CFL current profile.
I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at
the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly |
CFL current profile.
wrote in message ... I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. |
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:45:22 -0500, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory |
CFL current profile.
On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 10:02:52 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:45:22 -0500, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: wrote in message .. . I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory How much of a techie/geek can you be...with an AOL account? 💤 |
CFL current profile.
Ralph Mowery wrote:
wrote in message ... I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly What is the time division on the display? relay reaction time is in the msecs. It is safe to say that loads have inductive reactance value causing the spike like that. I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. |
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:06:35 -0800 (PST)
bob_villain wrote: On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 10:02:52 AM UTC-6, wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:45:22 -0500, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: wrote in message .. . I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory How much of a techie/geek can you be...with an AOL account? 💤 Better than anyone with a Gmail account...Damn Man! |
CFL current profile.
On 11/26/2015 8:45 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
wrote in message ... I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. That was a great 'scope! I lugged one around the country at my first job. Wouldn't enjoy doing that nowadays, though! : Presently using a rescued TDS754D -- for the few occasions when I actually need a 'scope. |
CFL current profile.
On 11/26/2015 9:18 AM, Tony Hwang wrote:
Ralph Mowery wrote: wrote in message ... I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly What is the time division on the display? Should be pretty obvious -- current repeats with a periodicity that tracks (rectified) line frequency. So, 8.3ms between repetitions... relay reaction time is in the msecs. You're not concerned with the actuation/release time (except if you try to synchronize it with a certain point on the waveform (e.g., to deliberately avoid these spikes which are roughly coincident with voltage peak). You're more concerned with how long the contacts bounce as they make/break -- especially when opening the connection (cuz current is flowing and will want to maintain an arc across the widening gap -- contacts melt) It is safe to say that loads have inductive reactance value causing the spike like that. I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. |
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:06:35 -0800 (PST), bob_villain
wrote: On Thursday, November 26, 2015 at 10:02:52 AM UTC-6, wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:45:22 -0500, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: wrote in message .. . I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory How much of a techie/geek can you be...with an AOL account? ? I have had it since AOL started, long before anyone even knew what the internet was. (Prodigy before that) Right now I like it for my public Email address because I run AOL7 and those nasty script based attacks simply pop up a gray error box. |
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:18:05 -0700, Tony Hwang
wrote: What is the time division on the display? relay reaction time is in the msecs. It is safe to say that loads have inductive reactance value causing the spike like that. That is just looking at the input capacitor(s) charging. The signal is 60hz and I knocked it out of calibration to get the best photo. |
CFL current profile.
wrote in message ... I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory I looked on ebay and they are around $ 200 used. I doubt that I will get one, Just don't think I would use one enough to justify the price. I will keep an eye out for one at fleamarkets. |
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:06:12 -0700, Don Y
wrote: On 11/25/2015 11:51 PM, wrote: I put a 75w equivalent CFL on a scope with a current probe, looking at the wave form. This is what it looks like http://gfretwell.com/electrical/CFL%...0a%20scope.jpg Those spikes are almost 2 amps so this might average 33w but it is not that simple. I assume this is also a very reactive load so if you opened a relay at or near peak, it could get pretty ugly I suspect they are roughly coincident with the peak (slightly leading) of the voltage waveform. So, apparent power is much higher (2A @ ~80+V?) The problem with relay drives is you can't readily predict how long it will take for the contacts to open. So, you can't realistically try to open it near a zero crossing (or, ANYWHERE that is "away from" the peak of the cycle and the peak current draw/power consumption). Likewise, unless it's a Hg-wetted relay, you can't tell how long the contacts will *bounce* when making. And, of course, if you're making consumer kit, you're usually quick to trade off *any* sorts of real "specifications" for a few micropennies! "field engineering" would say use a big honking relay rated for DC. Do you have access to a DSO? If so, you might try catching the turn-on transient to see what a discharged primary cap looks like to the line! I might be able to catch it with the mask and an open shutter. I am just not sure I care that much |
CFL current profile.
|
CFL current profile.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:29:38 -0500, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote: wrote in message .. . I have the B version of that scope. What are you using for the current probe ? I may want to look into getting one. Tektronix P6019 with the attenuator accessory I looked on ebay and they are around $ 200 used. I doubt that I will get one, Just don't think I would use one enough to justify the price. I will keep an eye out for one at fleamarkets. I have a clamp on accessory for my Fluke meter that works as well but you can't really trust the calibration as much, although the scope has not been calibrated since the Clinton administration. It used to be on a regular schedule when we were ISO 2000/1. I got it as a present when I retired, along with my 453 Tek and a bunch of other test equipment that nobody who stayed, knew how to use. One of my favorites is the Dranitz 626 line monitor. You don't need it much but when you do, there is not much else that will work. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter