DIYbanter

DIYbanter (https://www.diybanter.com/)
-   Home Repair (https://www.diybanter.com/home-repair/)
-   -   The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions (https://www.diybanter.com/home-repair/392734-world-through-pink-colored-glasses-wikipedia%E2%80%99s-leftist-editorial-distortions.html)

burfordTjustice March 30th 16 12:36 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/

Mr. Man-wai Chang March 30th 16 12:48 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On 30/03/2016 7:36 PM, burfordTjustice wrote:
https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/


Don't bother to read it... in the end, it's about throwing stones! :)

--
@~@ Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23) Linux 4.4.6-300.fc23.x86_64
^ ^ 19:33:01 up 3 days 16:57 0 users load average: 1.00 1.02 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

bob_villain March 30th 16 01:55 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedia's LeftistEditorial Distortions
 
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 6:36:09 AM UTC-5, burfordTjustice wrote:
https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/


....you cross-posting POS! *︵*凸

Shadow March 30th 16 02:33 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:36:06 -0400, burfordTjustice
wrote:

https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/


//Most SurvivalBlog readers have noticed that I refer to Wikipedia as
LeftistAgendapedia. I do so for good reason, as a I will explain in
this essay.

Because it has mostly attracted editors (called Wikipedians) from
academia, Wikipedia soon developed a strong leftist and anti-Christian
bias.//

(rest of the article was why he should have his own Wiki page)

Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.
[]'s

PS Most of the Wikipedia pages about Brazilian politics is
done by specialized companies, hired by our megacorps. There is very
little fact in what's there. If you look at the pt Wiki version of the
pages, the distance from reality is even greater. Convicted criminals
appear as "saints".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Maluf
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Maluf
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

rbowman March 30th 16 02:59 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On 03/30/2016 07:33 AM, Shadow wrote:
Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.


http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

Shadow March 30th 16 04:07 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:59:32 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

On 03/30/2016 07:33 AM, Shadow wrote:
Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.


http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page


LOL

I read the article about Atheism, and why it makes you fat.
You see, there are fat people in China, and they are atheists,
so ...................

Cannabis:
"In the past two decades, the number of brain tumors has
increased by up to 40% in the U.S. and Europe, particularly among men
between ages of 20 and 40". Even though the consumption of cannabis
has decreased, this PROVES it causes brain cancers. There is a list of
side effect: mass killings,violent fits, and almost as much cancer as
tobacco (which is defined as GOOD) etc

I've bookmarked the page, for when I run out of Monty Python
videos. I'll read the article on Donald Trump when I'm really
depressed.....
TY
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Uncle Monster[_2_] March 30th 16 04:59 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedia's LeftistEditorial Distortions
 
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:59:30 AM UTC-5, rbowman wrote:
On 03/30/2016 07:33 AM, Shadow wrote:
Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.


http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page


I think I had that link before but I saved it again because I like ALL different points of view so I can filter out the male bovine droppings. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle View Monster

Colonel Edmund J. Burke[_16_] March 30th 16 06:30 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On 3/30/2016 6:33 AM, Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:36:06 -0400, burfordTjustice
wrote:

https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/


//Most SurvivalBlog readers have noticed that I refer to Wikipedia as
LeftistAgendapedia. I do so for good reason, as a I will explain in
this essay.

Because it has mostly attracted editors (called Wikipedians) from
academia, Wikipedia soon developed a strong leftist and anti-Christian
bias.//

(rest of the article was why he should have his own Wiki page)

Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.
[]'s

PS Most of the Wikipedia pages about Brazilian politics is
done by specialized companies, hired by our megacorps. There is very
little fact in what's there. If you look at the pt Wiki version of the
pages, the distance from reality is even greater. Convicted criminals
appear as "saints".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Maluf
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Maluf

https://a4-images.myspacecdn.com/ima...71/300x300.jpg

john[_23_] March 30th 16 09:22 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedia's Leftist Editorial Distortions
 

"Shadow" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:59:32 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

On 03/30/2016 07:33 AM, Shadow wrote:
Quite right. Just because they are incapable of thinking,
there is NO reason why right wingers should NOT have their own
RightistAgendaPedia. They could even hire "academia" to do the writing
for them. That's what all the inheritance money was for.


http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page


LOL

I read the article about Atheism, and why it makes you fat.
You see, there are fat people in China, and they are atheists,
so ...................

Cannabis:
"In the past two decades, the number of brain tumors has
increased by up to 40% in the U.S. and Europe, particularly among men
between ages of 20 and 40". Even though the consumption of cannabis
has decreased, this PROVES it causes brain cancers. There is a list of
side effect: mass killings,violent fits, and almost as much cancer as
tobacco (which is defined as GOOD) etc

I've bookmarked the page, for when I run out of Monty Python
videos. I'll read the article on Donald Trump when I'm really
depressed.....
TY
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012


That is hysterical!



dvus March 31st 16 12:38 PM

The World Through Pink-Colored Glasses: Wikipedias Leftist Editorial Distortions
 
On 3/30/2016 7:48 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 30/03/2016 7:36 PM, burfordTjustice wrote:


https://survivalblog.com/the-world-t...l-distortions/


Don't bother to read it... in the end, it's about throwing stones! :)


Typical leftist response to anyone who writes articles that disagree
with them. Either delete it or advise people not to read it. It must
kill liberals that they can't delete Usenet posts that don't agree with
their liberal philosophy.

--
dvus


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 DIYbanter