needed.

Personally they can do what they want with my donation. Go to the
pub'
with it if that makes them feel better.


Oh yes? Do you feel the same about the donations to the campaign to
find Madeleine McCann? Betcha you don't.


No because I believe the child is dead and that her parents know why
she is dead.

The two parents are simpletons and I no longer have any sympathy for
them.

Perhaps if your own child was sick you would be under almighty
pressure too?


If my child was sick I'd take medical advice and I'd understand it.