|
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Stalin would be proud.
What a farce of a country you have become. A nation of sheep. ================================================== === Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones http://www.infowars.com/almost-half-...llance-drones/ Infowars.com Sept 28, 2012 Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically. According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. Only 36 percent said that they “strongly oppose” or “somewhat oppose” police use of drones, according to the survey. The poll also found that only one third of Americans say they are significantly concerned about their privacy being eroded by the adoption of drones by police forces throughout the country. Thrity-five percent of respondents said they were “extremely concerned” or “very concerned” when asked if they believed that police departments’ use of drones for surveillance would impact their privacy. Almost exactly the same number, 36 percent, noted that they were “not too concerned” or “not concerned at all”, while twenty-four percent were neutral on the issue, saying they were only “somewhat concerned” about a potential loss of privacy. FAA documents recently obtained and released by the Electronic Frontier Foundation have confirmed that the roll out of domestic unmanned drones will, for the most part, be focused solely on the mass surveillance of the American people. Furthermore, thousands of pages of FAA experimental drone flight records that were obtained by the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) detail just how complicated and risky it would be to operate thousands of unmanned arial vehicles safely without spending billions of dollars. Following intense lobbying, almost exclusively by defense contractors, Congress recently passed legislation paving the way for what the FAA predicts will be somewhere in the region of 30,000 drones in operation in US skies by 2020. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Bill wrote:
According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. When you give someone in authority (like police) a hammer, pretty soon everything starts to look like a nail. Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Tell that to ... AAI Corporation Advanced Technologies and Engineering (ATE) Aeronautics Defense Systems AeroVironment Aerovision Alenia Aeronautica American Dynamics Flight Systems Aurora Flight Sciences BAE Systems Baykar Machine Bell Helicopter Blue Bird Aero Systems Boeing Defence, Space & Security Cassidian Cyberflight Dassault Aviation Denel Aerospace Systems DRS Technologies EMT Flight Solutions Flying Robots General Atomics Aeronautical Systems General Dynamics Gulfstream Aerospace Hydra Technologies Innocon Insitu Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) Kaman Aerospace Corporation Korea Aerospace Industries L3 BAI Aerosystems Lockheed Martin Microdrones Mission Technologies (MiTex) MMIST Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems Patria Systems Pioneer UAV Prioria Proxy Qinetiq Rafael Raytheon Rheinmetall Defence Electronics Ruag Aerospace - Aviation & Space Saab Aerosystems Sagem Défense Sécurité Schiebel Selex Galileo Singapore Technologies Aerospace (ST Aerospace) Swift Engineering Swiss UAV Thales Ucon System United States Naval Research Laboratory Urban Aeronautics Warrior (Aero-Marine) Yamaha Motor Company Zala Aero |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
|
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Another thought on this. A danger to other aircraft??? I don't know if there
is any avoidance control. WW "Major Drone" wrote in message ... Stalin would be proud. What a farce of a country you have become. A nation of sheep. ================================================== === Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones http://www.infowars.com/almost-half-...llance-drones/ Infowars.com Sept 28, 2012 Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically. According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. Only 36 percent said that they €śstrongly oppose€ť or €śsomewhat oppose€ť police use of drones, according to the survey. The poll also found that only one third of Americans say they are significantly concerned about their privacy being eroded by the adoption of drones by police forces throughout the country. Thrity-five percent of respondents said they were €śextremely concerned€ť or €śvery concerned€ť when asked if they believed that police departments use of drones for surveillance would impact their privacy. Almost exactly the same number, 36 percent, noted that they were €śnot too concerned€ť or €śnot concerned at all€ť, while twenty-four percent were neutral on the issue, saying they were only €śsomewhat concerned€ť about a potential loss of privacy. FAA documents recently obtained and released by the Electronic Frontier Foundation have confirmed that the roll out of domestic unmanned drones will, for the most part, be focused solely on the mass surveillance of the American people. Furthermore, thousands of pages of FAA experimental drone flight records that were obtained by the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) detail just how complicated and risky it would be to operate thousands of unmanned arial vehicles safely without spending billions of dollars. Following intense lobbying, almost exclusively by defense contractors, Congress recently passed legislation paving the way for what the FAA predicts will be somewhere in the region of 30,000 drones in operation in US skies by 2020. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
