|
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
|
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:15:20 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL ...as if you're an expert...most of the regular volume posters here are "groupers", Mr. Loser! |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:15:20 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL ..as if you're an expert...most of the regular volume posters here are "groupers", Mr. Loser! Negative google grouper. Get your own computer and connection than you can weigh in |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 10:09:36 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:15:20 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL ..as if you're an expert...most of the regular volume posters here are "groupers", Mr. Loser! Negative google grouper. Get your own computer and connection than you can weigh in Typical...you're ignoring my point..and it would be "then" and not "than"! Loser. |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
burfordTjustice writes:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:15:20 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL ..as if you're an expert...most of the regular volume posters here are "groupers", Mr. Loser! Negative google grouper. Get your own computer and connection than you can weigh in So, you're unable to refute the facts, so you attack the poster. Learn latin, specifically the phrase "Ad Hominem". |
Majority of snap polls show Trump won debate by a landslide
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 2:23:33 PM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:34:52 GMT (Scott Lurndal) wrote: burfordTjustice writes: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 8:15:20 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:51:27 -0700 (PDT) bob_villa wrote: On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 7:42:59 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html 8 out of 10 polls say otherwise...you pick only what supports your views. Spamming POS that you are! as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL ..as if you're an expert...most of the regular volume posters here are "groupers", Mr. Loser! Negative google grouper. Get your own computer and connection than you can weigh in So, you're unable to refute the facts, so you attack the poster. Learn latin, specifically the phrase "Ad Hominem". Fact: as a rookie google grouper you are not fit to judge.....LOL Fact: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...landslide.html Now go back to the basement before daddy knocks you around again "Fact" #1 is your judgement...therefore *NOT* a fact. "Fact" #2 is only as good as your source...therefore *NOT* a fact. The only fact is...you're a bogus, invading spammer in the group and a plague to the common good that resides here. GFY! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter