Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for
not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Red |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 6:39 PM, Red wrote:
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Red Yep, got mine a couple days ago. Deposited it before they changed their minds. -- aem sends... |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 6:39 PM, Red wrote:
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Red Just got mine too. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 6:39 PM, Red wrote:
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Red But I bet the lawyers didn't have a cap and didn't have to pro rate their fees! |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
Red wrote:
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. Jon |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
Jon Danniken wrote:
Red wrote: Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. So you clearly want corporations to just get away with these scams with no consequences. Class actions are the only remedy we have to fight corrupt manufacturers, until consumer protection laws are drastically improved. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 7:58 PM, Jon Danniken wrote:
Red wrote: Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. Jon Well stated. Don |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 3:39 PM, Red wrote:
Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. I'm sure the fees were high enough to convince the manufacturers to not pull this sort of stunt again! "...the defendants sold "identical, but differently and misleadingly labeled, engines at different prices -- with higher prices for engines labeled with purported higher horsepower." In other words, the companies took two identical engines, slapped different labels on them, and sold them at significantly different prices." Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. It's still not too late to claim the one year warranty extension. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
"Bob F" wrote Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. So you clearly want corporations to just get away with these scams with no consequences. Class actions are the only remedy we have to fight corrupt manufacturers, until consumer protection laws are drastically improved. I don't see it as a big deal, but I'm going to cash my $10 check. If one company lied, they they would cause a problem with comparisons, but if they all lied and used the same rating method, the consumer is not going to suffer. You know that a number 6 motor has more power than a number 5 motor. Does anyone really know how much HP they need to cut their particular lawn? Auto maker used to rate the engine differently too. That 300 HP Chevy from 1960 had something less. But since they all used the same numbers, you had a basis for comparison. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On May 24, 6:39*pm, Red wrote:
Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. *I received my settlement check today. *Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" *was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. *My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. *No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. *Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. *Do I feel guilty? *Nope. Red YOU'RE JUST PITCHING FOR A REMAKE OF LAWNMOWER MAN ARENT YOU? BOOWAHAHAHAHA TGITM |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/24/2011 8:58 PM, Jon Danniken wrote:
Red wrote: Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. Jon The real solution to frivilous class action suits is to take all the lawyers out and shoot them. Think it would be amazing how much prices and various insurance policies would drop. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On May 24, 10:39*pm, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
"Bob F" wrote Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. So you clearly want corporations to just get away with these scams with no consequences. Class actions are the only remedy we have to fight corrupt manufacturers, until consumer protection laws are drastically improved. I don't see it as a big deal, but I'm going to cash my $10 check. *If one company lied, they they would cause a problem with comparisons, but if they all lied and used the same rating method, the consumer is not going to suffer. *You know that a number 6 motor has more power than a number 5 motor. *Does anyone really know how much HP they need to cut their particular lawn? Auto maker used to rate the engine differently too. *That 300 HP Chevy from 1960 had something less. *But since they all used the same numbers, you had a basis for comparison. I agree that a number is only used as a comparison, no big deal. It is how they used the number to make their product seem better than the others. Again, how important is the number in regards to lawnmowers? To the average consumer it may be important enough to buy a certain brand. Since I am only a number in the Government database and a peon that don't have enough clout ( think horsepower) to change things, I will take my $21.84 and cash the check and only hope it covers most of the price increases that follow. Hank ~~~~ Realist |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
"Red" wrote in message ... Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Generally the only people to get serious money from class action cases are the lawyers. However these cases do serve a valuable role in that they can be expensive enough for corporations that getting their knuckles rapped by a judge to the tune of x-million dollars can influence corporate behavior in future. My wife and I have been invited to participate in several such suits; the only one we bothered to join concerned an investment company that had colored outside the lines somehow and we actually got a nice piece of change out of that, we'd have been able to buy a real nice lawnmower if we'd needed one. But usually the pay out is so small it seems pointless other than the company in question hopefully learning a lesson. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
In article ,
"DGDevin" wrote: needed one. But usually the pay out is so small it seems pointless other than the company in question hopefully learning a lesson. And even that is often doubtful. My favorite was a settlement I "participated in" for some strange wording of the contract for the old GTE Mobilnet. I only got my free earbud in "settlement" if I renewed my contract for three years. Sorta class action suits as a marketing ploy. The other ones, you know they settled for something that probably more or less coincided with their insurance coverage and less than the probable costs of actually defending it. -- "Even I realized that money was to politicians what the ecalyptus tree is to koala bears: food, water, shelter and something to crap on." ---PJ O'Rourke |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
Roger wrote in :
On 5/24/2011 8:58 PM, Jon Danniken wrote: Red wrote: Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. Jon The real solution to frivilous class action suits is to take all the lawyers out and shoot them. Think it would be amazing how much prices and various insurance policies would drop. Tagged for Bounty comes to mind. Would they then become cannibals. You betcha! |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lawnmower HP Litigation
On 5/26/2011 3:29 PM, Bob-tx wrote:
"Red Green" wrote in message ... Roger wrote in : On 5/24/2011 8:58 PM, Jon Danniken wrote: Red wrote: Reference the class action lawsuit against lawnmower manufacturers for not calculating the HP claims properly, the case is apparently settled. I received my settlement check today. Suit claims for walk behinds said "up to $35" was actually $10.19 each, and riding mowers "up to $75" was actually $21.84 each. My check was for one of each for a total of $32.03. Accompanying statement said the overall amount was capped, more than expected claims were received, and amounts were reduced pro rata from the capped amounts. No mention of lawyer fees. Since I never expected to get a penny, I was surprised with the amount. Especially since the mowers worked just like I expected them to regardless of hp ratings. Do I feel guilty? Nope. Meanwhile the cost comes out of the workers pockets, product quality, the cost of the product goes up for the consumer, and more parts are contracted out overseas. Yes, they were idiots to lie about the HP rating, and deserve punishment, but class-action suits of this kind only serve to line the pockets of greedy lawyers. Congratulations on being part of the problem with this country. Jon The real solution to frivilous class action suits is to take all the lawyers out and shoot them. Think it would be amazing how much prices and various insurance policies would drop. Would it be okay to drown them instead? Ammunition has really gone up. Sure but then you have to put them in your vehicle to haul them to the water |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cost of Litigation | Woodworking | |||
747 Lawnmower ?..............Yes, this is real, a flying Lawnmower | Home Repair | |||
need help with lawnmower | Home Ownership | |||
need help with lawnmower | Home Repair |