In article , Police Man
wrote: Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. Nonsense. Helicopters to regular patrols, too in many cities. Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. Sorta like a cop in a car on patrol. Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Tell that to ... Why? YOu aren't really trying to suggest that drones cost more to buy, equip, maintain, and even staff than choppers are you? -- America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 29, 2:52*pm, Major Drone wrote:
Stalin would be proud. What a farce of a country you have become. A nation of sheep. ================================================== === Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones http://www.infowars.com/almost-half-...pport-domestic... Infowars.com Sept 28, 2012 Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically. According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. Only 36 percent said that they strongly oppose or somewhat oppose police use of drones, according to the survey. You can't blame them. They are afraid. It is such a lawless, violent and crime ridden place. I imagine the 36% will shoot them down anyway. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 29, 4:23*pm, "WW" wrote:
Another thought on this. A danger to other aircraft??? I don't know if there is any avoidance *control. *WW "Major Drone" *wrote in ... Stalin would be proud. What a farce of a country you have become. A nation of sheep. ================================================== === Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones http://www.infowars.com/almost-half-...pport-domestic... Following intense lobbying, almost exclusively by defense contractors, Congress recently passed legislation paving the way for what the FAA predicts will be somewhere in the region of 30,000 drones in operation in US skies by 2020. So there will need to be 30,000 people to operate them? Where's the money coming from? |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 29, 4:46*pm, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article , Police Man wrote: Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. *What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. * *Nonsense. Helicopters to regular patrols, too in many cities. Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. * * * Sorta like a cop in a car on patrol. Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Tell that to ... * * *Why? *YOu aren't really trying to suggest that drones cost more to buy, equip, maintain, and even staff than choppers are you? -- As these are additional, of course it will cost more. The cops will sit on their fat arses in the office instead of being on the streets. Safer for them? More taxpayers money wasted. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Kurt Ullman wrote:
Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. (put a space or blank line between what you're quoting and your response to make it more readable) Nonsense. Helicopters to regular patrols, too in many cities. This essay discusses the effectiveness of routine helicopter patrols: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/socio...er-patrols.php The emphasis of the various studies mentioned in the essay is to measure the effectiveness of the routine helicopter patrol as a crime *prevention* tool. Given the facts that helicopters are very expensive to operate (even compared to fixed-wing aircraft) it's not clear how many US police departments operate routine helicopter patrols today. The essay mentions there are more than 500 police agencies operate over 2000 helicopters worldwide. I couldn't find anything mentioning the numbers in the US, but a ballpark figure would probably be 1000 police helicopters (50% of the global total). I would guess that only the largest cities in the US operate routine helicopter patrols, and probably only along major highways as they perform traffic enforcement duties (looking for speeders, erratic or agressive driving, etc). Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. Sorta like a cop in a car on patrol. The idea of the cop on patrol is nice, but most likely cops go from one call to another, with little time in between to simply patrol. And I have to wonder how effective a drone helicopter would be at night as a crime deterrant or even a crime-discovery / observation tool. The safe operation of these drones at night (VFR) is also questionable. Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Tell that to ... Why? YOu aren't really trying to suggest that drones cost more to buy, equip, maintain, and even staff than choppers are you? Are you daft enought to think that police departments would REPLACE their existing helicopters with drones? The 30,000 drones expected in the air by 2020 will be IN ADDITION to what the police already have. And what do you think 30,000 drones will cost, compared to 1,000 manned police helicopters used (mostly) on a contingency-basis today? |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On 9/29/2012 10:48 AM, Bill wrote:
According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Except you are trying to discuss it with schizophrenic name changing home guy... |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Bill wrote:
In article , says... Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. Well I am not a criminal, so have no problem with that. Seems that a lot of Germans said something similar to the Gestapo "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:53:18 -0400, George
wrote: On 9/29/2012 10:48 AM, Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Except you are trying to discuss it with schizophrenic name changing home guy... Emphasis on "schizophrenic". |
Quote:
I'm sorry. You said something but I couldn't understand what you were saying for all the noise in here. Could you please repeat the question? Canada's where you wanna live. Canada has purple mountain magesties and amber waves of grain. Canadians also make better beer, better cigarettes, better rye whisky, better abductees and better hockey than Americans. I'm not either. I'm what you'd would probably call a "grey" or a "space alien" or an "extraterrestrial" or, for crying out loud, a "Martian" (LOL), but I live in Canada. I think most people would agree that it's not exactly the same thing as being a "Canadian". So, I don't pay income tax and I expect the Canadian government would prefer it stayed that way rather than admit that the "Martians" living in Canada don't pull their weight. (smirk) Canada has the Aurora Borealis, or the Northern Lights, so Canadians don't get all twisted out of shape if they see a light in the sky, and that makes my job easier. Anyhow, just me to you, don't believe what you read in the newspapers or online. Lots of us like to pull jokes on you "potato heads". If you remember that Chicken McNugget that bore a striking resemblance to the Virgin Mary and sold on e-Bay for $12,000, that was me. To keep your sanity, just remember: 1. If you don't understand something, it doesn't mean that it's paranormal, or voodoo or from outer space. you guys have much to learn about your planet, and a lot of what you're chaulking up to space aliens or "ghosts" is in your own head or perfectly natural stuff that you don't understand yet. 2. Just cuz it's a light in the sky, don't mean it's intelligent. When I see those films you guys make showing lights in the sky whizzing all over the place, I can't help but wonder how you can see an underlying intelligence in bizzare behaviour like that. 3. Just because we'd like to eat you, don't mean we're going to. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:56:22 -0500, "ChairMan" wrote:
Bill wrote: In article , says... Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. Remotely-controlled drones will be used (mostly) to snoop around and look for evidence of criminal activity. Well I am not a criminal, so have no problem with that. Seems that a lot of Germans said something similar to the Gestapo "First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me. "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
responding to http://www.homeownershub.com/mainten...-d-715320-.htm
DA wrote: Major Drone wrote: Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically. I hope police departments that do deploy them are very well insured! I would imagine that these things will drop far more frequently than actual piloted aircraft and typical homeowner's insurance does not cover the damage caused by falling aircraft. I had always assumed that to operate an aircraft you would have to carry a pretty hefty liability insurance and that, as well as the fact that damage causing events are extremely rare, has been figured into the price and the coverage of typical homeowners insurances over the years. Now, with drones flying overhead supposedly 24/7 and no pilot onboard to correct a situation and perhaps prevent or limit the damage to life and property (perhaps even by sacrificing his own, as did happen before), the chance of aircraft damage may become significant enough for insurance companies to start charging extra for it. If that happens, it would be very interesting to watch the civil discourse that will unfold. Presumably, the deployment of drones can cost both the police departments as well as the consumers huge amounts of money, and a nice benefit to insurance companies. I don't believe anything can stop eventual domestic deployments of drones (not necessarily for law enforcement) but it will take years to figure out all the laws and insurances and cost benefits, especially in densely populated metropolitan areas. Not as straightforward as to buy another cruiser and hire another officer. I don't even think it's going to be cheaper in any meaningful way. So, we'll see... -- /\_/\ ((@v@)) NIGHT ():::() OWL VV-VV |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Police Man wrote:
And I have to wonder how effective a drone helicopter would be at night as a crime deterrant or even a crime-discovery / observation tool. FLIR |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:09:25 -0400, Police Man wrote:
Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Police helicopters only go up into the air AFTER (or WHILE) a crime is in progress - to support ground operations. BS ... well in Houston, Texas that is !!! |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:50:52 -0500, "HeyBub" wrote:
Police Man wrote: And I have to wonder how effective a drone helicopter would be at night as a crime deterrant or even a crime-discovery / observation tool. FLIR Big-ass spotlight. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
In article ,
Oren wrote: On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:53:18 -0400, George wrote: On 9/29/2012 10:48 AM, Bill wrote: According to a survey conducted by The Associated Press and The National Constitution Center, 44 percent support the idea of police using unmanned aerial vehicles to track suspects and carry out investigations. They have been using police helicopters ever since I can remember. What is the big deal? Sounds like the drones would be cheaper... Except you are trying to discuss it with schizophrenic name changing home guy... Emphasis on "schizophrenic". I disagree. This is all personality disorder, nothing schiz about the dude. -- America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 29, 10:44*pm, DA
wrote: responding tohttp://www.homeownershub.com/maintenance/almost-half-of-all-americans... DA wrote: Major Drone *wrote: Close to half of Americans say they are in favour of police departments deploying surveillance drones domestically. I hope police departments that do deploy them are very well insured! I would imagine that these things will drop far more frequently than actual piloted aircraft and typical homeowner's insurance does not cover the damage caused by falling aircraft. I had always assumed that to operate an aircraft you would have to carry a pretty hefty liability insurance and that, as well as the fact that damage causing events are extremely rare, has been figured into the price and the coverage of typical homeowners insurances over the years. Now, with drones flying overhead supposedly 24/7 and no pilot onboard to correct a situation and perhaps prevent or limit the damage to life and *property (perhaps even by sacrificing his own, as did happen before), the chance of aircraft damage may become significant enough for insurance companies to start charging extra for it. If that happens, it would be very interesting to watch the civil discourse that will unfold. Presumably, the deployment of drones can cost both the police departments as well as the consumers huge amounts of money, and a nice benefit to insurance companies. I don't believe anything can stop eventual domestic deployments of drones (not necessarily for law enforcement) but it will take years to figure out all the laws and insurances and cost benefits, especially in densely populated metropolitan areas. Not as straightforward as to buy another cruiser and hire another officer. I don't even think it's going to be cheaper in any meaningful way. So, we'll see... You Americans are thick as sh*t. They are remote controlled, that's all. The pilot is sat in the office miles away. Probably looking out for women sunning themselves in the back garden. So no savings, just more snooping. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
In article m,
Earl wrote: Just wait. Something will be invented to see thru the walls of your home and spy on you. Stop the drones, now!!! That's already been addressed. The Supremes have noted that you can't use infrared thermal imaging (albeit from a chopper) as a way to get an arrest or a warrant. Next! -- America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
In m Kurt Ullman
wrote: In article m, Earl wrote: Just wait. Something will be invented to see thru the walls of your home and spy on you. Stop the drones, now!!! That's already been addressed. The Supremes have noted that you can't use infrared thermal imaging (albeit from a chopper) as a way to get an arrest or a warrant. Next! You think that simply because some government action has been found to be illegal by the courts, the government will stop doing it? How quaint. -- Bert |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 29, 10:23*am, "WW" wrote:
Another thought on this. A danger to other aircraft??? I don't know if there is any avoidance *control. *WW Regardless of what the article implied about FAA comments, rest assured that the drones will not be military/aircraft sized drones. They will have no need to fly hundreds of miles to reach their targets. Technology already has hummingbird sized drones easily controlled from the back of a van a few blocks away. And their flights will be below a couple of hundred feet altitude, well below altitudes controlled by the FAA or used by VFR aircraft. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Red
wrote: Regardless of what the article implied about FAA comments, rest assured that the drones will not be military/aircraft sized drones. They will have no need to fly hundreds of miles to reach their targets. Technology already has hummingbird sized drones easily controlled from the back of a van a few blocks away. And their flights will be below a couple of hundred feet altitude, well below altitudes controlled by the FAA or used by VFR aircraft. LEO will still need a warrant to use what they find in criminal cases.. Aside: "...A group of researchers led by Professor Todd Humphreys from the University of Texas at Austin Radionavigation Laboratory recently succeeded in raising the eyebrows of the US government. With just around $1,000 in parts, Humphreys’ team took control of an unmanned aerial vehicle owned by the college, all in front of the US Department of Homeland Security. After being challenged by his lab, the DHS dared Humphreys’ crew to hack into a drone and take command. Much to their chagrin, they did exactly that." http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/ |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sep 30, 11:40*am, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Red wrote: Regardless of what the article implied about FAA comments, rest assured that the drones will not be military/aircraft sized drones. They will have no need to fly hundreds of miles to reach their targets. *Technology already has hummingbird sized drones easily controlled from the back of a van a few blocks away. *And their flights will be below a couple of hundred feet altitude, well below altitudes controlled by the FAA or used by VFR aircraft. LEO will still need a warrant to use what they find in criminal cases.. True. I was addressing several posts about the concern of size if crashing and about interference with general aviation rather than the legality issues. Aside: "...A group of researchers led by Professor Todd Humphreys from the University of Texas at Austin Radionavigation Laboratory recently succeeded in raising the eyebrows of the US government. With just around $1,000 in parts, Humphreys team took control of an unmanned aerial vehicle owned by the college, all in front of the US Department of Homeland Security. After being challenged by his lab, the DHS dared Humphreys crew to hack into a drone and take command. Much to their chagrin, they did exactly that." http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/ Remember that the gatling gun was thought to be a weapon to end all wars. For every new technological 'toy' there has always been someone out to counteract it's effectiveness. And they'll always find a way. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Oren wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Red wrote: Regardless of what the article implied about FAA comments, rest assured that the drones will not be military/aircraft sized drones. They will have no need to fly hundreds of miles to reach their targets. Technology already has hummingbird sized drones easily controlled from the back of a van a few blocks away. And their flights will be below a couple of hundred feet altitude, well below altitudes controlled by the FAA or used by VFR aircraft. LEO will still need a warrant to use what they find in criminal cases.. Aside: "...A group of researchers led by Professor Todd Humphreys from the University of Texas at Austin Radionavigation Laboratory recently succeeded in raising the eyebrows of the US government. With just around $1,000 in parts, Humphreys' team took control of an unmanned aerial vehicle owned by the college, all in front of the US Department of Homeland Security. After being challenged by his lab, the DHS dared Humphreys' crew to hack into a drone and take command. Much to their chagrin, they did exactly that." http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/ tell someone they can't do something and I guarantee someone will find a way. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
Earl wrote:
Kurt Ullman wrote in m: In article m, Earl wrote: Just wait. Something will be invented to see thru the walls of your home and spy on you. Stop the drones, now!!! That's already been addressed. The Supremes have noted that you can't use infrared thermal imaging (albeit from a chopper) as a way to get an arrest or a warrant. Next! They will still use it to spy on you, get it???? And?.... |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:40:11 -0500, "ChairMan" wrote:
"...A group of researchers led by Professor Todd Humphreys from the University of Texas at Austin Radionavigation Laboratory recently succeeded in raising the eyebrows of the US government. With just around $1,000 in parts, Humphreys' team took control of an unmanned aerial vehicle owned by the college, all in front of the US Department of Homeland Security. After being challenged by his lab, the DHS dared Humphreys' crew to hack into a drone and take command. Much to their chagrin, they did exactly that." http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/ tell someone they can't do something and I guarantee someone will find a way. I have a stubborn streak like that I came by honestly. Folks that say you can't do that, to them, I say hide and watch. |
Almost Half Of All Americans Support Domestic Surveillance Drones
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:43:24 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote: They will still use it to spy on you, get it???? And?.... Count wide boar hogs. I thought you knew... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter